Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T05:43:06.738Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Agenda Building as a Comparative Political Process*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Roger Cobb ,
Jennie-Keith Ross  and
Marc Howard Ross
Roger Cobb
Affiliation:
Brown University
Jennie-Keith Ross
Affiliation:
Swarthmore College
Marc Howard Ross
Affiliation:
Bryn Mawr College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Agenda building is the process through which demands of various groups in a population are translated into issues which vie for the attention of decision makers (formal agenda) and/or the public (public agenda). This paper presents three models for the comparative study of agenda building. The outside initiative model describes groups with minimal prior access to decision makers, who must consequently first expand their issues to a public agenda before they can hope to reach the formal agenda. The mobilization model accounts for issues which are placed on the formal agenda by political leaders, who subsequently attempt to expand these issues to the public agenda to obtain the support required for implementation. The inside access model refers to leaders, or to those having close contact with these leaders, who seek to place issues on the formal agenda directly, and for whom expansion to the public agenda is both unnecessary and undesirable.

Propositions are stated about intergroup variation in patterns of agenda building within societies; about variations in success rates for different strategies and probabilities of occurrence for the three models in different types of societies; and about characteristics of the agenda-building process which hold in all three models and in any social setting.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 70 , Issue 1 , March 1976 , pp. 126 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

We wish to thank Barney Brown for his help in collecting and analyzing the case materials for this project.

References

1 For example, see Cobb, Roger W. and Elder, Charles D., Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda Building (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1975)Google Scholar; and Bachrach, Peter and Baratz, Morton S., “Two Faces of Powers,” American Political Science Review, 56 (09 1962), pp. 947–952 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 As a result a system must develop filter or gatekeeping mechanisms which will determine which issues attain visibility. See Easton, David, A Systems Analysis of Political Life (New York: John Wiley, 1965), pp. 87–96 Google Scholar. The problem is further compounded by issues continuing to survive in different forms once the initial issue has been resolved. See Lindblom, Charles E., The Policy-Making Process (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1968)Google Scholar.

3 Examples of strategies used for conflict containment include: Lipsky, Michael, “Protest as a Political Resource,” American Political Science Review, 62 (12, 1968), 1144–1158 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Walker, Jack L., “A Critique of the Elitist Theory of Democracy,” American Political Science Review, 60 (06, 1966), 285–295 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Vidich, Arthur J. and Bensman, Joseph, Small Town in Mass Society, (Garden City: Doubleday, 1960)Google Scholar.

4 Cobb and Elder, pp. 14-16.

5 See Bachrach, Peter and Baratz, Morton S., Power and Poverty (New York: Oxford Univ. Press 1970)Google Scholar; Wolfinger, Raymond E., “Nondecisions and the Study of Local Politics,” American Political Science Review, 65 (12, 1971), 1063–1081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Frey, Frederick W., “Comment,” American Political Science Review, 65 (12, 1971), 1081–1102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 See Crenson, Matthew A., The Un-Politics of Air Pollution (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1971), pp. 88–91 Google Scholar; and Trop, Cecile and Roos, Leslie L. Jr., “Public Opinion and the Environment,” The Politics of Ecosuicide ed. Roos, Leslie L. Jr., (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1971), pp. 53–63 Google Scholar.

7 Schattschneider, E. E., The Semi-Sovereign People (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1960), chapter 1Google Scholar.

8 For emphasis on a wide variety of characteristics, see: Crain, Robert L. et al., The Politics of Community Conflict: The Fluoridation Dispute (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1969)Google Scholar; Gusfield, Joseph, Symbolic Crusade: Status Politics and the American Temperance Movement (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1963)Google Scholar; Nie, Norman H., Powell, G. Bingham Jr. and Prewitt, Kenneth “Social Structure and Political Participation: Developmental Relationships, Part I,” American Political Science Review, 63 (06, 1969), 361–378 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; “Part II,” 63 (September, 1969), 808-832; and Verba, Sidney, Nie, Norman H. and Kim, Jae-on, “The Modes of Democratic Participation: A Cross-National Comparison,” Sage Professional Papers in Comparative Politics, 2, No. 01–013 (Beverley Hills, Calif., Sage Publishers, 1971)Google Scholar.

9 Schattschneider, chapter 4.

10 Ibid., chapter 4; Coleman, James, Community Conflict (Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1957)Google Scholar; Bachrach, Peter and Bergman, Elihu, Power and Choice: The Formation of American Population Policy (Lexington, Ma: Heath, 1973)Google Scholar; Coser, Lewis A., The Functions of Social Conflict (Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1956)Google Scholar; and Peterson, Paul, “British Interest Group Theory Reexamined,” Comparative Politics, 4 (04, 1971), 381–402 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Crain, , The Politics of Community Conflict, pp. 226–227 Google Scholar.

12 Nelson Polsby has also investigated the sources of successful issue initiation and found two general strategies which he has called “inside” and “outside” patterns of access. Polsby, Nelson W., “Policy Initiation in the American Political System,” in The Use and Abuse of Social Science, ed. Horowitz, Irving Louis (New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books, 1971), pp. 296–308 Google Scholar.

13 For example, see Christoph, James B., Capital Punishment and British Politics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962) pp. 26–33 Google Scholar; Hill, Jennie-Keith [Ross], “The Culture of Retirement” (Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Northwestern University, 1968)Google Scholar; and Ross, Jennie-Keith, “Social Borders: Definitions of Diversity,” Current Anthropology, 16 (03, 1975), 53–72 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 See Marshall, Lorna, “Sharing, Talking and Giving: Relief of Social Tensions Among Kung Bushmen,” Africa, 31 (1961), 231–246 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Turnbull, Colin, The Forest People (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1961)Google Scholar.

15 See Crenson, , Un-politics-of-Air Pollution, pp. 42–44 Google Scholar; Himes, Josephs, “The Functions of Racial Conflict,” Social Forces, 45 (09, 1966), 1–10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Inglehart, Ronald, “The Silent Revolution in Europe: Intergenerational Change in Post-Industrial Societies,” American Political Science Review, 65 (12, 1971), 991–1017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

16 For example, see Austin, Dennis, Politics in Ghana: 1946–1960 (New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1964)Google Scholar, and Sklar, Richard, Nigerian Political Parties (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963)Google Scholar.

17 Cobb, and Elder, , Participation in American Politics, pp. 103–109 Google Scholar.

18 Ibid., p. 106.

19 Peterson, , “British Interest Group Theory Re-examined,” pp. 381–402 Google Scholar.

20 Cobb, and Elder, , Participation in American Politics, pp. 107–108 Google Scholar.

21 For example, see Bourret, F. M., Ghana: The Road to Independence 1919–1957 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1960)Google Scholar.

22 See Gulliver, Philip H., Social Control in an African Society (Boston: Boston University Press, 1963), pp. 173–275 Google Scholar.

23 Marshall, , “Sharing,” pp. 231–246 Google Scholar.

24 Bachrach, and Baratz, “Two Faces of Power,” pp. 947–952 Google Scholar.

25 Cobb, and Elder, , Participation in American Politics, pp. 112–113 Google Scholar.

26 Crenson, , “Un-politics of Air Pollution,” pp. 58–75 Google Scholar.

27 See Edelman, Murray, The Symbolic Uses of Politics (Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press, 1964)Google Scholar; and Politics as Symbolic Action: Mass Arousal and Quiesence, (Chicago: Markham, 1971)Google Scholar; and Merelman, Richard, “Learning and Legitimacy,” American Political Science Review, 60 (06, 1966), 548–561 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 For example, see Gamson, William A., Power and Discontent (Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey, 1968)Google Scholar; and “Stable Unrepresentation in American Society,” American Behavioral Scientst, 12 (11–December, 1968), 15–21 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 Lipsky, Michael, Protest in City Politics: Rent Strikes, Housing and the Power of the Poor, (Chicago: Rand Mc-Nally, 1971), p. 7 Google Scholar.

30 Star, Shirley A. and Hughes, Helen MacGill, “Report on an Educational Campaign: the Cincinnati Plan for the United Nations,” American Journal of Sociology, 55 (01, 1950), 389–400 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

31 See Nieburg, H. L., “Violence, Law, and the Informal Polity,” Journal of Conflict Resolution, 13 (06 1969), 192–209 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32 See, for example, Lipsky, , Protest in Citv Politics, pp. 175–181 Google Scholar.

33 Cobb, and Elder, , Participation, pp. 151–159 Google Scholar; and Crenson, , Un-politics, pp. 133–158 Google Scholar.

34 For a review of the events, see Brown, Bernard E., >The French Revolt: May, 1968, (New York: McCaleb-Seiler Publishing Company, 1970)Google Scholar.

35 The stages we identify in each model are analytic and not necessarily temporal. For example, efforts to achieve entrance may in fact occur prior to expansion, although successful entrance usually requires that expansion take place before it. This argument is similar to Smelser's “value added” model for studying collective behavior. See Smelser, Neil J., Theory of Collective Behavior (New York: Free Press, 1962)Google Scholar.

36 For illustrations, see Rogers, Everett M., Diffusion of Innovations (New York: Free Press of Glencoe, 1962)Google Scholar; and Modernization Among Peasants: the Impact of Communication (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1969)Google Scholar.

37 For a presentation of his views, see Nyerere, Julius, “The Arusha Declaration and TANU's Policy of Socialism and Self-Reliance,” in African Politics and Society ed. Markovitz, Irving Leonard (New York: Free Press, 1970)Google Scholar.

38 See Hatch, John, Tanzania: A Profile (New York: Praeger, 1972), pp. 195–197 Google Scholar.

39 For a description of such a campaign, See Finkle, Jason, “Politics, Development Strategies and Family Planning Strategy in India and Pakistan,” Journal of Comparative Administration, 3 (12, 1971), 259–295 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

40 See Schapera, Isaac, Tribal Innovators: Tswana chiefs and social change, 1795–1940 (New York: Humanities Press, 1970)Google Scholar.

41 Schapera, p. 27.

42 Hatch, , Tanzania, pp. 197–198 Google Scholar.

43 For example, see Fleron, Frederick J. Jr., “Cooptation as a Mechanism of Adaptation to Change,” Polity, 2 (Winter, 1969), 176–201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

44 Hatch, pp. 199-205.

45 For example, see Ness, Gayl and Ando, Hirofumi, “The Politics of Population Planning in Malaysia and the Philippines,” Journal of Comparative Administration 3 (12, 1971), 296–329 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

46 Expansion from formal to public agenda on the national level may be followed or accompanied by a public to formal agenda-building process as the issue is placed on lower-level agendas.

47 Finkle, , “Development Strategies” pp. 259–295 Google Scholar.

48 See Wildavsky, Aaron, “Why Planning Fails in Nepal,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 17 (12, 1972), 508–528 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

49 Wrubel, Thomas P., “Liberia: The Dynamics of Continuity,” Journal of Modern African Studies, 9 (07 1971), pp. 189–204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50 For example, see Dexter, Lewis Anthony, “Congressmen and the Making of Military Policy,” in New Perspectives on the House of Representatives, ed. Pea-body, Robert L. and Polsby, Nelson W. (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1963), pp. 305–324 Google Scholar.

51 See, for example, Pye, Lucien W., Politics, Personality and Nation-Building: Burma's Search for Identity (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1962)Google Scholar; and Scott, James, Political Ideology in Malaysia (New Haven: Yale Univ. Press, 1968)Google Scholar.

52 Domhoff, G. William, The Higher Circles: The Governing Class in America (New York: Vintage Books, 1970), pp. 111–155 Google Scholar.

53 For example, see Cobb and Elder, pp. 71-77.

54 This resembles very closely the literature on political corruption; for example, see Scott, James C., Comparatire Political Corruption (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1972)Google Scholar, “Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia,” American Political Science Review, 66 (03, 1972), 91–113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Heidenheimer, Arnold, “The Analysis of Administrative Corruption,” in Political Corruption: Readings in Comparative Analysis, ed. Heidenheimer, Arnold J. (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston 1970)Google Scholar; and Jeremy Boissevain, “Patronage in Sicily,” in Heidenheimer.

55 See Hannon, Bruce and Cannon, Julie, “The Corps Out-Engineered,” in The Politics of Ecosuicide, pp. 220–227 Google Scholar.

56 For examples of such cases, see Hacker, Andrew, “Pressure Politics in Pennsylvania: The Truckers vs. The Railroads.” in The Uses of Power: 7 Cases in American Politics, ed. Westin, Alan (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1962)Google Scholar; and Furash, Edward, “The Problem of Technology Transfer,” in The Study of Policy Formation, ed. Bauer, Raymond and Gergen, Kenneth (New York: Free Press, 1968)Google Scholar.

57 Peterson, , “British Interest Group Theory Re-examined,” pp. 381–402 Google Scholar.