Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T23:45:58.429Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Administration of Japan's Pacific Mandate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Harlow J. Heneman*
Affiliation:
Northwestern University

Extract

The territory under Japanese mandate comprises the former German colonial possessions in the Pacific Ocean lying north of the equator. This region is made up of three main groups of islands, the Marshall, the Mariana, and the Caroline, having a total estimated land area of approximately 800 square miles. Included in these groups are more than 1,400 islets, reefs, and atolls stretching across the Pacific from 130 longitude east to 175 longitude east, and from the equator to 22 latitude north. Lying west of Hawaii, east of the Philippines, and south of Japan, many of these islands are near the steamship lanes running from the Hawaiian Islands to Guam and to the Philippines.

A recent census shows that there are more than 60,000 inhabitants in the territory under Japanese mandate, about four-fifths being natives. More than 12,000 Japanese have gone to the islands, as well as a few Europeans and Americans. The Japanese, for the most part, are engaged in agricultural or commercial pursuits or are government officials, while the Occidental population is made up mostly of missionaries. Racially, it is believed that the natives come within the Micronesian or Polynesian classification, although in many instances the racial strain is not pure.

Prior to 1914, the Japanese had few interests of importance in these islands. Occasional tramp steamers, trading vessels, or fishing boats from. Japan sometimes visited them, but no regular trade relations existed. When, however, the World War broke out, Japan lost no time in sending a naval squadron to the islands, and, with comparative ease, she obtained control of them in October, 1914. At the time, the Tokio government explained that the seizure of the islands was only temporary, for military purposes, and that Japan had no desire to keep them. Later events indicate, however, that these mere dots in the Pacific took on an increased value in Japanese eyes; certainly, once having secured control of them, the conqueror was loath to give them up.

Type
International Affairs
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1931

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Official Report of the Japanese Government to the League of Nations for 1928, p. 117.

2 New York Times, October 8, 1914.

3 Kawakami, K. K., Japan and World Peace (New York, 1919), pp. 6371Google Scholar.

4 For a more complete discussion, see Blakeslee, G. H., “Japan's New Island Possessions,” Journal of International Relations, XII, pp. 173191Google Scholar.

5 Second Annual Report of Japanese Government to the League of Nations, p. 1.

6 Ibid.

7 The arrangement is as follows:

8 Official Report of the Japanese Government to the League of Nations for 1027, p. 10.

9 Ibid.

10 Minutes of the Permanent Mandates Commission, Session 12,p. 46.

11 Report for 1927, p. 12.

12 Official Report of the Japanese Government to the League of Nations for 1925, p. 26.

13 Report for 1928, p. 23.

14 Report for 1927, p. 3.

15 Minutes of the Permanent Mandates Commission, Session 5, p. 12.

16 Report for 1927, p. 23.

17 Minutes of the Permanent Mandates Commission, Session 14, p. 273.

18 Report for 1925, p. 60.

19 Report for 1917, p. 82.

20 Ibid., p. 91.

21 Official Report of the Japanese Government to the League of Nations for 1926, pp. 79-80.

22 Minutes of the Permanent Mandates Commission, Session 10,p. 41.

23 Report for 1925, p. 98.

24 Minutes of the Permanent Mandates Commission, Session 7, p. 86.

25 Official Report of the Japanese Government to the League of Nations for 1984, p. 46.

26 Report for 1928, p. 117.

27 Minutes of the Permanent Mandates Commission, Session 16,p. 54.

28 Japan Chronicle, February 3,1921.

29 Japan Chronicle, May 3, 1926.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.