Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
  • Home
Hostname: page-component-78dcdb465f-xl52z Total loading time: 0.289 Render date: 2021-04-19T01:10:03.099Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }
EnglishFrançais
American Political Science Review American Political Science Review

Article contents

Thomas Hobbes: Skeptical Moralist

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Dana Chabot
Dana Chabot
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Get access
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Thomas Hobbes is usually held to have been a skeptic in matters of religion and morality. I accept the claim that there is a distinctive skeptical strain in Hobbes' thought but argue that his skepticism informs his moral vision, rather than depriving him of a conception of morality. As evidence for this reading, I situate Hobbes in a tradition of “skeptical moralism,” along with Montaigne and certain other Renaissance figures. As opposed to moral skeptics, skeptical moralists think of moral agents as divided selves, pulled in one direction by law and another by conscience. Skeptical moralists use skepticism to make people aware of this tension, and I argue that (especially in his remarks on religion) Hobbes was doing just that.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 89 , Issue 2 , June 1995 , pp. 401 - 410
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.
If you should have access and can't see this content please contact technical support.

References

Annas, Julia, and Barnes, Jonathan. 1985. The Modes of Scepticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, Myles. 1983. The Sceptical Tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Calvin, John. 1983. Institutes of the Christian Religion. 2 vols. Trans. Beveridge, Henry. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Charron, Pierre. 1697. Of Wisdom. 2 vols. Trans. Stanhope, G.. London: Gillyflower.Google Scholar
Dietz, Mary. 1990. “Hobbes's Subject as Citizen.” In Thomas Hobbes and Political Theory, ed. Dietz, Mary. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Ewin, R. E. 1991. Virtues and Rights: The Moral Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Farr, James. 1990. “Atomes of Scripture.” Thomas Hobbes and Political Theory, ed. Dietz, Mary. Lawrence: University Press of KansasGoogle Scholar
Farr, James. 1988. “Political Science and the Enlightenment of Enthusiasm.” American Political Science Review 82:51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frame, Donald. 1965. Montaigne: A Biography. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1990. Behemoth. Ed. Tonnies, F.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1978. Man and Citizen. Ed. Gert, B.. Gloucester: Peter Smith.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1840. The English Works of Thomas Hobbes. 11 vols. Ed. SirMolesworth, William. London: Bohn.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1968. Leviathan. Ed. MacPherson, C. B.. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 1975. Hume's Enquiries. Ed. Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, David. 1986. The Rhetoric of Leviathan. Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Maclntyre, Alasdair. 1984. After Virtue. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Martinich, Aloysius. 1992. The Two Gods of Leviathan: Thomas Hobbes on Religion and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintz, Samuel. 1969. The Hunting of Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de. 1987. An Apology for Raymond Sebond. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de. 1957. The Complete Essays. Ed. Frame, D.. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 1959. “Hobbes's Concept of Obligation.” Philosophical Review 68:68–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pocock, John. 1971. “Time, History, and Eschatology in the Thought of Thomas Hobbes.” In Politics, Language, and Time. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Ryan, Alan. 1988. “A More Tolerant Hobbes?” In Justifying Toleration, ed. Mendus, S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, Alan. 1983. “Hobbes, Toleration, and the Inner Life.” In The Nature of Political Theory, ed. Miller, D. and Seidentop, L.. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Shelton, George. 1992. Morality and Sovereignty in the Philosophy of Hobbes. New York: St. Martin's.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuck, Richard. 1989. Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. 1990. “Hobbes and Locke on Toleration.” In Thomas Hobbes and Political Theory, ed. Dietz, Mary.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. 1993. Philosophy and Government, 1572–1651. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, John. 1989. Hobbes's System of ideas. London: Gower.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon. 1960. Politics and Vision. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 14 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

3
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Thomas Hobbes: Skeptical Moralist
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Thomas Hobbes: Skeptical Moralist
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Thomas Hobbes: Skeptical Moralist
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *