Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-78dcdb465f-bmnx5 Total loading time: 13.876 Render date: 2021-04-16T13:48:50.465Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Disciplining Political Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

David D. Laitin
University of Chicago


Image of the first page of this article. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.
Book Reviews
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.


Achen, Christopher H. 1982. Interpreting and Using Regression Analysis. University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, no. 29. Beverly Hills: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Achen, Christopher H. 1986. The Statistical Analysis of Quasi-Experiments. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Achen, Christopher H., and Snidai, Duncan. 1989. “Rational Deterrence Theory and Comparative Case Studies.” World Politics 41:143–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, William Sheridan. 1965. The Nazi Seizure of Power: The Experience of a Single German Town, 1930–1935. New York: Watts.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel. 1990. A Divided Discipline. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The Origins of Totalitarianism. Cleveland, OH: World.Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J. 1946. Language, Truth, and Logic. 2d ed.London: Gollancz.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Trans. McGee, Vern M.. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bates, Robert H. 1981. Markets and States in Tropical Africa: The Political Basis of Agrarian Policies. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bates, Robert H. 1983. Essays on the Political Economy of Rural Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard. 1963. “Concepts and Generalizations in Comparative Sociological Studies.American Sociological Review 28:532–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkson, Joseph. 1946. “Limitations of the Application of Fourfold Table Analysis to Hospital Data.Biomdrics Bulletin 2:4753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blalock, Hubert M. 1964. Causal Inferences in Non-experimental Research. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Blalock, Hubert M. 1984. Basic Dilemmas in the Social Sciences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Bunce, Valerie. 1981. Do New Leaders Make a Difference? Exclusive Succession and Public Policy under Capitalism and Socialism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Peirre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Trans. Nice, Richard. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Donald T. 1969. “Reforms as Experiments.American Psychologist 24:409–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Donald T., and Stanley, Julian C.. 1963. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Collier, David. 1993. “The Comparative Method.” In Political Science: The State of the Discipline II, ed. Finifter, Ada W.. Washington: American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Cook, Thomas D., and Campbell, Donald T.. 1979. Quasi-Experimentation. Chicago: Rand-McNally.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 1938. The Rules of Sociological Method. Trans. Solovay, Sarah A. and Mueller, John H.. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Harry. 1975. “Case Study and Theory in Political Science.” In Handbook of Political Science, vol. 7, Strategies of Inquiry, ed. Greenstein, Fred I. and Polsby, Nelson. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1990. “Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political Science.World Politics 43:169–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feynman, Richard Phillips. 1965. The Character of Physical Law. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
SirFisher, Ronald Aylmer. 1935. The Design of Experiments. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge. Trans. Sheridan Smith, A. M.. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1990. “How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias in Comparative Politics.” In Political Analysis, vol. 2, ed. Stimson, James A.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. “Thick Description: Toward an Interpretative Theory of Culture.” In his Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
George, Alexander, and McKeown, Timothy J.. 1985. “Case Studies and Theories of Organizational Decision Making.Advances in Information Processes in Organizations 2:2158.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, Peter Alexis. 1978. “The International System and Regime Formation: A Critical Review of Anderson and Wallerstein.Comparative Politics 10:419–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, Larry J. 1992. “Temporality, Events, and Explanation in Historical Sociology: An Introduction.Sociological Methods and Research 20:403–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heberle, Rudolf. 1970. From Democracy to Nazism: A Regional Case Study on Political Parties in Germany. New York: Grosset & Dunlap.Google Scholar
Heberle, Rudolf. 1963. Landbevölkerung und Nationalsozialismus: Eine soziobgische Untersuchung der politischen Willensbildung in Schleswig-Holstein 1918 bis 1932. Rev. ed. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, Carl, G., 1966. Philosophy of Natural Science. Engle-wood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1989. “Rational Deterrence: Theory and Evidence.World Politics 41:183207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. 1985. Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kendall, Maurice G., and Buckland, William R.. 1960. A Dictionary of Statistical Terms. 2d ed.New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
King, Gary. 1989. Unifying Political Methodology: The Likelihood Theory of Statistical Inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kohli, Atul. 1987. The State and Poverty in India. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornhauser, William. 1959. The Politics of Mass Society. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Jan. 1994. New Social Movements in Western Europe. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Kubik, Jan. 1994. The Power of Symbols against the Symbols of Power: The Rise of Solidarity and the Fall of State Socialism in Poland. University Park: Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Laba, Roman. 1991. The Roots of Solidarity: A Political Sociology of Poland Working-class Democratization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laitin, David. 1994. “The Tower of Babel as a Coordination Game.American Political Science Review 88:622–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, Charles, and March, James. 1975. An Introduction to Models in the Social Sciences. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Lederer, Emil. 1940. State of the Masses. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1971. “Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method.American Political Science Review 65:682–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1975. The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lipton, Michael. 1976. Why Poor People Stay Poor: Urban Bias in World Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug. 1981. Freedom Summer. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Lisa L. 1992. Coercive Cooperation: Explaining Multilateral Economic Sanctions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, Lisa L., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1993. “U.S. Policy and Human Rights in Argentina and Guatemala, 1973–1980.” In Double-edged Diplomacy ed. Evans, Peter B., Jacobson, Harold K., and Putnam, Robert D.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Meehl, Paul E. 1967. “Theory-Testing in Psychology and Physics: A Methodological Paradox.Philosophy of Science, June, pp. 103–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1974. “Of the Four Methods of Experimental Inquiry.” In his A System of Logic. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Barrington Jr., 1967. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Moses, Lincoln E. 1968. “Truncation and Censorship.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. 15; ed. Sills, David L.. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Perrot, Michelle. 1986. “On the Formation of the French Working Class.” In Working Class Formation, ed. Katznelson, Ira and Zolberg, Aristide. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, Michael E. 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Limongi, Fernando. 1992. “Selection, Counterfactuals, and Comparisons.” University of Chicago. Typescript.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Limongi, Fernando. 1993. “Political Regimes and Economic Growth.Journal of Economic Perspectives 7:5169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, and Teune, Henry. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ragin, Charles C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1969. The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell, 1914–1944. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1970. “Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics.American Political Science Review 64:1033–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scuibba, Roberto, and Pace, Rossana Schiubba. 1976. Le comunita di base in Italia. 2 vols. Rome: Coines.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, and Somers, Margaret. 1980. “The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosocial Inquiry.Comparative Studies in Society and History 22:174–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smelser, Neil J. 1976. Comparative Methods in the Social Sciences. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, Arthur L. 1968. Constructing Social Theories. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Stolzenberg, Ross M., and Relies, Daniel A.. 1990. “Theory Testing in a World of Constrained Research Design: The Significance of Heckman's Censored Sampling Bias Correction for Nonexperimental Research.Sociological Methods and Research 18:395415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1988a. “Old Movements in New Cycles of Protest: The Career of an Italian Religious Community.” In From Structure to Action, ed. Klandermans, B. et al. , International Social Movement Research Series, no 1. Greenwich, CT:JAIGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1988b. Democracy and Disorder: Protest and Politics in Italy, 1965–1975. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1994. Power in Movement: Collective Action, Social Movements, and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1990. Coercion, Capital, and European States, 990–1990 A.D. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1993. European Revolutions, 1492–1992. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1994. “State and Nationalism in Europe, 1492–1992.Theory and Society 23:131–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truman, David Bicknell. 1951. The Governmental Process: Political Interest and Public Opinion. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Walker, Henry A., and Cohen, Bernard P.. 1985. “Scope Statements: Imperatives for Evaluating Theory.American Sociological Review 50:288301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1974. The Modern World System. Vol. 1. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Weber, Marianne. 1988. Max Weber: A Biography. Trans. Zohn, Harry. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 49 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 16th April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Disciplining Political Science
Available formats

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Disciplining Political Science
Available formats

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Disciplining Political Science
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *