Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-7tdvq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-21T03:12:30.745Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Birthrights: Freedom, Responsibility, and Democratic Comportment in Aeschylus' Oresteia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2009

ELIZABETH MARKOVITS*
Affiliation:
Mount Holyoke College
*
Elizabeth Markovits is Assistant Professor of Politics, Mount Holyoke College, 50 College Street, South Hadley, MA 01075 (emarkovi@mtholyoke.edu).

Abstract

Through an examination of Aeschylus' Oresteia, this essay argues for the critical importance of intergenerational justice to democratic theory. It explores the difficulties of democratic responsibility given the tension between necessity and freedom central to questions of intergenerational justice. The essay first details the relevant lacunae in the theories of two major figures of contemporary democratic theory, John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas. It then develops an account of democratic responsibility that acknowledges human freedom to make decisions, even given the necessity created by the fact that individuals and communities inherit their own range of potential actions from previous generations. The essay elaborates this claim by examining how each of the central figures in the Oresteia deals first with the dilemmas inherited from the past and then with new situations engendered by his or her own actions. The essay concludes with a consideration of this aspect of democracy in contemporary political life.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aeschylus. 2008. Oresteia. Ed. and trans. Sommerstein, Alan H.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, Danielle. 2004. Talking to Strangers: Anxieties of Citizenship Since Brown v. Board of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1998. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 2003. Responsibility and Judgment. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 2008. The Jewish Writings. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1999. Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. Irwin, T.. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Attius-Donfut, Claudine, and Arber, Sara, eds. 2000. The Myth of Generational Conflict: The Family and State in Ageing Societies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian. 1989. Theories of Justice. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1996. “Introduction.” In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. Benhabib, Seyla. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betensky, Aya. 1978. “Aeschylus’ Oresteia: The Power of Clytemnestra.Ramus: Critical Studies in Greek and Roman Literature 7 (1): 1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohman, James. 1997. “Deliberative Democracy and Effective Social Freedom.” In Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, ed. Bohman, James and Rehg, William. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 321–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, W. James. 1999. “Communities of Memory: On Identity, Memory, and Debt.American Political Science Review 93 (2, June): 249–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2005. Giving an Account of Oneself. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmola, Kateri. 2003. “Noble Lying: Justice and Intergenerational Tension in Plato's Republic.Political Theory 31 (1): 3962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartledge, Paul. 1997. “‘Deep Plays’: Theatre as Process in Greek Civic Life.” In The Cambridge Companion to Greek Tragedy, ed. Easterling, P. E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodds, E.R. 1973. The Ancient Concept of Progress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. 1957. “The Political Aspect of Aeschylus's Eumenides.The Journal of Hellenic Studies 77 (2): 230–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryzek, John S. 1995. “Political and Ecological Communication.Environmental Politics 4 (4): 1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckersley, Robyn. 2000. “Deliberative Democracy, Ecological Reresentation, and Risk: Towards a Democracy of the Affected.” In Democratic Innovation: Deliberation, representation and association, ed. Saward, Michael. New York: Routledge, 117–32.Google Scholar
Ekeli, Kristian Skagen. 2005. “Giving a Voice to Posterity—Deliberative Democracy and Representation of Future People.Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18: 429–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekeli, Kristian Skagen. 2007. “Green Constitutionalism: The Constitutional Protection of Future Generations.Ratio Juris 20 (3, September): 378401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Euben, J. Peter. 1986. Greek Tragedy and Political Theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Euben, J. Peter. 1990. The Tragedy of Political Theory: The Road Not Taken. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, Jill. 2005. A Democracy of Distinction: Aristotle and the Work of Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goldhill, Simon. 1987. “The Great Dionysia and Civic Ideology.The Journal of Hellenic Studies 107: 5876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldhill, Simon. 2000. “Civic Ideology and the Problem of Difference: The Politics of Aeschylean Tragedy, Once Again.The Journal of Hellenic Studies 120: 3456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, Robert E. 2000. “Democratic Deliberation Within.Philosophy and Public Affairs 29 (1, Winter): 81109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, Robert E. 2003. Reflective Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. A Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1, Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. A Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 2, Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1998. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 2001a. On the Pragmatics of Social Interaction: Preliminary Studies in the Theory of Communicative Action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 2001b. The Postnational Constellation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 2003. The Future of Human Nature. New York: Polity.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, and Ratzinger, Joseph. 2006. On the Dialectics of Secularization. San Francisco: Ignatius Press.Google Scholar
Hammond, N. G. L. 1965. “Personal Freedom and Its Limitations in the Oresteia.The Journal of Hellenic Studies 85: 4255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havelock, Eric A. 1978. The Greek Concept of Justice: From Its Shadows in Homer to Its Substance in Plato. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herington, C. J. 1963. “Athena in Athenian Literature and Cult.Greece and Rome, 2nd Series 10 (Supplement: Parthenos and Parthenon): 6173.Google Scholar
Hesk, Jon. 2000. Democracy and Deception in Classical Athens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Paul, Conrad, Christoph, and Thomson, David, eds. 1989. Workers versus Pensioners. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Kotlikoff, Lawrence, and Burns, Scott. 2005. The Coming Generational Storm: What You Need to Know about America's Economic Future. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Laslett, Peter. 1995. “Necessary Knowledge: Age and Aging in the Societies of the Past.” In Aging in the Past: Demography, Society, and Old Age, ed. Kertzer, David I. and Laslett, Peter. Berkeley: University of California Press, 377.Google Scholar
Laslett, Peter, and Fishkin, James S., eds. 1992. Justice between Age Groups and Generations. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lesky, Albin. 1966. “Decision and Responsibility in the Tragedy of Aeschylus.The Journal of Hellenic Studies 86: 7885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindh, Thomas, Malmberg, Bo, and Palme, Joakim. 2005. “Generations at War or Sustainable Social Policy in Ageing Societies?The Journal of Political Philosophy 13 (4): 470–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, Hugh. 1962. “The Guilt of Agamemnon.The Classical Quarterly 12 (2): 187–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, C.W. 1982. “Politics and the Oresteia.The Journal of Hellenic Studies 102: 124–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitland, Judith. 1992. “Dynasty and Family in the Athenian City State: A View from Attic Tragedy.The Classical Quarterly 42 (1): 2640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markell, Patchen. 2003. Bound by Recognition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Markell, Patchen. 2006. “The Rule of the People: Arendt, Arche, and Democracy.American Political Science Review 100 (1, February): 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markovits, Elizabeth. 2008. The Politics of Sincerity: Plato, Frank Speech, and Democratic Judgment. University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, Lukas H., ed. 2004. Justice in Time. Responding to Historical Injustice. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Miller, Jon, and Kumar, Rahul, eds. 2007. Reparations. Interdisciplinary Inquiries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Monoson, S. Sara. 2000. Plato's Democratic Entanglements: Athenian Politics and the Practice of Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, Bryan. 1989. “Intergenerational Equity and Environmental Decisions: A Model Using Rawls’ Veil of Ignorance.Ecological Economics 1 (2, May): 137–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 1986. The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek. 1986. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partridge, Ernest, ed. 1981. Responsibilities to Future Generations: Environmental Ethics. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Podlecki, Anthony. 1999. The Political Background of Aeschylean Tragedy. London: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, P.J. 2003. “Nothing to Do With Democracy: Athenian Drama and the Polis.Journal of Hellenic Studies 123: 104–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocco, Christopher. 1997. Tragedy and Enlightenment: Athenian Political Thought and the Dilemmas of Modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Said, Suzanne. 1998. “Tragedy and Politics.” In Democracy, Empire, and the Arts in Fifth-Century Athens, ed. Boedeker, Debora and Raaflaub, Kurt A.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 275–95.Google Scholar
Saxonhouse, Arlene W. 1984. “Aeschylus’ Oresteia: Misogyny, Filogyny and Justice.Women and Politics 4 (2): 1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schell, Jonathan. [1982] 2000. The Fate of the Earth and the Abolition. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seaford, Richard. 1994. Reciprocity and Ritual: Homer and Tragedy in the Developing City-State. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikora, R. I., and Barry, Brian, eds. 1978. Obligations to Future Generations. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Spinner-Halev, Jeff. 2007. “From Historical to Enduring Justice.Political Theory 35 (5): 574–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tompkins, Dan. 2006. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Thomson, David. 1996. Selfish Generations? How Welfare States Grow Old. Wellington, New Zealand: White Horse Press.Google Scholar
Vernant, Jean Pierre and Vidal-Naquet, Pierre. 1990. Myth and Tragedy in Ancient Greece. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. Shame and Necessity. 1993. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winnington-Ingram, R. P. 1948. “Clytemnestra and the Vote of Athena.The Journal of Hellenic Studies 68: 130–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeitlin, Froma. 1978. “The Dynamics of Misogyny: Myth and Mythmaking in the Oresteia.Arethusa 11 (1): 149–74.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.