Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. American Journal of International Law
  4. Volume 79
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×
< Back to all issues

Volume 79 - January 1985

Contents

Page 2 of 15

Editorial Comments

Notes and Comments

Agora: What Does Tel-Oren Tell Lawyers?

  • Professor D’Amato’s Concept of American Jurisdiction is Seriously Mistaken

  • Alfred P. Rubin
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    23 March 2017, pp. 105-112

  • Professor Anthony D’Amato criticizes a long opinion of Judge Bork rejecting American jurisdiction over various foreign defendants in a tort action growing out of an attack on civilians in Israel by members of the Palestine Liberation Organization. None of the victims was American and there seems to be no connection between the United States and the incident except the temporary presence of agents of various defendants in the United States.

Editorial Comments

Agora: What Does Tel-Oren Tell Lawyers?

  • Professor Rubin’s Reply Does Not Live up to Its Title

  • Anthony D’Amato
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    23 March 2017, pp. 112-113

  • If there were a truth-in-advertising law that applied to essays in the American Journal of International Law, Alfred Rubin’s reply to my article on Judge Bork could be charged with deceptive packaging. His tentative and speculative contentions hardly prove his title statement that I am “seriously mistaken.” Yet his very failure of proof means that my arguments remain valid and that I have suffered no damage. As a result, I may lack standing, or have no cause of action, to bring a case of deceptive advertising against Professor Rubin.

Notes and Comments

  • In Memoriam: Professor Ted L. Stein (1952-1985)

  • Jonathan I. Charney
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    27 February 2017, pp. 1036-1037
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Editorial Comments

Agora: What Price Expropriation?

Correspondence

  • [no title]

  • Bruce Harlow
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    27 February 2017, pp. 1037-1040
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Editorial Comments

Correspondence

Notes and Comments

  • [no title]

  • Benjamin B. Ferencz
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    23 March 2017, pp. 114-115
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Notes and Comments

Agora: What Price Expropriation?

Correspondence

  • [no title]

  • Niall MacDermot
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    23 March 2017, pp. 1040-1041
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Other

Notes and Comments

Judicial Decisions

Correspondence

  • [no title]

  • M. H. Mendelson
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    23 March 2017, pp. 1041-1043
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

  • [no title]

  • Davis R. Robinson
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    27 February 2017, p. 423
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Page 2 of 15