Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T23:01:54.480Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

We Have Met the Selectionist and It Is Us: Some Comments on Loney's “Critical Review of Models of Technological Change in Ceramic Studies”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Hector Neff
Hector Neff*
Affiliation:
Research Reactor Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Loney's (2000) recent paper in American Antiquity contains a critique of evolutionary archaeology that is based on fundamental misconceptions. Perhaps most seriously, she confounds the evolutionary archaeologist's conception of culture as an inheritance system based on social learning with an extreme claim about genetic control over cultural traits.

Résumé

Résumé

El artículo de Loney (2000) publicado recientemente en American Antiquity contiene una crítica de la arqueología evolucionaria que manifiesta errores de entendimiento fundamentales. Posiblemente lo mas serio es la confusión entre la idea de que la cultura constituye un sistema de herencia basado en aprendizaje social y la idea de que el control genético sobre rasgos culturales es extremo.

Type
Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 66 , Issue 4 , October 2001 , pp. 726 - 728
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Basalla, G. 1988 The Evolution of Technology. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Larson, D. O., Neff, H., Graybill, D. A., Michaelson, J., and Ambose, E. 1996 Risk, Climatic Variability, and the Study of Southwestern Prehistory: An Evolutionary Perspective. American Antiquity 61: 217–241.Google Scholar
Loney, H. 2000 Society and Technological Control: A Critical Review of Models of Technological Change in Ceramic Studies. American Antiquity 65: 646–668.Google Scholar
Neff, H. 1990 Culture Contact and Ceramic evolution: Examples from Mesoamerica. In Ceramics and Civilization V: The Changing Roles of Ceramics in Society, edited by Kingery, W. D.. pp. 159–182. American Ceramic Society, Inc., Westerville, Ohio.Google Scholar
Neff, H. 1992 Ceramics and Evolution. In Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 4, edited by Schiffer, M. B., pp. 141–193. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Neff, H. 2000 Comments on “Artifacts and Evolution,” a Symposium at the 2000 SAA Meetings, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Neff, H., Larson, D. O., and Glascock, M. D. 1997 The Evolution of Anasazi Ceramic Production and Distribution: Compositional Evidence from a Pueblo-III Site in South-Central Utah. Journal of Field Archaeology 24: 473–492.Google Scholar
O’Brien, M. J., and Lyman, R. L. 2000 Applying Evolutionary Archaeology: A Systematic Approach. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Van der Leeuw, S. E. 1993 Giving the Potter a Choice. In Technological Choices: Transformations in Material Cultures Since the Neolithic. edited by Lemonnier, P., pp. 238–288. Routledge, London.Google Scholar