Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T08:15:30.363Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Underwater Archaeology: Its Nature and Limitations*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

John M. Goggin
John M. Goggin*
Affiliation:
University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The recent development of efficient free-diving apparatus has made possible underwater exploration for both sport and science. Human and cultural remains underwater are being extensively exploited. Although the term “underwater archaeology” is frequently applied to such activities, most are at the best only underwater salvage. Archaeological remains in lakes, springs, rivers, or the sea have considerable to offer. Perhaps their greatest value is the more complete condition of such artifacts in contrast to similar remains on land. However, they often suffer from decomposition, impregnation with minerals, or incrustation by algae or corals. Although context and sequential (or stratigraphic) position are not so easily found or recognized as on land, they are present in many cases. Any body of water is a possible site of study, but in practice, areas of potential importance are limited by location, depth, visibility, and bottom factors. There are four major types of underwater archaeological sites: (1) discarded refuse and “lost” material; (2) submerged sites of former human occupation; (3) shrines or places of offerings; and (4) shipwrecks.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , January 1960 , pp. 348 - 354
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Based on a paper presented at the 24th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, May 1, 1959, Salt Lake City.

References

Andrews, E. W. 1959 Dzibilchaltun: Lost City of the Maya. National Geographic Magazine, Vol. 115, No. 1, pp. 90–109. Washington.Google Scholar
Borhegyi, S. F. 1958 Aqualung Archaeology. Natural History, Vol. 67, No. 3, pp. 120–5. New York.Google Scholar
Borhegyi, S. F. 1959 Underwater Archaeology in Guatemala. Scientific American, Vol. 200, No. 3, pp. 100–13. New York.Google Scholar
Brookfield, Charles 1941 Cannon on Florida Reef Solve Mystery of Sunken Ship. National Geographic Magazine, Vol. 80, No. 6, pp. 807-24. Washington.Google Scholar
Casson, L. S. 1953 Sea Digging. Archaeology, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 221-8. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cousteau, Jacques-Yves 1954 Fish Men Discover a 2,200-Year-Old Greek Ship. National Geographic Magazine, Vol. 105, No. 1, pp. 1–36. Washington.Google Scholar
Demangel, R. 1950 Fouilles et recherches sous-marines en Gréce. Bulletin de Correspondence Hellénique, Vol. 74, No. 2, pp. 271–3. Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diolé, Philippe [1952] Promenades d'archéologie sous-marine. Editions Albin Michel, Paris. [English edition, 1954, Julian Messner, New York.]Google Scholar
Doukan, Gilbert 1957 The World Beneath the Waves. J. De Graff, New York.Google Scholar
Dugan, James 1956 Man Under the Sea. Harper, New York.Google Scholar
Latil, Pierre De and Rivoire, Jean 1956 Man and the Underwater World. Putnam, New York.Google Scholar
Link, M. C. 1959 Sea Diver: A Quest for History Under the Sea. Rinehart, New York.Google Scholar
Lothrop, S. K. 1952 Metals From the Cenote of Sacrifice, Chichen Itza, Yucatan. Memoirs of the Peabody Museum, Harvard University, Vol. 10, No. 2. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Marden, Luis 1959 Up From the Well of Time. National Geographic Magazine, Vol. 115, No. 1, pp. 110–29. Washington.Google Scholar
Olson, S. J. 1958 The Wakulla Cave. Natural History, Vol. 67, No. 7, pp. 396–403. New York.Google Scholar
Peterson, M. L. 1955 The Last Cruise of H. M. S. Loo. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, Vol. 131, No. 2. Washington.Google Scholar
Roman, Bernard 1775 A Concise Natural History of East and West Florida. New York.Google Scholar
Tozzer, A. M. 1957 Chichen Itza and Its Cenote of Sacrifice. Memoirs of the Peabody Museum, Harvard University, Vols. 11, 12. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tuthill, Carr and Allanson, A. A. 1954 Ocean Bottom Artifacts. Masterkey, Vol. 28, No. 6, pp. 222–32. Los Angeles.Google Scholar