Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T22:00:33.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Site Structure of the Orbit Inn: An Application of Ethnoarchaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Steven R. Simms  and
Kathleen M. Heath
Steven R. Simms
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, Social Work, and Anthropology, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-0730
Kathleen M. Heath
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One goal of ethnoarchaeology is to strengthen archaeological inferences about the past. A fifteenth-century hunter-gatherer, open site in Utah is used to examine ethnoarchaeological contributions toward determining the use of space, duration of occupation, assemblage composition, and site function. Comparisons between macrorefuse and microrefuse patterning suggest that (1) the distribution of macrorefuse can help identify locations of ephemeral structures and household activity areas; (2) the distribution of microrefuse in this intermittently occupied open site is useful for assessing assemblage composition; (3) determining the characteristics of macro- and microrefuse improves hypotheses about duration of occupation; and (4) interpretation of plant remains can be improved by considering site-formation processes. The study points to the need for a closer linkage between ethnoarchaeology and the archaeology of the past.

Résumé

Résumé

Una de las metas de la etnoarqueología es fortalecer los modos de inferencia para interpretar casos de la arqueología del pasado. La comparación entre un sitio abierto de cazadores-recolectores en Utah, el cual data del sigh XV, y varios casos etnoarqueológicos ayuda a determinar: uso del espacio, duratión de la ocupación, composición del conjunto artefactual y función del sitio. Comparaciones entre lospatrones de desecho macroscópico y microscópico sugieren que (1) la distributión del desecho macroscópico puede ayudar en la identificatión de la localizatión de estructuras efimeras y áreas de actividad doméstica; (2) la distributión del desecho microscópico, en el caso de este sitio abierto quefue occupado intermitentemente, no es eficaz para este propósito, pero puede ser usada para evaluar la composición del conjunto artefactual; (3) la determinatión de las características del desecho macroscópico y microscópico fortalece las hipótesis sobre duratión de la ocupación; y (4) la interpretatión de desechos de plantas puede mejorarse mediante la consideratión de los procesos de formatión del sitio. Este estudio indica la necesidad de mejorar las relaciones entre etnoarqueología y arqueología del pasado.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 55 , Issue 4 , October 1990 , pp. 797 - 813
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Binford, L. R. 1977 Forty-seven Trips: A Case Study in the Character of Archaeological Formation Processes. In Stone Tools as Cultural Markers: Change, Evolution and Complexity, edited by S, R. V.. Wright, pp. 24–36. Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, Canberra.Google Scholar
Binford, L. R. 1978 Dimensional Analysis of Behavior and Site Structure: Learning From An Eskimo Hunting Stand. American Antiquity 43: 330–361.Google Scholar
Binford, L. R. 1983 In Pursuit of the Past: Decoding the Archaeological Record. Thames and Hudson, New York.Google Scholar
Binford, L. R. 1987 Researching Ambiguity: Frames of Reference and Site Structure. In Method and Theory For Activity Area Research: An Ethnoarchaeological Approach, edited by Kent, S., pp. 449–512. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Dunnell, R. C, and Stein, J. K. 1989 Theoretical Issues in the Interpretation of Microartifacts. Geoarchaeology: An International Journal 4: 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, J. W., and Strickland, H. C. 1989 Ethnoarchaeology Among the Efe Pygmies, Zaire: Spatial Organization of Campsites. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 78: 473–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fladmark, K. R. 1982 Microdebitage Analysis: Initial Considerations. Journal of Archaeological Science 9: 205–220.Google Scholar
Forsyth, D. W. 1986 Post-Formative Ceramics in the Eastern Great Basin: A Reappraisal of the Promontory Problem. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 8: 180–203.Google Scholar
Gilford, D. P. 1977 Observations of Contemporary Human Settlements As An Aid to Archaeological Interpretation. Ph. D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Hayden, B., and Cannon, A. 1983 Where the Garbage Goes: Refuse Disposal in the Maya Highlands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2: 117'-163.Google Scholar
Heath, K., and Metcalfe, D. 1984 Plant Macrofossils and Microrefuse. In Gooseberry Archeological Project: 1983, edited by Metcalfe, D., pp. 86–109. University of Utah Archeological Center Reports of Investigations No. 83-1. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Hull, K. L. 1987 Identification of Cultural Site Formation Processes through Microdebitage Analysis. American Antiquity 52: 772–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, I. T. 1964 Southern Paiute Ethnography. University of Utah Anthropological Papers No. 69. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Lupo, K. D. 1988 The Prehistoric Utilization of Variscite in Utah. Ms. on file, Department of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Madsen, D. B. 1979 Great Salt Lake Fremont Ceramics. In The Levee Site and The Knoll Site, edited by Fry, G. F. and Dalley, G. F., pp. 79–100. Anthropological Papers No. 100. University of Utah, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Madsen, R. 1977 Prehistoric Ceramics of the Fremont. Ceramic Series No. 6. Museum of North Arizona, Flagstaif. McGovern, T. H., Buckland, P. C., Savory, D., Sveinbjarnardottir, H. G., Andreasen, C., and P. SkidmoreGoogle Scholar
Madsen, R. 1983 A Study of the Faunal and Floral Remains from Two Norse Farms in the Western Settlement, Greenland. Arctic Anthropology 20: 93–111.Google Scholar
McKellar, J. A. 1983 Correlates and the Explanation of Distributions. Atlatl 4. Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, D., and Heath, K. M. 1990 Microrefuse and Site Structure: The Hearths and Floors of the Heartbreak Hotel. American Antiquity 55: 781–796.Google Scholar
Murray, P. 1980 Discard Location: The Ethnographic Evidence. American Antiquity 45: 490–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O., Connell, 1987 Alyawara Site Structure and Its Archaeological Implications. American Antiquity 52: 74–108.Google Scholar
Rosen, A. M. 1986 Cities of Clay: The Geoarcheology of Tells. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Rosen, A. M. 1989 Ancient Town and City Sites: A View From the Microscope. American Antiquity 54: 564–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffer, M. B. 1983 Toward the Identification of Formation Processes. American Antiquity 48: 675–706.Google Scholar
Schiffer, M. B. 1987 Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Sikkink, L. L. 1988 Ethnoarchaeology of Harvest and Crop-Processing in Traditional Households in the Montaro Valley, Central Andes of Peru. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
Simms, S. R. 1988 The Archaeological Structure of A Bedouin Camp. Journal of Archaeological Science 15: 197–211.Google Scholar
Simms, S. R. 1989 The Structure of the Bustos Wickiup Site, Eastern Nevada. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 11: 2–34.Google Scholar
Simms, S. R. 1990 Fremont Transitions. Utah Archaeology 3, in press.Google Scholar
Yellen, J. E. 1977 Archaeological Approaches to the Present: Models For Reconstructing the Past. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Zeier, C. D. 1986 Site Structure. In The Archaeology of the Vista Site 26WA3017, edited by Zeier, C. D. and Elston, R. G., pp. 341–356. Intermountain Research. Submitted to Nevada Department of Transportation, Contract No. P51-84-013. Copies available from Nevada Department of Transportation, Carson City.Google Scholar