Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T01:45:04.103Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REVISITING HOGUP CAVE, UTAH: INSIGHTS FROM NEW RADIOCARBON DATES AND STRATIGRAPHIC ANALYSIS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2017

Erik P. Martin ,
Joan Brenner Coltrain  and
Brian F. Codding
Erik P. Martin*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology and Archaeological Center, University of Utah, 270 S. 1400 E. RM 102, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
Joan Brenner Coltrain
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology and Archaeological Center, University of Utah, 270 S. 1400 E. RM 102, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
Brian F. Codding
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology and Archaeological Center, University of Utah, 270 S. 1400 E. RM 102, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
*
(erik.martin@anthro.utah.edu, corresponding author)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The remarkable finds from the trans-Holocene archaeological record excavated at Hogup Cave, Utah, helped define our understanding of Great Basin prehistory. However, many scholars doubt the integrity of the site's depositional sequence and resulting chronological interpretations. To resolve these concerns, we produce several Bayesian chronological models combining 14 new radiocarbon dates with the results of past dating efforts. We first present an examination of the excavation and previously derived dates, finding that several of the most anomalous dates can be accounted for by details in the excavation's field notes. We then report our new dates and construct an initial Bayesian chronological model to serve as a framework for three increasingly complex models synthesizing old and new dates from the site. The best-supported model divides the site's stratigraphy into four occupational phases: Strata 1 through 7 (9790 to 6490 cal B.P.), Stratum 8 (5840 to 3330 cal B.P.), Strata 9 and 10 (2870 to 2760 cal B.P.), and Strata 11 through 16 (2610 to 360 cal B.P.). This result raises several questions to direct future research and dating efforts at Hogup Cave and serves as a model for reevaluating complex stratigraphic sequences in western North America and beyond.

Los descubrimientos excepcionales del registro arqueológico trans-Holoceno excavado en Hogup Cave, Utah, han ayudado a definir nuestro entendimiento de la prehistoria de la Gran Cuenca. Sin embargo, muchos estudiosos dudan la integridad de la secuencia deposicional del yacimiento y, por consiguiente, la validez de las interpretaciones resultantes. Para resolver este problema, se produjeron varios modelos cronológicos bayesianos que combinan 14 nuevas fechas de radiocarbono con las fechas procedentes de trabajos anteriores. En primer lugar se presenta un análisis de la excavación y de las fechas obtenidas anteriormente, demostrando que varias de las fechas más anómalas son explicadas en las notas de excavación. Luego se reportan las nuevas fechas y se presenta un modelo cronológico bayesiano inicial que es utilizado como marco de referencia para producir tres modelos cada vez más complejos que sintetizan las fechas anteriores y las más recientes. El modelo más consistente divide la estratigrafía del yacimiento en cuatro etapas de ocupación: los niveles 1–7 (9790-6490 cal a.P.), el nivel 8 (5840-3330 cal a.P.), los niveles 9–10 (2870-2760 cal a.P.) y los niveles 11–16 (2610-360 cal a.P.). Este resultado genera varias preguntas para guiar las investigaciones futuras en Hogup Cave y sirve como modelo para reevaluar las secuencias estratigráficas complejas en el oeste de Norteamérica y otras regiones.

Type
Reports
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 82 , Issue 2 , April 2017 , pp. 301 - 324
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by the Society for American Archaeology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Aikens, C. Melvin 1970 Hogup Cave. Anthropological Papers No. 93. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Aikens, C. Melvin 1976 Cultural Hiatus in the Eastern Great Basin? American Antiquity 41:543–550.Google Scholar
Ambrose, Stanley J. 1990 Preparation and Characterization of Bone and Tooth Collagen for Isotopic Analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science 17:431–451.Google Scholar
Antevs, Ernst 1955 Geologic-Climatic Dating in the West. American Antiquity 20:317–335.Google Scholar
Ashmore, Patrick J. 1999 Radiocarbon Dating: Avoiding Errors by Avoiding Mixed Samples. Antiquity 73:124–130.Google Scholar
Bayham, Frank E. 1979 Factors Influencing the Archaic Pattern of Animal Exploitation. Kiva 44:219–235.Google Scholar
Bayliss, Alex 2015 Quality in Bayesian Chronological Models in Archaeology. World Archaeology 47:677–700.Google Scholar
Bayliss, Alex, Brock, Fiona, Farid, Shahina, Hodder, Ian, Southon, John, and Taylor, R. E. 2015 Getting to the Bottom of It All: A Bayesian Approach to Dating the Start of Çatalhöyük. Journal of World Prehistory 28:1–26.Google Scholar
Bayliss, Alex, Ramsey, Christopher Bronk, van derPlicht, Johannes, and Whittle, Alasdair 2007 Bradshaw and Bayes: Towards a Timetable for the Neolithic. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 17:1–28.Google Scholar
Berry, Michael S. 1976 Remnant Cave. In Swallow Shelter and Associated Sites, edited by Dalley, Gardiner F., pp. 115–127. Anthropological Papers No. 96. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Bettinger, Robert L., and Baumhoff, Martin A. 1982 The Numic Spread: Great Basin Cultures in Competition. American Antiquity 47:485–503.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, Christopher 2009a Bayesian Analysis of Radiocarbon Dates. Radiocarbon 51:337–360.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, Christopher 2009b Dealing with Outliers and Offsets in Radiocarbon Dating. Radiocarbon 51:1023–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broughton, Jack M., Byers, David A., Bryson, Reid A., Eckerle, William, and Madsen, David B. 2008 Did Climatic Seasonality Control Late Quaternary Artiodactyl Densities in Western North America? Quaternary Science Reviews 27:1916–1937.Google Scholar
Dalley, Gardiner F. 1976 Swallow Shelter and Associated Sites. Anthropological Papers No. 96. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Elston, Robert G., and Zeanah, David W. 2002 Thinking Outside the Box: A New Perspective on Diet Breadth and Sexual Division of Labor in the Prearchaic Great Basin. World Archaeology 34:103–130.Google Scholar
Elston, Robert G., Zeanah, David W., and Codding, Brian F. 2014 Living Outside the Box: An Updated Perspective on Diet Breadth and Sexual Division of Labor in the Prearchaic Great Basin. Quaternary International 352:200–211.Google Scholar
Goebel, Ted, Graf, Kelly, Hockett, Bryan, and Rhode, David 2007 The Paleoindian Occupations at Bonneville Estates Rockshelter, Danger Cave, and Smith Creek Cave (Eastern Great Basin, USA): Interpreting their Radiocarbon Chronologies. In On Shelter's Ledge: Histories, Theories and Methods of Rockshelter Research, edited by Kornfeld, Marcel, Vasil'ev, Sergey, and Miotti, Laura, pp. 147–161. BAR International Series. Archaeopress, Oxford.Google Scholar
Graf, Kelly E. 2007 Stratigraphy and Chronology of the Pleistocene to Holocene Transition at Bonneville Estates Rockshelter, Eastern Great Basin. In Paleoindian or Paleoarchaic, edited by Graf, Kelly E. and Schmitt, Dave N., pp. 82–104. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Grayson, Donald K. 2000 Mammalian Responses to Middle Holocene Climatic Change in the Great Basin of the Western United States. Journal of Biogeography 27:181–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grayson, Donald K. 2011 The Great Basin: A Natural Prehistory. University of California Press, Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, Joel 1975 An Envirotechnological System for Hogup Cave. American Antiquity 40:3–21.Google Scholar
Harper, K. T., and Alder, G. M. 1970 The Macroscopic Plant Remains of the Deposits of Hogup Cave, Utah, and Their Paleoclimatic Implications. In Hogup Cave, edited by Aikens, C. Melvin, pp. 215–240. Anthropological Papers No. 93. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Higham, Thomas 2011 European Middle and Upper Palaeolithic Radiocarbon Dates Are Often Older Than They Look: Problems with Previous Dates and Some Remedies. Antiquity 85:235–249.Google Scholar
Higham, Thomas, Basell, Laura, Jacobi, Roger, Wood, Rachel, Ramsey, Christopher Bronk, and Conard, Nicholas J. 2012 Testing Models for the Beginnings of the Aurignacian and the Advent of Figurative Art and Music: The Radiocarbon Chronology of Geißenklösterle. Journal of Human Evolution 62:664–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higham, Thomas, Jacobi, Roger, Julien, Michèle, David, Francine, Basell, Laura, Wood, Rachel, Davies, William, and Ramsey, Christopher Bronk 2010 Chronology of the Grotte du Renne (France) and Implications for the Context of Ornaments and Human Remains within the Châtelperronian. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107:20234–20239.Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, William R., and King, Jerome H. 2012 Distinguishing between Darts and Arrows in the Archaeological Record: Implications for Technological Change in the American West. American Antiquity 77:789–799.Google Scholar
Hockett, Bryan 1994 A Descriptive Reanalysis of the Leporid Bones from Hogup Cave, Utah. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 16:106–117.Google Scholar
Hockett, Bryan 2015 The Zooarchaeology of Bonneville Estates Rockshelter: 13,000 Years of Great Basin Hunting Strategies. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 2:291–301.Google Scholar
Hughes, Richard E. 2015 Prehistoric Obsidian Conveyance in the Eastern Great Basin: Evidence from Hogup and Danger Caves, Utah. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 4:293–309.Google Scholar
Ives, John W., Froese, Duane G., Janetski, Joel C., Brock, Fiona, and Ramsey, Christopher Bronk 2014 A High Resolution Chronology for Steward's Promontory Culture Collections, Promontory Point, Utah. American Antiquity 79:616–637.Google Scholar
Jennings, Jesse D. 1957 Danger Cave. Anthropological Papers No. 27. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Jones, George T., and Beck, Charlotte 2012 The Emergence of the Desert Archaic in the Great Basin. In Pleistocene to the Holocene: Human Organization and Cultural Transformations in Prehistoric North America, edited by Bousman, C. Brit and Vierra, Bradley J., pp. 105–124. Texas A&M University Press, College Station.Google Scholar
Kaestle, Frederika A., and Smith, David G. 2011 Ancient Mitochondrial DNA Evidence for Prehistoric Population Movement: The Numic Expansion. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 115:1–12.Google Scholar
Kelly, Robert L. 1997 Late Holocene Great Basin Prehistory. Journal of World Prehistory 11:1–49.Google Scholar
Kennett, Douglas J., Culleton, Brendan J., Dexter, Jaime, Mensing, Scott A., and Thomas, David H. 2014 High-Precision AMS 14C Chronology for Gatecliff Shelter, Nevada. Journal of Archaeological Science 52:621–632.Google Scholar
Kennett, Douglas J., Culleton, Brendan J., Voorhies, Barbara, and Southon, John R. 2011 Bayesian Analysis of High-Precision AMS 14C Dates from a Prehistoric Mexican Shellmound. Radiocarbon 53:245–259.Google Scholar
Lamb, Sydney M. 1958 Linguistic Prehistory in the Great Basin. International Journal of American Linguistics 24:95–100.Google Scholar
Levine, Abigail, and Stanish, Charles 2013 The Importance of Multiple 14C Dates from Significant Archaeological Contexts. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 21:824–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louderback, Lisbeth A., Grayson, Donald K., and Llobera, Marcos 2010 Middle-Holocene Climates and Human Population Densities in the Great Basin, Western USA. Holocene 21:366–373.Google Scholar
Madsen, David B., and Berry, Michael S. 1975 A Reassessment of Northeastern Great Basin Prehistory. American Antiquity 40:391–405.Google Scholar
Madsen, David B., and Schmitt, Dave N. 1998 Mass Collecting and the Diet Breadth Model: A Great Basin Example. Journal of Archaeological Science 25:445–455.Google Scholar
Madsen, David B., and Simms, Steven R. 1998 The Fremont Complex: A Behavioral Perspective. Journal of World Prehistory 12:255–336.Google Scholar
Miller, D. Shane, and Gingerich, Joseph A. M. 2013 Regional Variation in the Terminal Pleistocene and Early Holocene Radiocarbon Record of Eastern North America. Quaternary Research 79:175–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. Shane, Holliday, Vance T., and Bright, Jordon 2014 Clovis across the Continent. In Paleoamerican Odyssey, edited by Graf, Kelly E., Ketron, Caroline V., and Waters, Michael R., pp. 207–220. Texas A&M University Press, College Station.Google Scholar
Mullen, Christine O. 1997 Mammalian Response to Pleistocene/Holocene Environmental Change in the Great Basin: The Jackrabbit's Tale. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno.Google Scholar
Nolan, Kevin C. 2012 Temporal Hygiene: Problems in Cultural Chronology of the Late Prehistoric Period of the Middle Ohio River Valley. Southeastern Archaeology 31:185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connell, James F. 1987 Alyawara Site Structure and its Archaeological Implications. American Antiquity 52:74–108.Google Scholar
Pettitt, Paul B., Davies, William, Gamble, Clive S., and Richards, Michael B. 2003 Palaeolithic Radiocarbon Chronology: Quantifying our Confidence Beyond Two Half-Lives. Journal of Archaeological Science 30:1685–1693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, Paula J., Bard, Edouard, Bayliss, Alex, Beck, J. Warren, Blackwell, Paul G., Ramsey, Christopher Bronk, Buck, Caitlin E., Cheng, Hai, Edwards, R. Lawrence, Friedrich, Michael, Grootes, Pieter M., Guilderson, Thomas P., Haflidason, Haflidi, Hajdas, Irka, Hatté, Christine, Heaton, Timothy J., Hoffmann, Dirk L., Hogg, Alan G., Hughen, Konrad A., Kaiser, K. Felix, Kromer, Bernd, Manning, Sturt W., Niu, Mu, Reimer, Ron W., Richards, David A., Scott, E. Marian, Southon, John R., Staff, Richard A., Turney, Christian S.M., and Van DerPlicht, Johannes 2013 IntCal13 and Marine13 Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curves 0–50,000 Years Cal BP. Radiocarbon 55:1869–1887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhode, David, Madsen, David B., and Jones, Kevin T. 2006 Antiquity of Early Holocene Small-Seed Consumption and Processing at Danger Cave. Antiquity 80:328–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B. 1986 Radiocarbon Dating and the “Old Wood” Problem: The Case of the Hohokam Chronology. Journal of Archaeological Science 13:13–30.Google Scholar
Schmitt, David N., and Madsen, David B. 2005 Camels Back Cave. Anthropological Papers No. 125. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Taché, Karine, and Hart, John P. 2013 Chronometric Hygiene of Radiocarbon Databases for Early Durable Cooking Vessel Technologies in Northeastern North America. American Antiquity 78:359–372.Google Scholar
Webster, Gary S. 1980 Recent Data Bearing on the Question of the Origins of the Bow and Arrow in the Great Basin. American Antiquity 45:63–66.Google Scholar
Wilmshurst, Janet M., Hunt, Terry L., Lipo, Carl P., and Anderson, Atholl J. 2011 High-Precision Radiocarbon Dating Shows Recent and Rapid Initial Human Colonization of East Polynesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108:1815–1820.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, Rachel 2015 From Revolution to Convention: The Past, Present, and Future of Radiocarbon Dating. Journal of Archaeological Science 56:61–72.Google Scholar
Wood, Rachel, Arrizabalaga, Alvaro, Camps, M., Fallon, Stewart, Iriarte-Chiapusso, M-J, Jones, Rhys, Maroto, Julià, Rasilla, M. De La, Santamaría, D., Soler, J., Soler, N., Villalneng, A., and Higham, Thomas 2014 The Chronology of the Earliest Upper Palaeolithic in Northern Iberia: New Insights from l'Arbreda, Labeko Koba and La Viña. Journal of Human Evolution 69:91–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, Rachel, de Quirós, Federico B., Maíllo-Fernández, José-Manuel, Tejero, José-Miguel, Neira, Ana, and Higham, Thomas 2016 El Castillo (Cantabria, Northern Iberia) and the Transitional Aurignacian: Using Radiocarbon Dating to Assess Site Taphonomy. Quaternary International, in press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Martin supplementary material

Figure S1 Caption

Download Martin supplementary material(File)
File 12.4 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Martin supplementary material

Figure S1 image

Download Martin supplementary material(Image)
Image 16.3 MB