Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T09:25:34.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Quantitative Investigation of Aboriginal Sites: Comparative Physical and Chemical Analysis of Two California Indian Mounds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

S. F. Cook
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley, California
A. E. Treganza
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley, California

Extract

The investigation of archaeological sites in North America has in the past concerned itself predominantly with the discovery and examination of burials and artifacts and associated fauna. This purely qualitative approach has been essential to the elucidation of problems in the culture history of aboriginal man. At the same time, except in such cases where obvious stratigraphy displays itself, few efforts have been directed toward the analysis of the matrix itself, the deposits in which the more spectacular bones, pottery, and implements of war are embedded. Nevertheless, it is wholly possible that accumulations of debris, such as habitation mounds or midden deposits, may be able to supply information of a quantitative character which will throw light upon the population, living conditions, and ecological status of the former inhabitants. A recent study1 based upon older excavations of California shell mounds has indicated the type of information which might be obtained. The present paper explores certain aspects of the methodology applicable to the general problem.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1947

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cook, S. F. 1946. “A Reconsideration of Shell Mounds with Respect to Population and Nutrition.” AMERICAN ANTIQUITY, Vol. 12, pp. 51-3.Google Scholar
Gifford, E. W. 1916. “Composition of California Shellmounds.” University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 12, pp. 129. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Heizer, R. F., and A. E., Treganza 1944. “Mines and Quarries of the Indians of California.” California Journal of Mines and Geology, Report XL of the State Mineralogist. Sacramento.Google Scholar
Lillard, J. B.; Heizer, R. F.; and Fenenga, F. 1939. “An Introduction to the Archaeology of Central California.” Bulletin, Department of Anthropology, Sacramento Junior College, No. 2. Sacramento.Google Scholar
Nelson, N. C. 1909. “Shellmounds of San Francisco Bay Region.” University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 7, pp. 309-56. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Nelson, N. C. 1910. “The Ellis Landing Shellmound.” University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, Vol. 7, pp. 357426. Berkeley.Google Scholar