Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T19:01:08.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Putting it on the Calendar: Some Methodological Notes on Hockett's “Middle and Late Holocene Hunting in the Great Basin”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Mark E. Hall
Mark E. Hall*
Affiliation:
PO Box 349. Winemucca, NV 89946-0349 (mhall940@yahoo.com)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hockett's (2005) examination of the faunal deposition rates at three sites in the Great Basin contains two fundamental errors. The rates are calculated using uncalibrated radiocarbon determinations, and ignores the fact that atmospheric radiocarbon has fluctuated through the millennia. Second, despite pronouncements on significant differences, no formal significance tests were done. This comment re-analyzes two of the sites discussed by Hockett using calibrated radiocarbon determinations and formal statistical significance tests.

Resumen

Resumen

Hockett's (2005) examinación de las tarifas de deposición fáunicas en tres sitios en el Gran Lavabo contiene dos errores fundamentales. Las tarifas se calculan usando determinaciones sin calibrar del radiocarbono. No se hizo más lejos ningunas pruebas de significación formales. Este papel reanaliza dos sitios discutidos por Hockett usando determinaciones calibradas del radiocarbono y pruebas estadísticas formales de la significación.

Type
Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 75 , Issue 4 , October 2010 , pp. 954 - 961
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Biasi, Glenn P., and Weldon, Ray II 1994 Quantitative Refinement of Calibrated 14C Distributions. Quaternary Research 41(1): 1–18.Google Scholar
Bettinger, Robert L. 1999 What Happened in the Medithermal. In Models for the Millennium: Great Basin Anthropology Today, edited by C. Beck, pp. 62–74. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Byers, David A., Smith, Craig, and Broughton, Jack M. 2005 Holocene Artiodactyl Population Histories and Large Game hunting in the Wyoming Basin, USA. Journal of Archaeological Science 32(1): 125–142.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 1995 Radiocarbon Calibration and Analysis of Stratigraphy: The OxCal program. Radiocarbon 37(2):425–430.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2000 Comment on “The Use of Bayesian Statistics for 14C dates of Chronologically Ordered Samples: A Critical Analysis.” Radiocarbon 42(2): 199–202.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2001 Development of the Radiocarbon Calibration Program OxCal. Radiocarbon, 43(2A): 355–363.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2006 Online Help Manual. Electronic documents, http://www.rlaha.ox.ac.uk/oxcal/, accessed July 2006.Google Scholar
Buck, C. E., Cavanaugh, W. G., and Litton, C. D. 1996 Bayesian Approach to Interpreting Archaeological Data. John Wiley & Son, Chichester, England.Google Scholar
Buck, C. E., Christen, J. A., Kenworthy, J. B., and Litton, C. D. 1994 Estimating the Duration of Archaeological Activity using 14C Determinations. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 13(2):229–240.Google Scholar
Hall, Mark E. 1997 Towards an Absolute Chronology for the Iron Age of Inner Asia. Antiquity 71(4):863–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Bryan 2005 Middle and Late Holocene Hunting in the Great Basin: A Critical Review of the Debate and Future Prospects. American Antiquity 70:713–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, Jesse D. 1980 Introduction. In Sudden Shelter, edited by Jesse D. Jennings, Alan R. Schroedl, and Richard Holmer, pp. 3–30. Anthropological Papers 103. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Kelly, Robert L. 1999 Insights into Foraging Strategies in Stillwater Marsh. In Prehistoric Lifeways in the Great Basin Wetlands, edited by Brian E. Hemphill and Clark Spencer Larsen, pp. 117–150. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
McGuire, Kelly R., Delacorte, Michael G., and Carpenter, Kimberly 2004 Archaeological Excavations at Pie Creek and Tule Valleys Shelters, Elko County, Nevada. Nevada State Museum Anthropological Papers 25. Nevada State Museum, Carson City.Google Scholar
Reimer, P. J., Baillie, M. G. L., Bard, E., Bayliss, A., Beck, J. W., Bertrand, C. J. H., Blackwell, P. G., Buck, C. E., Burr, G. S., Cutler, K. B., Damon, P. E., Edwards, R. L., Fairbanks, R. G., Friedrich, M., Guilderson, T. P., Hogg, A. G., Hughen, K. A., Kromer, B., McCormac, G., Manning, S., Bronk Ramsey, C., Reimer, R. W., Remmele, S., Southon, J. R., Stuiver, M., Talamo, S, Taylor, F. W., van der Plicht, J. and Weyhenmeyer, C. E. 2004 IntCal04 Terrestrial Radiocarbon Age Calibration, 0-26 cal kyr BP. Radiocarbon 46(3):1029–1058.Google Scholar
Shiue, Wei-Kei, and Bain, Lee J. 1982 Experimental Size and Power Comparisons for Two-Sample Poisson Tests. Applied Statistics 31(2): 130–134.Google Scholar
Stein, Julie K., Deo, Jennie N., and Phillips, Laura 2003 Big Sites—Short Time: Accumulation Rates in Archaeological Sites. Journal of Archaeological Sciences 30:297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thode, Henry C. 1997 Power and Sample Size Requirements for Tests of Differences between Two Poisson Rates. The Statistician 46(2):227–230.Google Scholar
Webb, R. Esmée 1998 Problems with Radiometric “Time”: Dating the Initial Human Colonization of Sahul. Radiocarbon 40(2):749–758.Google Scholar
Zeidler, James A., Buck, Caitlin E., and Litton, Clifford 1998 Integration of Archaeological Phase Information and Radiocarbon Results from the Jama River Valley, Ecuador: A Bayesian Approach. Latin American Antiquity 9:160–179.Google Scholar