Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T11:03:28.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Prototype for the Southern Cult*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Gordon R. Willey
Gordon R. Willey*
Affiliation:
Bureau-of American Ethnology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Eastern archaeologists are familiar with the phenomena which have, in recent years, been interpreted as the Southern Cult. Although there is some dispute concerning the functional nature of the Cult, its exact position in the prehistoric time scale, and the sources which inspired it, there is common recognition of its elements and widespread occurrences. These component elements are artistic motifs and certain specialized, non-utilitarian artifact types which are bound together by a unity of style and technical treatment. The geographic occurrences are predominantly Southeastern but extend from the Atlantic to the western periphery of the Mound Area. The intrinsic qualities of the elements easily lend them to interpretation as ritualistic symbols and paraphernalia, and their frequent appearance in large mound sites adds to the implications of ceremonial import.

Type
Facts and Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 13 , Issue 4Part1 , April 1948 , pp. 328 - 330
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1948

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Published by permission of the Secretary, Smithsonian Institution.

References

Literature Cited

Ford, J. A., and Willey, G. R. 1941. "An Interpretation of the Prehistory of the Eastern United States." American Anthropologist, N.S., Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 325-63. Menasha.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J. B. 1944. "The De Luna Expedition and the 'Buzzard Cult' in the Southeast." Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, Vol. 34, pp. 299-303. Washington.Google Scholar
Krieger, A. D. 1945. "An Inquiry into Supposed Mexican Influence on a Prehistoric 'Cult' in the Southern United States." American Anthropologist, N.S., Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 483-515. Menasha.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, C. B. 1902. "Certain Aboriginal Remains of the Northwest Coast of Florida, Part 2." Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Vol. 12. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Moore, C. B. 1903. "Certain Aboriginal Mounds of the Central Florida West Coast." Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Vol. 12, Part 3. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Moore, C. B. 1907. "Mounds of the Lower Chattahoochee and Flint Rivers." Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Vol. 13. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Shetrone, H. C. 1930. The Mound-Builders. New York.Google Scholar
Waring, A. J. Jr. 1945. "The De Luna Expedition and Southeastern Ceremonial." AMERICAN ANTIQUITY, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 57-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waring, A. J. Jr., and Holder, Preston 1945. "A Prehistoric Ceremonial Complex in the Southeastern United States." American Anthropologist, N.S., Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 1-34. Menasha.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, W. S., and Snow, C. E. 1945. "The Adena People." Publications of the Department of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Kentucky, Vol. 6, Lexington.Google Scholar
Wiliey, Gordon R. 1948. "The Cultural Context of the Crystal River Negative-Painted Style." AMERICAN ANTIQUITY, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 325-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar