Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T03:12:50.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Positioning of Archaeology within Anthropology: A Canadian Historical Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jane H. Kelley  and
Ronald F. Williamson
Jane H. Kelley
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive N.W., Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada
Ronald F. Williamson
Affiliation:
Archaeological Services Inc., 528 Bathurst Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 2P9, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper we argue that archaeologists and anthropologists should be aware of forces that encourage the separation of archaeology from anthropology. Sociological, organizational, and intellectual factors that do not necessarily have disciplinary separation as their logical consequence can nonetheless have a cumulative effect that moves the relationship between the subfields of anthropology in the direction of greater or lesser independence. We compare the relative strength of certain factors that could either encourage or discourage the perpetuation of four-field anthropology in Canada and the United States.

Resumen

Resumen

En este articulo argúimos que arqueólogos y antropologos deben estar alertas a las fuerzas que estimulan la separatión de la arqueología y la antropología. Factores sociológicos, intelectuales, y de organizatión, aunque no producen necesariamente una separación, tienen un efecto acumulativo que mueve la relatión entre subdisciplinas en una directión de major o menor independencia. Comparamos lafuerza relativa de ciertos factores que podrían estimular o evitar la continuatión de una antropología de cuatro subdisciplinas en Canadá y los Estados Unidos.

Type
Articles
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 61 , Issue 1 , January 1996 , pp. 5 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

American Anthropological Association 1990 1990-1991 Guide to Departments, A Directory of Members. American Anthropological Association, Arlington, Virginia.Google Scholar
Burley, D. 1994 A Never Ending Story: Historical Developments in Canadian Archaeology and the Quest for Federal Heritage Legislation. Canadian Journal of Archaeology 18: 77–98.Google Scholar
Chapdelaine, C. 1989 Le site Mandeville a Tracy. Recherches amerindiennes au Quebec, La collection Signes des Ameriques, vol. 7. Montreal.Google Scholar
Clermont, N. 1982 Quebec Prehistory Goes Marching In. Canadian Journal of Archaeology 6: 195–200.Google Scholar
David, N. 1992 Integrating Ethnoarchaeology: A Subtle Realist Perspective. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 11: 330–359.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. 1973 Natural Symbols. Vintage, New York.Google Scholar
Firth, R. 1973 Symbols: Public and Private. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. 1973 The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Givens, D., and Skomal, S. 1992 Four Fields in the Triple A. Anthropology Newsletter 33(8): 1, 17. American Anthropological Association, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Givens, D., and Skomal, S. 1993 The Four Fields: Myth and Reality. Anthropology Newsletter 34(5): 1, 19. American Anthropological Association, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Goldsmith, A. S., Garvie, S., Selin, D., and Smith, J. (editors) 1992 Ancient Images, Ancient Thought: The Archaeology of Ideology, Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Chacmool Conference. University of Calgary Archaeological Association, Calgary, Alberta.Google Scholar
Goodenough, W 1992 Comment on the Four Fields. Anthropology Newsletter 33(7): 3—4. American Anthropological Association, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1982 Theoretical Archaeology: A Reactionary View. In Symbolic and Structural Archaeology, edited by Hodder, I., pp. 1–16. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Jenness, D. 1932 Fifty Years of Archaeology in Canada. In Anniversary Volume, 1882-1932, pp. 71–76. Royal Society of Canada, Toronto.Google Scholar
Kehoe, A. 1991 The Invention of Prehistory. Current Anthropology 43: 467–76.Google Scholar
Kelley, J. H., and Forbis, R. G. 1994 A Subjective History of the Department of Archaeology at the University of Calgary. Paper delivered at the Annual Conference of the Canadian Archaeological Association, Edmonton, Alberta.Google Scholar
Kelley, J. H., and Hanen, M. P. 1988 Archaeology and the Methodology of Science. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Keyes, A. F. 1973 Beyond Four Walls: The Origin and Development of Canadian Museums. McClelland and Stewart, Toronto.Google Scholar
Killan, G. 1980 The Canadian Institute and the Origins of the Ontario Archaeological Tradition, 1851-1854. Ontario Archaeology 34: 3–16.Google Scholar
Killan, G. 1983 David Boyle: From Artisan to Archaeologist. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.Google Scholar
Klimko, O. 1994 The Archaeology of Land Based Fur Trade Posts in Western Canada: A History and Critical Analysis. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Archaeology, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia.Google Scholar
Linklater, E. 1995 History of Native Women in Archaeology. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Canadian Archaeological Association, Kelowna, British Columbia.Google Scholar
Manis, J. G., and Meltzer, B. N. 1972 Symbolic Interaction: A Reader in Social Psychology. Allyn and Bacon, Boston.Google Scholar
Noble, W. C. 1972 One Hundred and Twenty-five Years of Archaeology in the Canadian Provinces. Bulletin of the Canadian Archaeological Association 4: 1–78.Google Scholar
Ontario Heritage Policy Review 1990 A Strategy for Conserving Ontario's Heritage: The Report of the Ontario Heritage Policy Review. Ontario Ministry of Culture and Communications, Toronto.Google Scholar
Ramsden, P. 1991 Death in Winter: Changing Symbolic Patterns in Southern Ontario Prehistory. Anthropologica XXXIL:167–181.Google Scholar
Reimer, B. (editor) 1990 1990-1991 Guide to Departments of Anthropology, Archaeology and Sociology in Universitites and Museums in Canada. Canadian Anthropology Society and Canadian Sociology and Anthropology Association, Toronto.Google Scholar
Rogge, A. E. 1976 A Look at Academic Anthropology: Through a Graph Darkly. American Anthropologist 78: 829–843.Google Scholar
Rohn, A. H. 1973 The Southwest and Intermontane West. In The Development of North American Archaeology, edited by Fitting, J. E., pp. 84–116. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M. D., and Service, E. R. (editors) 1960 Evolution and Culture. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Squier, E. G. 1849 Aboriginal Monuments of the State of New York. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge No. 2. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Squier, E. G. 1848 Ancient Monuments of the Mississippi Valley. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge No. 1. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Stoltman, J. B. 1973 The Southeastern United States. In The Development of North American Archaeology, edited by Fitting, J. E., pp. 117–150. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park.Google Scholar
Taylor, W. E., Jr. 1977 Introduction to the Fourth Session: New Motivations and Attitudes. In New Perspectives in Canadian Archaeology, edited by McKay, A. G., pp. 151–157. Proceedings of a symposium sponsored by the Royal Society of Canada. Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar
Trigger, B. G. 1977 The Archaeological Base in Canada: Training, Facilities, Opportunities. In New Perspectives in Canadian Archaeology, edited by McKay, A. G., pp. 185–201. Proceedings of a symposium sponsored by the Royal Society of Canada. Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar
Trigger, B. G. 1981 Giants and Pygmies: The Professionalization of Canadian Archaeology. In Towards a History of Archaeology, edited by Daniel, G., pp. 69–84. Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
Trigger, B. G. 1985 The Past as Power: Anthropology and the North American Indian. In Who Owns the Past?, edited by McBryde, I., pp. 11–40. Oxford University Press, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Trigger, B. G. 1989a A History of Archaeological Thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Trigger, B. G. 1989b Archaeology and Anthropology: Current and Future Relations. Canadian Journal of Archaeology 13: 1–12.Google Scholar
Turnbull, C. 1977 Of Backdirt and Bureaucracy: The Role of Government in Canadian Archaeology. In New Perspectives in Canadian Archaeology, edited by McKay, A. G., pp. 119–136. Proceedings of a symposium sponsored by the Royal Society of Canada, Toronto.Google Scholar
Turnbull, C. 1993 The Construction of Prehistoric Ideation: Exploring the Universality-Idiosyncrasy Continuum. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 3(1): 67–81.Google Scholar
Walde, D., and Willows, N. D. (editors) 1991 The Archaeology of Gender. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Chacmool Conference. University of Calgary Archaeological Association, Calgary, Alberta.Google Scholar
Weiner, A. B. 1995 Culture and Our Discontents. American Anthropologist 97(1): 14–21.Google Scholar
Weiner, A. B., and Peacock, J. 1993 Anthropology's Future: Report of a Wenner-Gren Foundation Conference. Anthropology Newsletter 34(6): 68 and 22-23.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. 1851 The Archaeology and Prehistoric Annals of Scotland. Sutherland and Knox, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. 1862 Prehistoric Man: Researches into the Origin of Civilization in the Old and the New World. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Wright, J. V. 1966 The Ontario Iroquois Tradition. Bulletin No. 210. National Museum of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar
Wright, J. V. 1977 Trends and Consequences in Canadian Prehistory. Canadian Journal of Archaeology 1: 1–14 Google Scholar
Wylie, A. 1989 The Interpretive Dilemma. In Critical Traditions in Contemporary Archaeology, edited by Pinsky, V. and Wylie, A., pp. 18–27. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wylie, A. 1992 The Interplay of Evidential Constraints and Political Interests: Recent Archaeological Research on Gender American Antiquity 57: 15–35.Google Scholar
Wylie, A. 1993 Facts and Fictions: Writing Archaeology in a Different Voice. Canadian Journal of Archaeology 17: 5–12.Google Scholar