Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T21:55:25.684Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Of Ethnohistory, Archaeology, and Playing with Fire: A Comment on Foster and Cohen 2007

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Joshua Piker*
Affiliation:
Department of History, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019 (jpiker@ou.edu)

Abstract

This Comment interrogates claims made by Foster and Cohen (2007) regarding eighteenth-century Creek Indian hunting strategies. It argues that Foster and Cohen’s attempts to link the archaeological and ethnohistorical record are flawed because of their misreading of the latter. The "Comment" demonstrates that Creeks did not—contra Foster and Cohen (2007)—conduct large-scale hunts near their communities or frequently rely on fire-drives. Thus, pollen and charcoal samples gathered by Foster and Cohen (2007) from the neighborhood of those communities speak to activities other than hunting.

Resumen

Resumen

El Comentario cuestiona las conclusiones que Foster y Cohen (2007) presentan acerca de las estrategias de caza de los indígenas Creek en el siglo XVIII. El texto argumenta que aunque Foster y Cohen intentan relacionar datos arqueológicos con datos etno-históricos, su lectura de éstos últimos no es correcta. En contraposición con Foster y Cohen, el "Comentario" demuestra que los indígenas Creek no cazaban en grandes cantidades en las cercanías de sus comunidades ni frequentemente utilizaban fuego en su cacería. Asíí, las muestras de polen y carbón recolectadas por Foster y Cohen en las vecindades de estas comunidades hacen explícita la existencia de actividades diferentes a la caza.

Type
Comments
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Adair, James 2005 The History of the Americans Indians. Kathryn E. Holland Braund, editor. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
Braund, Kathryn E. Holland 1993 Deerskins & Duffels: Creek Indian Trade with Anglo-America, 1685–1815. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.Google Scholar
Candler, Allen D. (editor) 1906 The Colonial Records of the State of Georgia, Vol. 6: Proceedings of the President and Assistants from October 12, 1741, to October 30, 1754. Franklin, Atlanta.Google Scholar
Coleman, Kenneth, and Ready, Milton (editors) 1976 Colonial Records of the State of Georgia Vol. 28, part 1: Original Papers of Governors Ellis, Wright, and Others, 1757–1763. University of Georgia Press, Athens.Google Scholar
Davies, K. G. (editor) 1974 David Taitt's Journal to and through the Upper Creek Nation, in Documents of the American Revolution, Vol. 5: Transcripts, 1772. Irish University Press, Dublin.Google Scholar
Feiler, Seymour (editor) 1962 Jean-Bernard Bossu’s Travels in the Interior of North America, 1751–1762. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman.Google Scholar
Foster, H. Thomas II, and Cohen, Arthur D. 2007 Palynological Evidence of the Effects of the Deerskin Trade on Forest Fires during the Eighteenth Century in Southeastern North America. American Antiquity 72:3551.Google Scholar
Glover, Charlesworthy 1727 Journal. “Records in the British Public Records Office Relating to South Carolina,” Vol. 13:80–171. Edited by W. Noel Sainsbury. 11 microfilm reels, South Carolina Department of Archives and History, Columbia Google Scholar
Hahn, Steven C. 2004 The Invention of the Creek Nation, 1670–1763. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.Google Scholar
Hammett, Julia F. 1992 The Shapes of Adaptation: Historical Ecology of Anthropogenic Landscapes in the Southeastern United States. Landscape Ecology 7(2): 121135.Google Scholar
Juricek, John T. (editor) 1989 Early American Indian Documents: Treaties and Laws, 1607–1789, Vol. 11: Georgia Treaties, 1733–1763. University Publications of America, Frederick, Maryland.Google Scholar
Martin, Jack B., and Mauldin, Margaret McKane 2000 A Dictionary of Creek/Muskogee. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.Google Scholar
McDowell, William L. Jr. (editor) 1958 The Colonial Records of South Carolina: Documents Relating to Indian Affairs, 1750–1754. South Carolina Department of Archives and History, Columbia.Google Scholar
McDowell, William L. Jr. (editor) 1970 The Colonial Records of South Carolina: Documents Relating to Indian Affairs, 1754–1765. South Carolina Department of Archives and History, Columbia.Google Scholar
Moore, Alexander (editor) 1988 Nairne’s Muskhogean Journals: The 1708 Expedition to the Mississippi River University of Mississippi Press, Jackson.Google Scholar
Piker, Joshua 2004a Colonists and Creeks: Rethinking the Pre-Revolutionary Southern Backcountry. Journal of Southern History 70:503540.Google Scholar
Piker, Joshua 2004b Okfuskee: A Creek Indian Town in Colonial America. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Swanton, John Reed 1946 The Indians of the Southeastern United States. Bulletin/U.S. Bureau of American Ethnology no. 137. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Waselkov, Gregory A. 1978 Evolution of Deer Hunting in the Eastern Woodlands. Mid-Continental Journal of Archaeology 3(1): 1534.Google Scholar
Wood, Peter 1989 The Changing Population of the Colonial South: An Overview by Race and Region, 1685–1790. In Powhatan’s Mantle: Indians in the Colonial Southeast, edited by Peter Wood, Gregory A. Waselkov, and M. Thomas Hatley, pp. 35103. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.Google Scholar