Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T12:42:01.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Indications of a Paleo-Indian Co-Tradition for North America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

John L. Cotter
John L. Cotter*
Affiliation:
U.S. National Park ServiceWashington, D.C.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is time to consider some recent trends in thought on the paleo-Indian and certain inferences which may be derived from trait evidence so. far discovered. Recently, some specialists on the problem have begun to realize that, although a good number of flaked blade types from the “early man” horizon have been found scattered over North America, there are also certain associated artifacts which bear significant similarities over a continental area. Thus, the idea is taking shape that the paleo-Indian here was not represented by many culturally diverse groups, but was, on the other hand, living perforce in a relatively culturally homogeneous manner since he existed on much the same economic base for several thousand years. Although different techniques and fashions of artifact manufacture were developed, these changes did not necessarily indicate change in a mode of living.

In discussing the western area with reference to Danger Cave, Jennings (1953) proposes that many of these “early man” manifestations could be lumped together as the Desert culture.

Type
Facts and Comments
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , July 1954 , pp. 64 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BENNETT, WENDELL C. 1948. The Peruvian Co-Tradition. In “A Reappraisal of Peruvian Archaeology.” Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology, No. 4, pp. 1–7. Menasha.Google Scholar
COTTER, JOHN L. 1937. The Occurrence of Flints and Extinct Animals in Pluvial Deposits near Clovis, New Mexico. Part 4. Proc. Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Vol. 89, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
COTTER, JOHN L. 1938. Ibid. Part 6, P P . 113–17.Google Scholar
CRESSMAN, LUTHER S. and Collaborators 1942. Archaeological Researches in the Northern Great Basin. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Publication 538.Google Scholar
DAUGHEHTY, RICHARD D. 1953. Archaeology of the Lind Coulee Site. MS submitted to the National Park Service in fulfillment of a contract with State College of WashingtonGoogle Scholar
GIDDINGS, JAMES L. Jr., 1951. The Denbigh Flint Complex. American Antiquity, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 193–203. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
GOGGIN, JOHN M. 1949. Cultutal Traditions in Florida Prehistory. In The Florida Indian and His Neighbors, Griffin, J. W., Ed. Winter Park: Rollins College Press.Google Scholar
JENKS, ALBERT E. and MRS. SIMPSON, H. H., SR. 1941. Beveled Artifacts in Florida of the Same Type as Artifacts found near Clovis, New Mexico. American Antiquity, Vol. 6, No. 4, p. 314. Menasha.Google Scholar
JENNINGS, JESSE D. 1953. Danger Cave: A Progress Summary. El Palacio, Vol. 60, No. 5. Santa Fe.Google Scholar
RAINEY, FROELICH G. 1939. Archaeology in Central Alaska. AntH. Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, Vol. 36, Part 4. New York.Google Scholar
ROBERTS, FRANK H. H. Jr., 1953. Earliest Man in America. Journal of World History, Vol. 1, No. 2. Paris.Google Scholar
ROUSE, IRVING 1954. On the Use of the Concept of Area Co-Tradition. American Antiquity, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 221–5. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
WILLEY, GORDON R. 1953. Archeological Theories and Interpretation: New World. In Anthropology Today, an Encyclopedic Inventory, pp. 361–85. New York.Google Scholar
WORMINGTON, H. M. 1949. Ancient Man in North America. Denver Museum of Natural History, Popular Series No. 4, Third Ed., p. 91.Google Scholar