Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T06:56:18.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Geological and Geochemical Evidence Concerning the Antiquity of Bone Tools from Tule Springs, Site 2, Clark County, Nevada1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

C. Vance Haynes Jr. ,
A. R. Doberenz  and
Jack A. Allen
C. Vance Haynes Jr.
Affiliation:
University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
A. R. Doberenz
Affiliation:
University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
Jack A. Allen
Affiliation:
University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two bone objects from the Tule Springs site, possibly tools, occurred in ancient sedimentary fill of a small spring outlet-channel remnant. The ancient spring was active more than 40,000 years ago and again 12,000 to 13,000 years ago. The fill and the bone contained therein could be of either age. Chemical and X-ray analysis on bone of the known ages and bone from the fill showed no significant or systematic differences in fluorine, uranium, nitrogen, or phosphate content. On geological grounds, it is concluded that the bone objects are 12,000 to 13,000 years old.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , April 1966 , pp. 517 - 521
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Contribution No. 85, Program in Geochronology, University of Arizona, Tucson.

References

References Cited

Brooks, R. H. 1963 An Interpretation of Polished, Split Bone from Tule Springs, Nevada. Paper presented at the 28th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Ferousson, G. J., and Llbby, W. F. 1964 UCLA Radiocarbon Dates III. Radiocarbon, Vol. 6 (in press).Google Scholar
Haynes, C. Vance Jr. 1965 Quaternary Geology of the Tule Springs Area, Clark County, Nevada. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Keith, M. L. and Anderson, G. M. 1963 Radiocarbon Dating: Fictitious Results with Mollusk Shells. Science, Vol. 141, No. 3581, pp. 634–7. Washington.Google Scholar
McConnell, D. 1963 Dating of Fossil Bones by the Fluorine Method. Science, Vol. 136, No. 3512, pp. 241–4. Washington.Google Scholar
Niggli, E., Overweel, C. V., and Vander Vlerk, T. M. An X-ray Crystallographical Application of the Fluorine-dating Method of Fossil Bones. Proceeds. Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie von Wetenshappen, Ser. B, Vol. 56, No. 5, pp. 538–42. The Hague.Google Scholar
Oakley, K. P. 1958 Application of Fluorine, Uranium and Nitrogen Analysis to the Relative Dating of the Rhunda Skull. Nues ]ahrbuck fur Geologie und Palaontologie, Monatshefte 3–4, pp. 130–6, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Rubin, M., Likins, R.C., and Berry, E. G. 1963 On the Validity of Radiocarbon Dates from Shells. Journal of Geology, Vol. 71, No. 1, pp. 84–9. New Haven.Google Scholar
Shutler, Richard Jr. 1965 Tule Springs Expedition. Current Anthropology, Vol. 6, p. 110. Utrecht.Google Scholar
Wyckoff, R. W. G., Hoffman, V. J., and Matter, Philip III 1963 Microradiography of Fossilized Teeth. Science, Vol. 140, No. 3562, pp. 79–80, Washington.Google Scholar