Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T02:39:07.662Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Archaeological and Paleoethnobotanical Investigations in Salts Cave, Mammoth Cave National Park, Kentucky

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Patty Jo Watson
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
Richard A. Yarnell
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia

Abstract

Reconnaissance, surface collecting, and test excavation were carried on in Salts Cave in August, 1963, by a joint Illinois State Museum-Cave Research Foundation expedition in cooperation with the National Park Service. Various analyses and secondary investigations have continued since then. The main upper passages of the cave were extensively visited during the last millennium B.C. by a prehistoric people who are probably to be assigned to the Early Woodland culture grouping. They were exploiting the mineral resources of the cave, primarily sulfate crystalline deposits, at least one of which is cathartic. Some individuals penetrated nearly two miles into the cave, using cane torches. Quantities of prehistoric, dried human feces are available and are yielding important dietary information. The people were apparently cultivating some plant species, including sunflower (Heliarn thus annus) and two members of the classic tropical horticultural complex, squash and gourd (Cucurbita pepo and Lagenarid siceraria). There is as yet no evidence that they grew or used maize (Zea mays).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beninoton, F., Melton, C., and Watson, P. J. 1962 Carbon Dating Prehistoric Soot from Salts Cave, Kentucky. American Antiquity, Vol. 28, No, 2, pp. 23841. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Black, Meredith 1963 The Distribution and Archaeological Significance of the Marshelder Iva annua L. Papers of the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts, and Letters, Vol. 48, pp. 5417. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Braidwood, R. J. and Willey, Gordon R. 1962 Conclusions and Afterthoughts. In “Courses Toward Urban Life,” edited by R. J. Braidwood and Gordon R. Willey, pp. 33059. Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology, No. 32. New York.Google Scholar
Callen, E. O. 1963 Diet as Revealed by Coprolites. In Science in Archaeology, edited by Don Brorhwell and Eric Higgs, pp. 18694. Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
Crane, H. R. 1956 University of Michigan Radiocarbon Dates I. Science, Vol. 124, No. 3224, pp. 66472. Washington.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Funkhouser, W. D. and Webb, W. S. 1929 The So-Called “Ash Caves” in Lee County, Kentucky. University of Kentucky Reports in Archaeology and Anthropology, Vol. 1, No. 2. Lexington.Google Scholar
Gilmore, M. R. 1931 Vegetal Remains of the Ozark Bluff-Dwellers Culture. Papers of the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts, and Letters, Vol. 14, pp. 83102. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Jackson, R. C. 1960 A Revision of the Genus Iva L. The University of Kansas Science Bulletin, Vol. 41, No. 7, pp. 793876. Lawrence.Google Scholar
Jones, Volney 1936 The Vegetal Remains of Newt Kash Hollow Shelter. In “Rock Shelters in Menifee County, Kentucky,” by W. S. Webb and W. D. Funkhouser, pp. 14767. University of Kentucky Reports in Archaeology and Anthropology, Vol. 3, No. 4. Lexington.Google Scholar
Nelson, N. C. 1917 Contributions to the Archaeology of Mammoth Cave and Vicinity, Kentucky. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History, Vol. 22, Pt. 1. New York.Google Scholar
Orchard, W. C. 1920 Sandals and other Fabrics from Kentucky Caves. Indian Notes and Monographs, Vol. 11, No. 4. Heye Foundation, New York.Google Scholar
Park, W. Z. 1938 Shamanism in Western North America. Northwestern University Press, Evanston.Google Scholar
Pond, Alonzo 1937 Lost John of Mummy Ledge. Natural History, Vol. 39, pp. 17684. New York.Google Scholar
Schwartz, D. W. 1958a Sandals and Textiles from Mammoth Cave National Park. MS, Mammoth Cave National Park Library, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky.Google Scholar
Schwartz, D. W. 1958b Archaeological Report on Materials in the John M. Nelson Collection from Mammoth Cave National Park. MS, Mammoth Cave National Park Library, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky.Google Scholar
Schwartz, D. W. 1958c An Archaeological Report on Physical Remains from Mammoth Cave National Park. MS, Mammoth Cave National Park Library, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky.Google Scholar
Schwartz, D. W. 1958d Summary and Evaluation of the 1916 American Museum Archaeological Work in Mammoth Cave National Park. MS, Mammoth Cave National Park Library, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky.Google Scholar
Schwartz, D. W. 1958e Description and Analysis of Museum Materials from Mammoth Cave National Park. MS, Mammoth Cave National Park Library, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky.Google Scholar
Schwartz, D. W. 1958f Archaeological Survey of Mammoth Cave National Park. MS, Mammoth Cave National Park Library, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky.Google Scholar
Schwartz, D. W. 1958g Report on Two Radiocarbon Dates from Mammoth Cave, Kentucky. MS, Mammoth Cave National Park Library, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky.Google Scholar
Schwartz, D. W. 1960 Prehistoric Man in Mammoth Cave. Scientific American, Vol. 203, pp. 13040. New York.Google Scholar
Schwartz, D. W. and Sloan, T. G. 1960 Archaeological Base Map and Survey of Mammoth Cave National Park. MS, Mammoth Cave National Park Library, Mammoth Cave, Kentucky.Google Scholar
Struever, S. 1962 Implications of Vegetal Remains from an Illinois Hopewell Site. American Antiquity, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 5847. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Treganza, A. E. 1964 An Ethno-Archaeological Examination of Samwel Cave. Cave Studies, No. 12. Cave Research Associates, Castro Valley, California.Google Scholar
Webb, W. S. and Baby, Raymond 1957 The Adena People, No. 2. Ohio State University Press, Columbus.Google Scholar
Yarnell, R. A. 1964 Aboriginal Relationships between Culture and Plant Life in the Upper Great Lakes Region. Anthropological Papers of the Museum of Anthropology, No. 23. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Yarnell, R. A. 1965 Early Woodland Plant Remains and the Question of Cultivation. The Florida Anthropologist, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 7782. Gainesville.Google Scholar
Young, Col. Bennett H. 1910 The Prehistoric Men of Kentucky. Filson Club Publication, No. 25. Louisville.Google Scholar