Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T21:26:45.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some Characteristics of Mongolian-Type Lames*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Ferdinand E. Okada*
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York 27, New York

Extract

Recent reports on Alaska by Solecki and by Giddings. have mentioned the presence there of Mongolian-type lames and cores already noted some twelve years earlier by Nelson and by Rainey. In this connection, it may not be out of place to summarize the findings of Hitoshi Watanabe, a Japanese archaeologist, on the characteristics that distinguish a lame from an ordinary flake. Although the primary purpose of his research was to clarify some misconceptions created in Japanese archaeology by somewhat indiscriminate application of the term lames to relatively long and narrow flakes, found in both the main island of Honshu and the northernmost island of Hokkaido, much of the data is relevant to Alaskan archaeology.

Type
Facts and Comments
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Received just in time for this issue, Mr. Okada's paper comprises a useful footnote to Giddings article on pp. 193 ff.

References

1 Solecki, Ralph 1950a. “New Data on the Inland Eskimo of Northern Alaska.” Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, Volume 40, No. 5, pp. 137157, Washington Google Scholar.

1 Solecki, Ralph 1950b. “ A Preliminary Report of an Archaeological Reconnaissance of the Kukpowruk and Kokolik Rivers in Northwest Alaska.” American Antiquity, Volume 16, No. 1, pp. 6669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Giddings, J. L. Jr., 1949. “Early Flint Horizons on the North Bering Sea Coast.” Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, Volume 39, No. 3, pp. 8590, Washington.Google Scholar

3 Nelson, N. C. 1937. “Notes on Cultural Relations between Asia and America.” American Antiquity, Volume 2, No. 4, pp. 267276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Rainey, Froelich 1939. “Archaeology in Central Alaska.” Anthropological Papers, American Museum of Natural History, Volume 36, Pt. 4, New York.Google Scholar

5 Watanabe, Hitoshi 1948. “The So-called Lames in Japan.” Journal of the Anthropological Society of Nippon, Volume 60 (688) pp. 8186, Tokyo.Google Scholar