Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T07:00:47.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New Archaeological Cultures from the Departments of Chuquisaca, Potosi and Tarija, Bolivia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Dick Edgar Ibarra Grasso*
Affiliation:
University of Cochabamba, Cochabamba, Bolivia

Extract

Very Little has been written about the archaeology of central and southern Bolivia, the attention of students having been concentrated on the Tiahuanaco area. I began exploring this great unknown region in 1940-44 and am now continuing the project in my present capacity as Director of the Archaeological Museum of the University of Cochabamba. The present report is a summary of the results of this work to date. The best described Bolivian culture outside of the Tiahuanaco area is the one called Mizque-Tiahuanaco by Nordenskiöld and Bennett which I am calling Yampará. I have found tombs in an earlier variety of this style without any Tiahuanaco influence. A characteristic of Yampará pottery is the presence of tripod bowls which resemble Mexican ones; this trait is entirely un-Tiahuanacoid.

The Yampará style extends to the whole of the Department of Chuquisaca, except for Cinti and the southern part of Azero, and it occurs also in the Province of Cornelio Saavedra in Potosí.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bennett, Wendell Clark 1936. Excavations in Bolivia. Anthropological Papers of the American Museum of Natural History. Vol. 35, part 4, pp. 327–507. New York.Google Scholar
Bini Frias, Honoria 1951. Vasos Huruquillas de la Colección Paz Posse. Ciencia Nueva. año II, tomo I, no. Ill, junio, pp. 53–55. Tucumán.Google Scholar
Costas Arguedas, Jose Felipe 1949. Descripción de algunos ceramios Yampará (Chuquisaca, Bolivia). Revista del Instituto de Antropologia. Vol. 4, pp. 325–9. Tucumán.Google Scholar
CréQui-Montfort, G. De 1906a. Fouilles dans la nécropole préhispanique de Calama. Les anciens Atacamas. Internationaler Amerikanisten-Kongress. Vierzehnte Tagung. Stuttgart 1904. Zweite Hälfte, pp. 551–65. Verlag von W. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
CréQui-Montfort, G. De 1906b. Fouilles de la mission scientifique française a Tiahuanaco. Ses recherches archéologiques et ethnographiques en Bolivie, au Chili et dans la République Argentine. Internationaler Amerikanisten-Kongress. Vierzehnte Tagung. Stuttgart 1904. Zweite Hälfte, pp. 531–50. Verlag von W. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Debenedetti, Salvador 1912. Influencias de la cultura de Tiahuanaco en la region del noroeste argentino. Revista de la Universidad de Buenos Aires. tomo XVII, pp. 326–52. Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Ibarra Grasso, Dick Edgar 1950. Nueva interpretación sobre-la arqueología del noroeste argentino. Ciencia Nueva. ano I, tomo I, no. I, pp. 11–37. Tucumán.Google Scholar
Ibarra Grasso, Dick Edgar 1952. La arqueología boliviana. Ciencia Nueva. año III, tomo I, no. 4, julio, pp. 7–22. Cochabamba.Google Scholar
Ibarra Grasso, Dick Edgar , and Ibarra Grasso, Carlos 1950. La colección arqueológica Paz Posse. Ciencia Nueva. año I, tomo I, no. II, pp. 21–54. Tucumán.Google Scholar
MéTraux, Alfred 1933. Contribution a l’archeologie bolivienne. journal de la Société des Américanistes. n.s., tome XXV, fasc. 2, pp. 279–91. Paris.Google Scholar
NordenskióLd, Erland 1917. Dieóstliche Ausbreitung der ‘ Tiahuanacokultur in Bolivien und ihr Verhältnis zur Aruakkultur in Mojos. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie. 49. Jahrgang, Heft 1, pp. 10–20. Berlin.Google Scholar
NordenskióLd, Erland 1924. Forscfiungen und Abentauer in Südamerica. Strecker und Schroeder, Stuttgart.Google Scholar