Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T03:29:18.555Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Differential Bone Destruction: An Ethnographic Example

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Patricia J. Lyon*
Affiliation:
Washington UniversitySt. Louis, Missouri

Abstract

Much recent archaeological work has been aimed at attempts to reconstruct ancient subsistence and ecological patterns. Ethnographic observations by the author in eastern Peru indicate that domesticated dogs may play a significant role in distorting the archaeological record as it is reflected in unmodified mammal bone. These observations indicate that medium-sized dogs may totally devour the bone of small animals and destroy identifiable portions of the bone of medium-sized animals, leaving only the remains of large animals in condition for identification. The possibility of such destruction in the past indicates the need for caution in evaluating subsistence on the basis of bone remains in archaeological sites.

Type
Facts and Comments
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Isaac, Glynn Ll. 1967 Towards the Interpretation of Occupation Debris: Some Experiments and Observations. Kroeber Anthropological So ciety Papers, No. 37, pp. 3157. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Lubbock, John 1904 Pre-historic times: As Illustrated by Ancient Remains and the Manners and Customs of Modem Savages. 6th edition, revised. J. A. Hill and Company, New York.Google Scholar
Wood, W. Raymond 1968 Mlssissippian Hunting and Butchering Patterns: Bone from the Vista Shelter, 23SR–20, Missouri. American Antiquity, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 1709. Salt Lake City.Google Scholar