Skip to main content Accessibility help

Advertising and U. S. Nonalcoholic Beverage Demand

  • Yuqing Zheng (a1) and Harry M. Kaiser (a1)


As a first effort at modeling nonalcoholic beverage demand in a systemwide framework that includes bottled water, this article examines the impact of advertising on the demand for nonalcoholic beverages in the United States. We employed an AIDS (almost ideal demand system) model of five jointly estimated equations that included advertising expenditures as explanatory variables to evaluate annual U. S. consumption of nonalcoholic beverages for 1974 through 2005. Results suggest that advertising increases demand for fluid milk, soft drinks, and coffee and tea, but not for juice or bottled water. Advertising spillover effects occur in over 50 percent of the cases considered, and such effects can be substantial, particularly for advertising of soft drinks, and coffee and tea. We find that a large increase in the retail price of fluid milk, an increasing trend towards dining out, and positive spillover effects from soft-drink advertising made significant contributions to bottled water's success in recent years.



Hide All
Alston, J. M., Chalfant, J.A., and Piggott, N. E. 2001. “Incorporating Demand Shifters in the Almost Ideal Demand System.” Economics Letters 70(1): 7378.
Alston, J. M., Freebairn, J. W., and James, J. S. 2001. “Beggar-Thy-Neighbor Advertising: Theory and Application to Generic Commodity Promotion Programs.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(4): 888902.
Beverage Marketing Corporation. 2006. Chapter 4 in “Report to Congress on the National Dairy Promotion and Research Program and the National Fluid Milk Processor Promotion Programs,” U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C.
Buse, A. 1994. “Evaluating the Linearized Almost Ideal Demand System.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76(4): 781793.
Coulibaly, N., and Brorsen, B. W. 1999. “Explaining Differences between Two Previous Meat Generic Advertising Studies.” Agribusiness 15(4): 501516.
Deaton, A., and Muelbauer, J. 1980. “An Almost Ideal Demand System.” American Economic Review 70(3): 312326.
Duffy, M. 1995. “Advertising in Demand Systems for Alcoholic Drinks and Tobacco: A Comparative Study.” Journal of Policy Modeling 17(6): 557577.
Gao, X. M., and Lee, J. 1995. “A Factor Analysis Approach to Measure the Biased Effects of Retail Fruit Juice Advertising.” Empirical Economics 20(1): 93107.
Kaiser, H. M. 1997. “Impact of National Generic Dairy Advertising on Dairy Markets, 1984-95.Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 29(2): 303313.
Kaiser, H. M. 2000. “Impact of National Generic Dairy Advertising on Dairy Markets, 1984-99.” NICPRE Research Bulletin No. 00-01, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Kaiser, H. M. 2006. Chapter 3 in “Report to Congress on the National Dairy Promotion and Research Program and the National Fluid Milk Processor Promotion Programs,” U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C.
Kinnucan, H. W., Miao, Y., Xiao, H., and Kaiser, H. M. 2001. “Effects of Advertising on U. S. Non-Alcoholic Beverage Demand: Evidence from A Two-Stage Rotterdam Model.” In Baye, M. R. and Nelson, J. P., eds., Advances in Applied Microeconomics. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Kinnucan, H. W., Xiao, H., Hsia, C., and Jackson, J. D. 1997. “Effects of Health Information and Generic Advertising on U. S. Meat Demand.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(1): 1323.
Kinnucan, H. W., and Zheng, Y. 2005. “National Benefit-Cost Estimates for the Dairy, Beef, Pork and Cotton Promotion Programs.” In Kaiser, H. M., Alston, J. M., Crespi, J., and Sexton, R. J., eds., The Economics of Commodity Promotion Programs: Lessons from California. New York: Peter Lang.
LaFrance, J. 1991. “When Is Expenditure ‘Exogenous’ in Separable Demand Models?Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 16(1): 4962.
Lariviere, E., Larue, B., and Chalfant, J. 2000. “Modeling the Demand for Alcoholic Beverages and Advertising Specifications.” Agricultural Economics 22(2): 147162.
Lee, Y., and Brown, M. G. 1992. “Commodity versus Brand Advertising: A Case Study of the Florida Orange Juice Industry.” In Kinnucan, H. W., Thompson, S. R., and Chang, H., eds., Commodity Advertising and Promotion. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
McGuirk, A., Driscoll, P., Alwang, J., and Huang, H., 1995. “System Misspecification Testing and Structural Change in the Demand for Meats.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 20(1): 121.
Moschini, G. 1995. “Units of Measurement and the Stone Index in Demand System Estimation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77(1): 6368.
Nelson, J. P., and Moran, J. R. 1995. “Advertising and U. S. Alcoholic Beverage Demand: System-Wide Estimates.” Applied Economics 27(12): 12251236.
Nelson, P., Siegfried, J. J., and Howell, J. 1992. “A Simultaneous Equations Model of Coffee Brand Pricing and Advertising.” Review of Economics and Statistics 74(1): 5463.
Schmit, T. M., and Kaiser, H. M. 2004. “Decomposing the Variation in Generic Advertising Response over Time.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(1): 139153.
Seale, Jr., L., J., Marchant, M.A., and Basso, A. 2003. “Imports versus Domestic Production: A Demand System Analysis of the U. S. Red Wine Market.” Review of Agricultural Economics 25(1): 187202.
Thompson, W. 2004. “Using Elasticities from an Almost Ideal Demand System? Watch Out for Group ExpenditureAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(4): 11081116.
Tomek, W. G., and Kaiser, H. M. 1999. “On Improving Econometric Analyses of Generic Advertising Impacts.” Agribusiness 15(4): 485500.
Ward, R. W., and Dixon, B. L. 1989. “Effectiveness of Fluid Milk Advertising Since the Dairy and Tobacco Adjustment Act of 1983.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71(3): 730740.
Yen, S. T., Lin, B., Smallwood, D. M., and Andrews, M. 2004. “Demand for Nonalcoholic Beverages: The Case of Low-Income Households.” Agribusiness 20(3): 309321.
Zheng, Y., Kinnucan, H. W., and Kaiser, H. M. 2008. “Measuring and Testing Advertising-Induced Rotation in the Demand Curve.” Applied Economics (forthcoming) (available at



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed