Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T00:45:47.334Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Small Urban Centers in Rural Development: What Else is Development Other than Helping Your Own Home Town?1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

Extract

In our original perspectives and hypotheses on Small Urban Centers in Rural Development in Africa, we stated that these small centers are “the most strategic key to problems of Rural Development…points of articulation between the national systems of marketing, distribution and policy development on the one hand and the interests and productivity of the rural poor on the other.” They are “points of articulation of incentives for greater productivity…at which local rural interests are aggregated and expressed to government and party…sources of new ideas and belief systems…what some would call ‘modernizing centers,’ sources of innovation, politicization, mobilization and national integration” (Southall, 1979: 371).

As knowledge grew, our hopeful optimism was punctured and this rosy, positive picture faded. We had recognized the stagnation of the rural sector, the over-centralization and over-bureaucratization of goverments, increasing the fiscal burden, weakening popular local institutions, benefiting mainly elites and even resorting to counterproductive coercion (Southall, 1979b: 375-7). In short, we had recognized that rural development efforts so far have been disappointing and that hypotheses on rural development “must take the form of assuming conditions which do not now prevail.” None the less, with hindsight, we see that our propositions tended to state aspirations as facts, in the wrong tense and the wrong mood. We now recognize in them the same flaws that we still recognize in many other grant-seeking documents.

We had also entertained the hypothesis that a three-tiered structure of local points of concentration, somewhat analogous to the Chinese three-tiered commune-production brigade-production team hierarchy, was likely to emerge if positive small center development took place; it was a valid model even without the Maoist ideology (Southall, 1979:377).

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1.

Quoted from a remark made by a Nigerian scholar.

References

REFERENCES

Abu-Lughod, Janet. 1980. Urban Apartheid in Morocco. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Berry, Sara. 1985. Fathers Work for Their Sons: Accumulation, Mobility and Class Formation in an Extended Yoruba Community. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dike, Azuka. 1979. “Growth and Developmental Patterns in the Small Urban Towns of Nsukka and Awka in Nigeria.” pp. 235–45 in Southall, Aidan (ed.) “Small Towns in African Development,” Africa, Special Issue 49/3.Google Scholar
Emmanuel, Arghiri. 1972. Unequal Exchange: A Study of Imperialism of Trade. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Xiaotong, Fei (Hsiao-tung, Fei). 1982. “The New Outlook of Rural China: Kaishienkung Revisited After Half a Century,” Huxley Memorial Lecture, Royal Anthropological Institute News 48: 48.Google Scholar
Hardoy, Jorge and Satterthwaite, D. (eds.) 1986. Small and Intermediate Urban Centers: Their Role in National and Regional Development in the Third World. London: Hodder and Stoughton. (In association with the National Institute for Environment and Development.)Google Scholar
Mason, E.S. 1973. The World Bank Since Bretton Woods. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
Middleton, John. 1979. “Home Town: A Study of an Urban Center in Southern Ghana,” pp. 246–57 in Southall, Aidan (ed.) “Small Towns in African Development” Africa, Special Issue 49/3.Google Scholar
Newbury, C. 1984. “Dead and Buried or Just Underground? The Privatization of the State in Zaire.” Canadian Journal of African Studies 18.Google Scholar
Rondinelli, D. 19791980. “Balanced Urbanization, Spatial Integration and Economic Development in Asia, Implicationsd for Policy Planning.” Urbanism Past and Present, No. 9.Google Scholar
Rondinelli, D. 1982. “Mythology or Misconception? The Potential Benefits of Deconstructed Urbanization in Asian Development.” Urbanism Past and Present 7/13, Issue 1.Google Scholar
Rondinelli, D. and Ruddle, K. 1978. Urbanization and Rural Development: A Spatial Policy for Equitable Growth. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Rondinelli, D. and Ruddle, K. 1983a. “Dynamics of Secondary Cities in Developing Countries.” Geographical Review 73/1: 4257.Google Scholar
Rondinelli, D. and Ruddle, K. 1983b. “Towns and Small Cities in Developing Countries.” Geographical Review 73/4: 379–95.Google Scholar
Schatzberg, Michael G. 1979. “Blockage Points in Zaire: The Flow of Budgets, Bureaucrats and Beer.” in Southall, Aidan (ed.) Small Urban Centers in Rural Development in Africa. Madison: African Studies Program, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Southall, Aidan (ed.) 1979a. “Small Towns in African Development.” Africa, Special Issue 49/3.Google Scholar
Southall, Aidan. (ed.) 1979b. Small Urban Centers in Rural Development in Africa. Madison: African Studies Program, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Southall, Aidan. 1982. “Double Talk and the Mythology of Urbanization in Asia.” Urbanism Past and Present 7/13, Issue 1.Google Scholar
Vwakyanakazi, Mukohya. 1976. “Description and Analysis of a Cluster of Small Centers in North Kivu (Zaire).” Term Paper, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar