Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T00:36:15.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Movement to Decriminalize Sex Work in Gauteng Province, South Africa, 1994–2002

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

Janet M. Wojcicki
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

This article explores the movement to decriminalize sex work in the Gauteng province of Johannesburg from 1994 to 2002. In particular, I examine the actions and statements of the provincial Ministry of Safety and Security and other ministries in the decision to de facto decriminalize prostitution using the international language of human rights. This article illustrates that the movement to decriminalize sex work in the postapartheid period is not a sharp departure from the past. Rather, as early as the 1970s there were minority contingents that advocated a legalization or decriminalization of sex work, arguing for the public health or policy benefits that would follow. What is new in the postapartheid period is the justification for decriminalization, which now is based on the international language of human rights. Also new in the postapartheid period is the inclusion in the debate of voices that were not heard during apartheid, when the media was dominated by white South Africans. There is now a counterdiscourse opposing decriminalization, based on religion and on the argument that sex work is “un-African.”

Résumé:

Résumé:

Cet article examine le mouvement de dépénalisation de l’industrie du sexe dans la province de Gauteng, Johannesburg, de 1994 à 2002. Nous examinons en particulier les actes et les déclarations du ministère de la sûreté et de la sécurité et d’autres ministères de cette province à la lumière de la décision de dépénaliser de facto la prostitution en invoquant le langage international des droits de l’homme. Cet article montre que ce mouvement de dépénalisation de l’industrie du sexe pendant la période postapartheid ne constitue pas un tournant radical par rapport au passé. Au contraire, dès les années 1970, il existait des contingents minoritaires qui militaient pour une légalisation ou une dépénalisation de l’industrie du sexe, invoquant les avantages en matière de santé publique et de politique qui ne manqueraient pas de s’ensuivre. Ce qui est nouveau dans la période postapartheid est lajustification citée pour la dépénalisation, qui se base désormais sur le langage international des droits de l’homme. Une autre nouveauté de la période postapartheid est l’inclusion dans ce débat de voix qui n’avaient pas pu être entendues pendant l’apartheid, les média étant alors dominés par les africains du sud blancs. II existe aujourd’hui un contre-discours s’opposant à la dépénalisation. Ce discours s’appuie sur la religion ainsi que sur l’argument que le travail de l’industrie du sexe est “contraire à l’esprit africain.”

Type
Articles
Information
African Studies Review , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , December 2003 , pp. 83 - 109
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

African National Congress (ANC). 1997. 50th National Conference Draft Resolutions. Mafikeng, Northwest Province. Cape Town.Google Scholar
Albertyn, C. 1995. Mainstreaming Gender: National Machinery for Women in South Africa. A Policy Outline. Occasional Paper 24, Centre for Applied Legal Studies. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand.Google Scholar
Attorney General, South Africa. 1998. “Attorney’s-General Policy and Statistics with regard to Offences Committed by So-Called ‘Sex-Workers.’“Google Scholar
Altman, D. 2001. Global Sex. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, P. 2001. “The Stepchild of National Liberation: Women and Rights in the New South Africa.” In Andrews, P. and Ellmann, S., eds., The Post-Apartheid Constitutions: Perspectives on South Africa’s Basic Law. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Commission on Gender Equality. 1997. Audit of Legislation. Johannesburg: Gender Research Project, Centre for Applied Legal Studies.Google Scholar
Crause, H. L., and Botha, P. M. C.. 1977. “Prostitution: An Analysis of the Social System Central in the Harbour Area of Port Elizabeth by Night.” University of Port Elizabeth Research Project 75 SMW016.Google Scholar
Croucher, S. 2002. “South Africa’s Democratisation and the Politics of Gay Liberation.” Journal of Southern African Studies 28 (2): 315–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crush, J., and Wellings, P.. 1983. “The Southern African Pleasure Periphery, 1966–83.” Journal of Southern African Studies 21(4): 673–98.Google Scholar
Deane, N. 2002. “Fighting for the Right to Sell Sex.” Mail and Guardian, 03 8.Google Scholar
De Bruyn, J., and Seidman-Makgetla, N.. 1997. “Engendering the Budget Process.” In Budlender, D., ed., The Second Women’s Budget, Institute for Democracy in South Africa. Cape Town: Institute for Democracy in South Africa.Google Scholar
Delacoste, F., and Alexander, P.. 1987. Sex Work: Writings by Women in the Sex Industry. San Francisco: Cleis Press.Google Scholar
Department of Justice (South Africa). 1997. “Gender Policy Considerations.” Draft Discussion Paper for Public Consideration. Pretoria: Gender Unit, Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Division of Welfare and Population Development, Gauteng Province. 1996. “The Decriminalistion of Sexwork: Perspectives from the Department of Welfare and Population Development.”Google Scholar
Dubow, S. 1995. Scientific Racism in Modern South Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Du Plessis, M. 1999. “The South African Employment Equity Act and HIV.” AIDS Analysis Africa 10 (4): 3.Google Scholar
Ebrahim, H. 2001. “The Making of the South African Constitution: Some Influences.” In Andrews, P. and Ellmann, S., eds., The Post-Apartheid Constitutions: Perspectives on South Africa’s Basic Law. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Epprecht, M. 2000. “The ‘Unsaying’ of Homosexuality among Indigenous Black Zimbabweans: Mapping a Blind Spot in an African Masculinity.” Journal of Southern African Studies 24: 631–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, M. 1999. “Translating Commitment into Policy and Practice.” Agenda (monograph): 2–17.Google Scholar
Gaitskell, D. 1979. “Christian Compounds for Girls: Church Hostels for African Women in Johannesburg, 1907–1970.” Journal of Southern African Studies 6 (1): 44–69.Google Scholar
Gaitskell, D. 1982. “Wailing for Purity: Prayer Unions, African Mothers and Adolescent Daughters, 1912–1940.” In Industrialisation and Social Change in South Africa: African Class Formation, 1870–1930, edited by Marks, Shula and Rathbone, Richard. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Gauteng Cabinet. 1997. Circular No. 10, HLG 7/3/P. Johannesburg: Development Planning and Local Government.Google Scholar
Gauteng Task Team. 1997. Decriminalisation of Sexwork. Gauteng Province: Department of Safety and Security.Google Scholar
Goetz, A. M. 1998. “Fiddling with Democracy: Translating Women’s Participation in Politics in Uganda and South Africa into Gender-Equity in Development Practice.” Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C., 08.Google Scholar
Govender, K. 2001. “The South African Human Rights Commission.” In Andrews, P. and Ellmann, S., eds., The Post-Apartheid Constitution: Perspectives on South Africa’s Basic Law. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Grobler, F. 2002. “Respect Sex Workers’ Privacy.” Star, 03 5.Google Scholar
Hassim, S., and Gouws, A.. “Mediating Women’s Interests: Gender, Law and the State in South Africa.” University of Cape Town: African Gender Institute.Google Scholar
Hyslop, J. 1995. “White Working-Class Women and the Invention of Apartheid: ‘Purified’ Afrikaner National Agitation for Legislation Against ‘Mixed’ Marriages, 1934–9.” Journal of African History 36 (1): 57–81.Google Scholar
Johannesburg Metropolitan City Council. 1993. Council Record, 07 27, 90–91.Google Scholar
Keegan, T. 2001. “Gender, Degeneration and Sexual Danger: Imagining Race and Class in South Africa, ca. 1912.” Journal of Southern African Studies 27 (3): 459–77.Google Scholar
Lekubu-Wilderson, K. 1999. “The Women’s Convention—Change in Social Practice Crucial.” Agenda 36: 68–71.Google Scholar
Liebenberg, S. 2000. “Violations of Socio-Economic Rights: The Role of the South African Human Rights Commission.” In Andrews, P. and Ellmann, S., eds. Post-Apartheid Constitutions: Perspectives on South Africa’s Basic Law. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
Lotter, S. 1994. “Decriminalization: A Principled Approach.” Consultus. 10.Google Scholar
Mager, A. 1977. “The First Decade of ‘European Beer’ in Apartheid South Africa: The State, the Brewers and the Drinking Public, 1962–72.” Journal of African History 40: 367–88.Google Scholar
Makatini, L. 1993. “Abortion as a Human Rights Issue.” Agenda 17: 18–22.Google Scholar
Meintjies, S., and Marks, M.. 1996. “Women’s Position in Society.” In The South African Women’s Health Book, edited by Goosen, M. and Klugman, B.. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moodley, A. 1993. “Black Woman You Are On Your Own.” Agenda 16: 44–85.Google Scholar
Murray, S. O., and Roscoe, W.. 1998. Boy-Wives and Female Husbands: Studies of African Homosexualities. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality. 1994. “We Must Claim Our Citizenship.” Report of the Interim Executive Committee, 12 1994–December 1995.Google Scholar
Omer-Cooper, J. D. 1987. History of Southern Africa. 2nd edition. London: David Philip, James Currey.Google Scholar
OmniChek (Cape Town). 1998. “Race, Class and Sex: The Politics of the Decriminalisation of Sex Work.” Agenda 42: 94–105.Google Scholar
Peterson, R.W., ed. 1975. South Africa and Apartheid. New York: Facts on File.Google Scholar
Petzer, S. A., and Issacs, G. M.. 1997. “The Development and Implementation of a Sex Worker Advocacy and Intervention Programme in Post-Apartheid South with Special Reference to the Western Cape City of Cape Town.” Presentation of the International Conference on Prostitution, Los Angeles, 03.Google Scholar
Petzer, S. A., and Issacs, G. M.. 1995. “SWEAT: The Development and Implementation of a Sex Worker Advocacy and Intervention Program in Post-Apartheid South Africa.” In Kempadoo, K. and Doezema, J., eds., Global Sex Workers: Rights, Resistance and Redefinition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pick, D. 1989. Faces of Degeneration: A European Disorder, c. 1848–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Posel, R. 1986. “A Modern Babylon: White Prostitution in Durban at the Turn of the Century.” Working Group L, Women’s Studies Paper no. 50. Paper presented at the Seventeenth Annual Congress of the Association for Sociology in Southern Africa, University of Natal, Durban. 06 30–July 4.Google Scholar
Rumney, R. 1994. “ANC Supports Legalised Abortion.” Weekly Mail and Guardian, 05 3.Google Scholar
Schurink, W., Liebenburg, I., and Schurink, E.. 1993. “Commercial Sex Work: A Study of Knowledge, Attitudes and General Sexual Behavioral Patterns/Practices among Prostitutes and Other Persons wth Regard to Sexuality and AIDS-related Matters.” Memorandum to the Department of National Health and Population Development, Pretoria.Google Scholar
Scrambler, G., and Scrambler, A., eds. 1997. Rethinking Prostitution: Purchasing Sex in the 1990s. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Seidman, G. W. 1999. “Gendered Citizenship: South Africa’s Democratic Transition and the Construction of a Gendered State.” Gender and Society 13 (3): 287–307.Google Scholar
Serote, P. 1991. “National Liberation Equals Women’s Emancipation: A Myth Totally Exploded.” Agenda 11: 5–6.Google Scholar
Statutes of the Republic of South Africa. Criminal Law and Procedure. Assented to 12 06 1985, Immorality and Prohibition of Mixed Marriages Amendment Act No. 72. Assented to 25 02 1988, Immorality Amendment Act No. 2.Google Scholar
Stoler, A. L. 1991. “Carnal Knowledge and Imperial Power: Gender, Race, and Morality in Colonial Asia.” In di Leonardo, M. L., ed., Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge: Feminist Anthropology in the Postmodern Era, 51–101. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Stoler, A. L. 1994. Race and the Education of Desire. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Teer-Tomaselli, R. 2001. “Nation Building, Social Identity and Television in a Changing Media Landscape.” In Kriger, R. and Zegeye, A., eds., Culture in the New South Africa, 117–38. Cape Town: Kwela Books.Google Scholar
Thompson, L. 1995. A History of South Africa. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Van Heyningen, E. 1984. “The Social Evil in the Cape Colony (1868–1902): Prostitution and the Contagious Diseases Acts.” Journal of Southern African Studies 10 (2): 170–97.Google Scholar
Van Onselen, C. 1982. Studies in the Social and Economic History of the Witwatersrand (1886–1914). Vol 1: New Babylon. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Walkowitz, J. 1980. Prostitution and Victorian Society: Women, Class, and the State. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wojcicki, J. 1999. “Race, Class and Sex: The Politics of the Decriminalisation of Sex Work.” Agenda 42: 94–106.Google Scholar
Wojcicki, J. 2001. “An Acceptance of Violence against Sex Workers and Women Who Exchange Sex for Money: Survey Results from Gauteng Province and Implications for HIV Prevention.” AIDS Bulletin 10 (1): 8–13.Google Scholar