Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

An optimal control approach for alleviation of tiltrotor gust response

  • D. Muro (a1), M. Molica Colella (a1), J. Serafini (a1) and M. Gennaretti (a1)

Abstract

The alleviation of gusts effects on a tiltrotor in aeroplane and helicopter operation modes obtained by an optimal control methodology based on the actuation of elevators, wing flaperons and swashplate is examined. An optimal observer for state estimate is included in the compensator synthesis, with the Kalman-Bucy filter applied in the presence of stochastic noise. Tiltrotor dynamics is simulated through an aeroelastic model that couples rigid-body motion with wing and proprotor structural dynamics. An extensive numerical investigation examines effectiveness and robustness of the applied control procedure, taking into account the action of both deterministic and stochastic vertical gusts. In addition, a passive pilot model is included in the aeroelastic loop and the corresponding effects on uncontrolled and controlled gust response are analysed.

Copyright

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
1. Johnson, J. Optimal control alleviation of tilting proprotor gust response, J Aircr, 1977, 14, pp 301308.
2. Nguyen, K., Betzina, M. and Kitaplioglu, C. Full-scale demonstration of higher harmonic control for noise and vibration reduction on the XV-15 rotor, J American Helicopter Society, 2001, 46, (3), pp 182191.
3. Theodorsen, T. General theory of aerodynamic instability and the mechanism of flutter, NACA Report 496, 1935.
4. Greenberg, J.M. Airfoil in sinusoidal motion in a pulsating stream, NACA TN-1326, 1947.
5. Hodges, D.H. and Dowell, E.H. Nonlinear equation for the elastic bending and torsion of twisted nonuniform rotor blades, NASA TN D-7818, 1974.
6. Friedland, B. Control System Design. An Introduction to State-Space Methods, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, 1986.
7. Mayo, J.R. The involuntary participation of a human pilot in a helicopter collective control loop, Proceedings of the 15th European Rotorcraft Forum, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, September 1989.
8. Gennaretti, M., Molica Colella, M. and Bernardini, G. Prediction of tiltrotor vibratory loads with inclusion of wing-proprotor aerodynamic interaction, J Aircr, 2010, 47, (1), pp 7179.
9. Gennaretti, M. and Bernardini, G. Aeroelastic response of helicopter rotors using a 3D unsteady aerodynamic solver, Aeronaut J, December 2006, 110, (1114), pp 793801.
10. Gennaretti, M. and Greco, L. Time-dependent coefficient reduced-order model for unsteady aerodynamics of proprotors, J Aircr, 2005, 42, (1), pp 138147.
11. Johnson, W. Analytical model for tilting proprotor aircraft dynamics, including blade torsion and coupled bending modes, and conversion mode operation, NASA TM X-62, 369, 1974.
12. Etkin, B. Dynamics of Atmospheric Flight, Wiley, New York, USA, 1972.
13. Parham, T. Jr and Popelka, D. V22 pilot-in-the-loop aeroelastic stability analysis, Proceedings of the 47th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, Phoenix, Arizona, USA, May 1991.
14. Mclean, D. Automatic Flight Control Systems, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1990.
15. Johnson, W. Analytical modeling requirements for tilting proprotor aircraft dynamics, NASA TN D-8013, 1975.
16. Nixon, M.W. Aeroelastic Response and Stability of Tiltrotors with Elastically-Coupled Composite Rotor Blades, PhD Thesis, University of Maryland, USA, 1993.

An optimal control approach for alleviation of tiltrotor gust response

  • D. Muro (a1), M. Molica Colella (a1), J. Serafini (a1) and M. Gennaretti (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed