Experimental aerodynamic testing of objects in close
ground proximity at high subsonic Mach numbers is
difficult due to the construction of a transonic
moving ground being largely unfeasible. Two simple,
passive methods have been evaluated for their
suitability for such testing in a small blowdown
wind tunnel: an elevated ground plane, and a
symmetry (or mirror-image) approach. The methods
were examined using an unswept wing of RAE2822
section, with experiments and Reynolds-Averaged
Navier Stokes CFD used synergistically to determine
the relative merits of the techniques. The symmetry
method was found to be a superior approximation of a
moving ground in all cases, with mild discrepancies
observed only at the lowest ground clearance. The
elevated ground plane was generally found to
influence the oncoming flow and distort the
flowfield between the wing and ground, such that the
method provided a less-satisfactory match to moving
ground simulations compared to the symmetry
technique.