Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:14:31.181Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Repairable models with operating and repair times governed by phase type distributions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2016

Marcel F. Neuts*
Affiliation:
The University of Arizona
Rafael Pérez-Ocón*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Granada
Inmaculada Torres-Castro*
Affiliation:
Universidad de Extremadura
*
Postal address: Department of Systems and Industrial Engineering, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA. Email address: marcel@sie.arizona.edu
∗∗ Postal address: Departamento de Estadística e Investigaciónes Operationales, Universidad de Granada, Campus de Fuente Nueva s/n, E-18071 Granada, Spain. Email address: rperezo@goliat.ugr.es
∗∗∗ Postal address: Escuela Politécnica, Departmento de Matemáticas, Avenida de la Universidad, s/n, Universidad de Extremadura, 10071 Cáceres, Spain. Email address: inmatorres@unex.es

Abstract

We consider a device that is subject to three types of failures: repairable, non-repairable and failures due to wear-out. This last type is also non-repairable. The times when the system is operative or being repaired follow phase type distributions. When a repairable failure occurs, the operating time of the device decreases, in that the lifetimes between failures are stochastically decreasing according to a geometric process. Following a non-repairable failure or after a previously fixed number of repairs occurs, the device is replaced by a new one. Under these conditions, the functioning of the device can be modelled by a Markov process. We consider two different models depending on whether or not the phase of the operational system at the instants of failure is remembered or not. For both models we derive the stationary distribution of the Markov process, the availability of the device, the rate of occurrence of the different types of failures, and certain quantities of interest.

Type
General Applied Probability
Copyright
Copyright © Applied Probability Trust 2000 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aalen, O. (1995). Phase type distributions in survival analysis. Scand. J. Statist. 22, 447463.Google Scholar
Bellman, R. (1970). Introduction to Matrix Analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Bhattacharjee, M. C. and Neuts, M. F. (1981). Shock models with phase type survival and shock resistance Naval Res. Logist. Quart. 28, 213219.Google Scholar
Lam, Y. (1988). A note on the optimal replacement problem. Adv. Appl. Prob. 20, 479482.Google Scholar
Lam, Y. (1995). Calculating the rate of occurrence of failures for continuous-time Markov chains with application to a two-component parallel system. J. Operat. Res. 46, 528536.Google Scholar
Lam, Y. (1997). The rate of occurrence of failures. J. Appl. Prob. 34, 234247.Google Scholar
Neuts, M. F. (1975). Probability distributions of phase type. Liber Amicorum Prof. Emeritus H. Florin. Dept. Math., Univ. Louvain, Belgium, pp. 173206.Google Scholar
Neuts, M. F. (1995). Matrix-Geometric Solutions in Stochastic Models—An Algorithmic Approach. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore [republished with minor corrections by Dover Publications, 1995].Google Scholar
Neuts, M. F. and Meier, K. S. (1980). On the use of phase type distributions in reliability modelling of systems with two components. O.R. Spektrum 2, 227234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, S. M. (1983). Stochastic Processes. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar