Curzan, A. (2014). Fixing English: Prescriptivism and Language History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eggington, W. (1997). The English Language Metaphors We Plan by, in Language Policy: Dominant English, Pluralist Challenges, eds. Eggington, W and Wren, H., 29–46. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: John Benjamins Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graff, H. J. (2010). The Literacy Myth at Thirty. Journal of Social History, 4(3), 635–61.Google Scholar

Mills, J. (2020). Toward a Theory of Myth. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 50(4), 410–24.Google Scholar

Thurlow, C. (2006). From Statistical Panic to Moral Panic: The Metadiscursive Construction and Popular Exaggeration of New Media Language in the Print Media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(3), 667–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zajko, V. and Leonard, M. (2006). Laughing with Medusa: Classical Myth and Feminist Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aull, B. and Aull, L. L. (2021 ). “Write a Greeting for Your Email Here”: Principles for Assessing Interpersonal Workplace Email Communication. Journal of Writing Analytics, 5 (1) 215–58.Google Scholar

Aull, L. L. (2020). How Students Write: A Linguistic Analysis. New York: Modern Language Association.Google Scholar

Biber, D. (1988). Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Biber, D. and Egbert, J. (2018). Register Variation Online. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Biber, D. and Conrad, S. (2005). Register Variation: A Corpus Approach, in The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, eds. Tannen, D, Hamilton, H. E, and Schiffrin, D, 175–96. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Chafe, W. (1982). Integration and Involvement in Speaking, Writing, and Oral Literature, in Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy, ed. Tannen, D, 35–54. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar

Clark, R. et al. (1990). Critical Language Awareness Part I: A Critical Review of Three Current Approaches to Language Awareness. Language and Education, 4(4), 249–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, M. (2015). The Importance of Robust Corpora in Providing More Realistic Descriptions of Variation in English Grammar. Linguistics Vanguard, 1(1), 305–12.Google Scholar

Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. 1970. Translated by Myra Bergman Ramos. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Hardy, J. A. and Friginal, E. (2016). Genre Variation in Student Writing: A Multi-dimensional Analysis. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 119–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardy, J. A. and Römer, U. (2013). Revealing Disciplinary Variation in Student Writing: A Multi-dimensional Analysis of the Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP). Corpora, 8(2), 183–207.Google Scholar

Hartig, A. J. and Lu, X. (2014). Plain English and Legal Writing: Comparing Expert and Novice Writers. English for Specific Purposes, 33, 87–96.Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (2010). Constructing Proximity: Relating to Readers in Popular and Professional Science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(2), 116–27.Google Scholar

Jenkins, J. (2013). English as a Lingua Franca in the International University: The Politics of Academic English Language Policy. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge,Google Scholar

Johns, A. M (1997). Text, Role, and Context: Developing Academic Literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lorés-Sanz, R. (2016). ELF in the Making? Simplification and Hybridity in Abstract Writing. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 5(1), 53–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mauranen, A. (2012). Exploring ELF: Academic English Shaped by Non-native Speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McCulloch, G. (2019). Because Internet: Understanding the New Rules of Language. New York: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar

Milu, E. (2021). Diversity of Raciolinguistic Experiences in the Writing Classroom: An Argument for a Transnational Black Language Pedagogy. College English, 83(6), 415–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapiro, S. (2022). Cultivating Critical Language Awareness in the Classroom. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.Google Scholar

Smitherman, G. (2017). Raciolinguistics, “Mis-education,” and Language Arts Teaching in the 21st Century. Language Arts Journal of Michigan, 32(2), 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sword, H. (2012). Stylish Academic Writing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Anonymous (2016). Dear Student, I Just Don’t Have Time to Mark your Essay Properly. In the Guardian, 20 May.Google Scholar

Biber, D. and Gray, B. (2016). Grammatical Complexity in Academic English: Linguistic Change in Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. and Passeron, J.-C. (1977). Reproduction in Society, Culture, and Education. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Canagarajah, A. S. (2005). Reclaiming the Local in Language Policy and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horner, B. et al. (2011). Language Difference in Writing: Toward a Translingual Approach. College English, 73(3), 303–21.Google Scholar

Matsuda, P. K. (2012). Let’s Face It: Language Issues and the Writing Program Administrator. Writing Program Administration, 36(1), 141–64.Google Scholar

Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as Social Action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2), 151–67.Google Scholar

Nesi, H. and Gardner, S. (2012). Genres Across the Disciplines: Student Writing in Higher Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nevalainen, T. and Traugott, E. C. (2016). The Oxford Handbook of the History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Swales, J. and Feak, C. (2012). Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Trachsel, M. (1987). The History of College Entrance Examinations in English: A Record of Academic Assumptions about Literacy. Austin, TX: The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar

Truss, L. (2004). Eats, Shoots & Leaves: The Zero-Tolerance Approach to Punctuation. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Campbell, G. (1776). The Philosophy of Rhetoric: In two volumes. Edinburgh: W. Strahan; T. Cadell and W. Creech.Google Scholar

Head, F. H. (1883). What is a Liberal Education: An Address. Utica, MY: Ellis H. Roberts & Company Printers.Google Scholar

Hill, A. S. (1995). An Answer to the Cry for More English, in The Origins of Composition Studies in the American College 1875–1925: A Documentary History, ed. Brereton, J. C, 45–57. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

Newbolt, H. J., (1921). The Teaching of English in England: Being the Report of the Departmental Committee Appointed by the President of the Board of Education to Inquire into the Position of English in the Educational System of England. London: H. M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar

Ash, J. (1788). Grammatical Institutes: or An Easy Introduction to Dr. Lowth’s English Grammar. A new edition. Revised, corrected and enlarged. London: Charles Dilly.Google Scholar

Baker, J. (2019). An Introduction to English Legal History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bates, R. M. (1997). The English Primer – A Circular Journey. Internationale Schulbuchforschung, 19(3), 249–58.Google Scholar

Bex, T. and Watts, R. J (eds), Standard English: the Widening Debate. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bryson, B. and Case, D., (1990). The Mother Tongue: English & How It Got that Way. New York: W. Morrow.Google Scholar

Curzan, A. and Adams, M. (2012). How English Works: A Linguistic Instruction. 3rd ed. Glenview, IL: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar

Downey, C. (1979). Introduction, in Grammatical Institutes, ed. Ash, J., Delmar, NY: Scholars’ Facsimiles & Reprints.Google Scholar

Eggington, W. and Wren, H. (1997). Language Policy: Dominant English, Pluralist Challenges. Vol. 83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, A. (1770). The Pleasing Instructor or Entertaining Moralist, Consisting of Select Essays, Relations, Visions, and Allegories Collected from… Eminent English Authors… to which are Prefixed New Thoughts on Education. London: Robinson, and Newcastle: Slack.Google Scholar

Fisher, J. H. (1977). Chancery and the Emergence of Standard Written English in the Fifteenth Century. Speculum, 52(4), 870–99.Google Scholar

Flanders, J., (2020). A Place for Everything: The Curious History of Alphabetical Order. London: Picador.Google Scholar

Hammond, S. (1760). A complete and comprehensive spelling-dictionary of the English language, on the newest plan; for the use of young gentlemen, ladies, and others … By Samuel Hammond; Schoolmaster in Nottingham … Nottingham: Samuel Creswell.Google Scholar

Johnson, S. (1850). A Dictionary of the English Language: In which the Words Are Deduced from Their Originals; and Illustrated in Their Different Significations by Examples from the Best Writers. London: Henry G. Bohn.Google Scholar

King, R. P. (2018). The Draconian Dictionary Is Back, in The Atlantic, August 5.Google Scholar

Kitzhaber, A. (1963). Themes, Theories and Therapy: The Writing of College Students. New York: McGraw-Hill Company.Google Scholar

Lang, B. (1982). Strunk, White and Grammar as Morality. Soundings , 65(1), 23–30.Google Scholar

Lowth, R. (1776). A Short Introduction to English Grammar: With Critical Notes. London: J. Dodsley.Google Scholar

Lynch, J. (2009). The Lexicographer’s Dilemma: The Evolution of ‘Proper’ English, from Shakespeare to South Park. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing USA.Google Scholar

Lynch, J. (2021). A Place for Everything: The Curious History of Alphabetical Order by Judith Flanders. Dictionaries: Journal of the Dictionary Society of North America,. 42(1), 281–5.Google Scholar

Martin, P. (2019). The Dictionary Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Massing, M. (2018). Fatal Discord: Erasmus, Luther, and the Fight for the Western Mind. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Miller, T. P. (1997). The Formation of College English: Rhetoric and Belles Lettres in the British Cultural Provinces. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

Murray, L. (1979 [1795]). English Grammar, Adapted to the Different Classes of Learners.Google Scholar

London: Scolar Press.Google Scholar

Scragg, D. G. (1974). A History of English Spelling. vol. 3. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Swift, J. (1969 [1712]). A Proposal for Correcting, Improving and Ascertaining the English Tongue, ed. Alston, R. C.. Menston.Google Scholar

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. (2000). Of Norms and Networks: The Language of Robert Lowth, in the Eleventh International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar

Ulman, H. L. (1990). Discerning Readers: British Reviewers’ Responses to Campbell’s Rhetoric and Related Works. Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric, 8(1), 65–90. https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1990.8.1.65.Google Scholar

Upward, C. and Davidson, G. (2011). The History of English Spelling, vol. 26. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

van Ostade, I.T.-B. (2010). The Bishop’s Grammar: Robert Lowth and the Rise of Prescriptivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Vorlat, E., (1959). The Sources of Lindley Murray’s “The English Grammar.” Leuvense Bijdragen, 48, 108–25.Google Scholar

Webster, N. (1962 [1828]). From the Preface to An American Dictionary of the English Language, in Dictionaries and “That” Dictionary: A Casebook on the Aims of Lexicographers and the Targets of Reviewers, eds. Sledd, J. and Ebbitt, W. B., 32–5. Chicago: Scott Foresman.Google Scholar

Webster, N. (1790). The American Spelling Book, vol. 1. Worcester, MA: Isaiah Thomas.Google Scholar

Baker, J. T. ( 1899). Correct English: How to Use It, in Correct EnglishGoogle Scholar

Ball, C. E. and Loewe, D. M. (eds.) (2017). Bad Ideas About Writing. Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University Libraries Digital Publishing Institute.Google Scholar

Brown, D. W. (forthcoming). Dictionaries, Language Ideologies, and Language Attitudes, in Cambridge Handbook of the Dictionary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cameron, D. (2012). Verbal Hygiene. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, B. (2012). 15 Grammar Goofs That Make You Look Silly, on Copyblogger: https://copyblogger.com/grammar-goofs/.Google Scholar

Eliot, C. W. (1888). Can School Programs Be Shortened and Enriched? Atlantic Monthly, 1012, 250–8.Google Scholar

Gee, J. P. (2007). Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gould, C. (1987). Josephine Turck Baker, ‘Correct English,’ and the Ancestry of Pop Grammar. The English Journal, 76(1) 22–7.Google Scholar

Graham, S. and Santangelo, T., (2014). Does Spelling Instruction Make Students Better Spellers, Readers, and Writers? A Meta-analytic Review. Reading and Writing, 27(9), 1703–43.Google Scholar

Horner, W.B., (1990). The Roots of Modern Writing Instruction: Eighteenth‐ and Nineteenth‐century Britain. Rhetoric Review, 8(2), 322–45.Google Scholar

Lang, B., (2020). Strunk, White, and Grammar as Morality, in Writing and the Moral Self, 11–18, Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lippi-Green, R., (1994). Accent, Standard Language Ideology, and Discriminatory Pretext in the Courts. Language in Society, 23(2), 163–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, E. L. ( 1900). Literary Study and Character Formation. The School Review, 8(5), 285–91.Google Scholar

Pattanayak, A. (2017). There is One Correct Way of Writing and Speaking, in Bad Ideas About Writing, eds. Ball, C. E. and Loewe, D. M., 82–7. Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University Libraries Digital Publishing Institute.Google Scholar

Pei, M. (1967). The Story of the English Language. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Pullum, G. K. (2009). 50 Years of Stupid Grammar Advice. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 55(32), B15.Google Scholar

Reynolds, T. ( 2005). Selling College Literacy: The Mass-market Magazine as Early 20th-Century Literacy Sponsor. American Periodicals: A Journal of History & Criticism, 15(2), 163–77.Google Scholar

Roberts, S. (2009). The ‘Elements of Style’ Turns 50, in The New York Times, April 29.Google Scholar

Vorlat, E. (1999). On the Originality of Lindley Murray’s Prescriptive Canon. Thinking English Grammar. Leuven/Paris: Peeters.Google Scholar

Wallraff, B. (2015). Improve Your Writing to Improve Your Credibility, in Harvard Business Review, July 29.Google Scholar

Zachrisson, R. E. (1931). Four Hundred Years of English Spelling Reform. Studia neophilologica, 4(1), 1–69.Google Scholar

Ädel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. vol. 24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar

Aull, L. L. (2015). First-year University Writing: A Corpus-based Study with Implications for Oedagogy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baron, D. (2009). A Better Pencil: Readers, Writers, and the Digital Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Biber, D. and Gray, B., (2010). Challenging Stereotypes about Academic Writing: Complexity, Elaboration, Explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(1), 2–20.Google Scholar

Biber, D. et al. (2002). Speaking and Writing in the University: A Multidimensional Comparison. TESOL Quarterly, 36(1), 9–48.Google Scholar

Groom, N. (2009). Phraseology and Epistemology in Academic Book Reviews: A Corpus-driven Analysis of Two Humanities Disciplines, in Academic Evaluation, 122–39, New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Hyland, K. and Guinda, C.S. (2012). Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

McNamara, D. S. (2013). The Epistemic Stance between the Author and Reader: A Driving Force in the Cohesion of Text and Writing. Discourse Studies, 15(5), 579–95.Google Scholar

McWhorter, J. (2022). Blackness and Standard English Can Coexist. Professors, Take Note, in The New York Times, May 3.Google Scholar

Pratt, R. A. (2017). Selma’s Bloody Sunday: Protest, Voting Rights, and the Struggle for Racial Equality. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Römer, U. and Wulff, S. (2010). Applying Corpus Methods to Written Academic Texts: Explorations of MICUSP. Journal of Writing Research, 2(2), 99–127.Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, S. A. and Denis, D. (2008). Linguistic Ruin? LOL! Instant Messaging and Teen Language. American Speech, 83(1), 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thompson, G. (2001). Interaction in Academic Writing: Learning to Argue with the Reader. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 58–78.Google Scholar

Waldron, S., Wood, C., and Kemp, N. (2017). Use of Predictive Text in Text Messaging over the Course of a Year and its Relationship with Spelling, Orthographic Processing and Grammar. Journal of Research in Reading, 40(4), 384–402.Google Scholar

Clarendon Report (1864). In Report of Her Majesty’s Commissioners appointed to inquire into the Revenues and Management of Certain Colleges and Schools, and the Studies Pursued and Instruction Given Therein. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar

Defoe, D. and Bülbring, K. D. (1890). The Compleat English Gentleman. London: Folcroft Library Editions.Google Scholar

Jenkins, R. (2018). We Must Help Students Master Standard English. The Chronicle of Higher Education, April 10.Google Scholar

Rae, J. (1982). The Decline and Fall of English Grammar. The Observer, February 7.Google Scholar

Anderson, R. D. and Lee, P. A., (1995). Education and the Scottish People, 1750–1918. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bain, A. (1866). English Composition and Rhetoric. London: Longmans.Google Scholar

Blair, H., (1965 [1784]). Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres. Published by Robert Aitken, at Pope’s Head in Market Street, reprinted 1965. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Cambridge, University of, Local Examination Syndicate (UCLES). (1883). Examiner Bound Volume Report 1883. Cambridge Assessment Archives & Heritage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Assessment.Google Scholar

Conrick, M. and Donovan, P. (2010). Immigration and Language Policy and Planning in Quebec and Canada: Language Learning and Integration. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 31(4), 331–45.Google Scholar

De Bellaigue, C. (2018). Home Education in Historical Perspective: Domestic Pedagogies in England and Wales, 1750–1900. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.Google Scholar

Devon Commission (1847). Digest of Evidence Taken Before Her Majesty’s Commissioners of Inquiry into the State of the Law and Practice in Respect to the Occupation of Land in Ireland. Part I.Google Scholar

Eggington, W. and Wren, H., (1997). Language Policy: Dominant English, Pluralist Challenges. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: J. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Fitzsimmons-Doolan, S. (2009). Is Public Discourse about Language Policy Really Public Discourse about Immigration? A Corpus-based Study. Language Policy, 8(4), 377–402.Google Scholar

Franklin, B. (1931). Observations Relative to the Intentions of the Original Founders of the Academy in Philadelphia, in Educational Views of Benjamin Franklin, ed. Woody, T. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar

Graff, H. J. (1979). The Literacy Myth: Literacy and Social Structure in the Nineteenth-century City. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Hodson, J. (2006). The problem of Joseph Priestley’s (1733–1804) descriptivism. Historiographia Linguistica, 33(1–2), 57–84.Google Scholar

Leibowitz, A. H. (1974). Language as a Means of Social Control: The United States Experience. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the World Congress of Sociology (Eighth) in Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar

Logan, D. (1979). Universities in the Commonwealth. Journal of the Royal Society of Arts, 127(5279), 700–17.Google Scholar

London, University of. ( 1838–43). Examination and Matriculation Papers. London.Google Scholar

Miller, T. P. (1990). Where Did College English Studies Come From? Rhetoric Review, 9(1), 50–69.Google Scholar

Monaghan, E. J. (1991). Family Literacy in Early 18th-Century Boston: Cotton Mather and His Children. Reading Research Quarterly, 26(4), 342–70.Google Scholar

Mugglestone, L. (2003). Talking proper: The rise of accent as social symbol. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ozolins, U. and Clyne, M. (2001). Immigration and Language Policy, in The Other Languages of Europe: Demographic, Sociolinguistic, and Educational Perspectives, eds. Extra, G and Gorter, D, 371–90. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters and European Cultural Foundation.Google Scholar

Pavlenko, A. (2002). We Have Room for But One Language Here: Language and National Identity in the US at the Turn of the 20th Century. Multilingua, 21(2–3), 163–96.Google Scholar

Popular Education in England, vols. I to VI. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Priestley, J. (1772). A Course of Lectures on Oratory and Criticism. London: J.Google Scholar

Johnson.Google Scholar

Raftery, D., McDermid, J., and Jones, G. E. (2007). Social Change and Education in Ireland, Scotland and Wales: Historiography on Nineteenth‐century Schooling. History of Education, 36(4–5), 447–63.Google Scholar

Reinhold, M. (1968). Opponents of Classical Learning in America during the Revolutionary Period. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 112(4), 221–34.Google Scholar

Robbins, S. (2002).“The Future Good and Great of our Land”: Republican Mothers, Female Authors, and Domesticated Literacy in Antebellum New England. The New England Quarterly, 75(4), 562–91.Google Scholar

Robbins, S. (2004). Managing Literacy, Mothering America: Women’s Narratives on Reading and Writing in the Nineteenth Century. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

Sack, S. (1962). Liberal Education: What Was it? What Is it? History of Education Quarterly, 2(4), 210–24.Google Scholar

Spack, R. (2002). America’s Second Tongue: American Indian Education and the Ownership of English, 1860–1900. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Suto, I., and Oates, T (2021). High-stakes Testing after Basic Secondary Education: How and Why Is it Done in High-performing Education Systems? Cambridge Assessment Research Report. Cambridge: Cambridge Assessment.Google Scholar

Valdés, G. (1997). Bilinguals and Bilingualism: Language Policy in an Anti-immigrant Age. International Journal of Society and Language, 127, 25–52.Google Scholar

van Leeuwen, B. and van Leeuwen-Li, J. (2015). Average Years of Education., IISH Dataverse: hdl. handle. net/10622/KCBMKI.Google Scholar

Woody, T. (1920). Early Quaker Education in Pennsylvania. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar

Anderson, M. (2015). The Costs of English-only Education, The Atlantic, November 2.Google Scholar

Arnet, C. et al. (1994). Teaching Children How to Discriminate. Paper presented at NWAVE Conference, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar

Baldwin, J. ( 1979). If Black English Isn’t a Language, Then Tell Me, What Is? in The New York Times, July 29.Google Scholar

Baron, D. (1990). The English-only Question: An Official Language for Americans? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Baron, D. (2014). America’s War on Language, on The Web of Language blog, September 3.Google Scholar

Baynes, C. (2019). Government “Deported 7,000 Foreign Students after Falsely Accusing Them of Cheating in English Language Tests.” The Independent, June 14.Google Scholar

Bianco, J. L. (1997). English and Pluralistic Policies: The Case of Australia, in Language Policy Dominant English, Pluralist Challenges, eds. Eggington, W. and Wren, H., 107–20. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: J. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Bourne, J. (1997). “The Grown-ups Know Best”: Language Policy-Making in Britain in the 1990s, in Language Policy: Dominant English, Pluralist challenges, eds. Eggington, W. and Wren, H., 49–65. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: J. Benjamins.Google Scholar

Clements, G. and Petray, M. J., (2021). Linguistic Discrimination in US Higher Education: Power, Prejudice, Impacts, and Remedies. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.Google Scholar

Davila, B. (2016). The Inevitability of “Standard” English: Discursive Constructions of Standard Language Ideologies. Written Communication, 33(2), 127–48.Google Scholar

Duff, P. A. and Li, D. (2009). Indigenous, Minority, and Heritage Language Education in Canada: Policies, Contexts, and Issues. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66(1), 1–8.Google Scholar

Dyste, C. (1989). Proposition 63: The California English Language Amendment. Applied Linguistics, 10(3), 313–30.Google Scholar

Gardiner-Garden, J. (1999). From Dispossession to Reconciliation. Research Paper 27. 1998–99. Canberra: Parliament of Australia.Google Scholar

Judd, E. L. (1987). The English Language Amendment: A Case Study on Language and Politics. TESOL Quarterly, 21(1), 113–35.Google Scholar

Kirkland, E. S. (1883). Speech and Manners for Home and School. Chicago: Jansen, Mcclurg & Company.Google Scholar

Kohler, M. (2017). Review of Languages Education Policies in Australia. Report commissioned by the Multicultural Education and Languages Committee (MELC). Adelaide: Government of South Australia.Google Scholar

Launspach, S. (2021). Conflicting Ideologies: Language Diversity in the Composition Classroom, in Linguistic Discrimination in US Higher Education, eds. Clements, G. and Petray, M. J, 55–73. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mac Síthigh, D. (2018). Official Status of Languages in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Common Law World Review, 47(1), 77–102.Google Scholar

Macedo, D. (2000). The Colonialism of the English-Only Movement. Educational Researcher, 29(3), 15–24.Google Scholar

Marshall, D. F. (1988). Foreign Reactions to American Concerns about the English Only Amendment, in TESOL., paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) in Chicago, Illinois, March 8–13, 1988.Google Scholar

May, S. (2005). Bilingual/immersion Education in Aotearoa/New Zealand: Setting the Context. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 8(5), 365–76.Google Scholar

McAuliffe, M. and Triandafyllidou, A.. (2022). 1 Report Overview: Technological, Geopolitical and Environmental Transformations Shaping Our Migration and Mobility Futures. World Migration Report, 2022(1), e00022.Google Scholar

Metz, M. H. (1989). Real School: A Universal Drama amid Disparate Experience. Politics of Education Association Yearbook, 4(5), 75–91.Google Scholar

Mislevy, R. and Elliot, N. (2020). Ethics, Psychometrics, and Writing Assessment: A Conceptual Model, in After Plato: Rhetoric, Ethics, and the Teaching of Writing, 143–62. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.Google Scholar

Nunberg, G. (1990). What the Usage Panel Thinks, in The State of the Language, eds. Ricks, C. and Michaels, L., 467–82. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Odell, L., Goswami, D., and Herrington (, A. 1983). The Discourse-based Interview: A Procedure for Exploring the Tacit Knowledge of Writers in Nonacademic Settings, in Research on Writing: Principles and Methods, eds. Mosenthal, P, Tamor, L, and Walmsley, S. A, 221–236. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Rae, J. (1982). The Decline and Fall of English Grammar, in The Observer, February 7.Google Scholar

Rafael, V. L. and Pratt, M. L. P. (2021). Introduction. American Quarterly, 73(3), 419–37.Google Scholar

Ramirez, M. (2016). Dual-language Learning Programs on the Rise. The Education Digest, 81(8), 26.Google Scholar

Shapiro, S. (2014). “Words That You Said Got Bigger”: English Language Learners’ Lived Experiences of Deficit Discourse. Research in the Teaching of English, 48(4), 386–406.Google Scholar

Silber, J. R. (1977). The Need for Elite Education, in Harper’s, June.Google Scholar

Simpson, J., Caffery, J., and McConvell, P. (2009). Gaps in Australia’s Indigenous Language Policy: Dismantling Bilingual Education in the Northern Territory. Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS) Discussion Paper 24: https://aiatsis.gov.au/sites/default/files/research_pub/simpson-caffery-mcconvell-dp24-indigenous-language-policy_0_3.pdf.Google Scholar

Smitherman, G. (1998). Ebonics, King, and Oakland: Some Folk Don’t Believe Fat Meat Is Greasy. Journal of English Linguistics, 26(2), 97–107.Google Scholar

Tyack, D. and Tobin, W. (1994). The “Grammar” of Schooling: Why Has It Been so Hard to Change? American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 453–79.Google Scholar

Vickers, S. et al. (2021). Split Infinitives: the English “Rule” that Refuses to Quietly Die, in the Guardian, Letters page, July 1.Google Scholar

Wilder, L. and Wolfe, J. (2009). Sharing the Tacit Rhetorical Knowledge of the Literary Scholar: The Effects of Making Disciplinary Conventions Explicit in Undergraduate Writing about Literature Courses. Research in the Teaching of English, 44(2), 170–209.Google Scholar

Wiley, T. G. and Lukes, M. (1996). English‐only and Standard English Ideologies in the US. TESOL Quarterly, 30(3), 511–35.Google Scholar

Hill, A. S., Briggs, L. R., and Hurlbut, B. S. (1896). Twenty Years of School and College English. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar

House, J. (2012). English as a Lingua Franca and Linguistic Diversity. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 1(1), 173–5.Google Scholar

UDLR (1996). Universal Declaration of Linguistic Rights: www.egt.ie/udhr/udlr-en.html.Google Scholar

Burt, C. (1925). The Subnormal School Child. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar

Mann, H. (1845). Boston Grammar and Writing Schools. The Common School Journal, 7(21–3), 321–68.Google Scholar

Mosley, M. (2020). The Great British Intelligence Test, BBC webpage: www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articles/5tFHwWMgg9VbrHT9kvGlFqd/the-great-british-intelligence-test.Google Scholar

Behizadeh, N. and Engelhard, G., Jr. (2011). Historical View of the Influences of Measurement and Writing Theories on the Practice of Writing Assessment in the United States. Assessing Writing, 16(3), 189–211.Google Scholar

Binet, A. and Simon, T. (1916). The Development of Intelligence in Children. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar

Boring, E. G. (1923). Intelligence as the Tests Test it. New Republic, 36(1923), 35–7.Google Scholar

Brigham, C. C. (1923). A Study of American Intelligence. Princeton, NJ; Oxford: Princeton University Press; Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Burt, C. (1914). The Measurement of Intelligence by the Binet Tests: Part II. The Eugenics Review, 6(2), 140–52.Google Scholar

Cohen, A. S. (2016). Harvard’s Eugenics Era. Harvard Magazine, 118(4), 48–52.Google Scholar

Eliot, C. W. (1869). Addresses at the Inauguration of Charles William Eliot as President of Harvard College. October 19. Cambridge, MA: Sever and Francis.Google Scholar

Eliot, C. W. (1898). Educational Reform: Essays and Addresses. New York: The Century Co.Google Scholar

Hammond, J. (2019). Composing Progress in the United States: Race Science, Social Justice, and the Rhetorics of Writing Assessment, 1845–1859. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Hillegas, M. (1912). Scale for the Measurement of Quality in English Composition by Young People: The Location of the Zero Point for English Composition. Teachers College Record, 13(4), 12–14.Google Scholar

Hudelson, E. (1923). The Development and Comparative Values of Composition Scales. The English Journal, 12(3), 163–8.Google Scholar

Johnson, F. W. (1913). The Hillegas-Thorndike Scale for Measurement of Quality in English Composition by Young People. The School Review, 21(1), 39–49.Google Scholar

Kayfetz, I. (1914). A Critical study of the Hillegas Composition Scale. The Pedagogical Seminary, 21(4), 559–77.Google Scholar

Leslie, M. (2000). The Vexing Legacy of Lewis Terman. Stanford Magazine, July/August.Google Scholar

Logan, S. W. (2008). Liberating Language: Sites of Rhetorical Education in Nineteenth-Century Black America. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Lunsford, A. A. (1986). The Past and Future of Writing Assessment, in Writing Assessment: Issues and Strategies, eds. Greenberg, K. L, Wiener, H. S, and Donovan, R. A, 1–12. New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Mann, H. (1887). A Few Thoughts for a Young Man. Boston, MA: Lee and Shepard.Google Scholar

Messerli, J. (1972). Horace Mann: A Biography. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar

New England Association of Teachers of English ( 1913). The Hillegas Scale. Leaflet no. 104. Cambridge, MA: New England Association of Teachers of English.Google Scholar

Reese, W. J. (2013). Testing Wars in the Public Schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Spearman, C. (1904). “General Intelligence,” Objectively Determined and Measured. The American Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 201–92.Google Scholar

Stoddard, W. (1916). A Comparison of the Hillegas and Harvard-Newton Scales in English Composition. The Pedagogical Seminary, 23(4), 498–501.Google Scholar

Stout, D. and Stuart, S. (1991). E. G. Boring’s Review of Brigham’s A Study of American Intelligence: A Case-Study in the Politics of Reviews. Social Studies of Science, 21(1), 133–42.Google Scholar

Terman, L. M. (1916). The Measurement of Intelligence: An Explanation of and a Complete Guide for the Use of the Stanford Revision and Extension of the Binet-Simon Intelligence Scale. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin company.Google Scholar

Thorndike, E. L. (1904). An Introduction to the Theory of Mental and Social Measurements. New York: Teacher’s College, Columbia University.Google Scholar

Thorndike, E. L. (1913). Notes on the Significance and Use of the Hillegas Scale for Measuring the Quality of English Composition. The English Journal, 2(9), 551–61.Google Scholar

Yerkes, R. M. (1923). Foreword, in A Study of American Intelligence, ed. Brigham, C. C., i–viii. Princeton; London: Princeton University Press; Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cohen, A. S. (2016). Imbeciles: The Supreme Court, American Eugenics, and the Sterilization of Carrie Buck. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Connors, R. J. and Lunsford, A. A. (1988). Frequency of Formal Errors in Current College Writing, or Ma and Pa Kettle Do Research. College Composition and Communication, 39(4), 395–409.Google Scholar

Elliot, N. (2005). On a Scale: A Social History of Writing Assessment in America. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Goddard, H. H. (1912). The Kallikak Family: A Study in the Heredity of Feeble-mindedness. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. (1996). The Mismeasure of Man. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar

Hamp-Lyons, L. (2007). The Impact of Testing Practices on Teaching, in International Handbook of English Language Teaching, eds. Cummins, J and Davison, C, 487–504. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Lombardo, P. A. ( 2003). Facing Carrie Buck. The Hastings Center Report, 33(2), 14–17.Google Scholar

Mislevy, R. J. (2018). Sociocognitive Foundations of Educational Measurement. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.Google Scholar

Russell, J. E. (1903). The Educational Value of Examinations for Admission to College. The School Review, 11(1), 42–54.Google Scholar

Ulrich, L. T. (1999). Harvard’s Womanless History. Harvard Magazine, 102, 50–9.Google Scholar

Walsh, C. (2012). Hard-earned Gains for Women at Harvard. Harvard Gazette, 4, 26.Google Scholar

Wright, K. (2017). Inventing the “Normal” Child: Psychology, Delinquency, and the Promise of Early Intervention. History of the Human Sciences, 30(5), 46–67.Google Scholar

Dryer, D. B. (2015). Writing Is Unnatural, in Naming What We Know: Threshold Concepts of Writing Studies, eds. Adler-Kassner, L. and Wardle, E., Denver, CO: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar

Locust, C. (1988). Wounding the Spirit: Discrimination and Traditional American Indian Belief Systems. Harvard Educational Review, 58(3), 315–31.Google Scholar

Mercer, J.R., (2022). Labeling the Mentally Retarded: Clinical and Social System Perspectives on Mental Retardation. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Mislevy, R. J. (1997). Postmodern Test Theory, in Transitions in Work and Learning: Implications for Assessment, National Research Council. Washington, D.C.: National Academic of Sciences National Research Council.Google Scholar

Perelman, L. C. (2013). Critique of Mark D. Shermis & Ben Hammer, Contrasting State-of-the-art Automated Scoring of Essays: Analysis. Journal of Writing Assessment, 6(1), 1–10.Google Scholar

Royster, J. J., (1996). When the First Voice You Hear Is not Your Own. College Composition and Communication, 47(1), 29–40.Google Scholar

Samuda, R. J. (1998). Psychological Testing of American Minorities: Issues and Consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Schuster, C., (1990). The Ideology of Literacy: A Bakhtinian Perspective, in The Right to Literacy, eds. Lunsford, A. A., Moglen, H., and Slevin, J., 225–32. New York: The Modern Language Association.Google Scholar

Von Stumm, S. and Plomin, R. (2015). Socioeconomic Status and the Growth of Intelligence from Infancy through Adolescence. Intelligence, 48, 30–6.Google Scholar

Bardell, G. S., Forrest, G. M., and Shoesmith (, D. 1978). Comparability in GCE: A Review of the Boards’ Studies; 1964–1977. Joint Matriculation Board.Google Scholar

Burt, C. (1945). The Reliability of Teachers’ Assessments of the Pupils. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 15(2), 80–92.Google Scholar

Crofts, J. M. and Jones, D. C. (1928). Secondary School Examination Statistics: Prefaced by a Simple Introduction to Statistical Methods. London: Longmans, Green and Company, Limited.Google Scholar

Tattersall, K., (2007). A Brief History of Policies, Practices and Issues Relating to Comparability: Techniques for Monitoring the Comparability of Examination Standards, 43–96: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/487051/2007-comparability-exam-standards-d-chapter2.pdf.Google Scholar

Barker, D. G. (1967). The History of Entrance Examinations. Improving College and University Teaching, 15(4), 250–3.Google Scholar

Berlin, J. (1984). Writing Instruction in Nineteenth-century American Colleges. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Connors, R. J. (1997). Composition-Rhetoric: Backgrounds, Theory, and Pedagogy. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

Goldin, C. and Katz, L. F., (1999). The Shaping of Higher Education: The Formative Years in the United States, 1890 to 1940. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(1), 37–62.Google Scholar

Hearnshaw, F. J. C. (1929). The Centenary History of King’s College, London, 1828–1928. London: G. G. Harrap.Google Scholar

Johnson, D. (2016). Can You Answer These Questions From the Original SAT?, in Time, June 20.Google Scholar

Jones, G. A. (2014). An Introduction to Higher Education in Canada, in Higher Education Across Nations, eds. Joshi, K. M and Paivandi, S, vol. 1, 1–38. Delhi: B. R. Publishing.Google Scholar

Levine, S. (2019). A Century of Change in High School English Assessments: An Analysis of 110 New York State Regents Exams, 1900–2018. Research in the Teaching of English, 54(1), 31–57.Google Scholar

Mann, H. (1854). Dedication of Antioch College, and Inaugural Address of Its President, Hon. Horace Mann: With Other Proceedings. Yellow Springs, Boston: A. S. Dean.Google Scholar

Morris, G. P. (1900). Twenty-five Years of Woman’s Higher Education: An Interview with President L. Clark Scelye of Smith College, in Congregationalist (1891–1901), 404. Boston: American Periodicals Series II.Google Scholar

Snyder, T. D. (1993). 120 Years of American Education: A Statistical Portrait. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.Google Scholar

Stedman, L. C. (2008). The NAEP Long-term Trend Assessment: A Review of its Transformation, Use, and Findings. Paper Commissioned for the 20th Anniversary of the National Assessment Governing Board 1988–2008.Google Scholar

Stray, C., (2001). The Shift from Oral to Written Examination: Cambridge and Oxford 1700–1900. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 8(1), 33–50.Google Scholar

Trachsel, M. (1992). Institutionalizing Literacy: The Historical Role of College Entrance Examinations in English. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate, (1893). English Composition Examiner Report.Google Scholar

University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate (1904). Forty-Sixth Annual Report of the Local Examinations,Google Scholar

University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate (1913). English Composition Examiner Report. p. xvii.Google Scholar

University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate (2008). How Have School Exams Changed over the Past 150 Years?Google Scholar

Vaughan, G. B. (1985). The Community College in America: A Short History. Revised. Washington, DC: American Association of Community and Junior Colleges.Google Scholar

Watts, A. (2008). Cambridge Local Examinations 1858–1945, in Examining the World: A History of the University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate, ed. Raban, S, 36–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Watts, A. (2008). Turn Your Papers Over. History Today, 58(8).Google Scholar

Webb, S. (1902). London University: A Policy and a Forecast. The Nineteenth Century and After: A Monthly Review, 51(304), 914–31.Google Scholar

Anderson, P., et al., (2015). The Contributions of Writing to Learning and Development: Results from a Large-scale Multi-institutional Study. Research in the Teaching of English, 50(2), 199–235.Google Scholar

Applebee, A. and Langer, J. (2011). “EJ” Extra: A Snapshot of Writing Instruction in Middle Schools and High Schools. The English Journal, 100(6), 14–27.Google Scholar

Arum, R. and Roksa, J. (2011). Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Aull, L. L. (Forthcoming). Attention to Language in Composition. Composition Forum.Google Scholar

Bain, A., (1866). English Composition and Rhetoric: A Manual (rev. American ed.). New York: D. Appleton and Co.Google Scholar

Beaufort, A. (2007). College Writing and Beyond: A New Framework for University Writing Instruction. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.Google Scholar

Blodget, A. (2019). It’s Time to End Timed Tests, in Education Week, September 30.Google Scholar

Brereton, J. (1996). The Origins of Composition Studies in the American College, 1875–1925. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

Burt, C. (1921). Mental and Scholastic Tests. Report by the Education Officer Submitting Three Memoranda by Mr. Cyril Burt. London: P. S. King and Son Ltd.Google Scholar

Burt, C. (1945). The Reliability of Teachers’ Assessments of their Pupils. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 15(2), 80–92.Google Scholar

Carter, D., Manuel, J., and Dutton (, J. 2018). How Do Secondary School English Teachers Score NAPLAN?: A Snapshot of English Teachers’ Views. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 41(3), 144–54.Google Scholar

Connors, R. J. (1999). Composition History and Disciplinarity, in History, Reflection, and Narrative: The Professionalization of Composition, 1963–1983, eds. Rosner, M., Boehm, B., and Journet, D.. Stamford, CT: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar

Connors, R., Lisa, S. Ede & Andrea, A. Lunsford. (1984). “The Revival of Rhetoric in America.” Essays on Classical Rhetoric and Modern Discourse. Ed. Connors, Ede & Lunsford. Carbondale: Southern Illinois Univ. Press, 1984: 1–15Google Scholar

Cook-Gumperz, J., ed. (2006). The Social Construction of Literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dance, C. (2017). An Oxford Exam from 1884, from Dance’s Historical Miscellany: www.danceshistoricalmiscellany.com/an-oxford-exam-from-1884/.Google Scholar

Gannon, S. (2019). Teaching Writing in the NAPLAN Era: The Experiences of Secondary English Teachers. English in Australia, 54(2), 43–56.Google Scholar

Haswell, R. H. (2012). Methodologically Adrift. College Composition and Communication, 63(3), 487–91.Google Scholar

Locke, T. (2010). Beyond the Grammar Wars. A Resource for Teachers and Students on Developing Language Knowledge in English/Literacy Classroom. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.Google Scholar

Luce-Kapler, R. and Klinger (, D. 2005.) Uneasy Writing: The Defining Moments of High-stakes Literacy Testing. Assessing Writing, 10(3), 157–73.Google Scholar

MacDonald, S. P. (2007). The Erasure of Language. College Composition and Communication, 58(4), 585–625.Google Scholar

Moore, C. ( 2011). History of the English Language in the English Department: Past and Present, in Contours of English and English Language Studies, eds. Adams, M. and Curzan, A., 157–67. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Oxford University Gazette (1870). Oxford University Gazette. Vols.1–2 (1870–1872).Google Scholar

Ross, A. (2001). What is the Curriculum? In Developing Pedagogy: Researching Practice, ed. Collins, J, Soler, J and Insley, K, 122–31. London: Paul Chapman.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2007). Who Are the Bright Children? The Cultural Context of Being and Acting Intelligent. Educational Researcher, 36(3), 148–55.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2022). The Search for the Elusive Basic Processes Underlying Human Intelligence: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Journal of Intelligence, 10(2):28: https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10020028.Google Scholar

UK Government (2021). Proposed Changes to the Assessment of GCSEs, AS and A Levels in 2022. Updated September 30, 2021:www.gov.uk/government/consultations/proposed-changes-to-the-assessment-of-gcses-as-and-a-levels-in-2022/proposed-changes-to-the-assessment-of-gcses-as-and-a-levels-in-2022.Google Scholar

Watts, A. (2008). Cambridge local examinations 1858–1945. Examining the World: A History of the University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate, pps 36–71.Google Scholar

Watts, A. (2019). School Certificate Examinations in England, 1918–1950. A Historical Investigation of the Formation and Maintenance of a National Examination System: Examination Boards, Teachers and the State: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.43215.Google Scholar

Winterowd, W. R. ( 1998,). The English Department: A Personal and Institutional History. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Zwick, R. (2017). Who Gets In?: Strategies for Fair and Effective College Admissions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Ädel, A., (2008). Involvement Features in Writing: Do Time and Interaction Trump Register Awareness? in Linking up Contrastive and Learner Corpus Research, 35–53. Leiden: Brill Publishing.Google Scholar

Au, K. H. (2006). Multicultural Issues and Literacy Achievement. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Aull, L.L., (2017). Corpus Analysis of Argumentative Versus Explanatory Discourse in Writing Task Genres. Journal of Writing Analytics, 1(1), 1–47.Google Scholar

Aull, L.L., (2019). Linguistic Markers of Stance and Genre in Upper-level Student Writing. Written Communication, 36(2), 267–95.Google Scholar

Bejar, I. I. (2017). A Historical Survey of Research Regarding Constructed-response Formats, in Advancing Human Assessment, eds. Bennett, R. E. and von Davier, M., 565–633. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar

Cambridge, University of. (1870). Examination for Women. Examination Papers, with Lists of Syndics and Examiners: https://archive.org/details/examinationforw00unkngoog/page/n7/mode/2up.Google Scholar

Coates, H. (2007). Developing Generalizable Measures of Knowledge and Skill Outcomes in Higher Education. Paper delivered at the Proceedings of AUQF2007: Evolution and Renewal In Quality Assurance, Hobart, Australia, July 11–13, 2007.Google Scholar

Deane, P., O’Reilly, T, Chao, S-F, and Dreier, K (2018). Writing Processes in Short Written Responses to Questions Probing Prior Knowledge. ETS Research Report Series, 2018(1), 1–30.Google Scholar

Dilnot, C. (2016). How Does the Choice of A‐level Subjects Vary with Students’ Socio‐economic Status in English State Schools? British Educational Research Journal, 42(6), 1081–1106.Google Scholar

Ede, L. S. and Lunsford, A. A. (1990). Singular Texts/Plural Authors: Perspectives on Collaborative Writing. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Elgin, S. H. (1976). Why “Newsweek” Can’t Tell us Why Johnny Can’t Write. The English Journal, 65(8), 29–35.Google Scholar

Elliot, N. (2016). A Theory of Ethics for Writing Assessment. Journal of Writing Assessment, 9(1), 1–29.Google Scholar

Gere, A. R. et al. (2013). Local Assessment: Using Genre Analysis to Validate Directed Self-Placement. College Composition and Communication, 4(64), 605–33.Google Scholar

Huot, B. and Williamson (, M. M. 1997). Rethinking Portfolios for Evaluating Writing, in Situating Portfolios: Four Perspectives, eds. Yancey, K. B. and Weiser, I.. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.Google Scholar

Judy, S. (1977). On Second Thought: Reviewing the SAT Decline. The English Journal, 66(8), 5–7.Google Scholar

Kamenetz, A. (2015). The Test: Why Our Schools are Obsessed with Standardized Testing – But You Don’t Have to Be. New York: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar

Kelly-Riley, D. and Elliot, N. (2014). The WPA Outcomes Statement, Validation, and the Pursuit of Localism. Assessing Writing, 21, 89–103.Google Scholar

Labov, W. and Waletzky, J (1997). Narrative Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal Experience. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 3–38.Google Scholar

Lunsford, A. A. (2013). Our Semi-literate Youth? Not So Fast. Report. Stanford University: www.stanford.Edu/group/ssw/cgi-bin/materials/OPED_Our_Semi-Literate_Youth.Pdf.Google Scholar

Lunsford, A. A., Fishman, J., and Liew, W. M.. (2013). College Writing, Identification, and the Production of Intellectual Property: Voices from the Stanford Study of Writing. College English, 75(5), 470–92.Google Scholar

Marini, J.P., et al. (2019). Validity of SAT® Essay Scores for Predicting First-Year Grades. New York: College Board.Google Scholar

Mary, B., Wade, M., and Sarah, P. (2004). Assessment as Opportunity: A Conversation with Brian Huot. Issues in Writing, 14(2), 94–115.Google Scholar

Olinghouse, N. G., Graham, S., and Gillespie, A. (2015). The Relationship of Discourse and Topic Knowledge to Fifth Graders’ Writing Performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(2), 391–406.Google Scholar

Perelman, L. (2012). Construct Validity, Length, Score, and Time in Holistically Graded Writing Assessments: The Case against Automated Essay Scoring (AES). In International Advances in Writing Research: Cultures, Places, Measures, eds. Bazerman, C et al., 121–31. Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse.Google Scholar

Poe, M. and Elliot, N., (2019). Evidence of Fairness: Twenty-five Years of Research in Assessing Writing. Assessing Writing, 42, 100418.Google Scholar

Poe, M., Eliot, N, Gogan, J. A, Jr., and Nurudeen, T. G, Jr. (2014). The Legal and the Local: Using Disparate Impact Analysis to Understand the Consequences of Writing Assessment. College Composition and Communication, 65(4), 588–611.Google Scholar

Robinson, J. A. (1981). Personal Narratives Reconsidered. The Journal of American Folklore, 94(371), 58–85.Google Scholar

Rothman, T. and Henderson, M., (2011). Do School-based Tutoring Programs Significantly Improve Student Performance on Standardized Tests? RMLE Online, 34(6), 1–10.Google Scholar

Smith, K. G., Girdharry, K., and Gallagher, C. W. (2021). Writing Transfer, Integration, and the Need for the Long View. College Composition and Communication, 73(1), 4–26.Google Scholar

Snyderman, M. and Rothman, S. (1987). Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence and Aptitude Testing. American Psychologist, 42(2), 137.Google Scholar

Von Stumm, S. et al. (2020). Predicting Educational Achievement from Genomic Measures and Socioeconomic Status. Developmental Science, 23(3), e12925.Google Scholar

Yancey, K. B. and Weiser, I (eds.) (1997). Situating Portfolios: Four Perspectives. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.Google Scholar

Zwick, R. (2019). Assessment in American Higher Education: The Role of Admissions Tests. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 683(1), 130–48.Google Scholar

Baker, J. (2020). Writing Wrongs: “Our Society Is About to Hit a Literacy Crisis,” in The Sydney Morning Herald, September 19.Google Scholar

Clare, J. (2002). New Cambridge Students “Can’t Write English,” in The Telegraph, July 16.Google Scholar

Fahey, G. (2020). Wrestling the Writing Decline Key to Education Improvement, The Canberra Times, September 20: www.cis.org.au/commentary/opinion/wrestling-the-writing-decline-key-to-education-improvement/.Google Scholar

Sheils, M. (1975). Why Johnny Can’t Write, in Newsweek, December 8: www.leetorda.com/uploads/2/3/2/5/23256940/why_johnny_cant_write__newsweek_1975___1_.pdf.Google Scholar

Wilce, H. (2006). University Students: They Can’t Write, Spell or Present an Argument, in The Independent, May 24.Google Scholar

Aull, L.L (2021). What AP Scorers Shouldn’t Grade, in Inside Higher Education, July 25.Google Scholar

Benjamin, R., et al., (2009). Returning to Learning in an Age of Assessment: Introducing the Rationale of the Collegiate Learning Assessment. New York: CAE.Google Scholar

Boyd, R. (1993). Mechanical Correctness and Ritual in the Late Nineteenth-Century Composition Classroom. Rhetoric Review, 11(2), 436–55.Google Scholar

Farkas, G. (2011). American Journal of Sociology, 117(3), 1000–2.Google Scholar

McConnell, K. D. (2011). Review of “Academically Adrift.” Research & Practice in Assessment, 6, 40–2.Google Scholar

Association of American Colleges and Universities (2009). Written Communication VALUE Rubric: wpacouncil.org/files/framework-for-success-postsecondary-writing.pdf.Google Scholar

Curzan, A. ( 2009.) Says Who? Teaching and Questioning the Rules of Grammar. PMLA, 124(3), 870–9.Google Scholar

Council of Writing Program Administrators, the National Council of Teachers of English, and the National Writing Project. (2011). Framework for Success in Postsecondary Writing: wpacouncil.org/files/framework-for-success-postsecondary-writing.pdf.Google Scholar

Gee, J. P. (2002). Literacies, Identities, and Discourses. Developing Advanced Literacy in First and Second Languages: Meaning with Power, 159–75.Google Scholar

Lankshear, C. and Knobel, M. (2003). New Literacies: Changing Knowledge and Classroom Learning. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Minnis, M. (1994 ). Toward a Definition of Law School Readiness, in Sociocultural Approaches to Language and Literacy: An Interactionist Perspective, eds. John-Steiner, V, Panofsky, C. P and Smith, L. W, 347–90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ohmann, R. (2003). Politics of Knowledge: The Commercialization of the University, the Professions, and Print Culture. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2015). Successful Intelligence: A Model for Testing Intelligence beyond IQ Tests. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 8(2), 76–84.Google Scholar

Williams, B. T. (2007). Why Johnny Can Never, Ever Read: The Perpetual Literacy Crisis and Student Identity. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51(2), 178–82.Google Scholar

Applebee, A. et al. (1990). The Writing Report Card, 1984–88: Findings from the Nation’s Report Card. Princton, NJ: National Assessment of Educational Progress.Google Scholar

Aull, L. L., Bandarage, D. and Miller, M. R. (2017). Generality in Student and Expert Epistemic Stance: A Corpus Analysis of First-year, Upper-level, and Published Academic Writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 26, 29–41.Google Scholar

Brereton, J. (2012). A Closer Look at the Harvard Entrance Examinations in the 1870s, in Writing Assessment in the 21st Century: Essays in Honor of Edward M. White, eds. Elliot, N. and Perelman, L., 31–43. New York: Hampton Press.Google Scholar

Brown, D. W. and Aull, L. L. (2017). Elaborated Specificity versus Emphatic Generality: A Corpus-Based Comparison of Higher-and Lower-Scoring Advanced Placement Exams in English. Research in the Teaching of English, 51(4), 394–417.Google Scholar

Cook, Margaret, plus editors. (2007). Can’t Write Can’t Spell…, in The Age, February 26.Google Scholar

Godstein, D. (2017). Why Kids Can’t Write, in The New York Times, August 2.Google Scholar

Haswell, R. and Elliot, N. (2019). Early Holistic Scoring of Writing: A Theory, a History, a Reflection. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.Google Scholar

James, C. L. (2008). Electronic Scoring of Essays: Does Topic Matter? Assessing Writing,. 13(2), 80–92.Google Scholar

Kellaghan, T. and Greaney, V. (2019). Public Examinations Examined. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar

Lunsford, A. A. and Lunsford, K. J. (2008). “Mistakes Are a Fact of Life”: A National Comparative Study. College Composition and Communication, 59(4), 781–806.Google Scholar

National Association for College Admission Counseling and National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators ( 2022). Toward a More Equitable Future for Postsecondary Access.Google Scholar

National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). National Assessment of Educational Progress 2017 Writing, May 10: https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/writing/2017writing.aspx.Google Scholar

Stedman, L. C., Mullis, I. V., and Timpane, M., (1998). An Assessment of the Contemporary Debate over US Achievement. Brookings Papers on Education Policy, (1), 53–121.Google Scholar

Applebee, A. and Langer, J. (2011). The National Study of Writing Instruction: Methods and Procedures. Albany, NY: Center on English Learning & Achievement.Google Scholar

Applebee, A. N. and Langer, J. A. (2011). “EJ” Extra: A Snapshot of Writing Instruction in Middle Schools and High Schools. The English Journal, 100(6), 14–27.Google Scholar

Applebee, A. N. and Langer, J. A. (2013). Writing Instruction that Works: Proven Methods for Middle and High School Classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Aull, L. L. (2015). Connecting Writing and Language in Assessment: Examining Style, Tone, and Argument in the US Common Core Standards and in Exemplary Student Writing. Assessing Writing, 24, 59–73.Google Scholar

Aull, L. L. (2018). Generality and Certainty in Undergraduate Writing Over Time, in Developing Writers in Higher Education: A Longitudinal Study, ed. Gere, A. R. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Aull, L. L. and Lancaster, Z. (2014). Linguistic Markers of Stance in Early and Advanced Academic Writing: A Corpus-based Comparison. Written Communication, 1(33), 151–83.Google Scholar

Bernstein, S. N. and Lowry, E. (2017). The Five-paragraph Essay Transmits Knowledge, in Bad ideas About Writing, eds. Ball, C. E. and Loewe, D. M., 214–19. Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University Libraries Digital Publishing Institute.Google Scholar

Borman, G. D. and Dowling, N. M. (2008). Teacher Attrition and Retention: A Meta-analytic and Narrative Review of the Research. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 367–409.Google Scholar

Cambridge Assessment and Research. (2008). “How have school exams changed over the past 150 years?” Accessed July 2022. www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/news/how-have-school-exams-changed-over-the-past-150-years/.Google Scholar

Clark, I. L. and Hernandez (, A. 2011). Genre Awareness, Academic Argument, and Transferability. The WAC Journal, 22, 65–78.Google Scholar

Geiger, T. and Pivovarova, M. (2018). The Effects of Working Conditions on Teacher Retention. Teachers and Teaching, 24(6), 604–25.Google Scholar

Gibbons, S. (2019). “Death by PEEL?” The Teaching of Writing in the Secondary English Classroom in England. English in Education, 53(1), 36–45.Google Scholar

Graham, S. (2019). Changing How Writing Is Taught. Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 277–303.Google Scholar

Hillocks, G., (2002). The Testing Trap: How State Writing Assessments Control Learning. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Kiuhara, S. A., Graham, S., and Hawken, L. S. (2009). Teaching Writing to High School Students: A National Survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 136–60.Google Scholar

Kobrin, J. L., Deng, H., and Shaw, E. J. (2011). The Association between SAT Prompt Characteristics, Response Features, and Essay Scores. Assessing Writing, 16(3), 154–69.Google Scholar

Macbeth, K. P. (2010). Deliberate False Provisions: The Use and Usefulness of Models in Learning Academic Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(1), 33–48.Google Scholar

Mason, S. and Matas, C. P. (2015). Teacher Attrition and Retention Research in Australia: Towards a New Theoretical Framework. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 40(11), 45–66.Google Scholar

Melzer, D. (2009). Writing Assignments across the Curriculum: A National Study of College Writing. College Composition and Communication, 61(2), W240–W261.Google Scholar

Ronfeldt, M., Loeb, S., and Wyckoff, J. (2013). How Teacher Turnover Harms Student Achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 4–36.Google Scholar

Sahlberg, P. (2009). A Short History of Educational Reform in Finland. White Paper, April.Google Scholar

See, B. H., Morris, R, Gorard, S, and Kokotsaki, D (2020). Teacher Recruitment and Retention: A Critical Review of International Evidence of Most Promising Interventions. Education Sciences, 10(10), 262–307.Google Scholar

Soliday, M. (2002). The Politics of Remediation: Institutional and Student Needs in Higher Education. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

Sutcher, L., Darling-Hammond, L., and Carver-Thomas, D. (2016). A Coming Crisis in Teaching? Teacher Supply, Demand, and Shortages in the US. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.Google Scholar

Thaiss, C. and Zawacki, T. M. (2006). Engaged Writers Dynamic Disciplines: Research on the Academic Writing Life. Porstmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Biber, D. and Conrad, S. (2019). Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Devitt, A. J. (2007). Transferability and Genres, in The Locations of Composition, eds. Keller, C. J. and Weisser, C. R., 215–27. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Driscoll, D. L. et al. (2020). Genre Knowledge and Writing Development: Results from the Writing Transfer Project. Written Communication, 37(1), 69–103.Google Scholar

Jarratt, S., Mack, K, Sartor, A, and Watson, S. E (2007). Pedagogical Memory and the Transferability of Writing Knowledge: An Interview-based Study of UCI Juniors and Seniors. Irvine, CA: University of California.Google Scholar

Miller, S. (1991). Textual Carnivals: The Politics of Composition. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illionois University Press.Google Scholar

Rounsaville, A., Goldberg, R., and Bawarshi, A. (2008). From Incomes to Outcomes: FYW Students’ Prior Genre Knowledge, Meta-cognition, and the Question of Transfer. WPA: Writing Program Administration, 1(32), 97–112.Google Scholar

Sullivan, P., (2015). The UnEssay: Making Room for Creativity in the Composition Classroom. College Composition and Communication, 67(1), 6–34.Google Scholar

Wardle, E. (2009). “Mutt Genres” and the Goal of FYC: Can We Help Students Write the Genres of the University? College Composition and Communication, 60(4), 765–89.Google Scholar

Wingate, U. and Tribble, C. (2012). The Best of Both Worlds? Towards an English for Academic Purposes/Academic Literacies Writing Pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education, 37(4), 481–95.Google Scholar

Ädel, A. (2014). Selecting Quantitative Data for Qualitative Analysis: A Case Study Connecting a Lexicogrammatical Pattern to Rhetorical Moves. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 16, 68–80.Google Scholar

Adler-Kassner, L. and Wardle, E. (2015). Naming What We Know: Threshold Concepts of Writing Studies. Denver, CO: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar

Adler-Kassner, L. and O’Neill, P. (2010). Reframing Writing Assessment to Improve Teaching and Learning. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.Google Scholar

Anson, C. M. (2016). The Pop Warner Chronicles: A Case Study in Contextual Adaptation and the Transfer of Writing Ability. College Composition and Communication, 67(4), 518–49.Google Scholar

Bazerman, C. et al. (2018). The Lifespan Development of Writing. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar

Brown, D. W. and Aull (, L. L. 2017). Elaborated Specificity vs. Emphatic Generality: A Corpus-Based Comparison of Higher and Lower Scoring Advanced Placement Exams in English. Research in the Teaching of English, 51(4), 394–417.Google Scholar

Cheng, A. (2007). Transferring Generic Features and Recontextualizing Genre Awareness: Understanding Writing Performance in the ESP Genre-based Literacy Framework. English for Specific Purposes, 26(3), 287–307.Google Scholar

Fischer, K. W. and Bidell, T. R. (2006). Dynamic Development of Action, Thought, and Emotion, in Theoretical Models of Human Development: Handbook of Child Psychology, eds. Damon, W and Learner, R. M, vol. I, 313–99. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Granville, S. and Dison, L. (2005). Thinking about Thinking: Integrating Self-reflection Into an Academic Literacy Course. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(2), 99–118.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and Engagement: A Model of Interaction in Academic Discourse. Discourse Studies,. 7(2), 173–92.Google Scholar

James, M. A. (2014). Learning Transfer in English-for-Academic-Purposes Contexts: A Systematic Review of Research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 14, 1–13.Google Scholar

Jarratt, S. C., Mack, K, Sartor, A, and Watson, S. E. (2009). Pedagogical Memory: Writing, Mapping, Translating. Writing Program Administration, 33(1–2), 46–73.Google Scholar

Keen, J. (1997). Grammar, Metalanguage, and Writing Development. Teacher Development. 3(1), 431–45.Google Scholar

Lancaster, Z. (2016). Do Academics Really Write This Way? A Corpus Investigation of Moves and Templates in “They Say/I Say.” College Composition and Communication, 67(3), 437–64.Google Scholar

Macken-Horarik, M. (2009). Navigational Metalanguages for New Territory in English: The Potential of Grammatics. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 8(3), 55–69.Google Scholar

Matsuda, P. K. and Tardy, C. M., (2007). Voice in Academic Writing: The Rhetorical Construction of Author Identity in Blind Manuscript Review. English for Specific Purposes, 26(2), 235–49.Google Scholar

Meizlish, D., LaVaque-Manty, D., and Silver, N. (2013). Think Like/Write Like, in Changing the Conversation About Higher Education, ed. Thompson, R.. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Negretti, R. (2012). Metacognition in Student Academic Writing. Written Communication,. 29(2), 142–79.Google Scholar

Parkinson, J. (2017). The Student Laboratory Report Genre: A Genre Analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 45, 1–13.Google Scholar

Ritter, K. (2009). Before Shaughnessy: Basic Writing at Yale and Harvard, 1920–1960. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Dias, P., Freedman, A., Medway, P., and Parr, A. (2013). Worlds Apart: Acting and Writing in Academic and Workplace Contexts. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.Google Scholar

Dursun, A., Morris, J. K., and Ünaldı, A. (2020). Designing Proficiency-oriented Performance Tasks for the 21st-century Workplace Written Communication: An Evidence-centered Design Approach. Assessing Writing, 46 (October).Google Scholar

Schneider, B. and Andre, J.-A. (1973) (2005). University Preparation for Workplace Writing: An Exploratory Study of the Perceptions of Students in Three Disciplines. The Journal of Business Communication, 42(2), 195–218.Google Scholar

Spilka, R. (1998). Writing in the Workplace: New Research Perspectives. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Aley, R. (1915). “The College and the Freshman.” School and Society, 2(31), 152–4.Google Scholar

Anson, C. M. and Forsberg, L. L. (1990). Moving Beyond the Academic Community: Transitional Stages in Professional Writing. Written Communication, 7(2), 200–31.Google Scholar

Aull, L. L. and Ross, V. (2020). From Cow Paths to Conversation: Rethinking the Argumentative Essay. Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture, 20(1), 21–34.Google Scholar

Barnard, H. C. (1947). A Short History of English Education from 1760 to 1944. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar

Bazerman, C. et al., eds. (2009). Traditions of Writing Research. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge. Google Scholar

Bizzell, P. (1992). Academic Discourse and Critical Consciousness. Pittsburgh Series in Composition, Literacy, and Culture. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar

Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Burstein, J., Elliot, N., and Molloy, H. (2016). Informing Automated Writing Evaluation using the Lens of Genre: Two Studies. Calico Journal, 33(1), 117–41.Google Scholar

Chambers, W. (1876). Getting On, in Chambers’s Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Arts, June, 353–5.Google Scholar

Cox, M., Ortmeier-Hooper, C., and Tirabassi, K. E. (2009). Teaching Writing for the “Real World”: Community and Workplace Writing. English Journal, 98(5), 72–80.Google Scholar

Eliot, C. W. (1915). Educational Evolution. School and Society, 1(1), 1–13.Google Scholar

Engle, J. (2007). Postsecondary Access and Success for First-generation College Students. American Academic, 3(1), 25–48.Google Scholar

Finkenstaedt-Quinn, S. A., Petterson, M, Gere, A. R, and Schultz, G. V (2021). Praxis of Writing-to-Learn: A Model for the Design and Propagation of Writing-to-Learn in STEM. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(5), 1548–55.Google Scholar

Graff, H. J. (1991). The Literacy Myth: Cultural Integration and Social Structure in the Nineteenth Century. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Gubala, C., Larson, K., and Melonçon, L. (2020). Do Writing Errors Bother Professionals? An Analysis of the Most Bothersome Errors and How the Writer’s Ethos Is Affected. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 34(3), 250–86.Google Scholar

Gutierrez, K. (2017). Editor’s Introduction: Assessing the Value of Experiential Learning in Community-Engaged Projects. Open Words: Access and English Studies, 10(1), 1–6.Google Scholar

Jansen, F. (2012). The Putative Email Style and its Explanations: Evidence from Two Effect Studies of Dutch Direct Email Letters and Direct Marketing Emails. Language@ Internet, 9(2).Google Scholar

Lanctot, A. M. (2019). You’ve Got Mail, But Is It Important And/Or Urgent?: An Investigation into Employees’ Perceptions of Email. Doctoral thesis. Carleton University.Google Scholar

McCulloch, G. (2020). Because Internet: Understanding the New Rules of Language. New York: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar

Meloncon, L. and Henschel, S. (2013). Current State of US Undergraduate Degree Programs in Technical and Professional Communication. Technical Communication, 60(1), 45–64.Google Scholar

Mirel, B. (1996). Writing and Database Technology: Extending the Definition of Writing in the Workplace. Electronic Literacies in the Workplace: Technologies of Writing, 91–112.Google Scholar

Moral and Entertaining Magazine editors (1779). The Lazy Lover: A Moral Tale, in The Moral and Entertaining Magazine.Google Scholar

Myers, D. 1800. (1980). Scottish Schoolmasters in the Nineteenth Century: Professionalism and Politics, in Scottish Culture and Scottish Education, 1800–1980, eds. Humes, W. M and Paterson, H. M. Edinburgh: John Donald.Google Scholar

Nevins, A. (1962). The Origins of the Land-grant Colleges and State Universities: A Brief Account of the Morrill Act of 1862 and its Results. Washington, DC: Civil War Centennial Commission.Google Scholar

Ochsner, R. and Fowler, J. (2004). Playing Devil’s Advocate: Evaluating the Literature of the WAC/WID Movement. Review of Educational Research, 74(2), 117–40.Google Scholar

Pigg, S. and Berger, A. (2020). Still “Worlds Apart”? Early-Career Writing Learning as a Cross-Field Opportunity. College English, 82(5), 507–14.Google Scholar

Rogers, P. (2009). The Contributions of North American Longitudinal Studies of Writing in Higher Education to our Understanding of Writing Development, in Traditions of Writing Research, ed. Bazerman, C., et al., Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge. Google Scholar

Rosebury, K. G. (1902). Inaugural Address of the Earl of Rosebery, K. G., to the University of Glasgow, November 16, 1900. The Edinburgh Review, 195(399), 58–78.Google Scholar

Sherrill, J. E. (1879). The Normal Teacher. Danville, IN: J. E. Sherrill.Google Scholar

Skovholt, K., Grønning, A., and Kankaanranta, A. (2014). The Communicative Functions of Emoticons in Workplace E-mails. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(4), 780–97.Google Scholar

Stuckey-French, N. (2011). The American Essay in the American Century. Columbia, MI: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar

Waldvogel, J. (2007). Greetings and Closings in Workplace Email. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(2), 456–77.Google Scholar

Beason, L. (2001). Ethos and Error: How Businesspeople React to Errors. College Composition and Communication, 53(1), 33–64.Google Scholar

Defazio, J., Jones, J, Tennant, F, and Hook, S. A (2010). Academic Literacy: The Importance and Impact of Writing across the Curriculum – A Case Study. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 34–47.Google Scholar

Krugman, P. (2022). Wonking Out: Education Has Less to Do with Inequality than You Think, in The New York Times, April 29.Google Scholar

Penrose, A. M. (2002). Academic Literacy Perceptions and Performance: Comparing First-generation and Continuing-generation College Students. Research in the Teaching of English, 36(4), 437–61.Google Scholar

Singletary, M. (2015). College Costs Aren’t Always Worth it, Alumni say, So Think before Borrowing, in The Washington Post, September 30.Google Scholar

Al Hilali, T. S. and McKinley, J., (2021). Exploring the Socio-contextual Nature of Workplace Writing: Towards Preparing Learners for the Complexities of English L2 Writing in the Workplace. English for Specific Purposes, 63 (3), 86–97.Google Scholar

American Management Association (2019). AMA Critical Skills Survey: Workers Need Higher-level Skills to Succeed in the 21st Century.Google Scholar

Bargiela-Chiappini, F., Nickerson, C., and Planken, B. (2013). What is Business Discourse?, in Business Discourse, eds. Bargiela-Chiappini, F., Nickerson, C., and Planken, B, 3–44. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Ede, L. S. and Lunsford, A. A. (1992). Singular Texts/Plural Authors: Perspectives on Collaborative Writing. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Paré, A. (2002). Keeping Writing in its Place: A Participatory Action Approach to Workplace Communication, in Reshaping Technical Communication, eds. Mirel, B and Spilka, R, 75–98. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.Google Scholar

Stafford, J. (1974). At This Point in Time, TV Is Murdering the English Language, in The New York Times, September 15: www.nytimes.com/1974/09/15/archives/at-this-point-in-time-tv-is-murdering-the-english-language.html.Google Scholar

Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative Writing: Product, Process, and Students’ Reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153–73.Google Scholar

Clark, L. (2012). Text Message Slang “Invading GCSEs and A-levels” as Teenagers Abandon Basic Grammar and Punctuation, in the Daily Mail, October 23.Google Scholar

Grace, A., et al. (2015). Undergraduates’ Attitudes to Text Messaging Language Use and Intrusions of Textisms into Formal Writing. New Media & Society, 17(5), 792–809.Google Scholar

Guardian Staff, (1978). Further Uses of Literacy, in the Guardian. https://theguardian.newspapers.com/search/?query=further%20uses%20of%20literacy&dr_year=1978-1978.Google Scholar

John, A. (2013). The Internet Is Making Writing Worse, in The Atlantic, July 17.Google Scholar

Media, C. S. (2015). The Common-sense Census: Media Use by Tweens and Teens. Vancouver, BC: British Columbia Teachers’ Federation.Google Scholar

Shuy, R. W. (1976). Confronting the Literacy Crisis. Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education and Welfare, National Institute of Education.Google Scholar

Bennett, K. (2009). English Academic Style Manuals: A Survey. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(1), 43–54.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1927). The Public and Its Problems (Athens, OH: Swallow Press).Google Scholar

Eisenstein, E. L. (1980). The Printing Press as an Agent of Change, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lee, J. J., Bychkovska, T., and Maxwell, J. D. (2019). Breaking the Rules? A Corpus-based Comparison of Informal Features in L1 and L2 Undergraduate Student Writing. System, 80, 143–53.Google Scholar

Murray, D. E. (2000). Changing Technologies, Changing Literacy Communities? Language Learning & Technology, 4(2), 39–53.Google Scholar

Thompson, C. (2009). Clive Thompson on the New Literacy. Wired, 17(9), August 24.Google Scholar

Thurlow, C. (2006). From Statistical Panic to Moral Panic: The Metadiscursive Construction and Popular Exaggeration of New Media Language in the Print Media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(3), 667–701.Google Scholar

Aull, B. (2019). A Study of Phatic Emoji Use in WhatsApp Communication. Internet Pragmatics, 2(2), 206–32.Google Scholar

Carr, N. (2008) Is Google Making us Stupid? The Atlantic, August 15.Google Scholar

Crystal, D. (2010). The Changing Nature of Text, in Text Comparison and Digital Creativity: The Production of Presence and Meaning in Digital Text Scholarship, eds. van Peursen, W. T., Thoutenhoofd, E., and van der Weel, A., 229–51. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

DeKay, S. H. (2012). Interpersonal Communication in the Workplace: A Largely Unexplored Region. Business Communication Quarterly, 75(4), 449–52.Google Scholar

Gray, B. (2010). On the use of Demonstrative Pronouns and Determiners as Cohesive Devices: A Focus on Sentence-initial This/these in Academic Prose. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(3), 167–83.Google Scholar

Herring, S. C. (2013). Relevance in Computer-mediated Conversation, in Handbook of Pragmatics of Computer-mediated Communication, eds. Herring, S. C, Stein, D and Virtanen, T, 245–68. Berlin: Mouton de Gruter.Google Scholar

Hougaard, T. T. and Rathje, M. (2018). Emojis in the Digital Writings of Young Danes, in Jugendsprachen/Youth Languages: Aktuelle Perspektiven internationaler Forschung/Current Perspectives of International Research, ed. Ziegler, A, 773–806. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar

Huang, C. et al. (2020). Clinical Features of Patients Infected with 2019 Novel Coronavirus in Wuhan, China. The Lancet, 395(10223), 497–506.Google Scholar

Kuznekoff, J. H., Munz, S., and Titsworth, S. (2015). Mobile Phones in the Classroom: Examining the Effects of Texting, Twitter, and Message Content on Student Learning. Communication Education, 64(3), 344–65.Google Scholar

Lorenz-Spreen, P., Mønsted, B. M, Hövel, P, and Lehmann, S (2019). Accelerating Dynamics of Collective Attention. Nature Communications, 10(1), 1759.Google Scholar

May, K. E. and Elder, A. D. (2018). Efficient, Helpful, or Distracting? A Literature Review of Media Multitasking in Relation to Academic Performance. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 1–17.Google Scholar

McWhorter, J. (2016). The Linguistic Evolution of “Like,” The Atlantic, November 25.Google Scholar

Murphy, C. (2020). Before Zuckerberg, Gutenberg. The Atlantic, 325(1), 22–4.Google Scholar

Pinker, S. (2015). The Sense of Style: The Thinking Person’s Guide to Writing in the 21st Century. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Shepherd, R. P. (2018). Digital Writing, Multimodality, and Learning Transfer: Crafting Connections between Composition and Online Composing. Computers and Composition, 48, 103–14.Google Scholar

Steinbrich, P. (2014). Perceptual Salience of Academic Formulas in Academic Writing, in Language Skills: Traditions, Transitions and Ways Forward, eds. Chodkiewicz, H. and Trepczyńska, M., 343–365. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar