Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-r7xzm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-19T11:18:15.683Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Reasonableness, impartiality and objectivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2014

Andrew Mitchell
Affiliation:
Melbourne Law School, Global Economic Law Network, and Melbourne School of Government
Tania Voon
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Aik Hoe Lim
Affiliation:
World Trade Organization, Geneva
Bart De Meester
Affiliation:
Sidley Austin LLP, Geneva
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Similar to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) imposes requirements of reasonableness and impartiality on World Trade Organization (WTO) members with respect to their administration of certain measures. This general obligation of procedural fairness offers a potentially powerful mechanism for ensuring equitable treatment for traded services and service suppliers beyond the substantive disciplines of WTO law, such as those related to discrimination. Yet, the provision has been subject to relatively little extended commentary or jurisprudence, perhaps because of an underlying concern about the sovereignty implications of WTO dispute settlement organs assessing the reasonableness of WTO members’ administration.

Further exploration of the requirements of GATS Article VI:1 is warranted, not only due to the potentially wide-reaching nature of the provision itself (particularly in view of the importance of licensing, access and similar decisions in the context of trade in services), but also due to the existence of corresponding concepts of reasonableness in other GATS provisions. For example, references to objectivity, impartiality and reasonableness appear elsewhere in the GATS domestic regulation provision, Article VI. GATS Article VI:2(a) provides that where judicial, arbitral or administrative review of administrative decisions affecting trade in services is ‘not independent’ of the agency that made the decision, members must ensure that the review procedures ‘in fact provide for an objective and impartial review’. GATS Article VI:3 requires that members’ competent authorities advise decisions ‘within a reasonable period of time’ after the submission of a complete application for authorization to supply a service on which the member has made a specific commitment.

Type
Chapter
Information
WTO Domestic Regulation and Services Trade
Putting Principles into Practice
, pp. 65 - 78
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bobek, M. (2009), ‘Reasonableness in Administrative Law: A Comparative Reflection on Functional Equivalence’ in Bongiovanni, G., Sartor, G. and Valentini, C. (eds.), Reasonableness and Law, Heidelberg: SpringerGoogle Scholar
Delimatsis, P. (2006), ‘Due Process and “Good” Regulation Embedded in the GATS: Disciplining Regulatory Behaviour in Services Through Article VI of the GATS’, Journal of International Economic Law 10(1): 13–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delimatsis, P. (2007), International Trade in Services and Domestic Regulations: Necessity, Transparency, and Regulatory Diversity, Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
della Cananea, G. (2009), ‘Reasonableness in Administrative Law’ in Bongiovanni, G., Sartor, G. and Valentini, C. (eds.), Reasonableness and Law, Heidelberg: SpringerGoogle Scholar
Franck, T. (1995), Fairness in International Law and Institutions, Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. (2000), ‘Introduction’ in Koskenniemi, M. (ed.), Sources of International Law, Aldershot: AshgateGoogle Scholar
Kramer, M. (2007), Objectivity and the Rule of Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCormick, N. (1999), ‘Reasonableness and Objectivity’, Notre Dame Law Review 74(5): 1575–603Google Scholar
Mitchell, A.D. (2008), Legal Principles in WTO Disputes, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, A.D. and Sheargold, E. (2009), ‘Global Governance: The World Trade Organization’s Contribution’, Alberta Law Review 46(4): 1061–80Google Scholar
WTO (1997), World Trade Organization: Agreement on Telecommunications Services (Fourth Protocol to General Agreement on Trade in Services), 36 ILM 354, 367
Yanovich, A. and Voon, T. (2005), ‘What is the Measure at Issue?’ in Mitchell, A. (ed.), Challenges and Prospects for the WTO, London: Cameron MayGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×