Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-10T03:41:30.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2011

David Blandford
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
David Orden
Affiliation:
International Food Policy Research Institute
David Orden
Affiliation:
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)
David Blandford
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Tim Josling
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Get access

Summary

Domestic support for agriculture by the United States has proven to be contentious in the World Trade Organization and a center of attention in the Doha negotiations. The United States signaled its willingness to accept tighter disciplines on domestic support but insisted on a harmonization of support levels, in effect reducing allowable domestic support in the EU by a greater amount. The US position has also been to require significantly increased market access in other countries, including the emerging markets. In addition to the tension over the level of US domestic support in the Doha Round, several challenges under the WTO dispute settlement process have raised questions about whether the United States is correctly notifying its support to the WTO. Even without a Doha Round outcome, US domestic farm programs will be the subject of international scrutiny.

The first part of this chapter provides a brief review of the political economy of US farm policies, including a synopsis of the Food, Conservation, and Energy (FCE) Act of 2008. The following section discusses US domestic support notifications from 1995–2008. We then assess compliance with the Agreement, including an examination of subsidies that arguably are misclassified, underreported, or omitted from the notifications. The following section provides projections of US support through 2016. These projections are compared to existing support commitments and those proposed in the December 2008 Doha draft modalities.

Type
Chapter
Information
WTO Disciplines on Agricultural Support
Seeking a Fair Basis for Trade
, pp. 97 - 152
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blandford, D., and Josling, T.. 2007. US and EU domestic support notifications, 2007–2012. Paper presented at a workshop of the German Marshall Fund of the United States, Washington, DC, September 11.
Blandford, D., Laborde, D., and Martin, W.. 2008. Implications for the United States. ICTSD/IPC/IFFPRI Project on Draft Agricultural Modalities. Paper presented at a seminar in Geneva, March 12.
Chite, R. M. 2007. Farm bill budget and costs: 2002 vs. 2007. RS22694, Congressional Research Service. November 7.
,Congressional Budget Office. 2008. H.R. 2419: The Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 – Conference agreement compared to March 2007 CBO baseline, May 12. www.cbo.gov (accessed June 8, 2008).
Gorter, H., and Just, D. R.. 2009. The economics of blend mandates for biofuels. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91(3): 738–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, B. 2002. American Agriculture in the Twentieth Century: How it Flourished and What it Cost. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, B 2009. Distortions to agricultural incentives in the United States and Canada. In Distortions to Agricultural Incentives: A Global Perspective 1955–2007, ed. Anderson, K.. London: Palgrave Macmillan, and Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Hull, D., Langley, J., and Hitz, G.. 2009. CBO March 2009 baseline for CCC & FCIC, February 20. www.cbo.gov (accessed March 10, 2009).
Josling, T. E., Tangermann, S., and Warley, T. K.. 1996. Agriculture in the GATT. New York: St. Martin's Press Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orden, D., Blandford, D., and Josling, T.. 2010. Determinants of farm policies in the United States, 1996–2008. In The Political Economy of Distortions to Agricultural Incentives, ed. Anderson, K.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Orden, D., Paarlberg, R., and Roe, T.. 1999. Policy Reform in American Agriculture: Analysis and Prognosis. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sumner, D. 2005. Boxed in: Conflicts between US farm policies and WTO obligations. Trade Policy Analysis No. 32, CATO Institute.
,USDA (US Department of Agriculture). 2009a. Commodity Credit Corporation commodity estimates book FY 2010 mid-session review. Presentation 2010–02. Farm Service Agency, July.
,USDA (US Department of Agriculture) 2009b. USDA agricultural projections to 2017. Long-term projections report OCE-2008–1. Office of the Chief Economist, World Agricultural Outlook Board.
,WTO. 2005. United States – Subsidies on upland cotton. Report of the Appellate Body. WT/DS267/AB/R, 3 March.
,WTO 2007a. United States – Domestic support and export credit guarantees for agricultural products. Request for the establishment of a panel by Brazil. WT/DS365/13, 9 November.
,WTO 2007b. United States – Subsidies and other domestic support for corn and other agricultural products. Request for the establishment of a panel by Canada. WT/DS357/12, 9 November.
,WTO 2008. Revised draft modalities for agriculture. TN/AG/W/4/Rev.4, 6 December.
Zulauf, C., and Orden, D.. 2010. The Revenue program option in the 2008 US farm bill: Evaluating performance characteristics of the ACRE program. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 39(3): 517–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×