Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents (outline)
- Contents (detail)
- Foreword to the 1995–2010 edition
- Part I Appellate Body Reports
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- R
- S
- T
- V
- W
- Part II Arbitration Awards under Article 21.3(c) of the DSU
- Annex A Terms of Office of Current and Former Appellate Body Members and Chairpersons – 31 December 2009
- Annex B Biographies of Current and Former Appellate Body Members
- Annex C Information on Appellate Body Reports – 1996 to January 2010
- Annex D Arbitration Awards under Article 21.3(c) of the DSU – 1996 to 2009
- Annex E Articles of Covered Agreements Addressed in Appellate Body Reports
- Annex F Working Procedures for Appellate Review WT/AB/WP/61
- Abbreviations used in the Table of References to the Covered Agreements and other Instruments and in the Indexes
- Table of References to the Covered Agreements and other Instruments by Article
- Index
- Subject Index by Case (Appellate Body reports)
- Subject Index by Case (Arbitration Awards under Article 21.3(c) of the DSU)
J
from Part I - Appellate Body Reports
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents (outline)
- Contents (detail)
- Foreword to the 1995–2010 edition
- Part I Appellate Body Reports
- A
- B
- C
- D
- E
- F
- G
- H
- I
- J
- L
- M
- N
- O
- P
- R
- S
- T
- V
- W
- Part II Arbitration Awards under Article 21.3(c) of the DSU
- Annex A Terms of Office of Current and Former Appellate Body Members and Chairpersons – 31 December 2009
- Annex B Biographies of Current and Former Appellate Body Members
- Annex C Information on Appellate Body Reports – 1996 to January 2010
- Annex D Arbitration Awards under Article 21.3(c) of the DSU – 1996 to 2009
- Annex E Articles of Covered Agreements Addressed in Appellate Body Reports
- Annex F Working Procedures for Appellate Review WT/AB/WP/61
- Abbreviations used in the Table of References to the Covered Agreements and other Instruments and in the Indexes
- Table of References to the Covered Agreements and other Instruments by Article
- Index
- Subject Index by Case (Appellate Body reports)
- Subject Index by Case (Arbitration Awards under Article 21.3(c) of the DSU)
Summary
Judicial Economy
See also Completion of the Legal Analysis by the Appellate Body (C.4)
(WT/DS33/AB/R, WT/DS33/AB/R/Corr.1)
Nothing in [Article 11 of the DSU] or in previous GATT practice requires a panel to examine all legal claims made by the complaining party. Previous GATT 1947 and WTO panels have frequently addressed only those issues that such panels considered necessary for the resolution of the matter between the parties, and have declined to decide other issues. Thus, if a panel found that a measure was inconsistent with a particular provision of the GATT 1947, it generally did not go on to examine whether the measure was also inconsistent with other GATT provisions that a complaining party may have argued were violated. In recent WTO practice, panels likewise have refrained from examining each and every claim made by the complaining party and have made findings only on those claims that such panels concluded were necessary to resolve the particular matter.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- WTO Appellate Body Repertory of Reports and Awards1995–2010, pp. 471 - 485Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011
- 1
- Cited by