Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T08:58:41.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

32 - WTO accession and accession to the Agreement on Government Procurement: what is the relationship? Why should WTO acceding governments also consider GPA accession?

from PART V - Salient features inWTOAccession Protocols

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2015

Robert D. Anderson
Affiliation:
Intellectual Property Division of the WTO
Anna Caroline Müller
Affiliation:
Intellectual Property Division of the WTO
Uri Dadush
Affiliation:
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington DC
Chiedu Osakwe
Affiliation:
World Trade Organization, Geneva
Get access

Summary

ABSTRACT

The WTO Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA) is unique in its duality as an international trade agreement that promotes and preserves market opening and as an instrument for the promotion of good governance. The recent successful renegotiation of the GPA has enhanced its coverage so that it now provides access to markets valued at US$1.7 trillion annually. In addition, the text of the GPA has been effectively modernised, making it more relevant, economically, and simplifying its implementation. Although not a substitute for domestic procurement reforms, it is a catalytic and reinforcing factor for reforms that enhance transparency and competition internally – thereby yielding important gains for governments and citizens in terms of value for money in national procurement activities. Participation in the GPA can also promote inward foreign direct investment by signalling a country's commitment to good governance and the fair treatment of all players under national legislation. The review in this chapter of the evidence from WTO and GPA accessions indicates that the WTO accession negotiations of Article XII members are often used to leverage increased GPA accessions. Specifically, of the members that have acceded to the WTO pursuant to Article XII of the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the WTO (WTO Agreement), twenty-two have undertaken GPA-related commitments, and seven subsequently joined the GPA. Out of the ten WTO members that are currently seeking accession to the GPA, nine undertook commitments related to GPA accession at the time of their WTO accessions, pursuant to Article XII of the WTO Agreement. The chapter concludes that, even though WTO accession and GPA accession are formally separate steps, the basic policy decision as to whether to join the GPA is often made long before GPA accession negotiations are started, at the time of WTO accession. This chapter provides countries and other WTO members considering taking on accession commitments with a strengthened understanding of the relevant benefits and costs.

Increasingly, governments that join the WTO are encouraged to make commitments, at the time of their accession, to also seek to join, eventually, the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA). GPA accession may seem, to some, ‘a bridge too far’ – an ‘add-on’ to the WTO accession process that requires significant policy reforms and institution-building processes.

Type
Chapter
Information
WTO Accessions and Trade Multilateralism
Case Studies and Lessons from the WTO at Twenty
, pp. 674 - 700
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, R. D. (2010). ‘The WTO Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA): an emerging tool of global integration and good governance’, Law in Transition, Autumn, pp. 1/8–8/8, at p. 5/8. Retrieved from www.ebrd.com/downloads/research/news/lit102.pdf.
Anderson, R. (2012). ‘The conclusion of the renegotiation of the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement: what it means for the Agreement and for the world economy’, Public Procurement Law Review, 21:83.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. D. and Müller, A. C. (2008). ‘Market access for government procurement of services: comparing recent PTAs with achievements’, in Roy, M. and Marchetti, J. (eds.), Services Trade Liberalization: Preferential Trade Agreements vs. the GATS. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. D. and Osei-Lah, K. (2011). ‘Forging a more global procurement market: issues concerning accessions to the Agreement on Government Procurement’, in Arrowsmith, S. and Anderson, R. D. (eds.), The WTO Regime on Government Procurement: Challenge and Reform. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. D., Kovacic, W. E. and Müller, A. C. (2011). ‘Ensuring integrity and competition in public procurement markets: a dual challenge for good governance’, in Arrowsmith, S. and Anderson, R. D. (eds.), The WTO Regime on Government Procurement: Challenge and Reform. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. D., Müller, A. C., Osei-Lah, K., León, J. Pardo de and Pelletier, P. (2011). ‘Government procurement provisions in regional trade agreements: a stepping stone to GPA accession?’ in Arrowsmith, S. and Anderson, R. D. (eds.), The WTO Regime on Government Procurement: Challenge and Reform. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. D., Müller, A. C., Osei-Lah, K. and Pelletier, P. (2012). ‘Assessing the value of future accessions to the WTO Agreement on Government Procurement (GPA): some new data sources, provisional estimates, and an evaluative framework for individual WTO members considering accession’, Public Procurement Law Review, 21(4).Google Scholar
Anderson, R. D., Schooner, S. L. and Swan, C. D. (2012). ‘The WTO's Revised Government Procurement Agreement: an important milestone toward greater market access and transparency in global public procurement markets’, Washington DC, George Washington University, GWU Legal Studies Research Paper no. 2012–7.
Arrowsmith, S. (2011). ‘The revised Agreement on Government Procurement: changes to the procedural rules and other transparency provisions’, in Arrowsmith, S. and Anderson, R. D. (eds.), The WTO Regime on Government Procurement: Challenge and Reform. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Europe Economics, Evaluation of Public Procurement Directives, Markt/2004/10/D, September 2006. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/publicprocurement/docs/final_report_en.pdf.
Evenett, S. J. and Hoekman, B. (2004). International Co-operation and the Reform of Public Procurement Policies. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=821424.
Müller, A. C. (2011). ‘Special and differential treatment and other special measures for developing countries under the Agreement on Government Procurement: the current text and new provisions’, in Arrowsmith, S. and Anderson, R. D. (eds.), The WTO Regime on Government Procurement: Challenge and Reform. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
OECD (2002). ‘The size of government procurement’. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/document/63/0,3343,en_2649_34487_1845951_1_1_1_1,00.html.
OECD (2003). Transparency in Government Procurement: The Benefits of Efficient Governance (TD/TC/WP/(2002)31/Rev2/14 April 2003). OECD Publications, France. http://www.oecd.org/trade.
Rodrik, D. (2012). The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy. New York, W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.Google Scholar
United States, Office of the United States Trade Representative (undated). ‘The WTO Government Procurement Agreement: a tremendous opportunity for China’. Retrieved from http://shenyang.usembassy-china.org.cn/wto-gpa.html.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×