Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:50:01.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - The politics of sense and sensibility: Mary Wollstonecraft and Catharine Macaulay Graham on Edmund Burke's Reflections on the Revolution in France

from Part II - Women's political and philosophical writings, 1690–1800

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2010

Hilda L. Smith
Affiliation:
University of Cincinnati
Get access

Summary

When this Right Honorable Author first threw down the gauntlet, and entering the ground from whence Sir Robert Filmer was forced so shamefully to retire, stood forth the champion of hereditary right, he undoubtedly expected to be opposed by all those men, who in a liberal and enlightened age, had ranged themselves on the side of liberty; but how deeply must it wound the feelings of a chivalrous knight, who owes the fealty of “proud submission and dignified obedience” to the fair sex, to perceive that two of the boldest of his adversaries are women!

Analytical Review, 1791

At the end of the eighteenth century Mary Wollstonecraft and Catharine Macaulay were considered by their contemporaries to be among Edmund Burke's “boldest adversaries.” Wollstonecraft's A Vindication of the Rights of Men was the first published reply to the Reflections on the Revolution in France as well as the pioneering feminist's earliest argument for equal rights and democratic government. Macaulay's Observations on the Reflections of the Right Honorable Edmund Burke, on the Revolution in France represented the last volley in a war of words between the celebrated republican historian and the famed parliamentarian. In this chapter I argue that by using the notions of sense and sensibility we are better able to understand how Wollstonecraft and Macaulay challenged the gender and class hierarchy of the Reflections. These terms played a central part in each woman's rhetorical strategy and made it possible for both to invert the gender logic of the Reflections.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×