References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2016
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Why Inequality MattersLuck Egalitarianism, its Meaning and Value, pp. 241 - 252Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Ackerman, Bruce. Social Justice in the Liberal State. New Haven: Yale University Press (1981)Google Scholar
Adler, Matthew D. Well-Being and Fair Distribution: Beyond Cost-Effective Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press (2012)Google Scholar
Albertsen, Andreas and Midtgaard, Sören Flinch. ‘Unjust Equalities’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (2014), 335–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth. ‘Fair Opportunity in Education: A Democratic Equality Perspective’, Ethics 117 (2007), 595–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth. ‘What Is the Point of Equality?’ Ethics 109 (1999), 287–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneson, Richard J. ‘Democratic Equality and Relating as Equals’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36 supplement (2010), 25–52Google Scholar
Arneson, Richard J. ‘Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare’, Philosophical Studies 56 (1989), 77–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneson, Richard J. ‘Equality of Opportunity for Welfare Defended and Recanted’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 7 (1999), 488–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneson, Richard J. ‘Luck Egalitarianism and Prioritarianism’, Ethics 110 (2000), 339–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneson, Richard J. ‘Luck Egalitarianism – A Primer’, in Knight, Carl and Stemplowska, Zofia (eds), Responsibility and Distributive Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2011), 24–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneson, Richard J. ‘Rawls, Responsibility, and Distributive Justice’, in Fleurbaey, Marc, Salles, Maurice, and Weymark, John A. (eds), Justice, Political Liberalism, and Utilitarianism: Themes from Harsanyi and Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2008), 80–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arneson, Richard J. ‘Why Justice Requires Transfers to Offset Income and Wealth Inequalities’, Social Philosophy and Policy 19 (2002), 172–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrhenius, Gustaf. ‘An Impossibility Theorem for Welfarist Axiologies’, Economics & Philosophy 16 (2000), 247–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrhenius, Gustaf. ‘Egalitarian Concerns and Population Change’, in Eyal, Nir, Hurst, Samia A., Norheim, Ole F., and Wikler, Dan (eds), Inequalities in Health: Concepts, Measures, and Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2013), 74–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bales, R. E. ‘Act Utilitarianism: Account of Right-Making Characteristics or Decision-Making Procedure?’ American Philosophical Quarterly 8 (1971), 257–65Google Scholar
Barry, Nicholas. ‘Reassessing Luck Egalitarianism’, The Journal of Politics 70 (2008), 136–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benbaji, Yitzhak. ‘Sufficiency or Priority?’ European Journal of Philosophy 14 (2006), 327–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benbaji, Yitzhak. ‘The Doctrine of Sufficiency: A Defence’, Utilitas 17 (2005), 310–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, Samuel. The New Economics of Inequality and Redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brighouse, Harry and Swift, Adam. ‘Equality, Priority, and Positional Goods’, Ethics 116 (2006), 471–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, John. ‘Equality versus Priority: A Useful Distinction’, Economics & Philosophy 31 (2015), 219–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, John. ‘Fairness’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 91 (1990), 87–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, John. ‘Fairness versus Doing the Most Good’, The Hastings Center Report 24 (1994), 36–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broome, John. ‘General and Personal Good: Harsanyi’s Contribution to the Theory of Value’, in Hirose, Iwao and Olson, Jonas (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Value Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2015), 249–66Google Scholar
Broome, John. ‘Kamm on Fairness’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (1998), 955–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, John. ‘Respects and Levelling Down’, unpublished manuscript, 2002, http://users.ox.ac.uk/~sfop0060/pdf/respects%20and%20levelling%20down.pdfGoogle Scholar
Broome, John. ‘Utilitarianism and Expected Utility’, The Journal of Philosophy 84 (1987), 405–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broome, John. Weighing Goods: Equality, Uncertainty and Time. Oxford: Blackwell (1991)Google Scholar
Broome, John. ‘What’s the Good of Equality?’ in Hey, J. (ed.), Current Issues in Microeconomics. London: Macmillan (1989), 236–62Google Scholar
Brown, Campbell. ‘Giving Up Levelling Down’, Economics & Philosophy 19 (2003), 111–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Campbell. ‘Priority or Sufficiency … or Both?’ Economics & Philosophy 21 (2005), 199–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bykvist, Krister. ‘Review of Dennis McKerlie’s “Justice between the Young and the Old”’, Ethics 125 (2015), 895–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappelen, Alexander and Tungodden, Bertil. ‘A Liberal Egalitarian Paradox’, Economics & Philosophy 22 (2006), 393–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappelen, Alexander and Tungodden, Bertil. ‘Relocating the Responsibility Cut: Should More Responsibility Imply Less Redistribution?’ Politics, Philosophy, & Economics 5 (2006), 353–62Google Scholar
Cavanagh, Matt. Against Equality of Opportunity. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, Thomas. The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and Its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A. ‘Casting the First Stone: Who Can, and Who Can’t, Condemn the Terrorists?’ Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 58 (2006), 113–36Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. ‘Fairness and Legitimacy in Justice, and: Does Option Luck Ever Preserve Justice?’ in Otsuka, Michael (ed.), On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice: And Other Essays in Political Philosophy. Princeton, NJ, and Oxford: Princeton University Press (2011), 124–46Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. ‘How to Do Political Philosophy’, in Otsuka, Michael (ed.), On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice: And Other Essays in Political Philosophy. Princeton, NJ, and Oxford: Princeton University Press (2011), 225–35Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. ‘Incentives, Inequality, and Community’, The Tanner Lectures on Human Values 13 (1992), 263–329Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. ‘On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice’, Ethics 99 (1989), 906–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A. Rescuing Justice and Equality. Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University Press (2008)Google Scholar
Cowell, Frank and Ebert, Udo. ‘Complaints and Inequality’, Social Choice and Welfare 23 (2004), 71–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, Roger. ‘In Defence of the Priority View: A Response to Otsuka and Voorhoeve’, Utilitas 23 (2011), 105–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, Norman. ‘Can There Be Moral Force for Favoring an Identified Life over a Statistical Life’, in Glenn Cohen, I., Daniels, Norman, and Eyal, Nir (eds), Identified versus Statistical Lives: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press (2015), 110–23Google Scholar
Daniels, Norman. ‘The Prudential Life-span Account of Justice across Generations’, in Justice and Justification: Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1996), 257–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen. The Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect and Accountability. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (2006)Google Scholar
Dekker, Teun J. ‘Choices, Consequences, and Desert’, Inquiry 52 (2009), 109–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doran, Brett. ‘Reconsidering the Levelling Down Objection against Egalitarianism’, Utilitas 13 (2001), 65–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorsey, Dale. ‘Equality-Tempered Prioritarianism’, Politics, Philosophy, & Economics 13 (2014), 45–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorsey, Dale. ‘Toward a Theory of the Basic Minimum’, Politics, Philosophy, & Economics 7 (2008), 423–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (2000)Google Scholar
Elford, Gideon. ‘Equality of Opportunity and Other-Affecting Choice: Why Luck Egalitarianism Does Not Require Brute Luck Equality’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (2013), 139–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon. Solomonic Judgments: Studies in the Limitation of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1989)Google Scholar
Eyal, Nir. ‘Against Fair Chances’, unpublished manuscript, 2015, http://w4.stern.nyu.edu/accounting/docs/ISUS/Against%20fair%20chances.pdfGoogle Scholar
Eyal, Nir. ‘Concentrated Risk, the Coventry Blitz, Chamberlain’s Cancer’, in Cohen, I. Glenn, Daniels, Norman, and Eyal, Nir (eds), Identified versus Statistical Lives: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press (2015), 94–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyal, Nir. ‘Egalitarian Justice and Innocent Choice’, Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 2 (2007), 1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabre, Cecile. ‘Global Distributive Justice: An Egalitarian Perspective’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35 (2005), 139–64Google Scholar
Fleurbaey, Marc. ‘Equal Opportunity or Equal Social Outcome’, Economics & Philosophy 11 (1995), 25–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleurbaey, Marc. Fairness, Responsibility, and Welfare. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleurbaey, Marc and Voorhoeve, Alex. ‘Decide As You Would with Full Information! An Argument against Ex-Ante Pareto’, in Eyal, Nir, Hurst, Samia A., Norheim, Ole F., and Wikler, Daniel (eds), Inequalities in Health: Concepts, Measures, and Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2013), 113–28Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. ‘The Moral Irrelevance of Equality’, Public Affairs Quarterly 14 (2000), 87–103Google Scholar
Frick, Johann. ‘Uncertainty and Justifiability to Each Person: Response to Fleurbaey and Voorhoeve’, in Eyal, Nir, Hurst, Samia A., Norheim, Ole F., and Wikler, Daniel (eds), Inequalities in Health: Concepts, Measures, and Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2013), 129–46Google Scholar
Griffin, James. Well-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement, and Moral Importance. Oxford: Clarendon Press (1986)Google Scholar
Hausman, Daniel M. ‘Equality versus Priority: A Badly Misleading Distinction’, in Wikler, D. and Murray, C., Goodness and Fairness. Geneva: WHO (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Hausman, Daniel M. ‘Equality versus Priority: A Misleading Distinction’, Economics & Philosophy 31 (2015), 229–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, Daniel M. and Waldren, Matt S. ‘Egalitarianism Reconsidered’, Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (2011), 567–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirose, Iwao. ‘Egalitarianism and Prioritarianism’, in Brooks, Thom (ed.), New Waves in Ethics. Basingstoke: McMillan (2011), 88–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirose, Iwao. ‘Intertemporal Distributive Judgment’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (2005), 371–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirose, Iwao. ‘Reconsidering the Value of Equality’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (2009), 301–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirose, Iwao. ‘Weighted Lotteries in Life and Death Cases’, Ratio 20 (2007), 45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtug, Nils. ‘Equality, Priority and Global Justice’, Journal of Global Ethics 5 (2009), 173–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtug, Nils. Persons, Interests, and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtug, Nils. ‘Theories of Value Aggregation: Utilitarianism, Egalitarianism, Prioritarianism’, in Hirose, Iwao and Olson, Jonas (eds), Oxford Handbook of Value Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2015), 267–84Google Scholar
Hurley, S. L. Justice, Luck, and Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (2003)Google Scholar
Huseby, Robert. ‘Can Luck Egalitarianism Justify the Fact That Some Are Worse Off than Others?’ Journal of Applied Philosophy, online first (2015), 1–11, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/japp.12122/epdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huseby, Robert. ‘Sufficientarianism: Restated and Defended’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (2010), 178–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamm, Frances M. ‘Equal Treatment and Equal Chances’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 14 (1985), 177–94Google Scholar
Knight, Carl. ‘Egalitarian Justice and Expected Value’, Ethical Theory & Moral Practice 16 (2013), 1061–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolm, Serge-Christophe. Macrojustice: The Political Economy of Fairness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornhauser, Lewis A. and Sager, Lawrence G. ‘Just Lotteries’, Social Science Information 27 (1988), 483–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. Oxford: Clarendon Press (1990)Google Scholar
Lake, Christopher. Equality and Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, Gerald R. ‘Fairness in Life and Death Cases’, Erkenntnis 62 (2005), 321–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, Gerald R. ‘How Interesting Is the “Boring Problem” for Luck Egalitarianism?’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (forthcoming)Google Scholar
Lazenby, Hugh. ‘One Kiss Too Many? Giving, Luck Egalitarianism and Other-Affecting Choice’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (2010), 271–86Google Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper. ‘Egalitarianism, Option Luck, and Responsibility’, Ethics 111 (2001), 548–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper. ‘Hurley on Egalitarianism and the Luck Neutralizing Aim’, Politics, Philosophy, & Economics 4 (2005), 249–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Andrew. ‘Egalitarianism and the Levelling Down Objection’, Analysis 61 (2001), 246–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthes, Erich Hatala. ‘Impersonal Value, Universal Value, and the Scope of Cultural Heritage’, Ethics 125 (2015), 999–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayerfeld, Jamie. Suffering and Moral Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2002)Google Scholar
McKerlie, Dennis. ‘Egalitarianism and the Separateness of Persons’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 18 (1988), 205–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKerlie, Dennis. ‘Equality between Age-Groups’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 21 (1992), 275–95Google ScholarPubMed
McKerlie, Dennis. ‘Egalitarianism and the Difference between Interpersonal and Intrapersonal Judgments’, in Holtug, Nils and Lippert-Rasmussen, Kasper (eds), Egalitarianism: New Essays on the Nature and Value of Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2007), 157–73Google Scholar
McKerlie, Dennis. Justice between the Young and the Old. New York: Oxford University Press (2013)Google Scholar
McKerlie, Dennis. ‘Priority and Time’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 27 (1997), 287–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, David. ‘Arguments for Equality’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 7 (1982), 73–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. ‘Equality’, in Mortal Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1979), 106–27Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. ‘Women and Cultural Universals’, in Sex and Social Justice. New York: Oxford University Press (1999), 29–54Google Scholar
O’Neill, Martin. ‘What Should Egalitarians Believe?’ Philosophy & Public Affairs 36 (2008), 119–56Google Scholar
Olsaretti, Serena. ‘Unmasking Equality? Kagan on Equality and Desert’, Utilitas 14 (2002), 387–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Jonas. ‘Intrinsicalism and Conditionalism about Final Value’, Ethical Theory & Moral Practice 7 (2004), 31–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otsuka, Michael. ‘Equality, Ambition, and Insurance’, Aristotelian Society Supplementary 78 (2004), 151–66Google Scholar
Otsuka, Michael. ‘Liberty, Equality, Envy, and Abstraction’, in Burley, Justine (ed.), Dworkin and His Critics: With Replies by Dworkin. Oxford: Blackwell (2004), 70–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otsuka, Michael. ‘Prioritarianism and the Measure of Utility’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 23 (2015), 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otsuka, Michael. ‘Risking Life and Limb: How to Discount Harms by Their Improbability’, in Cohen, I. Glenn, Daniels, Norman, and Eyal, Nir (eds), Identified versus Statistical Lives: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press (2015), 77–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otsuka, Michael. ‘Saving Lives, Moral Theory, and the Claims of Individuals’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 34 (2006), 109–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otsuka, Michael and Voorhoeve, Alex. ‘Why It Matters That Some Are Worse Off than Others: An Argument against the Priority View’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 37 (2009), 171–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, Derek. ‘Another Defence of the Priority View’, Utilitas 24 (2012), 399–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, Derek. ‘Equality or Priority?’ in Clayton, Matthew and Williams, Andrew (eds), The Ideal of Equality. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan (2000), 81–125Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek. ‘Equality or Priority?’ The Lindley Lectures. Kansas: University of Kansas Press (1991)Google Scholar
Persson, Ingmar. ‘Equality, Priority, and Person-Affecting Value’, Ethical Theory & Moral Practice 4 (2001), 23–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, Ingmar. ‘Prioritarianism and Welfare Reductions’, The Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (2012), 289–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, Ingmar. ‘The Badness of Unjust Inequality’, Theoria 69 (2003), 109–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, Ingmar. ‘Why Levelling Down Could Be Worse for Prioritarians than for Egalitarians’, Ethical Theory & Moral Practice 11 (2008), 295–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Martin. The Dimensions of Consequentialism: Ethics, Equality and Risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Martin and Hansson, Sven-Ove. ‘Equality and Priority’, Utilitas 17 (2005), 299–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, Karl. The Open Society and Its Enemies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (1950)Google Scholar
Powers, Madison and Faden, Ruth R. Social Justice: The Moral Foundations of Public Health and Health Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2006)Google Scholar
Rabinowicz, Wlodek. ‘The Size of Inequality and Its Badness: Some Reflections around Temkin’s Inequality’, Theoria 69 (2003), 60–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabinowicz, Wlodek and Rønnow-Rasmussen, Toni. ‘A Distinction in Value: Intrinsic and for Its Own Sake’, in Rønnow-Rasmussen, Toni and Zimmerman, Michael J. (eds), Recent Work on Intrinsic Value. Netherlands: Springer (2005), 115–29Google Scholar
Ramsay, Marc. ‘Teleological Egalitarianism vs. the Slogan’, Utilitas 17 (2005), 93–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph. ‘On the Value of Distributional Equality’, in de Wijze, Stephen, Kramer, Matthew H., and Carter, Ian (eds), Hillel Steiner and the Anatomy of Justice: Themes and Challenges. London: Routledge (2009), 22–33Google Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur. Equality, Responsibility, and the Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1999)Google Scholar
Roemer, John E. ‘Eclectic Distributional Ethics’, Politics, Philosophy & Economics 3 (2004), 267–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rønnow-Rasmussen, Toni. ‘Analysing Personal Value’, The Journal of Ethics 11 (2007), 405–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satz, Debra. ‘Equality, Adequacy, and Education for Citizenship’, Ethics 117 (2007), 623–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Satz, Debra. ‘Ideals of Egalitarianism and Sufficiency in Global Justice’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36 supplement (2010), 53–71Google Scholar
Saunders, Ben. ‘A Defence of Weighted Lotteries in Life Saving Cases’, Ethical Theory & Moral Practice 12 (2009), 279–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas M. ‘Preferences and Urgency’, The Journal of Philosophy 72 (1975), 655–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas M. ‘The Diversity of Objections to Inequality’, in The Difficulty of Tolerance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2003), 202–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas M. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (1998)Google Scholar
Segall, Shlomi. Equality and Opportunity. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segall, Shlomi. Health, Luck, and Justice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (2010)Google Scholar
Segall, Shlomi. ‘In Defense of Priority (and Equality)’, Politics, Philosophy & Economics 14 (2015), 343–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segall, Shlomi. ‘Why Egalitarians Should Not Care about Equality’, Ethical Theory & Moral Practice 15 (2012), 507–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sher, George. Equality for Inegalitarians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, Liam. ‘The Prospects for Sufficientarianism’, Utilitas 24 (2012), 101–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stefansson, H. Orri. ‘Fair Chances and Modal Consequentialism’, Economics & Philosophy, online first (2014), 1–25, http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayFulltext?type=1&fid=9965861&jid=EAP&volumeId=31&issueId=03&aid=9965856&bodyId=&membershipNumber=&societyETOCSession=Google Scholar
Steiner, Hillel. ‘Exploitation Takes Time’, in Vint, J., Metcalfe, J. S., Kurz, H. D., Salvadori, N., and Samuelson, P. A. (eds), Economic Theory and Economic Thought: Essays in Honour of Ian Steadman. London & New York: Routledge (2010), 20–9Google Scholar
Stone, Peter. The Luck of the Draw: The Role of Lotteries in Decision-Making. New York: Oxford University Press (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, Kok Chor. Justice, Institutions, and Luck: The Site, Ground, and Scope of Equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tännsjö, Torbjörn, ‘Utilitarianism or Prioritarianism?’ Utilitas, online first (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0953820815000011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taurek, John M. ‘Should the Numbers Count?’ Philosophy & Public Affairs 6 (1977), 293–316Google ScholarPubMed
Temkin, Larry S. ‘Harmful Goods, Harmless Bads’, in Frey, R. G. and Morris, Christopher W. (eds), Value, Welfare, and Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1993), 290–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temkin, Larry S. ‘Equality as Comparative Fairness’, The Journal of Applied Philosophy, online first (2015), 1–18, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/japp.12140/epdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temkin, Larry S. ‘Equality, Priority, and the Levelling Down Objection’, in Clayton, Matthew and Williams, Andrew (eds), The Ideal of Equality. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan (2002), 126–61Google Scholar
Temkin, Larry S. ‘Equality, Priority, or What?’ Economics & Philosophy 19 (2003), 61–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temkin, Larry S. ‘Illuminating Egalitarianism’, in Christiano, Thomas and Christman, John (eds), Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell (2009), 155–78Google Scholar
Temkin, Larry S. ‘Inequality: A Complex, Individualistic, and Comparative Notion’, Nous 35 (2001), 327–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temkin, Larry S. ‘Justice, Equality, Fairness, Desert, Rights, Free Will, Responsibility, and Luck’, in Knight, Carl and Stemplowska, Zofia (eds), Responsibility and Distributive Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2011), 51–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temkin, Larry S. Rethinking the Good: Moral Ideals and the Nature of Practical Reasoning. New York: Oxford University Press (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermann, Jens. ‘The Individualist Lottery: How People Count, but Not Their Numbers’, Analysis 64 (2004), 106–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tungodden, Bertil. ‘The Value of Equality’, Economics & Philosophy 19 (2003), 1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tungodden, Bertil and Vallentyne, Peter. ‘On the Possibility of Paretian Egalitarianism’, The Journal of Philosophy 102 (2005), 126–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallentyne, Peter. ‘Brute Luck and Responsibility’, Politics, Philosophy & Economics 7 (2008), 57–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallentyne, Peter. ‘Brute Luck Equality and Desert’, in Olsaretti, Serena (ed.), Desert and Justice. New York: Oxford University Press (2003), 169–86Google Scholar
Vallentyne, Peter. ‘Brute Luck, Option Luck, and Equality of Initial Opportunities’, Ethics 112 (2002), 529–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallentyne, Peter. ‘Hurley on Justice and Responsibility’, Philosophy & Phenomenological Research 72 (2006), 433–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallentyne, Peter. ‘Self Ownership and Equality: Brute Luck, Gifts, Universal Dominance, and Leximin’, Ethics 107(1997), 321–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Parijs, Philippe. Real Freedom for All: What (If Anything) Can Justify Capitalism? Oxford: Oxford University Press (1995)Google Scholar
Van Parijs, Philippe. ‘Talking to Stanley: What Do We Need for Global Justice to Make Sense’, unpublished manuscript, 2006, http://www.uclouvain.be/cps/ucl/doc/etes/documents/Van_Parijs_-_Oxford_1.pdfGoogle Scholar
Voorhoeve, Alex and Fleurbaey, Marc. ‘Egalitarianism and the Separateness of Persons’, Utilitas 24 (2012), 381–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voorhoeve, Alex and Fleurbaey, Marc. ‘Equality or Priority for Future People?’ unpublished manuscript, 2015, http://personal.lse.ac.uk/voorhoev/Priority%20or%20equality%20for%20possible%20people%20d8.pdfGoogle Scholar
Wasserman, David. ‘Let Them Eat Chances: Probability and Distributive Justice’, Economics & Philosophy 12 (1996), 29–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westen, Peter. ‘The Empty Idea of Equality’, Harvard Law Review 95 (1982), 537–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, Richard G. Unhealthy Societies: The Afflictions of Inequality. London: Routledge (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Andrew. ‘How Gifts and Gambles Preserve Justice’, Economics & Philosophy 29 (2013), 65–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Andrew. ‘The Priority View Bites the Dust?’ Utilitas 24 (2012), 315–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar