Abadinsky, H. (2001). Drugs: An introduction. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar

Adams, K. (1968). College-level instruction in U.S. prisons. Unpublished manuscript.

Adams, K., Bennett, K. J., Flanagan, T. J., Marquart, J. W., Cuvelier, S. J., Fritsch, E.. (1994). A large-scale multidimensional test of the effect of prison education programs on offenders' behavior. The Prison Journal, 74, 433–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agopian, M. W. (1990). The impact of intensive supervision probation on gang-drug offenders. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 4(3), 214–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alaska Department of Corrections. (1996). Sex offender treatment program: Initial recidivism study. Anchorage, AK: Alaska Justice Statistical Analysis Unit Justice Center, University of Alaska.

Allen, L. C., Mackenzie, D. L., & Hickman, L. J. (2001). The effectiveness of cognitive behavioral treatment for adult offenders: A methodological, quality-based review. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45, 498–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aloisi, M., & LeBaron, J. (2001). The Juvenile Justice Commission's stabilization and reintegration program: An updated recidivism analysis. Trenton, NJ: Juvenile Justice Commission Research & Evaluation Unit, New Jersey Department of Law and Public Safety.Google Scholar

American Friends Service Committee. (1971). Struggle for justice: A report on crime and punishment in America. New York: Hill & Wang.

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

American University. (2001). Drug court activity update: Composite summary information. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Drug Court Clearinghouse and Technical Assistance Project.

Anderson, D. (1981). The relationship between correctional education and parole success. Journal of Offender Counseling, Services, and Rehabilitation, 5, 13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, S. V. (1995a). Evaluation of the impact of correctional education programs on recidivism. Columbus, OH: Office of Management Information Systems Bureau of Planning and Evaluation, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction.Google Scholar

Anderson, S. V. (1995b). Evaluation of the impact of participation in Ohio penal industries on recidivism. Columbus, OH: Office of Management Information Systems Bureau of Planning and Evaluation, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction.Google Scholar

Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2003). The psychology of criminal conduct. Cincinatti, OH: Anderson Publishing.Google Scholar

Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Hoge, R. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 19–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrews, D. A., Dowden, C., & Gendreau, P. (1999). Clinically relevant and psychologically informed approaches to reduced re-offending: A meta-analytic study of human service, risk, need, responsibility, and other concerns in justice contexts. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 369–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anglin, D. M., & Hser, Y.-I. (1992). Drug abuse treatment. In Watson, Ronald R. (Ed.), Drug abuse treatment (pp. 1–36). Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anglin, D. M., & Hser, Y.-I. (1990). Treatment of drug abuse. In Tonry, Michael & Wilson, James Q. (Eds.), Drugs and crime (Vol. 13, pp. 393–460). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Anglin, D. M., & McGlothlin, W. (1988). Outcome of narcotic addict treatment in California. In Tims, Frank M. & Ludford, Jacqueline P. (Eds.), Drug abuse treatment evaluation: Strategies, progress, and prospects (pp. 106–128). Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar

Anspach, D. F., & Ferguson, A. S. (1999). Cumberland County's drug court program: An evaluation report of Project Exodus. Portland, ME: University of Southern Maine, Department of Sociology.Google Scholar

Antonowicz, D., & Ross, R. (1994). Essential components of successful rehabilitation programs for offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 38, 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Applegate, B. K., Cullen, F. T., & Fisher, B. S. (1997). Public support for correctional treatment: The continuing appeal of the rehabilitative ideal. Prison Journal, 77, 237–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arbuthnot, J., & Gordon, D. A. (1988). Crime and cognition: Community applications of sociomoral reasoning development. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 15, 498–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, J., & Hardyman, P. (1991). The use of early parole with electronic monitoring to control prison crowding: Evaluation of the Oklahoma Department of Corrections pre-parole supervised release with electronic monitoring. Madison, WI: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.Google Scholar

Austin, J., Jones, M., & Bolyard, M. (1993). Assessing the impact of a county operated boot camp: Evaluation of the Los Angeles County regimented inmate diversion program. San Francisco, CA: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.Google Scholar

Austin, T. (1997). Life skills for inmates: An evaluation of Dauphin County Prison's LASER program. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Babcock, J. C., & La Taillade, J. J. (2000). Evaluating interventions for men who batter. In Vincent, J. P. & Jouriles, E. N. (Eds.), Domestic violence: Guidelines for research-informed practice (pp. 37–77). Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar

Babcock, J. C., & Steiner, R. (1999). The relationship between treatment, incarceration, and recidivism of battering: A program of evaluation of Seattle's coordinated community response to domestic violence. Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 46–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baer, D. J., Jacobs, P., & Carr, F. E. (1975). Instructors' ratings of delinquents after Outward Bound survival training and their subsequent recidivism. Psychological Reports, 36, 547–553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baird, S. C., & Wagner, D. (1990). Measuring diversion: The Florida community control program. Crime and Delinquency, 36, 112–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ball, J. C., & Ross, A. (1991). The effectiveness of methadone maintenance treatment: Patients, programs, services, and outcomes. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ball, J., Shaffer, J., & Nurco, D. (1983). Day to day criminality of heroin addicts in Baltimore: A study of offense rates. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 12, 119–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Baro, A. L. (1999). Effects of a cognitive restructuring program on inmate institutional behavior. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 466–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barton, W. H., & Butts, J. A. (1990). Accommodating innovation in a juvenile court. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 4(2), 144–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Batiuk, M. E., Moke, P., & Rountree, P. W. (1997). Crime and rehabilitation: Correctional education as an agent of change. Justice Quarterly, 14, 167–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumer, T. L., Maxfield, M. G., & Mendelsohn, R. I. (1993). A comparative analysis of three electronically monitored home detention programs. Justice Quarterly, 10(1), 121–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baumer, T., & Mendelsohn, R. (1992). Electronically monitored home confinement: Does it work? In Byrne, J., Lurigio, A., & Petersilia, J. (Eds.), Smart sentencing: The emergence of intermediate sanctions (pp. 54–67). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Bavon, A. (2001). The effect of the Tarrant County drug court project on recidivism. Evaluation and Program Planning, 24(1), 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, J. L., & Klein-Saffran, J. (1990). Home confinement and the use of electronic monitoring with federal parolees. Federal Probation, 54(4), 22–34.Google Scholar

Belenko, S. R. (1999). Research on drug courts: A critical review 1999 update. National Drug Court Institute Review, 2(2), 1–58.Google Scholar

Belenko, S. (1998a). Behind bars: Substance abuse and America's prison population. Retrieved January 5, 2005, from http://www.casacolumbia.org/pdshopprov.

Belenko, S. R. (1998b). Research on drug courts: A critical review. National Drug Court Institute Review, 1(1), 1–42.Google Scholar

Benekos, P. J., & Merlo, A. V. (1995). Three strikes and you're out! The political sentencing game. Federal Probation, 59, 3–9.Google Scholar

Bench, L. L., Kramer, S. P., & Erickson, S. (1997). A discriminant analysis of predictive factors in sex offender recidivism. In Schwartz, B. K. & Cellini, H. R. (Eds.), The sex offender: New insights, treatment innovations and legal developments (pp. 15.1–15.15). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.Google Scholar

Berk, R. A., Campbell, A., Klap, R., & Western, B. (1992). A Bayesian analysis of the Colorado Springs spouse abuse experiment. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83, 170–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berlin, F. S. (2000). The etiology and treatment of sexual offending. In Fishbein, D. H. (Ed.), The science, treatment, and prevention of antisocial behaviors: Application to the criminal justice system. Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.Google Scholar

Blackburn, F. S. (1981). The relationship between recidivism and participation in a community college associate of arts degree program for incarcerated offenders. Paper presented at the meeting of the Thirty-Sixth Annual Conference of the Correctional Education Association, Costa Mesa, CA.

Blanchette, K. (1996). Sex offender assessment, treatment and recidivism: A literature review. Correctional Services of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar

Bloom, H., Orr, L. L., Cave, G., Bell, S. H., Doolittle, F., & Lin, W. (1994). The national JTPA study: Overview of impacts, benefits, and costs of Title IIA. Cambridge, MA: ABT Associates.Google Scholar

Blumstein, A. (1995). Prisons. In Wilson, J. Q., & Petersilia, J. (Eds.), Crime (pp. 387–419). San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies.Google ScholarPubMed

Blumstein, A., & Beck, A. J. (1999). Population growth in U.S. prisons, 1980–1996. In Tonry, M. & Petersilia, J. (Eds.), Prisons (pp. 17–62). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Blumstein, A., & Cohen, J. (1979). Estimation of individual crimes rates from arrest records. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 70, 561–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blumstein, A., & Cohen, J. (1973). A theory of the stability of punishment. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 64, 198–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., & Miller, H. (1980). Demographically disaggregated projections of prison populations. Journal of Criminal Justice, 8, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Roth, J., & Visher, C. A. (1986). Criminal careers and career criminals, Vol. 1. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar

Bonta, J., Wallace-Capretta, S., & Rooney, J. (2000a). Can electronic monitoring make a difference? An evaluation of three Canadian programs. Crime and Delinquency, 46(1), 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonta, J., Wallace-Capretta, S., & Rooney, J. (2000b). A quasi-experimental evaluation of an intensive rehabilitation supervision program. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27(3), 312–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bottcher, J. (1997). A boot camp and intensive parole program: The final impact evaluation (report to the California legislature). Sacramento, CA: California Department of Youth Authority.Google Scholar

Bourdin, C. M., Henggeler, S. W., Blaske, D. M., & Stein, R. J. (1994). Multisystemic treatment of adolescent sexual offenders. In West, D. (Ed.), Sex crimes (pp. 271–279). Brookfield, VT: Dartmouth.Google Scholar

Bourdin, C. M., Henggeler, S. W., Blaske, D. M., & Stein, R. J. (1990). Multisystemic treatment of adolescent sexual offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 34, 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourdin, C. M., Mann, B. J., Cone, L. T., Henggeler, S. W., Fucci, B. R., Blaske, D. M., & Williams, R. A. (1995). Multisystemic therapy of serious juvenile offenders: Long-term prevention of criminality and violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 569–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boudouris, J. (1985). Recidivism and rehabilitation. Des Moines, IA: Iowa Department of Corrections.Google Scholar

Bouffard, J. A., MacKenzie, D. L., & Hickman, L. (2000). Effectiveness of vocational education and employment programs for adult offenders: A methodology-based analysis of the literature. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 31, 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyles, C. E., Bokenkamp, E., & Madura, W. (1996). Evaluation of the Colorado juvenile regimented training program. Golden, CO: Colorado Department of Human Services, Division of Youth Corrections.Google Scholar

Brewster, M. P. (2001). An evaluation of the Chester County (PA) drug court program. Journal of Drug Issues, 31(1), 177–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brownlee, I. D. (1995). Intensive probation with young adult offenders: A short reconviction study. British Journal of Criminology, 35(4), 599–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buhrich, N., Bailey, J. M., & Martin, N. G. (1991). Sexual orientation, sexual identity, and sex-dimorphic behaviors in male twins. Behavioral Genetics, 21, 75–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2001). Key facts at a glance – Correctional populations, 1980–2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2000). Drug use, testing, and treatment in jails. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1999). Substance abuse and treatment, state and federal prisoners, 1997. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1997). Characteristics of adults on probation, 1995. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

Burke, L. O., & Vivian, J. E. (2001). The effect of college programming on recidivism rates at the Hampden County House of Correction: A 5-year study. Journal of Correctional Education, 52, 160–162.Google Scholar

Burnett, W. L. (1996). Treating post-incarcerated offenders with moral reconation therapy: A one-year recidivism study. Unpublished master's thesis: University of Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ.

Burns, J. C., & Vito, G. F. (1995). An impact analysis of the Alabama boot camp program. Federal Probation, 59, 63–67.Google Scholar

Bush, J., & Bilodeau, B. (1993). Options: A cognitive change program. Longmont, CO: National Institute of Corrections.Google Scholar

Bushway, S. D. (1998). Impact of an arrest on the job stability of young white American men. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35, 454–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bushway, S., & Reuter, P. (1997). Labor markets and crime risk factors. In Sherman, L. W., Gottfredson, D., MacKenzie, D., Eck, J., Reuter, P., & Bushway, S. (Eds.), Preventing crime: What works, what doesn't, what's promising (pp. 6-1–6-49). Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar

Buzawa, E. S., & Buzawa, C. G. (1996a). Domestic violence: The criminal justice response. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Buzawa, E. S., & Buzawa, C. G. (1996b). The role of arrest in domestic versus stranger assault: Is there a difference? In Buzawa, E. S. & Buzawa, C. G. (Eds.), Do arrests and restraining orders work? (pp. 150–175). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Byrne, J., & Kelly, L. (1989). Final report to the National Institute of Justice, research program of the punishment and control of offenders. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar

Byrne, J. M., Lurigio, A. J., & Petersilia, J. (1992). Smart sentencing: The emergence of intermediate sanctions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Camp, G., & Camp, C. (1990). Preventing and solving problems involved in operating therapeutic communities in a prison setting. South Salem, NY: Criminal Justice Institute.Google Scholar

Camp, D. A., & Sandhu, H. S. (1995). Evaluation of female offender regimented treatment program (FORT). Journal of the Oklahoma Criminal Justice Research Consortium, 2, 50–57.Google Scholar

Castellano, T. C., & Soderstrom, I. R. (1992). Therapeutic wilderness programs and juvenile recidivism: A program evaluation. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 17(3/4), 19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cecil, D. K., Drapkin, D. A., MacKenzie, D. L., & Hickman, L. J. (2000). The effectiveness of adult basic education and life-skills programs in reducing recidivism: A review and assessment of the research. Journal of Correctional Education, 51, 207–226.Google Scholar

Chaiken, J. M., & Chaiken, M. R. (1982). Varieties of criminal behavior (Rand Report R-2814-NIJ). Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar

Chen, H., Bersani, C., Myers, S. C., & Denton, R. (1989). Evaluating the effectiveness of a court sponsored abuser treatment program. Journal of Family Violence, 4, 309–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chown, B., & Davis, S. (1986). Recidivism among offenders incarcerated by the Oklahoma Department of Corrections who received vocational-techinical training: A survival data analysis of offenders released January 1982 through July 1986. Oklahoma City, OK: Oklahoma State Department of Corrections.Google Scholar

Clark, D. D. (1991). Analysis of return rates of the inmate college program participants. Albany, NY: New York State Department of Correctional Services.Google Scholar

Clark, C. L., & Aziz, D. W. (1996). Shock incarceration in New York State: Philosophy, results, and limitations. In D. L. MacKenzie & E. E. Hebert (Eds.), Correctional boot camps: A tough intermediate sanction (pp. 39–68). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar

Clark, P. M., Hartter, S., & Ford, E. (1992). An experiment in employment of offenders. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Society of Criminology, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar

Clarke, S. H. (1974). Getting 'em out of circulation: Does incarceration of juvenile offenders reduce crime?Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 65, 528–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clear, T., & Dammer, H. R. (2000). The offender in the community. Blemont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar

Clear, T. R., Flynn, S., & Shapiro, C. (1987). Intensive supervision in probation: A comparison of three projects. In McCarthy, B. R. (Ed.), Intermediate punishments: Intensive supervision, home confinement, and electronic surveillance (Vol. 31–51). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar

Coffey, B. B. (1983). The effectiveness of vocational education in Kentucky's correctional institutions as measured by employment status and recidivism (Doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky, 1983). Dissertation Abstracts International, 44-09A, 2745–2877.Google Scholar

Coffey, O. D., & Gemignani, M. G. (1994). Effective practices in juvenile correctional education: A study of the literature and research 1980–1992. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.Google Scholar

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Cohen, J. (1983). Incapacitation as a strategy for crime control: Possibilities and pitfalls. In Morris, N. & Tonry, M. (Eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research (Vol. 5, pp. 1–84). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Cohen, J., & Canela-Cacho, J. A. (1994). Incapacitation and violent crime. In Reiss, A. J. & Roth, J. (Eds.), Understanding and preventing violence, (Vol. 4, pp. 296–388). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar

Collaer, M. L., & Hines, M. (1995). Human behavioral sex differences: A role for gonadal hormones during early development?Psychological Bulletin, 118, 55–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cosden, M., Crothers, L., & Peerson, S. (1999). Ventura County drug court: Summary findings. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California, Graduate School of Education.Google Scholar

Courtright, K. E., Berg, B. L., & Mutchnick, R. J. (1997). Effects of house arrest with electronic monitoring on DUI offenders. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 24(3/4), 35–51.CrossRef

Craven, D. (1997). Sex differences in violent victimization, 1994. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Criminal Justice Research Center. (1994). Evaluation of the Virginia Department of Corrections' intensive supervision program. Richmond, VA: Virginia Department of Criminal Justice Services.

Cullen, F. T., & Gendreau, P. (2000). Assessing correctional rehabilitation: Policy, practice, and prospects. In Horney, J. (Ed.), Criminal justice 2000: Vol. 3. Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar

Cullen, F. T., & Gendreau, P. (1989). The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: Reconsidering the “nothing works” debate. In Goodstein, L. & MacKenzie, D. L. (Eds.), The American Prison: Issues in Research Policy: Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar

Cullen, F. T., Skovron, S. E., & Scott, J. E. (1990). Public support for correctional treatment: The tenacity of rehabilitative ideology. Survey of Cincinnati and Columbus residents. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 6–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cullen, F. T., Wright, J. P., & Applegate, B. K. (1996). Control in the community: The limits of reform? In Harland, A. T. (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Curulla, V. L. (1991). Aggression replacement training in the community for adult learning-disabled offenders (Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, 1991). Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 627).Google Scholar

Davidson, P. (1984, March). Outcome data for a penitentiary-based treatment program for sex offenders. Paper presented at the meeting of the Conference on the Assessment and Treatment of the Sex Offender, Kingston, Ontario.

Davis, R. C., & Lurigio, A. J. (1996). Fighting back: Neighborhood antidrug strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, R. C., & Taylor, B. G. (1999). Does batterer treatment reduce violence? A synthesis of the literature. Women and Criminal Justice, 10, 69–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeLeon, G. (1986). Program-based evaluation research in therapeutic communities. In Tims, F. M. & Ludford, J. P. (Eds.), Drug abuse treatment evaluation: Strategies, progress, and prospect (pp. 69–87). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.Google Scholar

Deschenes, E. P., Greenwood, P. W., & Marshall, G. (1996). The Nokomis Challenge program evaluation (DRU-1147-1-MD0SS). Michigan Department of Social Services, Lansing.Google Scholar

Deschenes, E. P., Iman, I., Foster, T. L., Diaz, L., Moreno, V., Patascil, L., & Ward, D. (1999). Evaluation of Orange County drug courts. Richmond, CA: Center for Applied Local Research.Google Scholar

Deschenes, E. P., Turner, S., & Greenwood, P. W. (1995). Drug court or probation? An experimental evaluation of Maricopa County's drug court. Justice System Journal, 18(1), 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Devine, J. A., Sheley, J. F., & Smith, M. D. (1988). Macroeconomic and social-control policy influences on crime rate changes, 1948–1985. American Sociological Review, 53, 407–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ditton, P. M., & Wilson, D. J. (1999). Truth in sentencing in state prisons. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar

Di Vito, R. J. (1991). Survey of mandatory education policies in state penal institutions. Journal of Correctional Education, 42, 126–130.Google Scholar

Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (2000). Evaluating criminal justice interventions for domestic violence. Crime and Delinquency, 46, 252–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dobson, K. S., & Craig, K. D. (1996). Advances in cognitive behavioral therapy. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Dobson, K. S., & Khatri, N. (2000). Cognitive therapy: Looking backward, looking forward. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 907–923.3.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dole, V. P., & Nyswander, M. E. (1965). A medical treatment of diacetyl-morphine (heroin) addiction. Journal of the American Medical Association, 193, 646–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donohue, J. J. (1998). Understanding the time path of crime. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88, 1423–1451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Downes, E. A., Monaco, K. R., & Schreiber, S. O. (1989). Evaluating the effects of vocational education on inmates: A research model and preliminary results. In Duguid, S. (Ed.), The yearbook of correctional education (pp. 249–262). Burnaby, BC, Canada: Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar

Dugan, J. R., & Everett, R. S. (1998). An experimental test of chemical dependency therapy for jail inmates. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 42, 360–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duguid, S. (1981). Rehabilitation through education: A Canadian model. Journal of Offender Counseling, Services and Rehabilitation, 6, 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duguid, S., Hawkey, C., & Pawson, R. (1996). Using recidivism to evaluate effectiveness in prison education programs. Journal of Correctional Education, 47, 74–85.Google Scholar

Dunford, F. W. (2000). Determining program success: The importance of employing experimental research designs. Crime and Delinquency, 46, 425–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunford, F. W. (1992). The measurement of recidivism in cases of spouse assault. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83, 120–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunford, F. W. (1990). System-initiated warrants for suspects of misdemeanor domestic assault: A pilot study. Justice Quarterly, 7, 621–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dunford, F. W., Huizinga, D., & Elliott, D. S. (1990). The role of arrest in domestic assault: The Omaha police experiment. Criminology, 28, 183–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dutton, D. G. (1998). The abusive personality: Violence and control in intimate relationships. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Dutton, D. G., Bodnarchuk, M., Kropp, R., Hart, S. D., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (1997). Wife assault treatment and criminal recidivism: An 11-year follow-up. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 41, 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edleson, J. L., & Grusznski, R. J. (1988). Treating men who batter: Four years of outcome data from the domestic abuse project. Journal of Social Service Research, 12, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edleson, J. L., & Syers, M. (1991). The effects of group treatment for men who batter: An 18-month follow-up study. Research on Social Work Practice, 1, 227–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisenberg, M. (2001). The substance abuse felony punishment program: Evaluation and recommendations. Austin, TX: Criminal Justice Policy Council.Google Scholar

Eisenberg, M., & Fabelo, T. (1996). Evaluation of the Texas correctional substance abuse treatment initiative: The impact of policy research. Crime and Delinquency, 42, 296–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elrod, H. P., & Minor, K. I. (1992). Second wave evaluation of a multi-faceted intervention for juvenile court probationers. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 36, 247–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

English, K. (1993). Self-reported crime rates of women prisoners. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9(4), 357–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

English, K., & Mande, M. (1992). Measuring crime rates of prisoners. Unpublished report to the National Institute of Justice. Denver, CO: Colorado Division of Criminal Justice.Google Scholar

Ericson, R., Welter, S., & Johnson, T. L. (1999). Evaluation of the Hennepin County drug court. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota Citizens Council on Crime and Justice.Google Scholar

Erwin, B. S. (1986, June). Turning up the heat on probationers in Georgia. Federal Probation, 50, 17–24.Google Scholar

Fagan, J. (1996). The criminalization of domestic violence: Promises and limits. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar

Fagan, J. (1995). Legal work and illegal work: Crime, work and unemployment. In Weisbrod, B. and Worthy, J. (Eds.), Dealing with urban crisis: Linking research to action. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Falkin, G. P., Strauss, S., & Bohen, T. (1999). Matching drug-involved probationers to appropriate drug interventions. Federal Probation, 63(1), 3–8.Google Scholar

Fallen, D. L., Apperson, C. D., Hall-Milligan, J., & Aos, S. (1981). Intensive parole supervision. Olympia, WA: Department of Social and Health Services, Analysis and Information Services Division.Google Scholar

Farrington, D. P. (1998). Individual differences and offending. In Tonry, M. (Ed.), The handbook of crime and punishment (pp. 241–268). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Farrington, D. (1986). Age and crime. In Tonry, M. and Morris, N. (Eds.), Crime and justice (Vol. 7, pp. 189–250). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Farrington, D. P., Ditchfield, J., Hancock, G., Howard, P., Jolliffee, D., Livingston, M. S., & Painter, K. A. (2002). Evaluation of two intensive regimes for young offenders, British Home Office, London.Google Scholar

Farrington, D. P., Gallagher, B., Morley, L., St., Ledger R. J. (1986). Unemployment, school leaving and crime. British Journal of Criminology. 26:335–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farrington, D. P., Hancock, G., Livingston, M., Painter, K., & Towl, G. (2001). Evaluation of intensive regimes for young offenders. London, England: Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.Google Scholar

Farrington, D. P., & Petrosino, A. (2001). The Campbell Collaboration crime and justice group. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578, 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feder, L., & Dugan, L. (2002). A test of the efficacy of court-mandated counseling for domestic violence offenders: The Broward experiment. Justice Quarterly, 19, 343–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Federal Bureau of Investigation. (2004). Crime in the United States 2004, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

Federoff, J. P., Wisner-Carlson, R., Dean, S., & Berlin, F. S. (1992). Medroxy-progesterone acetate in the treatment of paraphilic sexual disorders. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 18, 109–123.Google Scholar

Feeley, M. M., & Simon, J. (1992). The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications. Criminology, 30(4), 449–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, C. M., & Ridley, C. A. (1995). The etiology and treatment of domestic violence between partners. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 2, 317–348.Google Scholar

Field, G. (1989). A study of the effects of intensive treatment on reducing the criminal recidivism of addicted offenders.

Field, G. (1985). The Cornerstone Program: A client outcome study. Federal Probation, 49, 50–55.Google Scholar

Finckenauer, J. O. (1982). Scared Straight and the panacea phenomenon. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Finigan, M. W. (1998). An outcome program evaluation of the Multnomah County S. T. O. P. drug diversion program. Portland, OR: NPC Research.Google Scholar

Finn, P. (1998). The Delaware Department of Corrections life skills program. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar

Flanagan, T. (1989). Prison labor and industry. In Goodstein, L. I. & MacKenzie, D. L. (Eds.), The American Prison. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Florida Department of Juvenile Justice. (1997a). Bay County sheriff's office boot camp: A follow-up of the first seven platoons. Bay County, FL: Bureau of Data and Research.

Florida Department of Juvenile Justice. (1997b). Martin County sheriff's office boot camp: A follow-up study of the first four platoons. Martin County, FL: Bureau of Data and Research.

Florida Department of Juvenile Justice. (1997c). Polk County juvenile boot camp: A follow-up of the first four platoons. Tallahassee, FL: Bureau of Data and Research.

Florida Department of Juvenile Justice. (1997d). Polk County juvenile boot camp female program: A follow-up study of the first seven platoons. Polk County, FL: Bureau of Data and Research.

Florida Department of Juvenile Justice. (1996a). Leon County sheriff's department boot camp: A follow-up study of the first five platoons. Tallahassee, FL: Bureau of Data and Research.

Florida Department of Juvenile Justice. (1996b). Manatee County sheriff's boot camp: A follow-up study of the first four platoons. Tallahassee, FL: Bureau of Research and Data.

Florida Department of Juvenile Justice. (1996c). Pinellas County boot camp: A follow-up study of the first five platoons. Tallahassee, FL: Bureau of Data and Research.

Flowers, G. T., Carr, T. S., & Ruback, B. R. (1991). Special alternative incarceration evaluation. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Department of Corrections.Google Scholar

Foglia, W. D. (2000). Adding an explicit focus on cognition to criminological theory. In Fishbein, D. H. (Ed.), The science, treatment, and prevention of antisocial behaviors: Application to the criminal justice system. Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.Google Scholar

Furby, L., Weinrott, M. R., & Blackshaw, L. (1989). Sex offender recidivism: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 3–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gaither, C. (1976). An evaluation of the Texas Department of Corrections' Junior College program. Huntsville, TX: Department of Correction Treatment Directorate, Research and Development Division.Google Scholar

Gallagher, C. A., Wilson, D. B., Hirschfield, P., Coggeshall, M. B., & MacKenzie, D. L. (1999). The effects of sex offender treatment on sexual reoffending. Corrections Management Quarterly, 3, 19–29.Google Scholar

Gallagher, C. A., Wilson, D. B., & MacKenzie, D. L. (1999). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of sex offender treatment programs. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.Google Scholar

Garner, J., Fagan, J., & Maxwell, C. (1995). Published findings from the spousal assault replication program: A critical review. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 11, 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gendreau, P., Andrews, D. A., Goggin, C., & Chanteloupe, F. (1992). The development of clinical and policy guidelines for the prediction of criminal behavior in criminal justice settings. Unpublished manuscript.

Gendreau, P., Little, T., & Goggin, C. E. (1996). A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult recidivism: What works!Criminology, 34, 575–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gendreau, P., & Ross, R. R. (1987). Revivification or rehabilitation: Evidence from the 1980s. Justice Quarterly, 4, 349–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gendreau, P., & Ross, R. R. (1981). Offender rehabilitation: The appeal of success. Federal Probation, 45, 45–48.Google Scholar

Gendreau, P., & Ross, R. R. (1979). Effective correctional treatment. Bibliotherapy for cynics. Crime and Delinquency, 25, 463–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

General Accounting Office (GAO). (1997). Drug courts: Overview of growth, characteristics, and results. Washington, DC: Author.

General Accounting Office (GAO). (1996). Sex offender treatment: Research result inconclusive about what works to reduce recidivism. Washington, DC: Author.

Gerber, J., & Fritsch, E. J. (1995). Adult academic and vocational correctional education programs: A review of recent research. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 22, 119–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giancola, P. R. (2000). Neuropsychological functioning and antisocial behavior: Implications for etiology and prevention. In Fishbein, D. H. (Ed.), The science, treatment, and prevention of antisocial behaviors: Application to the criminal justice system. Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.Google Scholar

Giordano, P. C., Cernkovich, S. A., & Rudolph, J. L. (2002). Gender, crime, and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 107(4), 990–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glaser, D. (1969). The effectiveness of a prison and parole system. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar

Glaser, D., & Watts, R. (1992). Electronic monitoring of drug offenders on probation. Judicature, 76(3), 112–117.Google Scholar

Glueck, S., & Glueck, E. (1930). 500 criminal careers. New York: A. A. Knopf.Google Scholar

Godley, M. D., Dennis, M. L., Funk, R., Siekmann, M., & Weisheit, R. (1998). Madison County alternative treatment and court final evaluation report. Bloomington, IL: Chestnut Health Systems.Google Scholar

Godwin, G., Stone, S., & Hambrock, K. (1995). Recidivism study: Lake County, Florida Detention Center. Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment Review, 4, 6.Google Scholar

Goldkamp, J. S. (October 3, 2000). What we know about the impact of drug courts: Moving research from “do they work?” to “when and how they work.” Testimony before the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Youth Violence.

Goldkamp, J. S. (1999). When is a drug court not a drug court? In Terry, C. (Ed.), The early drug courts: Case studies in judicial innovation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Goldkamp, J. S., & Weiland, D. (1993). Assessing the impact of Dade County's felony drug court: Final report. Philadelphia: Crime and Justice Research Institute.Google Scholar

Goldkamp, J. S., White, M. D., & Robinson, J. B. (2000). Retrospective evaluation of two pioneering drug courts: Phase I findings from Clark County, Nevada, and Multnomah, Oregon: An interim report of the national evaluation of drug courts. Philadelphia: Crime and Justice Research Institute.Google Scholar

Gondolf, E. W. (1999). A comparison of four batterer intervention systems: Do court referral, program length, and services matter? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gordon, D. A., & Arbuthnot, J. (1987). Individual, group, and family interventions. In Quay, H. C. (Ed.), Handbook of juvenile delinquency (pp. 290–324). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Gordon, A., & Nicholaichuk, T. (1996). Applying the risk principle to sex offender treatment, Correctional Service of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar

Gottfredson, D. C., & Barton, W. H. (1993). Deinstitutionalization of juvenile offenders. Criminology, 31(4), 591–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gottfredson, D. C., Coblentz, K., & Harmon, M. A. (1996). A short-term outcome evaluation of the Baltimore City drug treatment court program. College Park, MD: University of Maryland, Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice.Google Scholar

Gottfredson, S. D., & Gottfredson, D. M. (1986). Behavioral prediction and the problem of incapacitation. Criminology, 32(3), 441–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Gottfredson, D. C., Najaka, S. S., & Kearley, B. (2003). Effectiveness of drug treatment courts: Evidence from a randomized trial. Criminology and Public Policy, 2(2), 171–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gowdy, V. B. (1996). Historical perspective. In Correctional boot camps: A tough intermediate sanction (pp. 1–16). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar

Granfield, R., Eby, C., & Brewster, T. (1998). An examination of the Denver drug court: The impact of a treatment-oriented drug-offender system. Law and Policy, 20(2), 183–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gransky, L. A., & Jones, R. J. (1995). Evaluation of the post-release status of substance abuse program participants. Chicago: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.Google Scholar

Greenberg, D. F. (1975). The incapacitative effects of imprisonment: Some estimates. Law and Society, 9(4), 541–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenfeld, L. A. (1997). Sex offenses and offenders: An analysis of data on rape and sexual assault. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar

Greenwood, P. W., & Abrahamse, A. (1982). Selective incapacitation: Report prepared for the National Institute of Justice. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar

Greenwood, P. W., Deschenes, E. P., & Adams, J. (1993). Chronic juvenile offenders: Final results from the Skillman Aftercare Experiment. RAND, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar

Greenwood, P. W., Rydell, C. P. Abrahamse, A. F., Caulkins, J. P., Chiesa, J., Model, K. E., & Klein, S. P. (1996). Estimated benefits and costs of California's new mandatory-sentencing law. In Shichor, D. & Sechrest, D. K. (Eds.), Three strikes and you're out: Vengeance as public policy (pp. 53–89). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Greenwood, P. W., & Turner, S. (1993). Evaluation of the Paint Creek Youth Center: A residential program for serious delinquents. Criminology, 31(2), 263–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenwood, P. W., & Turner, S. (1987a). Selective incapacitation revisited: Why the high-rate offenders are hard to predict. Santa Monica: Rand.Google Scholar

Greenwood, P. W., & Turner, S. (1987b). The VisionQuest program: An evaluation (R-3445-OJJDP). Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.

Groth, A. N. (1979). Sexual trauma in the life histories of rapists and child molesters. Victimology: An International Journal, 4, 10–16.Google Scholar

Groth, A. N. (1978). Patterns of sexual assault against children and adolescents. In Burgess, A. W., Groth, A. N., Holmstrom, L. L., & Sgroi, S. M. (Eds.), Sexual assault of children and adolescents. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Guarino, G. S., & Kimball, L. M. (1998). Juvenile sex offenders in treatment. Corrections Management Quarterly, 2, 45–54.Google Scholar

Hagan, J., & Dinovitzer, R. (1999). Collateral consequences of imprisonment. In Tonry, M. & Petersilia, J. (Eds.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 26, pp. 121–162). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hall, N. G. (1995). Sexual offender recidivism revisited: A meta-analysis of recent treatment studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 802–809.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hamberger, L. K., & Hastings, J. E. (1988). Skills training for treatment of spouse abusers: An outcome study. Journal of Family Violence, 3(2), 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanson, R. K., & Bussiere, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of recent treatment studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanson, R. K., Steffy, R. A., & Gauthier, R. (1993). Long-term recidivism of child molesters. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(4), 646–652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Harer, M. D. (1995a). Prison education program participation and recidivism: A test of the normalization hypothesis. Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Prisons, Office of Research and Evaluation.Google Scholar

Harer, M. D. (1995b). Recidivism among federal prisoners released in 1987. Journal of Correctional Education, 46, 98–127.Google Scholar

Harer, M. D., & Klein-Saffran, J. (1996). An evaluation of the Federal Bureau of Prisons Lewisburg Intensive Confinement Center. Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Prisons, Research and Evaluation.Google Scholar

Harland, A. T. (1996). Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Harrell, A., Hirst, A., Mitchell, O., Marlowe, D., & Merrill, J. (2001). Evaluation of the breaking the cycle demonstration in Birmingham, Alabama: Final report. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar

Harrell, A., Roman, J., & Sack, E. (2001). Evaluation of the Brooklyn Treatment Court: 1996–1999. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar

Harrison, R. S., Parsons, B. V., Byrnes, E. I., & Sahami, S. (n.d.). Salt Lake County drug court evaluation report July, 1996 through September, 1998. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah, Social Research Institute.

Hartmann, D. J., Wolk, J. L., Johnston, L. S., & Colyer, C. J. (1997). Recidivism and substance abuse outcomes in a prison-based therapeutic community. Federal Probation, 61, 18–25.Google Scholar

Healey, K., Smith, C., & Sullivan, C. (1998). Batterer intervention: Program approaches and criminal justice strategies. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar

Henggeler, S. W., & Bourdin, C. M. (1990). Family therapy and beyond: A multisystemic approach to treating the behaviour problems of children and adolescents. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar

Henggeler, S. W., Bourdin, C. M., Melton, G. B., Mann, B. J., Smith, L. A., Hall, J. A., Cone, L., & Fucci, B. R. (1991). Effects of multisystemic therapy on drug use and abuse in serious juvenile offenders: A progress report from two outcome studies. Family Dynamics of Addiction Quarterly, 1(3), 40–51.Google Scholar

Henggeler, S. W., Cligempeel, W. G., Brondino, M. J., & Pickrel, S. G. (2002). Four year follow-up of multisystemic therapy with substance abusing and dependent juvenile offenders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 868–874.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Henggeler, S. W., Metlon, G. B., Brondino, M. J., Scherer, D. G., & Hanley, J. H. (1997). Multisystemic therapy with violent and chronic juvenile offenders and their families: The role of treatment fidelity in successful dissemination. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 821–833.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Henggeler, S. W., Melton, G. B., Smith, L. A., Schoenwald, S. K., & Hanley, J. H. (1993). Family preservation using multisystemic therapy: Long-term follow-up to a clinical trial with serious juvenile offenders. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 2, 283–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henning, K. R., & Frueh, B. C. (1996). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of incarcerated offenders: An evaluation of the Vermont Department of Corrections cognitive self-change program. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hildebran, D. D., & Pithers, W. D. (1992). Relapse prevention: Application and outcome. In O'Donohue, W. & Geer, J. H. (Eds.), The sexual abuse of children (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Hirschel, J. D., & Hutchinson, I. W. (1992). Female spouse abuse and the police response: The Charlotte, North Carolina experiment. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 83, 73–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holloway, J., & Moke, P. (1986). Post-secondary correctional education: An evaluation of parolee performance. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Home Builders Institute. (1996). Project TRADE. A program of training, restitution, apprenticeship, development and education. Washington, DC: Home Builders Institute.

Horney, J., & Marshall, I. H. (1991). Measuring lambda through self-reports. Rand methodology. Criminology, 29, 471–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horney, J., Osgood, W. D., & Marshall-Ineke, H. (1995). Criminal careers in the short-term: Intra-individual variability in crime and its relation to local life circumstances. American Sociological Review, 60, 655–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hughey, R., & Klemke, L. W. (1996). Evaluation of a jail-based substance abuse treatment program. Federal Probation, 60, 40–44.Google Scholar

Hull, K. A. (1995). Analysis of recidivism rates for participants of the academic/vocational/transition education programs offered by the Virginia Department of Correctional Education. Richmond, VA: Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Correctional Education.

Hull, K. A., Forrester, S., Brown, J., Jobe, D., & McCullen, C. (2000). Analysis of recidivism rates for participants of the academic/vocational/transition education programs offered by the Virginia Department of Correctional Education. Journal of Correctional Education, 51, 256–261.Google Scholar

Huot, S. (1999). Sex offender treatment and recidivism. Minnesota Department of Corrections, St. Paul.Google Scholar

Husband, S. D., & Platt, J. J. (1993). The cognitive skills component in substance abuse treatment in correctional settings: A brief review. Journal of Drug Issues, 23, 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Inciardi, J. A. (1996). The therapeutic community: An effective model for corrections-based drug abuse treatment. In Early, K. E. (Ed.), Drug treatment behind bars: Prison-based strategies for change (pp. 65–74). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Inciardi, J. A., Martin, S. S., Butzin, C. A., Hooper, R. M., & Harrison, L. D. (1997). An effective model of prison-based treatment for drug-involved offenders. Journal of Drug Issues, 27, 261–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Izzo, R. L., & Ross, R. R. (1990). Meta-analysis of rehabilitation programs for juvenile delinquents. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 134–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaffe, P. G., Hastings, E., Reitzel, D., & Austin, G. W. (1993). The impact of police laying charges. In Hilton, N. Z. (Ed.), Legal responses to wife assault: Current trends and evaluation (pp. 62–95). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Jeffords, C. R., & McNitt, S. (1993). The relationship between GED attainment and recidivism. Texas Youth Commission Department of Research and Planning, Austin.Google Scholar

Johnson, G. D., Formichella, C. M., & Bowers, D. A. Jr. (1998). Do drug courts work? An outcome evaluation of a promising program. Journal of Applied Sociology, 15(1), 44–62.Google Scholar

Johnson, G., & Hunter, R. M. (1995). Evaluation of the specialized drug offender program. In Ross, R. R. & Ross, B. (Eds.), Thinking straight (pp. 215–234). Ottawa, Canada: Cognitive Center.Google Scholar

Johnson, S., & Latessa, E. J. (2000). The Hamilton County drug court: Outcome evaluation findings. Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati, Center for Criminal Justice Research.Google Scholar

Jolin, A., & Stipak, B. (1991). Clackamas County community corrections intensive drug program: Program evaluation report. Portland, OR: Portland State University, Department of Public Administration.Google Scholar

Jones, M. (1996). Do boot camp graduates make better probationers?Journal of Crime and Justice, 19, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, M., & Ross, D. L. (1997). Is less better? Boot camp, regular probation and rearrest in North Carolina. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 21, 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, R. J. (1998). Annual report to the governor and the general assembly: Impact incarceration program. Springfield, IL: Illinois Department of Corrections.Google Scholar

Kelly, F. J., & Baer, D. J. (1971, October). Physical challenge as a treatment for delinquency. Crime and Delinquency, 437–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kempinen, C., & Kurlychek, M. (2003). An outcome evaluation of Pennsylvania's boot camp: Does rehabilitative programming within a disciplinary setting reduce recidivism?Crime and Delinquency, 49, 581–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirkpatrick, B. L. H. (1996). Cognitive restructuring: Effects on recidivism (Doctoral dissertation, Ball State University, 1996). Dissertation Abstracts International, 57, 2680).Google Scholar

Knight, K., Simpson, D. D., & Hiller, M. (1999). Three-year reincarceration outcomes for in-prison therapeutic community treatment in Texas. Prison Journal, 79, 337–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knight, R. A. (1988). A taxonomic analysis of child molesters. In Prentky, R. A. & Quinsey, V. L. (Eds.), Human sexual aggression: Current perspectives. New York: New York Academy of Science.Google Scholar

Knight, R. A., & Prentky, R. A. (1990). The developmental antecedents and adult adaptations of rapist subtypes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 14, 403–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knott, C. (1995). The STOP Programme: Reasoning and rehabilitation in a British setting. In McGuire, J. (Ed.), What works: Reducing reoffending – Guidelines from research and practice (pp. 115–126). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Koch Crime Institute. (2001), http://www.kci.org/forms/kccreach.htm.

Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive developmental approach. In Lockona, T. (Ed.), Moral development and behavior: Theory, research and social issue (pp. 31–53). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar

Krueger, S. (1997). Five-year recidivism study of MRT-treated offenders in a county jail. Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment Review, 6, 3.Google Scholar

Lab, S. P., Shields, G., & Schondel, C. (1993). Research note: An evaluation of juvenile sexual offender treatment. Crime and Delinquency, 39, 543–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Land, K. C. M. P. L., & Williams, J. R. (1990). Something that works in juvenile justice: An evaluation of the North Carolina court counselors' intensive protective supervision randomized experimental project, 1987–1989. Evaluation Review, 14(6), 574–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langenbach, M., North, M. Y., Aagaard, L., & Chown, W. (1990). Televised instruction in Oklahoma prisons: A study of recidivism and disciplinary actions. Journal of Correctional Education, 41, 87–94.Google Scholar

Langevin, R., Paitich, D., Hucker, S., Newman, S., Ramsay, G., Pope, S., Geller, G., & Anderson, C. (1979). The effect of assertiveness training, provera and sex of therapist in the treatment of genital exhibitionism. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 10, 275–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latessa, E. J. (1993a). An evaluation of the Lucas County adult probation department's IDU & high risk groups. Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati, Department of Criminal Justice.Google Scholar

Latessa, E. J. (1993b). Profile of the special units of the Lucas County adult probation department. Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati, Department of Criminal Justice.Google Scholar

Latessa, E. J. (1991). A preliminary evaluation of the Cuyahoga County adult probation department's intensive supervision groups. Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati, Department of Criminal Justice.Google Scholar

Latessa, E. J., Travis, L., Fulton, B., & Stichman, A. (1998). Evaluating the prototypical ISP: Final report. Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati, Division of Criminal Justice.Google Scholar

Lattimore, P. K., Witte, A. D., & Baker, J. R. (1990). Experimental assessment of the effect of vocational training on youthful property offenders. Evaluation Review, 14, 115–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laws, D. R. (1995). Central elements in relapse prevention procedures with sex offenders. Crime and Law, 2, 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, K. M. (1983). The Wichita work release center: An evaluative study (Kansas). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kansas State University.Google Scholar

Leschied, A. W., Bernfeld, G. A., & Farrington, D. P. (2001). Implementation issues. In Bernfeld, G. A., Farrington, D. P., & Leschied, A. W. (Eds.), Offender rehabilitation in practice (pp. 3–19). Chichester, England: Wiley.Google Scholar

Levitt, S. (1996). The effect of prison population size on crime rates: Evidence from prison overcrowding litigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(2), 319–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lilly, J. R., Cullen, F. T., & Ball, R. A. (2002). Criminological theory: Context and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Linden, R., & Perry, L. (1983). The effectiveness of prison education programs. Journal of Offender Counseling, Services and Rehabilitation, 6, 43–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Linden, R., Perry, L., Ayers, D., & Parlett, T. A. (1984). An evaluation of a prison education program. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 26, 65–73.Google Scholar

Lindsey, M., McBride, R. W., & Platt, C. M. (1993). Amend: Philosophy and curriculum for treating batterers. Littleton, CO: Gylantic.Google Scholar

Lipsey, M. W. (1995). What do we learn from 400 research studies on the effectiveness of treatment with juvenile delinquents? In McGuire, J. (Ed.), What works? Reducing offending (pp. 63–78). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Lipsey, M. W. (1992). Juvenile delinquency treatment: A meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects. In Cook, T. D., Cooper, H., Cordray, D. S., Hartmann, H., Hedges, L. V., Light, R. J., Louis, T. A., & Mosteller, F. (Ed.), Meta-analysis for explanation: A casebook. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1998). Effective intervention for serious juvenile offenders: A synthesis of research. In Loeber, R. & Farrington, D. (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 313–345). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 48, 1181–1209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lipton, D., Martinson, R., & Wilkes, L. (1975). The effectiveness of correctional treatment and what works: A survey of treatment evaluation studies. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Littell, J. H. (2005 August). A systematic review of effects of multisystemic therapy. Paper presented at the 14th World Congress of Criminology, University of Pennsylvania.

Little, G. L., & Robinson, K. D. (1989). Treating drunk drivers with moral reconation therapy: A one-year recidivism report. Psychological Reports, 64, 960–962.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Little, G. L., & Robinson, K. D. (1988). Moral reconation therapy: A systematic step-by-step. Psychological Reports, 62, 135–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Little, G. L., Robinson, K. D., & Burnette, K. D. (1994). Treating offenders with cognitive-behavioral therapy: 5-year recidivism report. Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment Review, 3, 1–3.Google Scholar

Little, G. L., Robinson, K. D., & Burnette, K. D. (1993a). 42 month alcohol treatment data: Multiple DWI offenders treated with MRT show lower recidivism rates. Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment Review, 2, 5.Google Scholar

Little, G. L., Robinson, K. D., & Burnette, K. D. (1993b). Cognitive behavioral treatment of felony drug offenders: A five-year recidivism report. Psychological Reports, 73, 1089–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Little, G. L., Robinson, K. D., & Burnette, K. D. (1991a). Treating drug offenders with moral reconation therapy: A three-year recidivism report. Psychological Reports, 69, 953–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Little, G. L., Robinson, K. D., & Burnette, K. D. (1991b). Treating drunk drivers with moral reconation therapy: A three-year report. Psychological Reports, 69, 953–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Little, G. L., Robinson, K. D., & Burnette, K. D. (1990). Treating drunk drivers with moral reconation therapy: A two-year recidivism study. Psychological Reports, 66, 1379–1387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Little, G. L., Robinson, K. D., Burnette, K. D., & Swan, S. (1996). Review of outcome data with MRT: Seven year recidivism results. Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment Review, 5, 1–7.Google Scholar

Little, G. L., Robinson, K. D., Burnette, K. D., & Swan, S. (1995a). Seven-year recidivism of felony offenders treated with MRT. Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment Review, 4, 6.Google Scholar

Little, G. L., Robinson, K. D., Burnette, K. D., & Swan, S. (1995b). Six-year MRT recidivism data on felons and DWI offenders: Treated offenders show significantly lower reincarceration. Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment Review, 4(1), 4–5.Google Scholar

Lo, C. C., & Stephens, R. C. (2000). Drugs and prisoners: Treatment needs on entering prison. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 26, 229–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lockwood, D. (1991). Prison higher education and recidivism: A program evaluation. In Yearbook of Correctional Education (pp. 187–201). Burnaby, BC, Canada: Simon Fraser University, Institute for the Humanities.Google Scholar

Losel, F. (1995a). The efficacy of correctional treatment: A review and synthesis of meta-evaluations. In McGuire, J. (Ed.), What works: Reducing reoffending – Guidelines from research and practice (pp. 79–111). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Losel, F. (1995b). Increasing consensus in the evaluation of offender rehabilitation? Lessons from recent research synthesis. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 2, 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Losel, F., & Koferl, P. (1989). Evaluation research on correctional treatment in West Germany: A meta-analysis. In Wegener, H., Losel, F., & Haisch, J. (Eds.), Criminal behavior and the justice system: Psychological perspectives (pp. 334–355). New York: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luftig, J. T. (1978). Vocational education in prison: An alternative to recidivism. Journal of Studies in Technical Careers, 1, 31–42.Google Scholar

Lurigio, A. J., & Petersilia, J. (1992). The emergence of intensive probation supervision programs in the United States. In Byrne, J. M., Lurigio, A. J., & Petersilia, J. (Eds.), Smart sentencing: The emergence of intermediate sanctions (pp. 3–17). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Lynch, J. P., & Sabol, W. J. 2000. Prison use and social control. In Horney, J. (Ed.), Policies, processes, and decisions of the criminal justice system: Criminal justice 2000 (Vol. 3, pp. 7–44). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar

Maciekowich, Z. D. (1976). Academic education/vocational training and recidivism of adult prisoners (Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, 1976). Dissertation Abstracts International, 37-08A, 5080–5195.Google Scholar

MacKenzie, D. L. 2005. The importance of using scientific evidence to make decisions about correctional programming. Criminology and Public Policy, 4(2), 1001–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacKenzie, D. L. (2001). Corrections and sentencing in the 21st century: evidence-based corrections and sentencing. Prison Journal, 81, 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacKenzie, D. L. (2000). Evidence-based corrections: Identifying what works. Crime and Delinquency, 46(4), 457–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacKenzie, D. L. (2002). Reducing the criminal activities of known offenders and delinquents: Crime prevention in the courts and corrections. In Sherman, W. L., Welsch, B. C., Farrington, D. P. & MacKenzie, D. L. (Eds.), Evidence-Based Crime Prevention, London, UK: Harwood Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacKenzie, D. L. (1997). Criminal justice and crime prevention. In Sherman, L. W., Gottfredson, D., MacKenzie, D. L., Eck, J., Reuter, P., & Bushway, S. (Eds.), Preventing crime: What works, what doesn't, what's promising (Report to the U.S. Congress). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar

MacKenzie, D. L. (1989). Prison classification: The management and psychological perspectives. In Goodstein, L. & MacKenzie, D. (Eds.), The American prison: Issues in research and policy. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacKenzie, D. L., Brame, R., McDowall, D., & Souryal, C. (1995). Boot camp prisons and recidivism in eight states. Criminology, 33, 327–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacKenzie, D. L., Browning, K., Priu, H., Skroban, S., & Smith, D. (1998). Probationer compliance with conditions of supervision. Unpublished report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.

MacKenzie, D. L., Browning, K., Skroban, S., & Smith, D. (1999). The impact of probation on the criminal activities of offenders. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 36(4), 423–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacKenzie, D. L., & Li, S. D.. (2002). The impact of formal and informal social controls on the criminal activities of probationers. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 39(3), 243–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mackenzie, D. L., & Hebert, E. E. (1996). Correctional boot camps: A tough intermediate sanction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar

MacKenzie, D. L., & Hickman, L. J.. (1998). What works in corrections? An examination of the effectiveness of the type of rehabilitation programs offered by Washington State Department of Corrections (Report to the State of Washington Legislature Joint Audit and Review Committee). College Park, MD: University of Maryland.Google Scholar

MacKenzie, D. L., & Parent, D. (1992). Boot camp prisons for young offenders. In Smart sentencing: The emergence of intermediate sanctions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

MacKenzie, D. L., & Parent, D. (1991). Shock incarceration and prison overcrowding in Louisiana. Journal of Criminal Justice, 19, 225–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacKenzie, D. L., & Piquero, A. (1994). The impact of shock incarceration programs on prison overcrowding. Crime and Delinquency, 40, 222–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacKenzie, D. L., & Shaw, J. W. (1990). Inmate adjustment and change during shock incarceration. Justice Quarterly, 7, 125–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacKenzie, D. L., & Souryal, C. (1995). Inmate attitude change during incarceration: A comparison of boot camp with traditional prison. Justice Quarterly, 12, 325–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacKenzie, D. L., Souryal, C., Sealock, M., & Bin Kashem, M. (1997). Outcome study of the Sergeant Henry Johnson Youth Leadership Academy (YLA). Washington, DC: University of Maryland, National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar

MacKenzie, D. L., Tracy, G. S., & Williams, G. (1988). Incarceration rates and demographic changes: A test of the demographic change hypothesis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 16, 241–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacKenzie, D. L., Wilson, D. B., Armstrong, G. S., & Gover, A. (2001). The impact of boot camps and traditional institutions on juvenile residents: Adjustment, perception of the environment and changes in social bonds, impulsivity, and antisocial attitudes. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38(3), 279–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacKenzie, D. L., Wilson, D. B., & Kider, S. B. (2001). Effects of correctional boot camps on offending. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 578 (Nov), 126–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maguire, K. E., Flanagan, T. J., & Thornberry, T. P. (1988). Prison labor and recidivism. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 4, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Magura, S., Nwakeze, P. C., Kang, S. Y., & Demsky, S. (1999). Program quality effects on patient outcomes during methadone maintenance: A study of 17 clinics. Substance Use Misuse, 34(9), 1299–1327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Magura, S., Rosenblum, A. L. C., & Joseph, H. (1993). The effectiveness of in-jail methadone maintenance. Journal of Drug Issues, 23, 75–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mahoney, M. J., & Arnkoff, D. B. (1978). Cognitive and self-control therapies. In Garfield, S. L. & Bergin, A. E. (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change: An empirical analysis (pp. 689–722). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Maletzky, B. M. (1991). The use of medoxyprogesterone acetate to assist in the treatment of sexual offenders. Annals of Sex Research, 4, 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marcus-Mendoza, S. T. (1995). Preliminary investigation of Oklahoma's shock incarceration program. Journal of the Oklahoma Criminal Justice Research Consortium, 2, 44–49.Google Scholar

Marques, J. K., Day, D. M., Nelson, C., & West, M. A. (1994). Effects of cognitive-behavioral treatment on sex offender recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 21, 28–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marquis, H. A., Bourgon, G. A., Armstrong, B., & Pfaff, J. (1996). Reducing recidivism through institutional treatment programs. Forum on Corrections Research, 8, 3–5.Google Scholar

Marquis, J. K. (1981). Quality of prisoner self-reports, arrest and conviction response errors. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.Google Scholar

Marshall, W. L., & Barbaree, H. E. (1988). The long-term evaluation of a behavioral treatment program for child molesters. Behavior Research & Therapy, 26, 499–511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Marshall, W. L., Eccles, A., & Barbaree, H. E. (1991). The treatment of exhibitionists: A focus on sexual deviance versus cognitive and relationship features. Behavior Research and Therapy, 29, 129–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Marshall, W. L., Jones, R., Ward, T., Johnston, P., & Barbaree, H. E. (1991). Treatment outcome with sex offenders. Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 465–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martinson, R. (1979). What works: Questions and answers about prison reform. Public Interest, 35, 22–54.Google Scholar

Martinson, R. (1976). California research at the crossroads. Crime and Delinquency, 22, 178–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martinson, R. (1974). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. Public Interest, 10, 22–54.Google Scholar

Marvell, T. B., & Moody, C. E. (1998). The impact of out-of-state prison population on state homicide rates: Displacement and free-rider effects. Criminology, 36(3), 513–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marvell, T. B., & Moody, C. E. (1994). Prison population and crime reduction. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 10, 109–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McConaghy, N., Blasczynski, A., & Kidson, W. (1988). Treatment of sex offenders with imaginal desensitization and /or medroxyprogesterone. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 77, 199–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

McFall, R. M. (1990). The enhancement of social skills: An information-processing analysis. In Marshall, W. L., Laws, D. R., & Barbaree, H. E. (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender (pp. 311–330). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McGee, C. J. (1997). The positive impact of corrections education on recidivism and employment. Springfield, IL: Illinois Department of Corrections and Illinois Council on Vocational Education.Google Scholar

McGrath, R. J., Hoke, S. E., & Vojtisek, J. E. (1998). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of sex offenders: A treatment comparison and long-term follow-up study. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25, 203–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McKelvey, B. (1972). American prisons: A study in American social history prior to 1915. Montclair, NJ: Patterson Smith Publishing.Google Scholar

McNeece, C. A., & Byers, J. B. (1995). Hillsborough County drug court two year follow-up study. Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University, Institute for Health and Human Services Research.Google Scholar

Melton, R., & Pennell, S. (1998). Staying out successfully: An evaluation of an in-custody life skills training program. San Diego, CA: San Diego Association of Governments.Google Scholar

Menon, R., Blakely, C., Carmichael, D., & Silver, L. (1992). An evaluation of Project RIO outcomes: An evaluative report. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University, Public Policy Resources Laboratory.Google Scholar

Menton, P. C. (1999). The effect of a domestic violence program on incarcerated batterers (Doctoral dissertation, Boston University, 1999). Dissertation Abstracts International, 59, 3217.Google Scholar

Meyer, W. J., Cole, C., & Emory, E. (1992). Depo provera treatment for sex offending behavior: An evaluation of outcome. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 20, 249–259.Google Scholar

Miethe, T. D., Lu, H., & Reese, E. (2000). Reintegrative shaming and recidivism risks in drug court: Explanations for some unexpected findings. Crime and Delinquency, 46(4), 522–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milhalic, S. W., & Elliott, D. (1997). A social learning theory model of marital violence. Journal of Family Violence, 12, 21–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Milkman, R. H., Timrots, A. D., Peyser, A. V., Toborg, M. A., Gottlieb, B. E., Yezer, A. M. J., et al. (1985). Employment services for ex-offenders field test: Summary report (Report to the National Institute of Justice). McLean, VA: Lazar Institute.Google Scholar

Miller, M. (1997). Evaluation of the life skills program. Division of Correctional Education, Delaware State Department of Corrections, Dover.Google Scholar

Miller, M. (1995). The Delaware life skills program: Evaluation report. Cognitive-Behavioral-Treatment Review, 4, 1–4.Google Scholar

Miller, M. L., Scocas, E. A., & Connell, J. P. (1998). Evaluation of the juvenile drug court diversion program. Dover, DE: Statistical Analysis Center.Google Scholar

Minnesota Department of Corrections. (1987). Transistional sex offender program. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Corrections.

Minor, K. I., & Elrod, H. P. (1990). The effects of a multi-faceted intervention on the offense activities of juvenile probationers. Journal of Offender Counseling, Services and Rehabilitation, 15(2), 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miranne, A. C., & Geerken, M. R. (1991). The New Orleans inmate survey: A test of Greenwood's predictive scale. Criminology, 29(3), 497–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, O., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2003). Crime prevention via prison-based drug treatment: A systematic review and assessment of the research. In Kury, H. & Obergfell-Fuchs, J. (Eds.), Crime prevention: New approaches. Weberstrabe, Mainz: Weisser Ring, Germany.Google Scholar

Mitchell, O., MacKenzie, D. L., & Wilson, D. B. (2005). The effectiveness of incarceration-based drug treatment: An empirical synthesis of the research. In Farrington, D. P. & Welsh, B. C. (Eds.), In preventing crime: What works for children, offenders, victims, and places. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar

Mitchell, C., Zehr, J., & Butler, C. (1987). Intensive supervision/high risk parole: Utah Department of Corrections. Crime and juvenile delinquency: 1987 update. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International.Google Scholar

M M Bell, Inc. (1998). King County drug court evaluation: Final report. Seattle, WA: M M Bell, Inc.

Moody, E. E. Jr. (1997). Lessons of pair counseling with incarcerated juvenile delinquents. Journal of Addictions and Offender Counseling, 18, 10–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moon, M. M., & Latessa, E. J. (1994). Drug treatment in adult probation: An evaluation of an outpatient and acupunture program. Evaluation and Program Planning, 17(2), 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Money, J. (1980). Love and love sickness. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Money, J. A., Wideling, P. S., Walker, & Gain, D. (1976). Combined antiandrogenic and counseling program for treatment of 46 XY and 47 XYY sex offenders. In Sachar, E. J. (Ed.), Hormones, behavior and psychopathology. New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar

Morash, M., & Rucker, L. (1990). A critical look at the idea of boot camp as correctional reform. Crime and Delinquency, 36, 204–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morris, N., & Tonry, M. (1990). Between prison and probation: Intermediate punishments in a rational sentencing system. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mumola, C. J. (1999). Substance abuse and treatment, state and federal prisoners, 1997. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar

Murphy, C. M., Musser, P. H., & Maton, K. I. (1998). Coordinated community intervention for domestic abusers: Intervention system involvement and criminal recidivism. Journal of Family Violence, 13, 263–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

National Institute of Justice. (2003) 2000: Arrestee drug abuse monitoring: Annual report. Retrieved January 13, 2005, from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/.

Needels, K. (1996). Go directly to jail and do not collect? A long-term study of recidivism, employment and earnings patterns among prison releasees. Journal of Research on Crime and Delinquency, 33, 471–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nicholaichuk, T. (1996). Sex offender treatment priority: An illustration of the risk/need principle. Forum, 8, 30–32.Google Scholar

Nicholaichuk, T., Gordon, A., Andre, G., & Gu, D. (1995, Nov). Long-term outcome of the Clearwater sex offender treatment. Paper presented to the 14th Annual Conference of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers, New Orleans, LA.

Nielson, A. L., & Scarpitti, F. R. (1997, Spring). Changing the behavior of substance abusers: Factors influencing the effectiveness of therapeutic communities. Journal of Drug Issues, 27, 279–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neil, M. (1990). Correctional higher education: Reduced recidivism?Journal of Correctional Education, 41, 28–31.Google Scholar

Oregon Department of Corrections. (1994). Comparison of outcomes and costs residential and outpatient treatment programs for inmates alcohol and drug, mental health, sex offender, and social skills treatment. Corrections Treatment Program and Corrections Treatment Services Executive Summary. Salem, OR: Oregon Department of Corrections.

Palmer, T. (1996). Programmatic and nonprogrammatic aspects of successful implementation. In Harland, A. T. (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply (pp. 131–182). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Palmer, T. (1992). The re-emergence of correctional intervention. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palmer, T. (1983). The “effectiveness” issue today: An overview. Federal Probation, 47, 3–10.Google Scholar

Palmer, T. (1975). Martinson revisited. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 12, 133–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palmer, S. E., Brown, R. A., & Barrera, M. E. (1992). Group treatment for abusive husbands: Long term evaluation. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 62, 276–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pate, A. M., & Hamilton, E. E. (1992). Formal and informal deterrents to domestic violence: The Dade County spouse assault experiment. American Sociological Review, 57, 691–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pearson, F. S. (1987). Final report of research on New Jerseys's intensive supervision program. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers – the State University of New Jersey, Department of Sociology.Google Scholar

Pearson, F. S., & Lipton, D. S. (1999). A meta-analytic review of the effectiveness of corrections-based treatment for drug abuse. Prison Journal, 79, 384–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pelissier, B. M., Gaes, G., Rhodes, W., Camp, S., Neil, J., Wallace, S., & Saylor, W. (1998). TRIAD drug treatment evaluation project, six-month interim report. Federal Bureau of Prisons, Office of Research and Evaluation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Pence, E. (1989). Batterer programs: Shifting from community collusion to community confrontation. In Caesar, P. L. & Hamberger, L. K. (Eds.), Treating men who batter: Theory, practice, and programs (pp. 24–50). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Peters, M. (1996a). Evaluation of the impact of boot camps for juvenile offenders: Denver interim report. Fairfax, VA: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar

Peters, M. (1996b). Evaluation of the impact of boot camps for juvenile offenders: Mobile interim report. Fairfax, VA: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar

Peters, R. H., Greenbaum, P. E., Edens, J. F., Carter, C. R., & Ortiz, M. M. (1998). Prevalence of DSM-IV substance abuse and dependence disorders among prison inmates. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 24, 573–587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Peters, R. H., Kearns, W. D., Murrin, M. R., Dolente, A. S., & May, R. L. II. (1993). Examining the effectiveness of in-jail substance abuse treatment. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 19, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peters, R. H., & Murrin, M. R. (2000). Effectiveness of treatment-based drug courts in reducing criminal recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27(1), 72–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petersilia, J. (2004). What works in prisoner reentry? Reviewing and questioning the evidence. Federal Probation, 68(2), 4–8.Google Scholar

Petersilia, J., & Greenwood, P. (1978). Mandatory prison sentences: Their projected effects on crime and prison populations. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 69, 604–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petersilia, J., & Turner, S. (1993). Intensive probation and parole. Crime and Justice, 17, 281–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petersilia, J., & Turner, S. (1992). An evaluation of intensive probation in California. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82(3), 610–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peterson, M. A., & Braiker, H. B. (1980). Doing crime: A survey of California prison inmates (Report R-2200-DOJ). Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar

Peterson, M. A., Braiker, H. B., & Polich, S. M. (1981). Who commits crimes: A survey of prison inmates. Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn, and Hain.Google Scholar

Peterson, M. A., Chaiken, J., Ebener, P., & Honig, P. (1982). Survey of prison and jail inmates: Background and methods. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar

Petrosino, A., Boruch, R. F., Farrington, D., Sherman, L., & Weisburd, D. (2003). Towards evidence-based criminology and criminal justice: Systematic reviews and the Campbell Collaboration crime and justice group. International Journal of Comparative Criminology, 3, 18–41.Google Scholar

Petrosino, A., Boruch, R. F., Soydan, H., Duggan, L., & Sanchez-Meca, J. (2001). Meeting the challenges of evidence-based policy: The Campbell Collaboration, The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578, 14–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petrosino, A., Turpin-Petrosino, C., & Buehler, J. (2003, September). Scared Straight and other juvenile awareness programs for preventing juvenile delinquency: A systematic review of the randomize experimental evidence. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 589, 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piaget, J. (1965). The moral judgement of the child. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Piehl, A. M. (1995). Learning while doing time. Unpublished manuscript, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Platt, J. J., & Labate, C. (1976). Heroin addiction: Theory, research, and treatment. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Polizzi, D. L., MacKenzie, D. L., & Hickman, L. (1999). What works in adult sex offender treatment? A review of prison and non-prison-based treatment programs. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43, 357–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Porporino, F. J., Fabiano, E. A., & Robinson, D. (1991). Focusing on successful reintegration: Cognitive skills training for offenders, R-19. Canada: Research and Statistics Branch, Correctional Service of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar

Porporino, F. J., & Robinson, D. (1995). An evaluation of the reasoning and rehabilitation program with Canadian federal offenders. In Ross, R. R. & Ross, B. (Eds.), Thinking straight (pp. 155–191). Ottawa, Canada: Cognitive Centre.Google Scholar

Porporino, F. J., & Robinson, D. (1992). The correctional benefits of education: A follow-up of Canadian federal offenders participating in ABE. Journal of Correctional Education, 43, 92–98.Google Scholar

Postmus, J. L. (2000). Analysis of the family violence option: A strengths perspective. Journal of Women and Social Work, 15, 244–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prendergast, M. L., Podus, D., Chang, E., & Urada, D. (2002, June). The effectiveness of drug abuse treatment: A meta-analysis of comparison group studies. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 67(1), 53–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice. (1967). Task force report: Corrections. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Quinsey, V. L. (1986). Men who have sex with children. In Weisstub, D. N. (Ed.), Law and mental health: International perspectives (Vol. 2, pp. 140–172). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Quinsey, V. L., & Chaplin, T. C. (1988). Preventing faking in phallometric assessments of sexual preference. In Prentky, R. & Quinsey, V. L. (Eds.), Human sexual aggression: Contemporary perspectives: Vol. 528. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar

Quinsey, V. L., & Earls, C. M. (1990). The modification of sexual preferences. In , D. R. L. & Marshall, H. E. B. W. L. (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories, and treatment of the offender (pp. 279–296). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar