Matthews, T., et al., 2020: Going to extremes: Installing the world’s highest weather stations on Mount Everest. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 101: pp. E1870–E1890. doi:10.1175/bams-d-19-0198.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wilkinson, Freddie, 2022: Next-gen weather station installed near Everest’s summit. National Geographic, 25 May 2022 www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/article/perpetual-planet-next-gen-weather-station-installed-near-everests-summitGoogle Scholar

Photographs of the six AWS sites and the archive of (lightly) quality-controlled data from the Mt Everest AWSs are available at www.nationalgeographic.org/projects/perpetual-planet/everest/weather-data/. The most recent data can be viewed at the low-bandwidth page: https://everest-pwa.nationalgeographic.org. Note, however, that data transmission lapses and instrument faults may mean that near-real-time data are occasionally unavailable.Google Scholar

World Meteorological Organization (WMO), 2021: WMO No. 8 – Guide to Meteorological Instruments and Methods of Observation (CIMO guide). 2021 edition – Volume I: Measurement of Meteorological Variables. Geneva: World Meteorological Organization. 581 pp. WMO permalink: https://library.wmo.int/idurl/4/68695. English: also available in French, Spanish and Russian.Google Scholar

Burt, Stephen, 2017: Mercury sunset. Meteorological Technology International, 2017(4): pp. 16–20Google Scholar

Middleton, W. E. K., 1969: Invention of the meteorological instruments. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Press. 362 pp.Google Scholar

Lawrence, E. N., 1973: Merle’s weather. Weather, 28(3): pp. 127–30. doi:10.1002/j.1477-8696.1973.tb02248.xGoogle Scholar

Meaden, G. T., 1973: Merle’s weather diary and its motivation. Weather, 28(5): pp. 210–211. doi:10.1002/j.1477-8696.1973.tb02267.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiebrich, Christopher A., 2009: History of surface weather observations in the United States. Earth-Science Reviews, 93(3): pp. 77–84. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2009.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tinniswood, Adrian, 2001: His invention so fertile: A life of Christopher Wren. London: Jonathan Cape. 463 pp.Google Scholar

Bennett, J. A., 2002: The mathematical science of Christopher Wren. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 148 pp.Google Scholar

Tinniswood, Adrian, 2019: The Royal Society and the invention of modern science. London: Head of Zeus. 208 pp.Google Scholar

Gribbin, John, 2006: The fellowship: The story of the Royal Society and a scientific revolution. London: Allen Lane. 336 pp.Google Scholar

Mills, A., 2009: Dr Hooke’s ‘Weather-Clock’ and its self-emptying bucket. Bulletin of the Scientific Instrument Society, 102: pp. 29–30: see also Mihailescu, I., 2021: Graphical details: the secret life of Christopher Wren’s drawing of the weather clock. Notes and Records of the Royal Society, 77: pp. 355–378Google Scholar

Folland, C. K. and Wales-Smith, B. G., 1977: Richard Towneley and 300 years of regular rainfall measurement. Weather, 32(12): pp. 438–445. doi:10.1002/j.1477-8696.1977.tb04501.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biswas, A. K., 1967: The automatic rain-gauge of Sir Christopher Wren, F.R.S. Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London, 22(1): pp. 94–104. doi:10.1098/rsnr.1967.0009Google Scholar

Inwood, Stephen, 2002: The man who knew too much: The strange and inventive life of Robert Hooke 1635–1703. London: Macmillan. 497 pp.Google Scholar

Bennett, J. A., 1980: Robert Hooke as mechanic and natural philosopher. Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London, 35(1): pp. 33–48. doi:10.1098/rsnr.1980.0003Google Scholar

Austin, Jillian F. and McConnell, Anita, 1980: James Six F.R.S.: Two hundred years of the Six’s self-registering thermometer. Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London, 35(1): pp. 49–65Google Scholar

Hamblyn, Richard, 2001: The invention of clouds: How an amateur meteorologist forged the language of the skies. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. 403 pp.Google Scholar

Blench, B. J. R., 1963: Luke Howard and his contribution to meteorology. Weather, 18(3): pp. 83–92. doi:10.1002/j.1477-8696.1963.tb01977.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Details of the Alexander Cumming barometer in the Royal Collection, including photographs and a full description, can be found online at www.royalcollection.org.uk/eGallery. King George III paid the enormous sum of £1,178 for this instrument in 1763, to which he added a payment of £150 and an annual retainer to Cumming of £37 10s for maintaining the barograph. The king kept the Cumming barograph with the Pinchbeck astronomical clock in the Passage Room of his apartments at Buckingham House; today it is displayed in the Throne Room at Buckingham Palace. Luke Howard’s instrument is in the Science Museum in London.Google Scholar

Middleton, W. E. K., 1966: A history of the thermometer and its use in meteorology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press. 249 pp. Historical details regarding aspirated thermometers are given on pp. 234–238. Middleton rightly credits the pioneering work of Aitken and Assman in the 1880s, who were more than a century ahead of their time in this area.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bathurst, Bella, 1999: The Lighthouse Stevensons. London: HarperCollins. 284 pp.Google Scholar

Morrison-Low, A. D., 2010: Northern Lights: The age of Scottish lighthouses. Edinburgh: NMSE Publishing Ltd. 262 pp.Google Scholar

Stevenson, Thomas, 1864: New description of box for holding thermometers. Journal of the Scottish Meteorological Society, 1: p. 122.Google Scholar

Burt, Stephen, 2013: An unsung hero in meteorology: Charles Higman Griffith (1830–1896). Weather, 68(5): pp. 135–138. doi:10.1002/wea.2059CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Council of the Royal Meteorological Society, 1884: Report of the Council for the year 1883: Appendix 1, Report of the thermometer screen committee. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 10(50): pp. 92–94. doi:10.1002/qj.4970105003Google Scholar

Multhauf, R. P., 1961: The introduction of self-registering meteorological instruments. Washington DC: United States National Museum Bulletin, 228: pp. 95–116. Multhauf made the interesting speculation that the technology of the 1880s (mechanical sensors, levers to magnify small movements and a clock mechanism to drive a paper chart) was largely available in the 1660s, and that Hooke could probably have built a ‘modern’ clock-driven single-element recorder, such as a thermograph, had he instead progressed his ideas along those lines.Google Scholar

Strangeways, I. C. and Smith, S. W., 1985: Development and use of automatic weather stations. Weather, 40(9): pp. 277–285 . doi:10.1002/j.1477-8696.1985.tb06900.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camuffo, Dario and Bertolin, Chiara, 2012: The earliest temperature observations in the world: the Medici Network (1654–1670). Climatic Change, 111(2): pp. 335–363. doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0142-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camuffo, D., Bertolin, C., Jones, P. D., Cornes, R. and Garnier, E., 2010: The earliest daily barometric pressure readings in Italy: Pisa AD 1657–1658 and Modena AD 1694, and the weather over Europe. The Holocene, 20(3): pp. 337–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cornes, Richard C., et al., 2012: A daily series of mean sea-level pressure for Paris, 1670–2007. International Journal of Climatology, 32(8): pp. 1135–1150 doi:10.1002/joc.2349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cornes, Richard C., et al., 2012: A daily series of mean sea-level pressure for London, 1692–2007. International Journal of Climatology, 32(5): pp. 641–656. doi:10.1002/joc.2301: also Cornes, Richard C., et al., 2023: The London, Paris and De Bilt sub‐daily pressure series. Geoscience Data Journal., online version doi: 10.1002/gdj3.226CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manley, Gordon, 1953: The mean temperature of central England, 1698–1952. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 79(342): pp. 558–567 doi:10.1002/qj.49707934222CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manley, Gordon, 1974: Central England temperatures: Monthly means 1659 to 1973. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 100(425): pp. 389–405 doi:10.1002/qj.49710042511CrossRefGoogle Scholar

The Central England Temperature (CET) database and the England and Wales Precipitation (EWP) series (and others) are available from the Hadley Centre website: metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/index.htmlGoogle Scholar

Parker, D. E., Legg, T. P., and Folland, C. K., 1992: A new daily central England temperature series, 1772–1991. International Journal of Climatology, 12(4): pp. 317–342. doi:10.1002/joc.3370120402CrossRefGoogle Scholar

For more information on the Centennial Observing Stations and an updated list (nominations are sought and reviewed every two years), see https://wmo.int/centennial-observing-stationsGoogle Scholar

Bergström, Hans and Moberg, Anders, 2002: Daily air temperature and pressure series for Uppsala (1722–1998). Climatic Change, 53(1): pp. 213–252 doi:10.1023/a:1014983229213. Further information is available on the University of Uppsala’s website at www.uu.se/en/about-uu/celsius-300CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burt, Stephen, 2023: The Celsius Symposium: 300 years of weather statistics. Weather, 78(1): pp. 30–31 doi:10.1002/wea.4325CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cocheo, Claudio and Camuffo, Dario, 2002: Corrections of systematic errors and data homogenisation in the daily temperature Padova series (1725–1998). Climatic Change, 53(1): pp. 77–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moberg, Anders and Bergström, Hans, 1997: Homogenization of Swedish temperature data. Part III: the long temperature records from Uppsala and Stockholm. International Journal of Climatology, 17(7): pp. 667-699 doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0088(19970615)17:7<667::AID-JOC115>3.0.CO;2-J. Also: Moberg, Anders, et al., 2002: Daily Air Temperature and Pressure Series for Stockholm (1756–1998). Climatic Change, 53(1): pp. 171–212 doi: 10.1023/A:1014966724670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Böhm, Reinhard, et al., 2010: Early instrumental warm-bias: a solution for long central European temperature series 1760–2007. Climatic Change, 101(1–2): pp. 41–67. doi:10.1007/s10584-009-9649-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maugeri, Maurizio, Buffoni, Letizia, and Chlistovsky, Franca, 2002: Daily Milan temperature and pressure series (1763–1998): History of the observations and data and metadata recovery. Climatic Change, 53(1): pp. 101–117. doi:10.1023/A:1014970825579CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maugeri, M., et al., 2002: Daily Milan temperature and pressure series (1763–1998): Completing and homogenising the data. Climatic Change, 53: pp. 119–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Czech Hydrometeorological Institute. Meteorological observations at the Prague Clementinum. Available from: http://portal.chmi.cz/historicka-data/pocasi/praha-klementinum?l=enGoogle Scholar

Prague Klementinum details – on the Czech Hydrometeorological Institute site at www.chmi.cz/historicka-data/pocasi/praha-klementinum?l=enGoogle Scholar

Winkler, P., 2009: Revision and necessary correction of the long-term temperature series of Hohenpeissenberg, 1781–2006. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 98(3): pp. 259–268 doi: 10.1007/s00704-009-0108-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deutscher Wetterdienst. Meteorological Observatory Hohenpeissenberg. Available from: www.dwd.de/EN/aboutus/locations/observatories/mohp/mohp.htmlGoogle Scholar

Pappert, Duncan, et al., 2021: Unlocking weather observations from the Societas Meteorologica Palatina (1781–1792). Climate of the Past, 17(6): pp. 2361–2379 doi:10.5194/cp-17-2361-2021CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennett, J. A., 1990: Church, state and astronomy in Ireland: 200 years of Armagh Observatory. Armagh: The Armagh Observatory. 277 pp.Google Scholar

Butler, C. J., et al., 2005: Air temperatures at Armagh Observatory, Northern Ireland, from 1796 to 2002. International Journal of Climatology, 25(8): pp. 1055–1079. doi:10.1002/joc.1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, C. J. and García-Suárez, A. M., 2012: Relative humidity at Armagh Observatory, 1838–2008. International Journal of Climatology, 32(5): pp. 657–668. doi:10.1002/joc.2302CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butler, John and Hoskin, Michael, 1987: The archives of Armagh Observatory. Journal for the History of Astronomy, 18: pp. 295–307. (List of meteorological records on page 9 of the paper.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guest, Ivor, 1991: Dr John Radcliffe and his Trust. London: The Radcliffe Trust. 595 pp. PDF copy available from The Radcliffe Trust websiteGoogle Scholar

Burt, Stephen and Burt, Timothy, 2019: Oxford weather and climate since 1767. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 544 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burt, Stephen, 2021: Two hundred years of thunderstorms in Oxford. Weather, 76: pp. 212–222. doi:10.1002/wea.3884CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wallace, J. G., 1997: Meteorological observations at the Radcliffe Observatory, Oxford: 1815–1995. Oxford: University of Oxford – School of Geography. 77 pp.Google Scholar

Manley, Gordon, 1941: The Durham meteorological record, 1847–1940. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 67(292): pp. 363–380. doi:10.1002/qj.49706729209CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burt, Stephen and Burt, Timothy, 2022: Durham weather and climate since 1841. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 580 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Details of the Minneapolis records can be found at www.climatestations.com/minneapolis-2Google Scholar

Slonosky, Victoria, 2018: Climate in the age of empire: weather observers in colonial Canada. American Meteorological Society, Boston, MA. 325 pp.Google Scholar

Slonosky, Victoria C., 2015: Daily minimum and maximum temperature in the St Lawrence Valley, Quebec: two centuries of climatic observations from Canada. International Journal of Climatology, 35(7): pp. 1662–1681. doi:10.1002/joc.4085CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Details of the New York Central Park historical records can be found at www.weather.gov/okx/CentralParkHistoricalGoogle Scholar

The Blue Hill Meteorological Observatory website contains much interesting information about the Observatory and its climate record since 1885: see https://bluehill.org/climate-weather.Google Scholar

Wang, Pao K. and De’er, Zhang, 1988: An introduction to some historical governmental weather records of China. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 69(7): pp. 753–758. doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1988)069<0753:aitshg>2.0.co;22.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brönnimann, Stefan, et al., 2019: Unlocking Pre-1850 instrumental meteorological records: A global inventory. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 100(12): pp. ES389–ES413. doi:10.1175/bams-d-19-0040.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ren, Yuyu, Guoyu Ren, Rob Allan, Jiao Li et al., 2022: The 1757–62 temperature observed in Beijing. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 103(11): pp. E2470–E2483. doi:10.1175/bams-d-21-0245.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashcroft, Linden, 2018: Meteorology at Sydney Observatory, in The story of Sydney Observ-atory. Ultimo, New South Wales, Australia: Museum of Applied Arts and Sciences. 61 pp.Google Scholar

Ashcroft, Linden, et al., 2021: The world’s longest known parallel temperature dataset: A comparison between daily Glaisher and Stevenson screen temperature data at Adelaide, Australia, 1887–1947. International Journal of Climatology. doi:10.1002/joc.7385CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gergis, Joëlle, et al., 2021: A historical climate dataset for southwestern Australia, 1830–1875. International Journal of Climatology, 41(10): pp. 4898–4919. doi:10.1002/joc.7105CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diamond, Howard J., et al., 2013: US Climate Reference Network after one decade of operations: Status and assessment. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 94(4): pp. 485–498. doi:10.1175/bams-d-12-00170.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hubbard, K. G., Lin, X., and Baker, C. B., 2005: On the USCRN temperature system. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 22: pp. 1095–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hubbard, K. G., et al., 2004: Air temperature comparison between the MMTS and the USCRN temperature systems. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 21: pp. 1590–15972.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Body, D. and Kuik, F., 2021: Generic Automatic Weather Station (AWS) tender specifications. Geneva: World Meteorological Organization (WMO). Available from https://library.wmo.int/records/item/57830-generic-automatic-weather-station-aws-tender-specifications.Google Scholar

Vuerich, E., et al., 2009: WMO field intercomparison of rainfall intensity gauges. Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization: Instruments and observing methods report no. 99, WMO/TD‐No. 1504. Available from https://library.wmo.int/records/item/50453-wmo-field-intercomparison-of-rainfall-intensity-gauges. 290 pp.Google Scholar

Coney, Jonathan, et al., 2022: How useful are crowdsourced air temperature observations? An assessment of Netatmo stations and quality control schemes over the United Kingdom. Meteorological Applications, 29(3): doi:10.1002/met.2075CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burt, Stephen. 2013: User review of the Davis Vantage Vue automatic weather station. Available from: www.measuringtheweather.netGoogle Scholar

Burt, Stephen. 2009: User review of the Davis Vantage Pro2 automatic weather station. Available from: www.measuringtheweather.netGoogle Scholar

Sun, B., et al., 2005: A comparative study of ASOS and USCRN temperature measurements. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 22(6): pp. 679–686. doi:10.1175/jtech1752.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

More information, and access to current USCRN observations, is available at www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/crn/.Google Scholar

Leeper, Ronald D., Rennie, Jared, and Palecki, Michael A., 2015: Observational perspectives from U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN) and Cooperative Observer Program (COOP) network: Temperature and precipitation comparison. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 32(4): pp. 703–721. doi:10.1175/jtech-d-14-00172.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trewin, B. 2018: Station catalogue – Australian Climate Observations Reference Network – Surface Air Temperature (ACORN-SAT). Available from www.bom.gov.au/metadata/catalogue/19115/ANZCW0503900725Google Scholar

Ren, Yuyu and Ren, Guoyu, 2011: A remote-sensing method of selecting reference stations for evaluating urbanization effect on surface air temperature trends. Journal of Climate, 24(13): pp. 3179–3189. doi:10.1175/2010jcli3658.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strangeways, Ian, 2015: A global climate reference network. Weather, 70(4): pp. 124–129 doi:10.1002/wea.2460CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thorne, P. W., et al., 2018: Towards a global land surface climate fiducial reference measurements network. International Journal of Climatology, 38(6): pp. 2760–2774. doi:10.1002/joc.5458CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doesken, N., 2005: The National Weather Service MMTS (Maximum-Minimum Temperature System) – 20 years after, in American Meteorological Society conference papers – available online at ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/91613.pdfGoogle Scholar

Quayle, Robert G., et al., 1991: Effects of recent thermometer changes in the cooperative station network. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 72(11): pp. 1718–1723. doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1991)072<1718:EORTCI>2.0.CO;22.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

The data for Table 4.2 came from NCEI’s HOMR database, March 2023 (with grateful thanks to Shelley McNeill, NOAA). Lists of current stations can be extracted from the website www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/homr. Of the 4,472 ‘temperature’ sites listed in Table 4.2, 89% are MMTS sites suggesting that the remainder (11%, 495 sites) continue to use Cotton Region Shelters (CRS). Unsurprisingly, this represents a continuing decline from 31% in February 2009 (data from that date from the website weather.gov/coop) when there were 4,300 listed sites within the continental United States, of which 1,337 were CRS sites (namely 31%).Google Scholar

Meyer, Steven J. and Hubbard, Kenneth G., 1992: Nonfederal automated weather stations and networks in the United States and Canada: A preliminary survey. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 73(4): pp. 449–457. doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1992)073<0449:nawsan>2.0.co;22.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mahmood, Rezaul, et al., 2019: A technical overview of the Kentucky Mesonet. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 36(9): pp. 1753–1771. doi:10.1175/jtech-d-18-0198.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mahmood, Rezaul, et al., 2020: The Total Solar Eclipse of 2017: Meteorological observations from a statewide mesonet and atmospheric profiling systems. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 101(6): pp. E720–E737. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0051.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Details of the Met Office land surface observing network, and a map of the locations, is available at www.metoffice.gov.uk/weather/guides/observations/uk-observations-networkGoogle Scholar

Details of the Met Office synoptic and climate station network, including map of the locations and a table of their location, is available at www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/climate/maps-and-data/uk-synoptic-and-climate-stationsGoogle Scholar

A list of, and links to, the world’s national weather services is available on the WMO website: https://community.wmo.int/membersGoogle Scholar

Preston-Thomas, H., 1990: International Practical Temperature Scale of 1990. Metrologia, 27: pp. 3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar

The basic requirements were set out over a century ago: see, for example, Gaster, F. (1882) Report on experiments made at Strathfield Turgiss in 1869 with stands or screens of various patterns, devised and employed for the exposing of thermometers, in order to determine the temperature of the air. Quarterly Weather Report for 1879, Meteorological Office, London: also Köppen, W. (1913) Uniform thermometer set-up for meteorological stations for the determination of air temperature and humidity. Meteorol. Zeitschr., 30, pp. 474–88 and 514–23: English translation in Monthly Weather Review, August 1915.Google Scholar

Foken, Thomas, ed. 2022. Springer handbook of atmospheric measurements. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-52171-4. Springer International Publishing, 1748 pp.Google Scholar

Park, Jae-Woo, et al., 2022: Air temperature dependencies on the structure of thermometer screens in summer at Daejeon, South Korea. Meteorological Applications, 29(3): doi: 10.1002/met.2064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnett, A., Hatton, D. B., and Jones, D. W., 1998: Recent changes in thermometer [screen] design and their impact. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva: Instruments and Observing Methods Report no. 66Google Scholar

Strangeways, Ian, 2010: Measuring global temperatures: Their analysis and interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Oke, T. R., et al., 2017: Urban Climates, in Urban Climates: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 525 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chandler, T. J., 1965: The climate of London. London: Hutchinson. 292 pp.Google Scholar

Sparks, W. R. 1972: The effect of thermometer screen design on the observed temperature. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Publication No. 315. Available online at https://library.wmo.int/doc_num.php?explnum_id=8131Google Scholar

International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2007: ISO 17714 Meteorology – Air temperature measurements – Test methods for comparing the performance of thermometer shields/screens and defining important characteristics. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO)Google Scholar

Gaster, Frederick, 1882: Report on experiments made at Strathfield Turgiss in 1869 with stands or screens of various patterns, devised and employed for the exposing of thermometers, in order to determine the temperature of the air. Meteorological Office Quarterly Weather Report, Addendum for 1879 [dated May 1880, published 1882].Google Scholar

Bilham, E. G., 1937: A screen for sheathed thermometers. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 63(271): pp. 309–322. doi:10.1002/qj.49706327104CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Specifications and drawings to construct Cotton Region shelters are available at several places on the web – try https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1vHg5oUZMQ5iqmM2iC73PK70dMQiZ4qaQ?usp=sharing. Cotton Region Shelters come in ‘medium’ and ‘large’ sizes, the main difference being that the large size usually had a wooden post on which the maximum and minimum thermometers were mounted, with a baffle within the shelter to avoid the readings being affected by the aspirator fan used to ventilate the dry and wet bulb thermometers (source: Grant Goodge, ex NOAA, personal communication March 2023). In the US, NovaLynx sell self-assembly Cotton Region shelter kits (Small Instrument shelter, model no. 380–601 and Large, model no. 380–605) – see https://novalynx.com/brochures/380-shelters.pdf. A copy of the 1960 Met Office/HMSO publication Instructions for making thermometer screens of the Stevenson type (Met O No. 670, 19 pages) is available online from the National Meteorological Library: www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/library-and-archive, item Miscellaneous Met Office Publications METDLA/3/4. Another option, with less complicated carpentry involved, is described in McConnell, D. (1988) Making a simple thermometer screen. Weather, 43, pp. 198–203; other do-it-yourself plans can be found on the web.Google Scholar

Perry, M. C., Prior, M. J., and Parker, D. E., 2007: An assessment of the suitability of a plastic thermometer screen for climatic data collection. International Journal of Climatology, 27(2): pp. 267–276. doi:10.1002/joc.1381CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hubbard, K.G., Lin, X., and Walter-Shea, E.A., 2001: The effectiveness of the ASOS, MMTS, Gill, and CRS air temperature radiation shields. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 18: pp. 851–8642.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burt, Stephen, 2022: Measurements of natural airflow within a Stevenson screen and its influence on air temperature and humidity records. Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems, 11(2): pp. 263–277. doi:10.5194/gi-11-263-2022CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burt, Stephen and de Podesta, Michael, 2020: Response times of meteorological air temperature sensors. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 146: pp. 2789–2800. doi:10.1002/qj.3817CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, R. G., 2010: Natural ventilation effects on temperatures within Stevenson screens. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 136(646): pp. 253–259. doi:10.1002/qj.537CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lopardo, G., et al., 2014: Comparative analysis of the influence of solar radiation screen ageing on temperature measurements by means of weather stations. International Journal of Climatology, 34(4): pp. 1297–1310. doi:10.1002/joc.3765CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, R. G., 2011: Lag-time effects on a naturally ventilated large thermometer screen. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 137(655): pp. 402–408. doi:10.1002/qj.745CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richardson, Scott J., et al., 1999: Minimizing errors associated with multiplate radiation shields. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 16(11): pp. 1862–1872. doi:10.1175/1520-0426(1999)016<1862:meawmr>2.0.co;22.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Differences in air temperature between identical sensors housed in a Stevenson screen and an aspirated radiation shelter (RM Young model 43502). Daylight only, 10 year period (49 853 hourly observations) at Stratfield Mortimer Observatory in southern England (51°N, 1°W), minimum class size 5 entriesGoogle Scholar

Aitken, John, 1884: Thermometer screens. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 12: pp. 661–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aitken, John, 1913: The Stevenson screen. Symons’s Meteorological Magazine, 48: pp. 232–233Google Scholar

Miller, Samuel H., 1877: On the aspiration of the dry and wet bulb thermometers. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 3(19): pp. 150–158. doi:10.1002/qj.4970031906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Assmann, Richard, 1887: Das Aspirationspsychrometer, ein neuer Apparat zur Ermittlung der wahren Temperatur und Feuchtigkeit der Luft. Wetter, 4: pp. 245–286Google Scholar

Daily maximum, minimum and mean daily temperatures over the period midnight to midnight UTC from calibrated platinum resistance sensors in adjacent RM Young and Apogee aspirated radiation shields were logged over the two year period November 2016 to December 2018 (765 daily observations) at Stratfield Mortimer Observatory in southern England (51°N, 1°W)Google Scholar

Lacombe, M., D. Bousri, M. Leroy and M. Mezred, 2011: Instruments and observing methods report no. 106: WMO field intercomparison of thermometer screens/shields and humidity measuring instruments, Ghardaïa, Algeria, November 2008 – October 2009. Instruments and Observing Methods Report No. 106, WMO/TD-No. 1579. Geneva: World Meteorological Organization (WMO) https://library.wmo.int/records/item/50488-wmo-field-intercomparison-of-thermometer-screens-shields-and-humidity-measuring-instruments.Google Scholar

Apogee Instruments aspirated radiation shield: www.apogeeinstruments.com/aspirated-radiation-shieldGoogle Scholar

One minute mean temperatures in a Stevenson screen and nearby aspirated screen observed at Stratfield Mortimer Observatory in southern England (51°N, 1°W), 0700 to 1000 UTC on 3 September 2022Google Scholar

Details of the Hong Kong King’s Park meteorological site are available from www.hko.gov.hk/en/wxinfo/aws/100_Upper_Air/kings-park-past-and-present.htmlGoogle Scholar

Hatton, D. B., 2002: Results of an intercomparison of wooden and plastic thermometer screens. In Papers presented at the WMO Technical Conference on Meteorological Instruments and Methods of Observation (TECO-2002), Bratislava, Slovak Republic, 23–25 September 2002. WMO, Geneva, Instruments and Observing Methods Report No. 75 (WMO/TD – No 1123)Google Scholar

Lin, X., Hubbard, K. G., and Meyer, G. E., 2001: Airflow characteristics of commonly used temperature radiation shields. J. Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 18: pp. 329–3392.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Assessment of the Campbell Scientific ‘Met 21’ passive thermometer screen. Unpublished report, available at www.measuringtheweather.netGoogle Scholar

Warne, Jane, 1998: A preliminary investigation of temperature screen [sic] design and their impacts on temperature measurements. Bureau of Meteorology, Australia: Instrument Test Report No. 649Google Scholar

Buisan, Samuel T., Azorin‐Molina, Cesar, and Jimenez, Yolanda, 2015: Impact of two different sized Stevenson screens on air temperature measurements. International Journal of Climatology, 35(14): pp. 4408–4416. doi:10.1002/joc.4287CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brandsma, T. and van der Meulen, J. P., 2008: Thermometer screen intercomparison in De Bilt (the Netherlands) – Part II: description and modeling of mean temperature differences and extremes. International Journal of Climatology, 28(3): pp. 389–400. doi:10.1002/joc.1524CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aoshima, Tadayoshi, et al., 2010: RIC-Tsukuba (Japan) Intercomparison of Thermometer Screens/Shields in 2009, in WMO TECO 2010 conference paper, available at https://community.wmo.int/en/teco-2010-programmeGoogle Scholar

Nordli, P. Ø., et al., 1997: The effect of radiation screens on Nordic time series of mean temperature. International Journal of Climatology, 17(15): pp. 1667–1681. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0088(199712)17:15<1667::AID-JOC221>3.0.CO;2-D3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersson, T. and Mattison, I., 1991: A field test of thermometer screens. SMHI Report No. RMK 62, Norrkoping, SwedenGoogle Scholar

Hourly averages by month of Stevenson screen warming vs aspirated screen, over 10 years 2013–22, Stratfield Mortimer Observatory in southern England (51°N, 1°W): 87,608 observations, from possible 87,672 (data availability 99.93%)Google Scholar

One minute mean temperatures in a Stevenson screen and nearby aspirated screen observed at Stratfield Mortimer Observatory, southern England (51°N, 1°W). Figure 5.10 dataset 1130-1430 UTC on 16 December 2022: Figure 5.11 1200-1500 UTC on 13 August 2022: Figure 5.12 0300-0600 UTC on 28 November 2022.Google Scholar

Brock, Fred V. and Richardson, Scott J., 2001: Meteorological Measurement Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 290 pp. doi:10.1093/oso/9780195134513.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, R. Giles, 2014: Meteorological measurements and instrumentation. Wiley: Advancing weather and climate science series. doi:10.1002/9781118745793CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Podesta, Michael, Bell, Stephanie, and Underwood, Robin, 2018: Air temperature sensors: Dependence of radiative errors on sensor diameter in precision metrology and meteorology. Metrologia, 55: pp. 229–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trewin, Blair, 2022: A climatology of short-period temperature variations at Australian observation sites. Journal of Southern Hemisphere Earth Systems Science. doi:10.1071/es21027CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ayers, G. P. and Warne, J. O., 2020: Response time of temperature measurements at automatic weather stations in Australia. Journal of Southern Hemisphere Earth Systems Science, 70(1): pp. 160–165. doi:10.1071/es19032CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, Ronald J. and Bair, Andrea, 2022: NOAA State Climate Extremes Committee Memorandum: New value for Washington maximum temperature record at Hanford, WA. Available from www.ncei.noaa.gov/monitoring-content/extremes/scec/reports/20220210-Washington-Maximum-Temperature.pdfGoogle Scholar

International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2021: BS ISO 23350 2021 Hydrometry – Catching-type liquid precipitation measuring gauges. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO)Google Scholar

Lanza, L. G., et al., 2021: Calibration of non‐catching precipitation measurement instruments: A review. Meteorological Applications, 28(3): doi:10.1002/met.2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar

British Standards Institution, 2024: BS 7843:2024 Acquisition and management of meteorological precipitation data from a gauge network. British Standards InstitutionGoogle Scholar

Sevruk, B. and Klemm, S., 1989: Catalogue of national standard precipitation gauges. Vol. Instruments and Observing Methods, Report no. 39: WMO/TD-No. 313. Geneva: World Meteorological OrganizationGoogle Scholar

Goble, Peter E., et al., 2020: Who received the most rain today?: An analysis of daily precipitation extremes in the contiguous United States using COCORAHS and COOP reports. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 101(6): pp. E710–E719. doi:10.1175/bams-d-18-0310.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doesken, N. and Reges, Henry, 2010 The value of the citizen weather observer. Weatherwise, 63: pp. 30–37. doi:10.1080/00431672.2010.519607CrossRefGoogle Scholar

The CoCoRaHS website at www.cocorahs.org includes maps of precipitation totals across the United States and Canada updated daily, as well as information on how to join, observing methods, how to buy and site the CoCoRaHS raingauge, and much moreGoogle Scholar

Reges, Henry and Doesken, Nolan, 2020: A day in the life of the CoCoRaHS network. Weatherwise, 73(4): pp. 32–39. doi:10.1080/00431672.2020.1762416CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reges, Henry W., et al., 2016: CoCoRaHS: The evolution and accomplishments of a volunteer rain gauge network. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 97(10): pp. 1831–1846. doi:10.1175/bams-d-14-00213.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

The excellent Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology climate website is updated daily at www.bom.gov.au/climateGoogle Scholar

Table 6.1 sources: Information on raingauge site numbers were sought from the various national meteorological services, updated to May 2023. Australia: Current rainfall station numbers (6652) were taken from the stations list at www.bom.gov.au/climate/cdo/about/sitedata.shtml selecting for all sites still open at the date accessed (6 March 2023). The same list was used to count all sites still open whose records commenced in 1920 or earlier to count those with > 100 years record (total 1927) although this does include some with breaks in their record. Australian-run sites in Antarctica were excluded from these counts. Switzerland: MeteoSwiss site at www.meteoswiss.admin.ch/services-and-publications/applications/measurement-values-and-measuring-networks.html#param=messnetz-partner&lang=en&table=true, selecting aviation, climate, precipitation and partner stations and de-duplicating sites that appear in more than one category. Republic of Ireland: Met Eireann rainfall site numbers at end 2022 (enquiries team email 10 March 2023). USA NOAA – NOAA/NWS network: see also Table 4.2 and references therein. USA CoCoRaHS numbers are sites in US GCHN daily dataset from Table 4.2. UK: information provided by Melyssa Wright, Climate and Pollen Networks Manager, Met Office. Germany (Deutscher Wetterdienst, DWD): personal communication from Stegfan Gilge and Carola Grundmann 22 March 2023: see also websites ‘Bodenmessnetzkarte des DWD – automatische Niederschlagsstationen (Nst A)’ which shows the automatic precipitation sites, and the ‘Bodenmessnetzkarte des DWD – konventionelle Niedrschlagsstationen (Nst k)’, the conventional ones. Together with the main and aviation sites and the German army ones ‘Hauptamtliches Messntz, GeoInfoDBW und Aerologie’ and automatic weather stations ‘automatische Wetterstationen [WST III]’ there are 1868 precipitation sites in Germany. The Netherlands: 336 raingauges plus 34 synoptic AWS – thanks to Gerard van der Schrier (KNMI). India (India Meteorological Department): information provided by Sreejith Op. The total includes 209 climate stations (Synoptic Observatory) managed by India Meteorological Department and 338 part-time observatories. No reply was received to my enquiries to France (MeteoFrance), and the numbers are those supplied for the first edition of this book in 2012.+100+years+record+(total+1927)+although+this+does+include+some+with+breaks+in+their+record.+Australian-run+sites+in+Antarctica+were+excluded+from+these+counts.+Switzerland:+MeteoSwiss+site+at+www.meteoswiss.admin.ch/services-and-publications/applications/measurement-values-and-measuring-networks.html#param=messnetz-partner&lang=en&table=true,+selecting+aviation,+climate,+precipitation+and+partner+stations+and+de-duplicating+sites+that+appear+in+more+than+one+category.+Republic+of+Ireland:+Met+Eireann+rainfall+site+numbers+at+end+2022+(enquiries+team+email+10+March+2023).+USA+NOAA+–+NOAA/NWS+network:+see+also+Table+4.2+and+references+therein.+USA+CoCoRaHS+numbers+are+sites+in+US+GCHN+daily+dataset+from+Table+4.2.+UK:+information+provided+by+Melyssa+Wright,+Climate+and+Pollen+Networks+Manager,+Met+Office.+Germany+(Deutscher+Wetterdienst,+DWD):+personal+communication+from+Stegfan+Gilge+and+Carola+Grundmann+22+March+2023:+see+also+websites+‘Bodenmessnetzkarte+des+DWD+–+automatische+Niederschlagsstationen+(Nst+A)’+which+shows+the+automatic+precipitation+sites,+and+the+‘Bodenmessnetzkarte+des+DWD+–+konventionelle+Niedrschlagsstationen+(Nst+k)’,+the+conventional+ones.+Together+with+the+main+and+aviation+sites+and+the+German+army+ones+‘Hauptamtliches+Messntz,+GeoInfoDBW+und+Aerologie’+and+automatic+weather+stations+‘automatische+Wetterstationen+[WST+III]’+there+are+1868+precipitation+sites+in+Germany.+The+Netherlands:+336+raingauges+plus+34+synoptic+AWS+–+thanks+to+Gerard+van+der+Schrier+(KNMI).+India+(India+Meteorological+Department):+information+provided+by+Sreejith+Op.+The+total+includes+209+climate+stations+(Synoptic+Observatory)+managed+by+India+Meteorological+Department+and+338+part-time+observatories.+No+reply+was+received+to+my+enquiries+to+France+(MeteoFrance),+and+the+numbers+are+those+supplied+for+the+first+edition+of+this+book+in+2012.>Google Scholar

Personal communication from Christopher C. Burt, e-mail dated 26 August 2011Google Scholar

I am indebted to Michael Kendon from the UK Met Office National Climate Information Centre for this figure, and the detailed rationale that went in to defining it (personal communication, 21 March 2023)Google Scholar

Burt, Stephen, et al., 2016: Cumbrian floods, 5/6 December 2015. Weather, 71(2): pp. 36–37. doi:10.1002/wea.2704CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Groisman, Pavel Ya and Legates, David R., 1994: The accuracy of United States precipitation data. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 75(2): pp. 215–227. doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1994)075<0215:taousp>2.0.co;2. Xref 3135a2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pan, Xicai, et al., 2016: Bias corrections of precipitation measurements across experimental sites in different ecoclimatic regions of western Canada. The Cryosphere, 10(5): pp. 2347–2360. doi:10.5194/tc-10-2347-2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Essery, Charles I. and Wilcock, David N., 1991: The variation in rainfall catch from standard UK Meteorological Office raingauges: a twelve year case study. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 36(1): pp. 23–34. doi:10.1080/02626669109492482CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, M.J., 1970: Some factors affecting the catch of raingauges. Meteorological Magazine, 99: pp. 10–20Google Scholar

Groisman, Pavel Ya, l. Peck, Eugene, and Quayle, Robert G., 1999: Intercomparison of recording and standard nonrecording U.S. gauges [raingauges]. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 16: pp. 602–6092.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kurtyka, J. C., 1953: Precipitation measurement study. Report of investigation No 20. Illinois, USA: State Water Survey. 178. Available from https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.461.3364&rep=rep1&type=pdfGoogle Scholar

Heberden, William, 1769: XLVII. Of the different quantities of rain, which appear to fall, at different heights, over the same spot of ground. Philosophical Transactions, 59: pp. 359–362. doi:10.1098/rstl.1769.0047Google Scholar

Muchan, Katie and Dixon, Harry, 2019: Insights into rainfall undercatch for differing raingauge rim heights. Hydrology Research, 50(6): pp. 1564–1576. doi:10.2166/nh.2019.024CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daly, Christopher, et al., 2007: Observer bias in daily precipitation measurements at United States Cooperative Network Stations. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 88(6): pp. 899–912. doi:10.1175/bams-88-6-899CrossRefGoogle Scholar

BBC News, 18 January 2024: Anglesey man has measured the rainfall every day since 1948. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-68005382Google Scholar

More information on the US SRG can be found at www.weather.gov/iwx/coop_8inch.Google Scholar

Liu, X. C., Gao, T. C., and Liu, L., 2013: A comparison of rainfall measurements from multiple instruments. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 6(7): pp. 1585–1595. doi:10.5194/amt-6-1585-2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peck, E. L., 1993: Biases in precipitation measurements: an American experience, in American Meteorological Society: Eighth symposium on meteorological observations and instrumentation. Anaheim, CA, 17–22 January 1993Google Scholar

Strangeways, Ian 2007: Precipitation: Theory, measurement and distribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 290 pp.Google Scholar

Lanza, Luca G. and Cauteruccio, Arianna, 2022: Chapter 1 – Accuracy assessment and intercomparison of precipitation measurement instruments, in Precipitation Science, S. Michaelides, Editor: Elsevier. pp. 3–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acreman, Mike, 1989: Extreme rainfall in Calderdale, 19 May 1989. Weather, 44(11): pp. 438–446. doi:10.1002/j.1477-8696.1989.tb04980.x.Xref1032CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collinge, V. K., et al., 1990: Radar observations of the Halifax storm, 19 May 1989. Weather, 45(10): pp. 354–365. doi:10.1002/j.1477-8696.1990.tb05554.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burt, Stephen, 2005: Cloudburst upon Hendraburnick Down: The Boscastle storm of 16 August 2004. Weather, 60(8): pp. 219–227. doi:10.1256/wea.26.05CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holley, Dan, Dent, James, and Clark, Colin, 2021: Thunderstorms and extreme rainfall in south Norfolk, 16 August 2020: meteorological analysis. Weather. doi:10.1002/wea.4038CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dent, James, Clark, Colin, and Holley, Dan, 2022: The Brettenham, East Anglia storm of 25 July 2021: hydrological response and implications for PMP. Weather. doi: 10.1002/wea.4206CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holley, Dan, Dent, James, and Clark, Colin, 2022: The Brettenham storm of 25 July 2021. Weather. doi:10.1002/wea.4145CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burt, Christopher, 2007: Extreme weather: A guide and record book. Second ed.: W W Norton & Co, New York. 303 pp.Google Scholar

Burt, Christopher. 2019: A summary of U.S. State historical precipitation extremes. Available from www.wunderground.com/cat6/Summary-US-State-Historical-Precipitation-ExtremesGoogle Scholar

Quetelard, Hubert, et al., 2009: Extreme Weather: World-Record rainfalls during tropical cyclone Gamede. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 90(5): pp. 603–608. doi:10.1175/2008bams2660.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Costello, T. A. and Williams, H. J., 1991: Short duration rainfall intensity measured using calibrated time-of-tip data from a tipping bucket raingage [raingauge]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 57: pp. 147–155. Xref 3134CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Table 6.4 and Figure 6.13: rainfall record from EML ARG314 0.1 mm resolution TBR within Stratfield Mortimer Observatory in southern England (51°N, 1°W), 31 October 2022Google Scholar

EML’s field calibration kit for raingauges is described at www.emltd.net/rfvk.htmlGoogle Scholar

Sušin, Nejc and Peer, Peter, 2018: Open-source tool for interactive digitisation of pluviograph strip charts. Weather, 73(7): pp. 222–226. doi:10.1002/wea.3001CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lambrecht rain[e] raingauge: details at www.lambrecht.net/en/products/precipitation/weighing-precipitation-sensor-rain-eGoogle Scholar

Burt, Stephen, 2016: Field test: Lambrecht rain[e] high-precision precipitation sensor. Envirotech-Online. Available from www.envirotech-online.com/article/air-monitoring/6/lambrecht/field-test-lambrecht-raine-high-precision-precipitation-sensor/2045Google Scholar

Figure 6.19: Rainfall record from Stratfield Mortimer Observatory in southern England (51°N, 1°W) on 23 October 2022Google Scholar

Figure 6.20: Rainfall record from Stratfield Mortimer Observatory in southern England (51°N, 1°W) on 10 January 2023Google Scholar

EML SW120R precipitation detector www.emltd.net/sw120r.htmlGoogle Scholar

Pollock, M. D., et al., 2018: Quantifying and mitigating wind‐induced undercatch in rainfall measurements. Water Resources Research, 54(6): pp. 3863–3875. doi:10.1029/2017wr022421CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strangeways, Ian, 2004: Improving precipitation measurement. International Journal of Climatology, 24(11): pp. 1443–1460. doi:10.1002/joc.1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cauteruccio, Arianna and Lanza, Luca G., 2020: Parameterization of the collection efficiency of a cylindrical catching-type rain gauge based on rainfall intensity. Water, 12(12): pp. 3431. doi:10.3390/w12123431CrossRefGoogle Scholar

British Standards Institution, 2010: BS EN 13798:2010 Hydrometry – Specification for a reference raingauge pit.Google Scholar

Hudleston, F., 1933: A summary of seven years’ experiments with raingauge shields in exposed positions, 1926–32 at Hutton John, Penrith. British Rainfall 1933: pp. 274–293.Google Scholar

Goodison, B. E., Louie, P. Y. T., and Yang, D., 1998: WMO solid precipitation measurement intercomparison – final report. Geneva: World Meteorological Organization (WMO), TD No. 872Google Scholar

Goodison, B. E., Sevruk, B., and Klemm, S., 1989: WMO solid precipitation measurement intercomparison: Objectives, methodology and analysis. International Association of Hydrological Sciences, 1989: Atmospheric deposition. Proceedings, Baltimore Symposium (May 1989). IAHS Publication No. 179, Wallingford, Oxon, UKGoogle Scholar

Kochendorfer, John, et al., 2022: How well are we measuring snow post-SPICE? Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 103(2): pp. E370–E388. doi:10.1175/bams-d-20-0228.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nitu, R., et al., 2021: WMO Solid Precipitation Intercomparison Experiment (SPICE) (2012–2015). Geneva: World Meteorological Organization. 451 pp. Available from https://library.wmo.int/viewer/56317?medianame=iom_131_en_1_#page=1&viewer=picture&o=bookmark&n=0&q=.Google Scholar

Smith, Craig D., et al., 2020: Evaluation of the WMO Solid Precipitation Intercomparison Experiment (SPICE) transfer functions for adjusting the wind bias in solid precipitation measurements. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 24(8): pp. 4025–4043. doi:10.5194/hess-24-4025-2020CrossRefGoogle Scholar

World Meteorological Organization (WMO), 1992: Snow cover measurements and areal assessment of precipitation and soil moisture (WMO-No. 749), ed. B. Sevruk, . Geneva: World Meteorological Organization (WMO). 312 pp. Available from https://library.wmo.int/records/item/33781-snow-cover-measurements-and-areal-assessment-of-precipitation-and-soil-moisture.Google Scholar

Doesken, Nolan and Judson, Arthur, 1996: The Snow booklet: A guide to the science, climatology and measurement of snow in the United States. Colorado Climate Center, Colorado State UniversityGoogle Scholar

Whipple, G. M., 1881: The relative frequency of given heights of the barometer readings at the Kew Observatory, during the ten years, 1870 to 1879. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 7(37): pp. 52–59. doi:10.1002/qj.4970073710CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, John, 1688: A compleat Discourse of the Nature, Use and Right Managing of that wonderful instrument the Baroscope. or Quicksilver Weather-Glass. London, printed for Joseph Watts, at the Angel in St Paul’s Churchyard. Reference from Whipple, 1881 q.v.Google Scholar

Middleton, W. E. K., 1964: The history of the barometer. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press. 489 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lamb, H. H., 1986: Ancient units used by the pioneers of meteorological measurements. Weather, 41(7): pp. 230–233. doi:10.1002/j.1477-8696.1986.tb03842.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cornes, Richard, 2010: Early meteorological data from London and Paris. PhD thesis – University of East Anglia, 233 pp.Google Scholar

Harrison, R. Giles, 2020: Make your own met measurements: build a digital barometer for about £10. Weather, 76: pp. 45–47. doi:10.1002/wea.3857CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amores, Angel, et al., 2022: Numerical simulation of atmospheric Lamb Waves generated by the 2022 Hunga‐Tonga volcanic eruption. Geophysical Research Letters, 49(6): doi:10.1029/2022gl098240CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burt, Stephen, 2022: Multiple airwaves crossing Britain and Ireland following the eruption of Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha’apai on 15 January 2022. Weather, 77: pp. 76–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Li, Chunyan, 2022: Global shockwaves of the Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai volcano eruption measured at ground stations. iScience, 25(11): pp. 105356. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.105356CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Matoza, Robin S., et al., 2022: Atmospheric waves and global seismoacoustic observations of the January 2022 Hunga eruption, Tonga. Science. doi: 10.1126/science.abo7063. (Published online, 12 May 2022)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Terry, James P., et al., 2022: Tonga volcanic eruption and tsunami, January 2022: globally the most significant opportunity to observe an explosive and tsunamigenic submarine eruption since AD 1883 Krakatau. Geoscience Letters, 9(1): doi:10.1186/s40562-022-00232-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, Giles, 2022: Pressure anomalies from the January 2022 Hunga Tonga‐Hunga Ha’apai eruption. Weather, 77(3): pp. 87–90. doi:10.1002/wea.4170CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smart, David, 2022: The first hour of the paroxysmal phase of the 2022 Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha’apai volcanic eruption as seen by a geostationary meteorological satellite. Weather, 77(3): pp. 81–82. doi:10.1002/wea.4173CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meteorological Office, 1980: Handbook of Meteorological Instruments: Volume 1, Measurement of atmospheric pressure, in Handbook of Meteorological Instruments: London: Her Majesty’s Stationery OfficeGoogle Scholar

Meteorological Office, 1956: Handbook of Meteorological Instruments: Part 1, Instruments for surface observations. Fifth impression 1969 ed. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. PDF copy available in Met Office Archive at https://digital.nmla.metoffice.gov.uk/SO_3c42ff4e-ac2a-4f5c-9d8c-1d7716f3c211Google Scholar

A variety of online humidity calculators are available – for example, www.omnicalculator.com/physics/absolute-humidity. There are also numerous smartphone apps providing similar functionality available for both Android and Apple devicesGoogle Scholar

Harrison, R. G. and Wood, C. R., 2012: Ventilation effects on humidity measurements in thermometer screens. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 138(665): pp. 1114–1120. doi:10.1002/qj.985CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McIlveen, Robin, 2010: Fundamentals of weather and climate. Second ed, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 632 pp., specifically Chapter 5.4; also Bolton, D., 1980: The computation of equivalent potential temperature. Mon. Weather Rev., 108: pp. 1046–1053Google Scholar

Farahani, Hamid, Wagiran, Rahman, and Hamidon, Mohd, 2014: Humidity sensors principle, mechanism, and fabrication technologies: a comprehensive review. Sensors, 14(5): pp. 7881–7939. doi:10.3390/s140507881CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Burt, Stephen, 2011: Exceptionally low relative humidity in northern England, 2–3 March 2011. Weather, 66(7): pp. 197–199. doi:10.1002/wea.833CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malyon, Charles, 2015: Comparative performance of surface relative humidity measurements using commercially–available sensors within an automatic weather screen. MSc dissertation, University of Reading Department of MeteorologyGoogle Scholar

One minute mean relative humidity records, comparing a digital sensor and RH derived from dry and wet bulb psychrometer readings within a Stevenson screen: Stratfield Mortimer Observatory in southern England (51°N, 1°W), 17 August 2022Google Scholar

Burt, Stephen and Hawkins, Ed, 2019: Near-zero humidities on Ben Nevis, Scotland, revealed by pioneering nineteenth century observers and modern volunteers. International Journal of Climatology, 39: pp. 4451–4466. doi:10.1002/joc.6084CrossRefGoogle Scholar

One minute mean dry and wet bulb temperatures, and relative humidity measured using a digital sensor and derived from dry and wet bulb psychrometer readings, in a Stevenson screen observed at Stratfield Mortimer Observatory, southern England (51°N, 1°W), 9–10 December 2022Google Scholar

The US Heat Index is given (in °F only) at www.nsis.org/weather/heatindex.html (accessed 29 November 2022)Google Scholar

The Canadian humidex index can be found at www.csgnetwork.com/canhumidexcalc.html, which gives an online humidity calculator for temperatures in °C and relative humidity as % (accessed 29 November 2022)Google Scholar

Burt, Stephen, 2022: The gust that never was: a meteorological instrumentation mystery. Weather, 77: pp. 123–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Strangeways, Ian, 2003: Measuring the natural environment. Second Edition ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 534 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meteorological Office, 1981: Handbook of Meteorological Instruments: Volume 4, Measurement of surface wind, in Handbook of Meteorological Instruments: London: Her Majesty’s Stationery OfficeGoogle Scholar

Jenkins, Geoff, 2014: A comparison between two types of widely used weather stations. Weather, 69(4): pp. 105–110. doi:10.1002/wea.2158CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Product specifications sourced from www.gill.co.uk/products/anemometer/windsonic.htm.Google Scholar

Beljaars, A. C. M., 1987: The influence on sampling and filtering on measured wind gusts. Journal of Oceanic and Atmospheric Technology, 4: pp. 613–626. doi: 10.1175/1520-0426(1987)004<0613:TIOSAF>2.0.CO;22.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beljaars, A. C. M., 1987: Instruments and Observing Methods Report No. 31: The measurement of gustiness at routine wind stations: a review. Instruments and Observing Methods Report No. 31. Geneva: World Meteorological Organization (WMO). Available from https://library.wmo.int/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=15514Google Scholar

Curran, J. C., et al., 1977: Cairngorm summit automatic weather station. Weather, 32(2): pp. 61–63. doi:10.1002/j.1477-8696.1977.tb04513.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barton, J. S., 1984: Observing mountain weather using an automatic station. Weather, 39(5): pp. 140–145. doi:10.1002/j.1477-8696.1984.tb07480.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barton, J. S., 2020: The Cairngorm automatic weather station. Weather, 75(4): pp. 129–130. doi:10.1002/wea.3514Google Scholar

The Cairngorm AWS is online at cairngormweather.eps.hw.ac.uk and the site contains some details of the instruments together with a multi-year data archive. The summit instruments and webcam were set up by funded research projects, which finished a number of years ago. Heriot-Watt University continues to support these facilities as much as possible, but regret that there may well be extended periods when they are unavailable.Google Scholar

Putnam, William Lowell, 1991: The worst weather on Earth: A history of the Mount Washington Observatory. New York: American Alpine Club. 265 pp.Google Scholar

Smith, Alan A., 1982: The Mount Washington Observatory—50 Years Old. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 63(9): pp. 986–995. doi: 10.1175/1520-0477(1982)063<0986:TMWOYO>2.0.CO;22.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kelsey, Eric, et al., 2014: Blown Away: Interns experience science, research, and life on top of Mount Washington. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 96(9): pp. 1533–1543. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00195.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Philippoff, K. 2023: Brutal cold on Mount Washington: A weather story. Available from www.mountwashington.org/experience-the-weather/observer-comments.aspx?id=59058Google Scholar

The Mount Washington Observatory website is at www.mountwashington.org/weatherGoogle Scholar

Rappaport, Edward N., 1994: Hurricane Andrew [August 1992]. Weather, 49(2): pp. 51–61. doi:10.1002/j.1477-8696.1994.tb05974.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Details of the Barrow Island world wind speed extreme are available online at wmo.asu.edu/content/world-maximum-surface-wind-gust, along with other WMO ‘extremes’ investigation summariesGoogle Scholar

Meteorological Office, 1982: Observer’s Handbook. HMSOGoogle Scholar

Burt, Stephen, 2007: A comparison of traditional and modern methods of measuring earth temperatures. Weather, 62(12): pp. 331–336. doi:10.1002/wea.165CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McIlveen, Robin, 2010: Fundamentals of weather and climate. Second ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 632 pp.Google Scholar

Vignola, Frank, Michalsky, Joseph, and Stoffel, Thomas, 2012: Solar and Infrared radiation measurements. Boca Raton, Florida: Taylor & Francis. 394 pp.Google Scholar

Figure 11.1 shows the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) G-173–03 Reference Spectra (‘Standard Tables for Reference Solar Spectral Irradiance at Air Mass 1.5: Direct Normal and Hemispherical for a 37 Tilted Surface’), also known as ISO 9845–1, 2022 which is available at www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9845:-1:ed-2:v1:en. The two plots were prepared using the SMARTS model version 2.9.2 (SMARTS: Simple Model of the Radiative Transfer of Sunshine). More information about the SMARTS model is available online at www.nrel.gov/rredc/smarts; full details of the ASTM G-173–03 Reference Spectra standard and complete references can be found at http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/spectra/am1.5 and linked references thereinGoogle Scholar

Gueymard, Christian A., 2018: A reevaluation of the solar constant based on a 42-year total solar irradiance time series and a reconciliation of spaceborne observations. Solar Energy, 168: pp. 2–9. doi:10.1016/j.solener.2018.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wild, Martin, et al., 2019: The cloud-free global energy balance and inferred cloud radiative effects: an assessment based on direct observations and climate models. Climate Dynamics, 52(7–8): pp. 4787–4812. doi:10.1007/s00382-018-4413-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

More information on the Australian Bureau of Meteorology’s use of satellite measurements for surface solar radiation estimates is given online at www.bom.gov.au/climate/austmaps/solar-radiation-glossary.shtml#globalexposureGoogle Scholar

Good, Elizabeth, 2010: Estimating daily sunshine duration over the UK from geostationary satellite data. Weather, 65(12): pp. 324–328. doi:10.1002/wea.619CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matuszko, Dorota, et al., 2020: Sunshine duration in Poland from ground‐ and satellite‐based data. International Journal of Climatology, 40(9): pp. 4259–4271. doi:10.1002/joc.6460CrossRefGoogle Scholar

For more detail the reader is referred to World Meteorological Organization (1984) Radiation and Sunshine Duration Measurements: Comparison of Pyranometers and Electronic Sunshine Duration Recorders of RA VI (Budapest, Hungary, 1984). WMO/TD No. 146: also WMO (1989) Automatic Sunshine Duration Measurement Comparison, Hamburg (Germany), IOM 42 (results not formally published but available from WMO). See also the reports of the WMO International Pyrheliometer Intercomparisons, conducted by the World Radiation Centre at Davos, Switzerland (www.pmodwrc.ch/en/ipc-xiii) and carried out at five-yearly intervals, also distributed by WMO. At the time of writing, the most recent intercomparison event took place in September-October 2021Google Scholar

Foster, N. B. and Foskett, L. W., 1953: A photoelectric sunshine recorder. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society: pp. 212–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Michalsky, J. J., 1992: Comparison of a National Weather Service Foster sunshine recorder and the World Meteorological Organization standard for sunshine duration. Solar Energy, 48(2): pp. 133–141. doi:10.1016/0038-092X(92)90041-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

See, for example, Olivieri, Jean (1998) Sunshine measurements using a pyranometer and Fiore, J. V. et al. (1998) A comparison between a proposed ASOS sunshine sensor and a pyrheliometer: both papers in Instruments and Observing Methods, Report No. 70: Papers presented at the WMO Technical Conference on meteorological and environmental instruments and methods of observation (TECO-98) held in Casablanca, Morocco, 13–15 May 1998: also Dyson, Paul (2005) Investigation of the accuracy of the Delta-T devices BF3 sunshine sensor. Australian Bureau of Meteorology, Instrument Test Report No. 700Google Scholar

Massen, Francis, 2016: Sunshine duration from pyranometer readings. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.2255.7042CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wang, Yuchang, et al., 2021: A review on sunshine recorders: Evolution of operation principle and construction. Measurement, 186: pp. 110138. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110138CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Slob, W. H. and Monna, W. A. A., 1991: Bepaling van directe en diffuse straling en van zonneschijndurr uit 10-minuutwaarden van globale straling [Determination of direct and diffuse radiation and of sunshine duration from 10-minute values of global radiation]. De Bilt, the Netherlands: Koninklijk Nederlands Meteorologisch Instituut (KNMI)Google Scholar

Groen, G., et al., 2011: Implementation of the Hinssen-Knap algorithm for the calculation of sunshine duration. De Bilt: KNMI. Technical report TR-319Google Scholar

Stokes, George Gabriel, 1880: Description of the card supporter for sunshine recorders adopted at the Meteorological Office. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 7: pp. 83–94Google Scholar

Stanhill, G., 2003: Through a glass brightly: Some new light on the Campbell–Stokes sunshine recorder. Weather, 58(1): pp. 3–11. doi:10.1256/wea.278.01CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanchez-Lorenzo, A., et al., 2013: New insights into the history of the Campbell–Stokes sunshine recorder. Weather, 68(12): pp. 327–331. Doi:10.1002/wea.2130CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wood, Curtis R. and Giles Harrison, R., 2011: Scorch marks from the sky. Weather, 66(2): pp. 39–41. Doi:10.1002/wea.657CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Painter, H. E., 1981: The performance of a Campbell–Stokes sunshine recorder compared with a simultaneous record of the normal incidence irradiance. Meteorological Magazine, 110: pp. 102–109.Google Scholar

Baumgartner, D. J., et al., 2017: A comparison of long-term parallel measurements of sunshine duration obtained with a Campbell–Stokes sunshine recorder and two automated sunshine sensors. Theoretical and Applied Climatology. doi:10.1007/s00704-017-2159-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kerr, Andrew and Tabony, Richard, 2004: Comparison of sunshine recorded by Campbell–Stokes and automatic sensors. Weather, 59(4): pp. 90–95. Doi:10.1256/wea.99.03CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Legg, Tim, 2014: Comparison of daily sunshine duration recorded by Campbell–Stokes and Kipp and Zonen sensors. Weather, 69(10): pp. 264–267. Doi: 10.1002/wea.2288CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanchez-Romero, A., et al., 2015: Using digital image processing to characterize the Campbell–Stokes sunshine recorder and to derive high-temporal resolution direct solar irradiance. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 8(1): pp. 183–194. Doi:10.5194/amt-8-183-2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shearn, P. D., 1999: Automatic sunshine sensor trial report. Bracknell, Met Office: Observations, Logistics and Automation Branch (unpublished internal report: copy available from National Meteorological Library, Exeter, UK)Google Scholar

Matuszko, Dorota, 2015: A comparison of sunshine duration records from the Campbell-Stokes sunshine recorder and CSD3 sunshine duration sensor. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 119(3–4): pp. 401–406. Doi:10.1007/s00704-014-1125-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koninklijk Nederlands Meteorologisch Instituut – KNMI, 2002: Klimaatatlas van Nederland 1971–2000. De Bilt, the Netherlands: Koninklijk Nederlands Meteorologisch Instituut – KNMI. Zonneschijn, pp. 68–70Google Scholar

Steurer, P. M. and Karl, T. R., 1991: Historical sunshine and cloud data in the United States. Office of Scientific and Technical Information, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831. 158 pp.Google Scholar

For details, see Baker, D. C. and Haines, D. A., 1969: Solar radiation and sunshine duration relationships in the north-central region and Alaska. North Central Regional Research Publication 195, Technical Bulletin 262, Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (as quoted in Steurer and Karl, 1991, Oak Ridge National Laboratory): 0.12 cal cm^–2 min^–1 is about 87 W/m². Note that the threshold for the Marvin sunshine recorder was determined as approximately 255 W/m² (0.37 cal cm^–2 min^–1) in Brooks, C. F. and Brooks, E. S. (1947) Sunshine recorders: A comparative study of the burning-glass and thermometric systems. J. Meteorol, 4, pp. 105–115Google Scholar

Stanhill, Gerald and Cohen, Shabtai, 2005: Solar radiation changes in the United States during the twentieth century: Evidence from sunshine duration measurements. Journal of Climate, 18(10): pp. 1503–1512. Doi:10.1175/jcli3354.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quinlan, F. T., 1985: A history of sunshine data in the United States, in Handbook of applied meteorology, Houghton, D. D., Editor., John Wiley and Sons, New York. 1199–1201Google Scholar

Cerveny, Randall S. and Balling, Robert C., 1990: Inhomogeneities in the long-term United States’ sunshine record. Journal of Climate, 3(9): pp. 1045–10482.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2023: ISO 9847:2023 Solar energy – Calibration of field pyranometers by comparison to a reference pyranometerGoogle Scholar

World Meteorological Organization (WMO), 2019: Manual on Codes. International Codes, Volume I.1: Annex II to the WMO Technical Regulations, Part A – Alphanumeric Codes. Geneva, Switzerland: WMO. 480. Available from https://library.wmo.int/doc_num.php?explnum_id=10235Google Scholar

This information was collated from the Climatological Observers Link Bulletin for November 2022. Station terminal hours form one part of the station grading code for COL stations. Details are available at www.colweather.org.ukGoogle Scholar

Table 13.3 contains a short extract from the datalogger record of gust speeds at the Stratfield Mortimer Observatory in southern England (51°N, 1°W) during windstorm Eunice on 18 February 2022. Entries shown are the highest 3 s mean wind speeds, near-duplicate table entries within 3 s of those shown have been omitted for clarityGoogle Scholar

Bilham, E. G., 1948: Washington codes. Meteorological Magazine, 77: pp. 217–20. This is the first instance of the word ‘okta’ in the index of the Meteorological Magazine. The attribution of the term to Colonel Ernest Gold CB, DSO, OBE, FRS (1882–1976) is well known but apparently poorly documented: Gold was the Deputy Director of the Meteorological Office upon his retirement in 1947.Google Scholar

Hamblyn, Richard, 2021: The Cloud Book: how to understand the skies. Second ed. Exeter: David & Charles. 176 pp.Google Scholar

Pretor-Pinney, Gavin, 2006: The Cloudspotter’s guide. London: Hodder & Stoughton / Sceptre. 320 pp.Google Scholar

Dunlop, Storm, 2008: The Oxford dictionary of weather. Second ed.: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Met Office, 1991: Meteorological glossary. Sixth ed. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office (HMSO)Google Scholar

Meaden, G. T., 1976: Practical hail gauges for climatological stations. Journal of Meteorology, UK, 1: pp. 313–319Google Scholar

International Electrotechnical Commission, 2022: IEC 60751:2022: Industrial platinum resistance thermometers and platinum temperature sensors. Geneva: International Electrotechnical Commission. 22 pp.Google Scholar

McArthur, L. J. B, 2005: World Climate Research Programme – Baseline Surface Radiation Network (BSRN): Operations manual, version 2.1. Geneva: World Meteorological Organization. 176. Available from https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/30644/Google Scholar

In the UK, the Climatological Observers Link (www.colweather.org.uk) archives all monthly and annual summaries submitted by members, together with numerous long runs of monthly station data added since. These datasets have been used to create and publish 10 and 30 year averages for all sites with sufficiently long records. Membership also includes free access to up to 1 GB for members’ weather and climate records on a commercial cloud storage facility.Google Scholar

Figure 18.2. Microsoft Excel scatterplot showing the relationship between daily sunshine duration and daily global solar radiation totals during 10 years in June. Records from Stratfield Mortimer Observatory in southern England (51°N, 1°W), period 2013–22Google Scholar

Hourly sunshine records from Stratfield Mortimer Observatory in southern England (51°N, 1°W), 20 years period 2003–22. Instromet sunshine recorder 2003–2011 inclusive, Kipp & Zonen CSD3 unit 2012 onwards. Open exposure at 10 m above ground. Data availability 100%, minor gaps filled with estimates from alternate instrumentsGoogle Scholar

Hourly rainfall and wind direction records from Stratfield Mortimer Observatory in southern England (51°N, 1°W), 20 year period 2003 –22. Wind direction and speed from instruments at 10 m above ground level, rainfall from a 0.2 mm tipping-bucket gauge located within the nearby instrument enclosureGoogle Scholar

Frequency of days with snow or sleet observed to fall, and thunder heard, at Stratfield Mortimer Observatory in southern England (51°N, 1°W), by week number over the 30 years standard averaging period 1991–2020Google Scholar

Hourly rainfall and 10 m wind speed data at Stratfield Mortimer Observatory (51°N, 1°W) over the 25 year period 1997 to 2022 inclusive. Wind speeds in m/sGoogle Scholar

Tufte, Edward R., 1983: The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press. 197 pp.Google Scholar

Sunshine data for 2022 at Stratfield Mortimer Observatory in southern England (51°N, 1°W), 5 minute data in seconds plotted using an Excel pivot tableGoogle Scholar

Tufte, Edward R., 1990: Envisioning information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press. 126 pp.Google Scholar

Tufte, Edward R., 1997: Visual explanations. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press. 157 pp.Google Scholar

Lakes Environmental Software: www.weblakes.com. WRPLOT view is free to use, although registration is requiredGoogle Scholar

Met Office. 2019: Met Office MIDAS Open: UK Land Surface Stations Data (1853–current). Centre for Environmental Data Analysis (CEDA). Available from http://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/dbd451271eb04662beade68da43546e1Google Scholar

Hawkins, , Ed, et al., 2022: Rainfall Rescue: Millions of historical monthly rainfall observations taken in the UK and Ireland rescued by citizen scientists. Geoscience Data Journal, 10(2): pp. 246–261. doi:10.1002/gdj3.157CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burt, Stephen and Brugge, Roger, 2011: Climatological averages for 1981–2010 and 2001–2010 for stations appearing in the monthly bulletin of the Climatological Observers Link. Maidenhead, UK: Climatological Observers Link, 434 pp.Google Scholar

Climatological Observers Link (COL), 2021: Climatological averages for 1991–2020 and 2011–2020 for stations appearing in the monthly bulletin of the Climatological Observers Link (COL). 71 pp. Available from www.colweather.org.ukGoogle Scholar

Kirk, Peter J., Clark, Matthew R., and Creed, Ellie, 2021: Weather Observations Website. Weather, 76(2): pp. 47–49 doi: 10.1002/wea.3856CrossRefGoogle Scholar

For information on WOW inputs into a storm on 31 October 2021, see https://weatherobservationswebsite.blogspot.com/2022/02/using-wow-observations-to-capture-high.htmlGoogle Scholar

Burt, Stephen, 2020: The Climatological Observers Link (COL) at 50. Weather, 75(5): pp. 137–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Details of the US voluntary COOP observers awards scheme (updated November 2019) can be found at www.nws.noaa.gov/directives/sym/pd01013014curr.pdfGoogle Scholar

Carter, H. E., 1948: Seventy-five years of rainfall recording. Meteorological Magazine: pp. 234–235Google Scholar

More details on the US COOP programme can be found at www.weather.gov/coop/overviewGoogle Scholar

Ogden, R.J., 1978: Co-operating observers and the climatological network. Meteorological Magazine, 107: pp. 209–218Google Scholar

Merlone, A., G. Lopardo, F. Sanna et al., 2015: The MeteoMet project – metrology for meteorology: challenges and results. Meteorological Applications, 22(S1): pp. 820–829. doi: 10.1002/met.1528CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burt, Stephen, 2014: Trials of the low-cost, high-accuracy CoCoRaHS raingauge. Climatological Observers Link Bulletin, 532: pp. 29–30Google Scholar

Daily rainfall totals over the 12 months ending April 2023 at the Stratfield Mortimer Observatory in central southern England (51°N, 1°W). Minor breaks in record for maintenance purposes, and for periods of snowfall, have been estimated to complete the recordsGoogle Scholar

Bell, Simon, Cornford, Dan, and Bastin, Lucy, 2013: The state of automated amateur weather observations. Weather, 68(2): pp. 36–41. doi:10.1002/wea.1980CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, Simon, Cornford, Dan, and Bastin, Lucy, 2015: How good are citizen weather stations? Addressing a biased opinion. Weather, 70(3): pp. 75–84. doi:10.1002/wea.2316CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooks, C. E. P. and Carruthers, N., 1953: Handbook of statistical methods in meteorology. London: HMSO. Vector mean winds, pp. 178–191. More details on the method can be obtained from Webmet.com: www.webmet.com/met_monitoring/62.htmlGoogle Scholar