Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Print publication year: 2018
  • Online publication date: February 2018

Introduction: Hydrosocial De-Patterning and Re-Composition

from Part II - Hydrosocial De-Patterning and Re-Composition
Agnew, J. and Oslender, U. (2013). Overlapping territories, sovereignty in dispute. In Nicholl, W. and Miller, B. (eds.), Spaces of Contention: Spatialities and Social Movements. London: Ashgate, pp. 121–40.
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
Baviskar, A. (2007). Waterscapes: The Cultural Politics of a Natural Resource. Delhi: Permanent Black.
Bebbington, A., Humphreys-Bebbington, D. and Bury, J. (2010). Federating and defending: Water, territory and extraction in the Andes. In Boelens, R., Getches, D. and Guevara-Gil, (eds.), Out of the Mainstream: Water Rights, Politics and Identity. London: Earthscan, pp. 307–27.
Boelens, R. (2014). Cultural politics and the hydrosocial cycle: Water, power and identity in the Andean highlands. Geoforum, 57, 234–47.
Boelens, R., Hoogesteger, J. and Baud, M. (2015). Water reform governmentality in Ecuador: Neoliberalism, centralization and the restraining of polycentric authority and community rule-making. Geoforum, 64, 281–91.
Boelens, R., Hoogesteger, J., Swyngedouw, J., Vos, E., J. and Wester, P. (2016). Hydrosocial territories: A political ecology perspective. Water International, 41(1), 114.
Bridge, G. and Perreault, T. (2009). Environmental governance. In Castree, N., Demeritt, D., Liverman, D., and Rhoads, B. (eds.), Companion to Environmental Geography. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 399475.
Duarte-Abadía, B. and Boelens, R. (2016). Disputes over territorial boundaries and diverging valuation languages: The Santurban hydrosocial highlands territory in Colombia. Water International, 41(1), 15–36.
Ferguson, J. (2005). Seeing like an oil company. American Anthropologist, 107(3), 377–82.
Ferguson, J. and Gupta, A. (2002). Spatializing states: Toward an ethnography of neoliberal governmentality. American Ethnologist, 29(4), 9811002.
Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.
Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, and P. Miller (eds.), The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 87104.
Foucault, M. (2008). The Birth of Biopolitics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Harris, L. M. and Alatout, S. (2010). Negotiating hydro-scales, forging states: Comparison of the upper Tigris/Euphrates and Jordan River basins. Political Geography, 29, 148–56.
Hommes, L. and Boelens, R. (2017). Urbanizing rural waters: Rural-urban water transfers and the reconfiguration of hydrosocial territories in Lima. Political Geography, 57, 7180.
Hommes, L., Boelens, R. and Maat, H. (2016). Contested hydrosocial territories and disputed water governance: Struggles and competing claims over the Ilisu Dam development in southeastern Turkey. Geoforum, 71, 920.
Hoogesteger, J., Boelens, R. and Baud, M. (2016). Territorial pluralism: Water users’ multi-scalar struggles against state ordering in Ecuador’s highlands. Water International, 41(1), 91106.
Kaika, M. (2006). Dams as symbols of modernization: The urbanization of nature between geographical imagination and materiality. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(2), 276–30.
Latour, B. (1994). We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Li, T. (2011). Rendering society technical: Government through community and the ethnographic turn at the World Bank in Indonesia. In Mosse, D. (ed.), Adventures in Aidland. Oxford: Berghahn.
Linton, J. and Budds, J. (2014). The hydrosocial cycle: Defining and mobilizing a relational-dialectical approach to water. Geoforum, 54, 170–80.
Lynch, B. D. (2012). Vulnerabilities, competition and rights in a context of climate change toward equitable water governance in Peru’s Rio Santa Valley. Global Environmental Change, 22, 364–73.
Marston, S. (2000). The social construction of scale. Progress in Human Geography, 24(2), 219–42.
Meehan, K. (2013). Disciplining de facto development: Water theft and hydrosocial order in Tijuana. Environment and Planning, 31, 319–36.
Molle, F. (2004). Defining water rights: By prescription or negotiation? Water Policy, 6, 207–27.
Nixon, R. (2010). Unimagined communities: Developmental refugees, megadams and monumental modernity. New Formations, 69, 6280.
Oberborbeck Andersen, A. (2016). Infrastructures of progress and dispossession: Collective responses to shrinking water access among farmers in Arequipa, Peru. Focaal, 74, 2841.
Obertreis, J., Moss, T., Mollinga, P. and Bichsel, C. (2016). Water, infrastructure and political rule: Introduction to the Special Issue. Water Alternatives, 9(2), 168–81.
Paerregaard, K., Bredholt Stensrud, A. and Oberborbeck Andersen, A. (2016). Water citizenship: Negotiating water rights and contesting water culture in the Peruvian Andes. Latin American Research Review, 51(1), 198217.
Perreault, T. (2014). What kind of governance for what kind of equity? Towards a theorization of justice in water governance. Water International, 39(2), 233–45.
Perreault, T., Wraight, S. and Perreault, M. (2011). “The social life of water: Histories and geographies of environmental injustice in the Onondaga Lake watershed,”
Rodriguez-de-Francisco, J. C. and Boelens, R. (2016). PES hydrosocial territories: De-territorialization and re-patterning of water control arenas in the Andean highlands. Water International, 41(1), 140–56.
Romano, S. (2017). Building capacities for sustainable water governance at the grassroots: “Organic empowerment” and its policy implications in Nicaragua. Society & Natural Resources, DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2016.1273413.
Ruiz-Ballesteros, E. and Gálvez-García, C. (2014). Community, common-pool resources and socio-ecological systems: Water management and community building in southern Spain. Human Ecology, 42, 847–56.
Scott, J. (1998). Seeing Like a State. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
Smith, N. (1984). Uneven Development: Nature, Capital and the Production of Space. Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Swyngedouw, E. (1997). Excluding the other: The production of scale and scaled politics. In Lee, R. and Wills, J. (eds.), Geographies of Economies. London: Arnold, pp.167–76.
Swyngedouw, E. (2004). Globalisation or “glocalisation”? Networks, territories and rescaling. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 17(1), 2548.
Swyngedouw, E. (2007). Technonatural revolutions: The scalar politics of Franco’s hydro-social dream for Spain, 1939–1975. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(1), 928.
Swyngedouw, E. (2009). The political economy and political ecology of the hydrosocial cycle. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education, 142, 5660.
Valladares, C. and Boelens, R. (2017). Extractivism and the rights of nature: Governmentality, “convenient communities” and epistemic pacts in Ecuador. Environmental Politics, 26(6), 1015–34.
Van Teijlingen, K. van (2017). Large-scale mining and territorial pluralism: Mapping conflicts and convergence in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Revista de Estudios Atacameños.
Vos, J. and Hinojosa, L. (2016). Virtual water trade and the contestation of hydrosocial territories. Water International, 41(1), 3753.
Winner, L. (1986). Do artifacts have politics? In Winner, L. (ed.), The Whale and the Reactor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zwarteveen, M. and Boelens, R. (2014). Defining, researching and struggling for water justice: Some conceptual building blocks for research and action. Water International, 39(2), 143–58.