Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T22:13:57.401Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Investment Criteria for Water Resource Projects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2022

Kamta Prasad
Affiliation:
Chairman, Institute for Resource Management and Economic Development, Delhi and Former professor, Economics and rural development, Indian Institute of Public Administration, Delhi
Get access

Summary

To avoid or minimize arbitrary decisions, measurable criteria or standards for taking up investment projects are often prescribed by the government. Such criteria have been in existence for irrigation and flood management projects for a long time and are discussed in this chapter. Aspects related to irrigation projects are discussed first since government's investment in irrigation has a much longer history and has been more extensive. This is followed by criteria for flood management projects.

Financial return criterion for irrigation projects during the pre-independence period

The British approach to irrigation development started from 1836, after which several major projects were developed. Only those irrigation projects were taken up which could meet interest on loans after paying for other expenses.

An explicit criterion for investment in irrigation projects was announced in 1879, in terms of the financial return criterion, known as the financial productivity test or briefly as productivity test. Irrigation works, thus undertaken, came to be known as productive works. This test continued to prevail during the entire period of the British rule up to 1947 and continued thereafter also, till it was changed in favour of benefit cost ratio (BCR).

The financial results of an irrigation project in India were to be determined as follows.

  • i) By considering the capital cost of any work as the sum actually spent on its construction.

  • ii) By debiting the revenue account yearly with

  • - the simple interest on the capital cost of the works at the commencement of the year and

  • - the working expenses of the year.

  • iii) By crediting the revenue account yearly with

  • - direct receipts and

  • - indirect receipts.

The difference between (iii) and (ii) for one year would show the profit or loss for a particular year. The test of financial productivity was that a project should be able to show a certain percentage return on the sum-at-charge in the tenth year after its opening, the sum-at-charge being the capital cost plus the arrears of interest up to that year. The rate of return varied from time to time being influenced by variations in the long-term rate of borrowing of the Government of India.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Foundation Books
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Investment Criteria for Water Resource Projects
  • Kamta Prasad, Chairman, Institute for Resource Management and Economic Development, Delhi and Former professor, Economics and rural development, Indian Institute of Public Administration, Delhi
  • Book: Water in the Coming Decades: Policy and Governance Issues in India
  • Online publication: 13 July 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9789385386077.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Investment Criteria for Water Resource Projects
  • Kamta Prasad, Chairman, Institute for Resource Management and Economic Development, Delhi and Former professor, Economics and rural development, Indian Institute of Public Administration, Delhi
  • Book: Water in the Coming Decades: Policy and Governance Issues in India
  • Online publication: 13 July 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9789385386077.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Investment Criteria for Water Resource Projects
  • Kamta Prasad, Chairman, Institute for Resource Management and Economic Development, Delhi and Former professor, Economics and rural development, Indian Institute of Public Administration, Delhi
  • Book: Water in the Coming Decades: Policy and Governance Issues in India
  • Online publication: 13 July 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9789385386077.015
Available formats
×