Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T23:29:55.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - The benefits of accreditation clubs for fundraising nonprofits

from Part III - Club design and effectiveness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2010

Mary Kay Gugerty
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Aseem Prakash
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access

Summary

How can fundraising organizations signal trustworthiness to prospective donors? One way to do this is by conforming to standards of excellence and allowing a trusted, independent agency to monitor the organization with regard to these standards. The Central Bureau of Fundraising (CBF) in the Netherlands is an example of a club running such an accountability program. This chapter empirically investigates whether (1) awareness of the accountability program among donors increases donations by households; and (2) fundraising organizations that participate in the accountability program attract more donations than organizations that do not. To help understand the context in which the program operates, I will first briefly describe the regulation of fundraising in the Netherlands.

In contrast to the US context of many of the chapters in this volume, in the Netherlands the regulation of nonprofits can be described as a combination of few legal requirements, little government involvement, some self-regulation, and independent monitoring by a third party. The focus of the regulation that does exist is on fundraising practices. Nonprofit organizations that want to claim tax-exemption status have to register with the tax authorities, but are not required to submit audited financial statements or elaborate reports to obtain the status. To raise money in a door-to-door collection or in town, a permit from the municipality in which the collection is planned is required. Door-to-door collection is still a very common method of raising funds in the Netherlands. Such fundraising is done by unpaid volunteers for large, national fundraising organizations.

Type
Chapter
Information
Voluntary Regulation of NGOs and Nonprofits
An Accountability Club Framework
, pp. 253 - 280
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akerlof, G. 1970. The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics 84: 488–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, P. D. 1994. Using Panel Data to Estimate the Effects of Events. Sociological Methods and Research 23(2): 174–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arellano, M. and Bond, S. 1991. Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. Review of Economic Studies 58: 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arumi, A. M., Wooden, R., Johnson, J., Farkas, S., Duffett, A., and Ott, A.. 2005. The Charitable Impulse. New York: Public Agenda.Google Scholar
Bekkers, R. 2003. Trust, Accreditation, and Philanthropy in the Netherlands. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 32: 596–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bekkers, R. 2005. Geven van Tijd: Vrijwilligerswerk. In Schuyt, T. N. M. and Gouwenberg, B. M., eds. Geven in Nederland 2005: Giften, Legaten, Sponsoring en Vrijwilligerswerk. Amsterdam: Elsevier Overheid, pp. 80–92.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. T. and McCrohan, K. F.. 1993. Public Policy Issues in the Marketing of Seals of Approval for Food. Journal of Consumer Affairs 27(2): 397–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, W. 2004. Confidence in Charitable Institutions and Volunteering. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 33: 247–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, W. 2006. Should Donors Care about Overhead Costs? Do They Care?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 35: 288–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, W. and Bies, A.. 2005. Can the Charitable Sector Regulate Itself?Nonprofit Quarterly 12 (special issue): 39–43.Google Scholar
Hager, M. A. 2003. Current Practices in Allocation of Fundraising Expenditures. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising 41: 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halaby, C. N. 2004. Panel Models in Sociological Research: Theory into Practice. Annual Review of Sociology 30: 507–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanzetta, John T. and Driscoll, James M.. 1968. Effects of Uncertainty and Importance on Information Search in Decision Making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 10(4): 479–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, L. M. 2003. Is Accounting Information from Nonprofit Organizations Useful to Donors? A Review of Charitable Giving and Value-relevance. Journal of Accounting Literature 22: 104–129.Google Scholar
Rooney, P. M., Steinberg, K. S., and Schervish, P. G.. 2004. Methodology is Destiny: The Effect of Survey Prompts on Reported Levels of Giving and Volunteering. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 33: 628–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiter, S. and Bekkers, R.. 2008. Religion and Voluntary Association Involvement over the Life Course: An Event History Analysis for the Netherlands. Manuscript, Department of Sociology, Radboud University, Nijmegen.
Sargeant, A. and Kähler, J.. 1999. Returns on Fundraising Expenditures in the Voluntary Sector. Nonprofit Management and Leadership 10: 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, R. S. 1986. Should Donors Care about Fundraising? in Rose-Ackerman, S., ed. The Economics of Nonprofit Institutions. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 347–364.Google Scholar
Svítková, K. and Ortmann, A.. 2006. Certification as a Viable Quality Assurance Mechanism: Theory and Suggestive Evidence. Charles University, Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education, Working Paper No. 288, February.
Terlaak, A. and King, A. A.. 2006. The Effect of Certification with the ISO9000 Quality Management Standard: A Signalling Approach. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 60: 579–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinkelman, D. 1998. Differences in Sensitivity of Financial Statement Users to Joint Cost Allocations: The Case of Nonprofit Organizations. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 13(4): 377–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilhelm, M. O., Brown, E., Rooney, P. M., and Steinberg, R.. 2008. The Intergenerational Transmission of Generosity. Journal of Public Economics 92: 2146–2156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilke, B. 2003. Monitoring Charitable Organizations: Criteria and Assessment Methods. Contribution to the OECD/DAC Workshop “Development Partners in Evaluation,” Paris, March 25–26, 2003.
Wing, K. and Hager, M. A.. 2004. The Quality of Financial Reporting by Nonprofits: Findings and Implications. Brief No. 4 from the Nonprofit Overhead Cost Project. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
,WWAV. 2008. Het Nederlandse donateurspanel: Onderzoeksrapportage September 2008. Woerden:WWAV.Google Scholar
Berkel, Zalpha and ,WWAV. 2005. Publieksvertrouwen in de Goede Doelensector. Woerden: Zalpha van Berkel and WWAV.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×