Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T19:00:05.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Case 13 - Clinical Decision Support Tools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2017

By
Kelly Bookman  and
Ali S. Raja
Edited by
Jennifer L. Wiler ,
Jesse M. Pines  and
Michael J. Ward
Jennifer L. Wiler
Affiliation:
University of Colorado School of Medicine
Jesse M. Pines
Affiliation:
George Washington University, Washington DC
Michael J. Ward
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Tennessee
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Value and Quality Innovations in Acute and Emergency Care , pp. 164 - 169
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Collen, MF, Rubin, L, Neyman, J, et al. Automated multiphasic screening and diagnosis. American Journal of Public Health and the Nation’s Health. 1964;54:741–750.Google Scholar
Harvard Library of Evidence. Available at http://libraryofevidence.med.harvard.edu/. Accessed February 15, 2016.Google Scholar
Schuur, JD, Carney, DP, Lyn, ET, et al. A top-five list for emergency medicine: a pilot project to improve the value of emergency care. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2014;174(4):509–515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, PS, Anderson, DR, Rodger, M, et al. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patient’s probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2000;83(3):416–420.Google Scholar
Hoffman, JR, Mower, WR, Wolfson, AB, et al., for the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group. Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. New England Journal of Medicine. 2000;343(2):94–99.Google Scholar
Stiell, IG, Wells, GA, Vandemheen, KL, et al. The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients. JAMA. 2001;286(15):1841–1848.Google Scholar
Stiell, IG, Wells, GA, Vandemheen, K, et al. The Canadian CT head rule for patients with minor head injury. The Lancet. 2001;357(9266):1391–1396.Google Scholar
Raja, AS, Greenberg, JO, Qaseem, A, et al. Evaluation of patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism: best practice advice from the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2015;162(9):701–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitts, JR. H.R.4302 - 113th Congress (2013–2014): Protecting access to Medicare Act of 2014. Available at www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/house-bill/4302. Accessed May 28, 2015.Google Scholar
Andruchow, JE, Raja, AS, Prevedello, LM, et al. Variation in head computed tomography use for emergency department trauma patients and physician risk tolerance. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2012;172(8):660–661.Google Scholar
Prevedello, LM, Raja, AS, Zane, RD, et al. Variation in use of head computed tomography by emergency physicians. American Journal of Medicine. 2012;125(4):356–364.Google Scholar
Raja, AS, Ip, IK, Prevedello, LM, et al. Effect of computerized clinical decision support on the use and yield of CT pulmonary angiography in the emergency department. Radiology. 2012;262(2):468–474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ip, IK, Raja, AS, Gupta, A, et al. Impact of clinical decision support on head computed tomography use in patients with mild traumatic brain injury in the ED. American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2015;33(3):320–325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hussey, PS, Timbie, JW, Burgette, LF, et al. Appropriateness of advanced diagnostic imaging ordering before and after implementation of clinical decision support systems. JAMA. 2015;313(21):2181–2182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drescher, FS, Chandrika, S, Weir, ID, et al. Effectiveness and acceptability of a computerized decision support system using modified Wells criteria for evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2011;57(6):613–621.Google Scholar
Gupta, A, Raja, AS, Khorasani, R. Examining clinical decision support integrity: is clinician self-reported data entry accurate? JAMIA. 2014;21:23–26.Google Scholar
Roy, P-M, Durieux, P, Gillaizeau, F, et al. A computerized handheld decision-support system to improve pulmonary embolism diagnosis. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2009;151(10):677–686.Google Scholar
Raja, AS, Ip, IK, Dunne, RM, et al. Effects of performance feedback reports on adherence to evidence-based guidelines in use of CT for evaluation of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: a randomized trial. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2015 Nov;205(5):936–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gupta, A, Ip, IK, Raja, AS, et al. Effect of clinical decision support on documented guideline adherence for head CT in emergency department patients with mild traumatic brain injury. JAMIA. 2014;21:347–351.Google Scholar
Raja, AS, Gupta, A, Ip, IK, et al. The use of decision support to measure documented adherence to a national imaging quality measure. Academic Radiology. 2014;21(3):378–383.Google Scholar
Raja, AS, Lanning, J, Gower, A, et al. Prevalence of chest injury with the presence of NEXUS chest criteria: data to inform shared decision making about imaging use. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2016 Aug;68(2):222–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hess, EP, Grudzen, CR, Thomson, R, et al. Shared decision-making in the emergency department: respecting patient autonomy when seconds count. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2015;22(7):856–864.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×