Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:39:39.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Bringing cities alive: the importance of urban green spaces for people and biodiversity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Jon Sadler ,
Adam Bates ,
James Hale  and
Philip James
Edited by
Kevin J. Gaston
Kevin J. Gaston
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Get access

Summary

Introduction

A plethora of papers exist that trumpet the value of urban green spaces as providers of benefits to both people and wildlife (James et al. 2009). This body of work emphasises five means by which such spaces improve the urban environment: (i) shaping the character of the city and its neighbourhoods (Pauleit 2003); (ii) engendering a sense of place for city inhabitants (Frumkin 2003); (iii) providing a range of physical (Maas et al. 2006) and psychological (Hartig 2008) health benefits to people; (iv) supporting rich assemblages of wildlife, including many rare and endangered species (Gibson 1998; Mortberg & Wallentinus 2000); and (v) possessing important environmental functions that scale to provide a wide range of ecosystem services (Bolund & Hunhammar 1999; Elmqvist et al. 2004).

It is estimated that the number of urban areas with over a million people will grow by over 40% by 2015 (Crane & Kinzig 2005). To accommodate this rapidly increasing population and to reduce the deleterious impact of global sprawling cities (European Environment Agency 2006; Irwin & Bockstael 2007), in many countries regulatory bodies have created a range of policies on urban living, housing provision and city development that appear to be in conflict. On the one hand, policies exist espousing the utilisation of as much open space in cities as possible to meet construction targets for new-build housing (e.g. ODPM 2002a), while on the other hand different policy documents highlight the provision of green space for people and wildlife to enhance quality of life (e.g. EEA 2009).

Type
Chapter
Information
Urban Ecology , pp. 230 - 260
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahrne, K., Bengtsson, J. and Elmqvist, T. (2009). Bumble bees (Bombus spp) along a gradient of increasing urbanization. PLoS One, 4, e5574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akbari, H., Pomerantz, M. and Taha, H. (2001). Cool surfaces and shade trees to reduce energy use and improve air quality in urban areas. Solar Energy, 70, 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, E. (2006). Urban landscapes and sustainable cities. Ecology and Society, 11, 23–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, E. and Bodin, O. (2009). Practical tool for landscape planning? An empirical investigation of network based models of habitat fragmentation. Ecography, 32, 123–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angold, P. G., Sadler, J. P., Hill, M. O.et al. (2006). Biodiversity in urban habitat patches. Science of the Total Environment, 360, 196–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Avila-Flores, R. and Fenton, M. B. (2005). Use of spatial features by foraging insectivorous bats in a large urban landscape. Journal of Mammalogy, 86, 1193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, O., Tratalos, J. A., Armsworth, P. R.et al. (2007). Who benefits from access to green space? A case study from Sheffield, U.K. Landscape and Urban Planning, 83, 187–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckett, K. P., Freer-Smith, P. H. and Taylor, G. (1998). Urban woodlands: their role in reducing the effects of particulate pollution. Environmental Pollution, 99, 347–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beier, P. and Noss, R. F. (1998). Do habitat corridors provide connectivity?Conservation Biology, 12, 1241–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, J. F., Wilson, J. S. and Liu, G. C. (2008). Neighborhood greenness and 2-year changes in Body Mass Index of children and youth. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35, 547–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benedict, M. A. and McMahon, E. T. (2002). Green infrastructure: smart conservation for the 21st century. Renewable Resources Journal, 20, 12–17.Google Scholar
Blair, R. B. (1999). Birds and butterflies along an urban gradient: surrogate taxa for assessing biodiversity?Ecological Applications, 9, 164–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolger, D. T., Beard, K. H., Suarez, A. V. and Case, T. J. (2008). Increased abundance of native and non-native spiders with habitat fragment. Journal of Biogeography, 14, 655–65.Google Scholar
Bolger, D. T., Suarez, A. V., Crooks, K. R., Morrison, S. A. and Case, T. J. (2000). Arthropods in urban habitat fragments in southern California: area, age, and edge effects. Ecological Applications, 10, 1230–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolund, P. and Hunhammar, S. (1999). Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics, 29, 293–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckton, S. T. and Ormerod, S. J. (2002). Global patterns of diversity among the specialist birds of riverine landscapes. Freshwater Biology, 47, 695–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, E. (2000). The compact city: just or just compact? A preliminary analysis. Urban Studies, 37, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,CABE (2009a). Is the Grass Greener…? Learning from International Innovations in Urban Green Space Management. London: ODPM.Google Scholar
,CABE (2009b). Open Space Strategy: Best Practice Guidance. London: Commission for the Built Environment.Google Scholar
Cairns, J. (2006). Designing for nature and sustainability. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 13, 77–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cane, J. H., Minckley, R. L., Kervin, L. J., Roulston, T. H. and Williams, N. M. (2006). Complex responses within a desert bee guild (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) to urban habitat fragmentation. Ecological Applications, 16, 632–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, D. E., Gough, S., Vaughan, H., Vickery, J. A. and Appleton, G. F. (2007). Determinants of bird species richness in public green spaces. Bird Study, 54, 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comber, A., Brunsdon, C. and Green, E. (2008). Using a GIS-based network analysis to determine urban greenspace accessibility for different ethnic and religious groups. Landscape and Urban Planning, 86, 103–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., deGroot, R.et al. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, P. and Kinzig, A. (2005). Nature in the metropolis. Science, 308, 1225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,CSDH (2008). losing the Gap in a Generation: Health Equity through Action on the Social Determinants of Health. Final Report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Dantzing, G. B. and Saaty, T. (1973). Compact City: A Plan for a Livable Urban Environment. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Davies, R. G., Barbosa, O., Fuller, R. A. and Tratalos, J. (2008). City-wide relationships between green spaces, urban land use and topography. Urban Ecosystems, 11, 269–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, Z. G., Fuller, R. A., Loram, A.et al. (2009). A national scale inventory of resource provision for biodiversity within domestic gardens. Biological Conservation, 142, 761–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,DCLG (2000). Planning Policy Guidance 17: Planning for Open Space, Sport and Recreation. HMSO, London: Department for Communities and Local Government.Google Scholar
Sousa, C. A. (2003). Turning brownfields into green space in the City of Toronto. Landscape and Urban Planning, 62, 181–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vries, S., Verheij, R. A. and Groenewegen, P. P. (2003). Natural environments-healthy environments? An exploratory analysis of the relationship between greenspace and health. Environment and Planning A, 35, 1717–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denoel, M. and Lehmann, A. (2006). Multi-scale effect of landscape processes and habitat quality on newt abundance: implication for conservation. Biological Conservation, 130, 495–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,DETR (2000). Our Towns and Cities: Delivering an Urban Renaissance. London: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions.Google Scholar
,DETR (2002). Green Spaces, Better Places. London: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions.Google Scholar
Dickman, C. R. (1987). Habitat fragmentation and vertebrate species richness in an urban environment. Journal of Applied Ecology, 24, 337–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickman, C. R. and Doncaster, C. P. (1987). The ecology of small mammals in urban habitats. I. Populations in a patchy environment. Journal of Animal Ecology, 56, 629–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donovan, R., Sadler, J. P. and Bryson, J. R. (2005). Urban biodiversity and sustainable development. Engineering Sustainability, 158, 105–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,EEA (2002). Towards an urban atlas: assessment of spatial data on 25 European cities and urban areas. Environmental Issues Report No. 30. Copenhagen: European Commission, Joint Research Centre, pp. 117.Google Scholar
,EEA (2006). Urban Sprawl in Europe: The Ignored Challenge. Copenhagen: European Commission, Joint Research Centre, pp. 56.Google Scholar
,EEA (2009). Ensuring Quality of Life in Europe's Cities and Towns. Copenhagen: European Commission, pp. 108.
Elmqvist, T., Colding, J., Barthel, S.et al. (2004). The dynamics of social-ecological systems in urban landscapes – Stockholm and the National Urban Park, Sweden. Urban Biosphere and Society: Partnership of Cities, 1023, 308–22.Google ScholarPubMed
Evans, J. (2007). Wildlife corridors: an urban political ecology. Local Environment, 12, 129–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, K. L., Newson, S. E. and Gaston, K. J. (2009). Habitat influences on urban avian assemblages. Ibis, 151, 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Evergreen (2004). Green Space Acquisition and Stewardship in Canada's Urban Municipalities. Toronto: Evergreen.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Juricic, E. (2000). Avifaunal use of wooded streets in an urban landscape. Conservation Biology, 14, 513–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, D. F. B., Gogol-Prokurat, M., Nogeire, T.et al. (2009). Loss of functional diversity under land use intensification across multiple taxa. Ecology Letters, 12, 22–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forman, R. T. T. and Deblinger, R. D. (2000). The ecological road-effect zone of a Massachusetts (USA) suburban highway. Conservation Biology, 14, 36–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, L. D., Andresen, M. A. and Schmid, T. L. (2004). Obesity relationships with community design, physical activity, and time spent in cars. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 27, 87–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frank, L. D., Schmid, T. L., Sallis, J. F., Chapman, J. and Saelens, B. E. (2005). Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form – findings from SMARTRAQ. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28, 117–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frumkin, H. (2003). Healthy places: exploring the evidence. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1451–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frumkin, H. (2005). Health, equity, and the built environment. Environmental Health Perspectives, 113, A290–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuller, R. A. and Gaston, K. J. (2009). The scaling of green space coverage in European cities. Biology Letters, 5, 352–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuller, R. A., Irvine, K. N., Devine-Wright, P., Warren, P. H. and Gaston, K. J. (2007). Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biology Letters, 3, 390–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garden, F. L. and Jalaludin, B. B. (2009). Impact of urban sprawl on overweight, obesity, and physical activity in Sydney, Australia. Journal of Urban Health, 86, 19–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garden, J. G., McAlpine, C. A., Possingham, H. P. and Jones, D. N. (2007). Habitat structure is more important than vegetation composition for local-level management of native terrestrial reptile and small mammal species living in urban remnants: a case study from Brisbane, Australia. Austral Ecology, 32, 669–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaston, K. J., Smith, R. M., Thompson, K. and Warren, P. H. (2005). Urban domestic gardens (II): experimental tests of methods for increasing biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14, 395–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehrt, S. D. and Chelsvig, J. E. (2003). Bat activity in an urban landscape: patterns at the landscape and microhabitat scale. Ecological Applications, 13, 939–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehrt, S. D. and Chelsvig, J. E. (2004). Species-specific patterns of bat activity in an urban landscape. Ecological Applications, 14, 625–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Germaine, S. S. and Wakeling, B. F. (2001). Lizard species distributions and habitat occupation along an urban gradient in Tucson, Arizona, USA. Biological Conservation, 97, 229–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, C. W. D. (1998). Brownfield: Red Data. The Values Artificial Habitats Have for Uncommon Invertebrates. Peterborough: English Nature.Google Scholar
Gilbert, O. (1989). The Ecology of Urban Habitats. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles-Corti, B., Broomhall, M. H., Knuiman, M.et al. (2005). Increasing walking – how important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space?American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28, 169–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gill, S. E., Handley, J., Ennos, A. R. and Pauleit, S. (2007). Adapting cities for climate change: the role of the green infrastructure. Built Environment, 33, 115–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, S. E., Handley, J. F., Ennos, A. R.et al. (2008). Characterising the urban environment of U.K. cities and towns: a template for landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 87, 210–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gobster, P. H. (1998). Urban parks as green walls or green magnets? Interracial relations in neighborhood boundary parks. Landscape and Urban Planning, 41, 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gobster, P. H. (2002). Managing urban parks for a racially and ethnically diverse clientele. Leisure Sciences, 24, 143–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gobster, P. H. and Westphal, L. M. (2004). The human dimensions of urban greenways: planning for recreation and related experiences. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68, 147–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorrensen, P. M., Willig, M. R. and Strauss, R. E. (2005). Multivariate analysis of scale-dependent associations between bats and landscape structure. Ecological Applications, 15, 2126–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandchamp, A.-C., Niemelä, J. and Kotze, J. (2000). The effects of trampling on assemblages of ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in urban forests in Helsinki, Finland. Urban Ecosystems, 4, 321–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, N. B., Faeth, S. H., Golubiewski, N. E.et al. (2008). Global change and the ecology of cities. Science, 319, 756–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haddad, N. M. and Baum, K. A. (1999). An experimental test of corridor effects on butterfly densities. Ecological Applications, 9, 623–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haddad, N. M., Bowne, D. R., Cunningham, A.et al. (2003). Corridor use by diverse taxa. Ecology, 84, 609–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handley, J., Pauleit, S., Slinn, P.et al. (2003). Accessible Natural Green Space Standards in Towns and Cities: A Review and Toolkit for their Implementation. Peterborough: English Nature Report No.526.Google Scholar
Hardy, P. B. and Dennis, R. L. H. (1999). The impact of urban development on butterflies within a city region. Biodiversity and Conservation, 8, 1261–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, C., Burgess, J., Millward, A. and Dawe, G. (1995). Accessible Natural Greenspace in Towns and Cities: A Review of Appropriate Size and Distance Criteria. Peterborough: English Nature Research Report No.153.Google Scholar
Hartig, T. (2008). Green space, psychological restoration, and health inequality. The Lancet, 372, 1614–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartig, T., Evans, G. W., Jamner, L. D., Davis, D. S. and Gärling, T. (2003). Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 109–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartig, T., Mang, M. and Evans, G. W. (1991). Restorative effects of natural environment experiences. Environment and Behavior, 23, 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helden, A. J. and Leather, S. R. (2004). Biodiversity on urban roundabouts – Hemiptera, management and the species area. Basic and Applied Ecology, 5, 367–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, G. R. (1994). Conservation corridors and contagious-disease – a cautionary note. Conservation Biology, 8, 256–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, G. R. and Fischer, R. A. (2001). Communicating clearly about conservation corridors. Landscape and Urban Planning, 55, 195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heynen, N. (2006). Green urban political ecologies: toward a better understanding of inner-city environmental change. Environment and Planning A, 38, 499–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillsdon, M., Panter, J., Foster, C. and Jones, A. (2006). The relationship between access and quality of urban green space with population physical activity. Public Health, 120, 1127–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunter, M. R. and Hunter, M. D. (2008). Designing for conservation of insects in the built environment. Insect Conservation and Diversity, 1, 189–96.Google Scholar
Irwin, E. G. and Bockstael, N. E. (2007). The evolution of urban sprawl: evidence of spatial heterogeneity and increasing land fragmentation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 104, 20672–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ishitani, M., Kotze, D. J. and Niemelä, J. (2003). Changes in carabid beetle assemblages across an urban-rural gradient in Japan. Ecography, 26, 481–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, P., Tzoulas, K., Adams, M. D.et al. (2009). Towards an integrated understanding of green space in the European built environment. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 8, 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jongman, R. H. G., Kulvik, M. and Kristiansen, I. (2004). European ecological networks and greenways. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68, 305–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joshu, C. E., Boehmer, T. K., Brownson, R. C. and Ewing, R. (2008). Personal, neighbourhood and urban factors associated with obesity in the United States. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 62, 202–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, R. and Kaplan, S. (1989). The Experience of Nature. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: towards an integrated framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuo, F. E. (2001). Coping with poverty: impacts of environment and attention in the inner city. Environment and Behavior, 33, 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Landscape Institute (2009). Green Infrastructure: Connected and Multifunctional Landscapes. London: Landscape Institute.Google Scholar
Li, F. Z., Fisher, K. J., Brownson, R. C. and Bosworth, M. (2005). Multilevel modelling of built environment characteristics related to neighbourhood walking activity in older adults. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 59, 558–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loeb, S. C., Post, C. J. and Hall, S. T. (2009). Relationship between urbanisation and bat community structure in national parks of the southern U.S. Urban Ecosystems, 12, 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loram, A., Thompson, K., Warren, P. H. and Gaston, K. J. (2008). Urban domestic gardens (XII): the richness and composition of the flora in five U.K. cities. Journal of Vegetation Science, 19, 321–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loram, A., Tratalos, J., Warren, P. H. and Gaston, K. J. (2007). Urban domestic gardens (X): the extent & structure of the resource in five major cities. Landscape Ecology, 22, 601–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maas, J., Verheij, R. A., Groenewegen, P. P., Vries, S. and Spreeuwenberg, P. (2006). Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation?Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60, 587–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacArthur, R. H. and Wilson, E. O. (1967). The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Magura, T., Tothmeresz, B. and Molnar, T. (2004). Changes in carabid beetle assemblages along an urbanisation gradient in the city of Debrecen, Hungary. Landscape Ecology, 19, 747–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, J., Moorman, C., Hess, G. and Sinclair, K. (2007). Designing suburban greenways to provide habitat for forest-breeding birds. Landscape and Urban Planning, 80, 153–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matteson, K. C., Ascher, J. S. and Langellotto, G. A. (2008). Bee richness and abundance in New York city urban gardens. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 101, 140–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonnell, M. J. and Hahs, A. K. (2008). The use of gradient analysis studies in advancing our understanding of the ecology of urbanizing landscapes: current status and future directions. Landscape Ecology, 23, 1143–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonnell, M. J. and Pickett, S. T. A. (1990). Ecosystem structure and function along urban–rural gradients: an unexploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology, 71, 1232–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinney, M. L. (2006). Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biological Conservation, 127, 247–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinney, M. L. (2008). Effects of urbanization on species richness: a review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosystems, 11, 161–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, E. G., Nowak, D. and Heisler, G. (1997). Quantifying urban forest structure, function, and value: the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project. Urban Ecosystems, 1, 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. and Popham, F. (2007). Greenspace, urbanity and health: relationships in England. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61, 681–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, R. and Popham, F. (2008). Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study. The Lancet, 372, 1655–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyashita, T., Shinkai, A. and Chida, T. (1998). The effects of forest fragmentation on web spider communities in urban areas. Biological Conservation, 86, 357–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortberg, U. and Wallentinus, H. G. (2000). Red-listed forest bird species in an urban environment – assessment of green space corridors. Landscape and Urban Planning, 50, 215–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, T. S. and Hansen, K. B. (2007). Do green areas affect health? Results from a Danish survey on the use of green areas and health indicators. Health and Place, 13, 839–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niemela, J. (1999). Ecology and urban planning. Biodiversity and Conservation, 8, 119–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, D. J. and Crane, D. E. (2002). Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environmental Pollution, 116, 381–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nowak, D. J., Noble, M. H., Sisinni, S. M. and Dwyer, J. F. (2001). People & trees – assessing the US urban forest resource. Journal of Forestry, 99, 37–42.Google Scholar
Oberndorfer, E., Lundholm, J., Bass, B.et al. (2007). Green roofs as urban ecosystems: ecological structures, functions, and services. BioScience, 57, 823–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,ODPM (2002a). Planning Policy Guidance 3: Housing. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.Google Scholar
,ODPM (2002b). Living Places – Cleaner, Safer, Greener. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.Google Scholar
Palomino, D. and Carrascal, L. M. (2006). Urban influence on birds at a regional scale: a case study with the avifauna of northern Madrid province. Landscape and Urban Planning, 77, 276–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parris, K. M. (2006). Urban amphibian assemblages as metacommunities. Journal of Animal Ecology, 75, 757–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parsons, R., Tassinary, L. G. and Ulrich, R. S. (1998). The view from the road: implications for stress recovery and immunization. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18, 113–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauleit, S. (2003). Perspectives on urban greenspace in Europe. Built Environment, 29, 89–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauleit, S. and Duhme, F. (2000). Assessing the environmental performance of land cover types for urban planning. Landscape and Urban Planning, 52, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauleit, S., Ennos, R. and Golding, Y. (2005). Modeling the environmental impacts of urban land use and land cover change – a study in Merseyside, U.K. Landscape and Urban Planning, 71, 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauleit, S., Slinn, P., Handley, J. and Lindley, S. (2001). Promoting the natural green structure of towns and cities: English Nature's Accessible Natural Greenspace Standards model. Built Environment, 29, 157–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickett, S. T. A. and Cadenasso, M. L. (2008). Linking ecological and built components of urban mosaics: an open cycle of ecological design. Journal of Ecology, 96, 8–12.Google Scholar
Pickett, S. T. A., Cadenasso, M. L., Grove, J. M.et al. (2001). Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 32, 127–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pillsbury, F. C. and Miller, J. R. (2008). Habitat and landscape characteristics underlying anuran community structure along an urban–rural gradient. Ecological Applications, 18, 1107–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Polasky, S., Nelson, E., Camm, J.et al. (2008). Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns. Biological Conservation, 141, 1505–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouyat, R. V., Yesilonis, I. D. and Nowak, D. J. (2006). Carbon storage by urban soils in the United States. Journal of Environmental Quality, 35, 1566–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Puth, L. M. and Burns, C. E. (2009). New York's nature: a review of the status and trends in species richness across the metropolitan region. Diversity and Distributions, 15, 12–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rafiee, R., Salman Mahiny, A. and Khorasani, N. (2009). Assessment of changes in urban green spaces of Mashad city using satellite data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 11, 431–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,RCEP (2007). The Urban Environment. Norwich: Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution.Google Scholar
Sadler, J. P., Small, E. C., Fiszpan, H., Telfer, M. G. and Niemela, J. (2006). Investigating environmental variation and landscape characteristics of an urban–rural gradient using woodland carabid assemblages. Journal of Biogeography, 33, 1126–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sahely, H. R., Dudding, S. and Kennedy, C. A. (2003). Estimating the urban metabolism of Canadian cities: Greater Toronto Area case study. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 30, 468–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandford, M. P., Manley, P. N. and Murphy, D. D. (2008). Effects of urban development on ant communities: implications for ecosystem services and management. Conservation Biology, 23, 131–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, E., Sadler, J. P. and Telfer, M. (2006). Do landscape factors affect brownfield carabid assemblages?Science of the Total Environment, 360, 205–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Small, E. C., Sadler, J. P. and Telfer, M. G. (2003). Carabid beetle assemblages on urban derelict sites in Birmingham, U.K. Journal of Insect Conservation, 6, 233–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. M., Thompson, K., Hodgson, J. G., Warren, P. H. and Gaston, K. J. (2006a). Urban domestic gardens (IX): composition and richness of the vascular plant flora, and implications for native biodiversity. Biological Conservation, 129, 312–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. M., Warren, P. H., Thompson, K. and Gaston, K. J. (2006b). Urban domestic gardens (VI): environmental correlates of invertebrate species richness. Biodiversity and Conservation, 15, 2415–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, F. (2005). Medical geography: therapeutic places, spaces and networks. Progress in Human Geography, 29, 488–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, F. (2008). Medical geography: understanding health inequalities. Progress in Human Geography, 32, 119–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanners, D. and Bourdeau, P. (1995). Europe's Environment: The Dobris Assessment. Copenhagen: The European Environment Agency.Google Scholar
Strauss, B. and Biedermann, R. (2006). Urban brownfields as temporary habitats: driving forces for the diversity of phytophagous insects. Ecography, 29, 928–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sukopp, H., Numata, M. and Huber, A. (1995). Urban Ecology as the Basis of Urban Planning. The Hague: SPB Academic Publications.Google Scholar
Swanwick, C., Dunnett, N. and Woolley, H. (2003). Nature, role and value of green space in towns and cities: an overview. Built Environment, 29, 94–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takano, T., Nakamura, K. and Watanabe, M. (2002). Urban residential environments and senior citizens' longevity in mega-city areas: the importance of walkable green space. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56, 913–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tratalos, J., Fuller, R. A., Warren, P. H., Davies, R. G. and Gaston, K. J. (2007). Urban form, biodiversity potential and ecosystem services. Landscape and Urban Planning, 83, 308–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tunstall, H. V. Z., Shaw, M. and Dorling, D. (2004). Places and health. Journal of Epidemiology and Commununity Health, 58, 6–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, T. (2006). Greenway planning in Britain: recent work and future plans. Landscape and Urban Planning, 76, 240–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tzoulas, K., Korpela, K., Venn, S.et al. (2007). Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: a literature review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 81, 167–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224, 420–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D. and Fiorito, E. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 201–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Urban Parks Forum (2001). A Survey of Local Authority Owned Parks of Historic Interest. Reading: DLTR.Google Scholar
,Urban Task Force (1999). Towards an Urban Renaissance, Report of the Urban Task Force. London: Spon.Google Scholar
Haaren, C. and Reich, M. (2006). The German way to greenways and habitat networks. Landscape and Urban Planning, 76, 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X. (2009). Analysis of problems in urban green space system planning in China. Journal of Forestry Research, 20, 79–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, N. M. and Evans, G. W. (2003). Nearby nature: a buffer of life stress among rural children. Environment and Behavior, 35, 311–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitford, V., Ennos, A. R. and Handley, J. F. (2001). City form and natural processes: indicators for the ecological performance of urban areas and their application to Merseyside, U.K. Landscape and Urban Planning, 20, 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilby, R. L. and Perry, G. L. W. (2006). Climate change, biodiversity and the urban environment: a critical review based on London, U.K. Progress in Physical Geography, 30, 73–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, N. S. G., Schwartz, M. W., Vesk, P. A.et al. (2009). A conceptual framework for predicting the effects of urban environments on floras. Journal of Ecology, 97, 4–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, J. C., Eyre, M. D. and Luff, M. L. (2003). Beetles (Coleoptera) on brownfield sites in England: an important conservation resource?Journal of Insect Conservation, 7, 223–31.Google Scholar
Yli-Pelkonen, V. and Niemelä, J. (2005). Linking ecological and social systems in cities: urban planning in Finland as a case. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14, 1947–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×