Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-08T18:26:21.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Strategy under Alternative Multicandidate Voting Procedures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2009

Samuel Merrill, III
Affiliation:
Wilkes University, Pennsylvania
Bernard Grofman
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Get access

Summary

[A] voter finds party ideologies useful because … ideologies help him focus attention on the differences between parties.

Anthony Downs, An Economic Theory of Democracy (1957: 98)

Alternative Voting Procedures

Numerous voting procedures have been suggested for use in multicandidate elections, including the Borda count, the single-transferable vote (STV), plurality with runoff, and approval voting. That the choice of system can affect the outcome and the strategies of both voters and candidates and can advantage certain types of candidates – for example, centrists or extremists – has been well documented (Rae, 1971; Straffin, 1980; Riker, 1982; Bogdanor and Butler, 1983; Brams and Fishburn, 1983; Merrill, 1988; Cox, 1997). We discuss briefly – for directional and proximity assumptions – the regions of support and the strategies they imply for these alternative voting systems. This chapter is based on Merrill (1993).

Under approval voting, each voter casts a single vote each for as many candidates as he wishes. The candidate with the largest vote total wins. We assume that each voter chooses that strategy that will maximize his expected utility (see Merrill, 1988: 60). If the candidates are denoted by C1, … CK, the voter votes for Ci if his utility for Ci exceeds his average utility for all the candidates. For a two-dimensional RM model, each candidate receives votes from all voters in a half-plane bounded by a line that passes through the neutral point 0. Thus, for a symmetric voter distribution, each candidate receives support from exactly half the voters.

Type
Chapter
Information
A Unified Theory of Voting
Directional and Proximity Spatial Models
, pp. 158 - 163
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×