Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T00:59:20.856Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Policy Competition under the Unified Theory: Empirical Applications to the 1989 Norwegian Parliamentary Election

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2009

James F. Adams
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Barbara
Samuel Merrill III
Affiliation:
Wilkes University, Pennsylvania
Bernard Grofman
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Unlike France, which has a strong president as well as a governing party or governing coalition in the parliament (the National Assembly), Norway is a pure parliamentary government. Election of this parliament (the Storting), like many similar elections in Europe and elsewhere, is held under proportional representation (PR) and a list system in which each voter votes for a party, not a candidate. Seats in the Storting are assigned roughly in proportion to the vote share received by each party (using a modified Sainte-Laguë system). Again, as in many other polities, some grouping of parties must form a coalition – either explicitly or implicitly – to constitute a government, unless one party can achieve a majority of all the seats, something that has not happened in Norway since 1961.

Not only is Norway the only one of the four countries in our study that has a parliamentary election under PR, it also has a relatively large number (seven) of viable parties that usually secure seats. These parties, in their conventionally conceived order from left to right, are the leftist Socialists and Labor; three center parties – the Liberal, Center, and Christian People's Parties; the rightist Conservative Party; and the ultra-right and maverick Progress Party. Five, and at times six, of these parties partition themselves into two relatively stable blocs that traditionally vie for sufficient seats to form a government (Aardal 1990; Aardal and Valen 1997; Strøm and Svåsand 1997; Urwin 1997). The two leftist parties may form a leftist coalition, or Labor may form a minority government with implicit support from the Socialists.

Type
Chapter
Information
A Unified Theory of Party Competition
A Cross-National Analysis Integrating Spatial and Behavioral Factors
, pp. 94 - 116
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×