Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T22:01:47.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - The Restatement (Third) of Agency and the unauthorised agent in US law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2009

Danny Busch
Affiliation:
University of Nijmegen Faculty of Law
Laura J. Macgregor
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Contemporary agency law in the United States reflects the dominant influence of a relatively uniform body of common law principles, applied in a context in which statutes and regulatory rules are also significant. Common law agency principles bring intellectual coherence to a legal landscape with potentially disparate features, many stemming from the federal structure of the United States. In six states, basic principles of agency were codified to some extent in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, for the most part reflecting then-contemporary common law. Louisiana's current codification of agency, adopted in 1997, draws to some extent on the Quebec Civil Code. Moreover, contemporary applications of common law agency principles often occur in a context in which other statutory material is highly relevant, as is inevitably so when an agent or a principal owes its legal personality to a statute's recognition of a particular type of organisational form, such as a corporation or a limited partnership.

The first and second Restatements of Agency have long dominated as statements of the foundational elements of common law agency doctrine in the United States. In part, their influence may be explained by the fact that, after 1914, the subject attracted no comprehensive account in a treatise. Restatement (Third) of Agency, although representing continuity with the earlier Restatements, also departs from their style, structure and substantive formulations in major ways.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Unauthorised Agent
Perspectives from European and Comparative Law
, pp. 219 - 244
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×