Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface and acknowledgments
- Maps
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The political and diplomatic background to the establishment of peace support operations in Lebanon, Somalia and Kosovo
- 3 Legal framework of UN peacekeeping forces and issues of command and control
- 4 United Nations peacekeeping in Lebanon, Somalia and Kosovo, and the use of force
- 5 UN military operations and international humanitarian and human rights law
- 6 Conclusion
- Appendix 1 Resolutions of the Security Council: UNIFIL
- Appendix 2 Resolutions of the Security Council: Somalia
- Appendix 3 Resolutions of the Security Council: Kosovo
- Bibliography
- Index
1 - Introduction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 July 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface and acknowledgments
- Maps
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The political and diplomatic background to the establishment of peace support operations in Lebanon, Somalia and Kosovo
- 3 Legal framework of UN peacekeeping forces and issues of command and control
- 4 United Nations peacekeeping in Lebanon, Somalia and Kosovo, and the use of force
- 5 UN military operations and international humanitarian and human rights law
- 6 Conclusion
- Appendix 1 Resolutions of the Security Council: UNIFIL
- Appendix 2 Resolutions of the Security Council: Somalia
- Appendix 3 Resolutions of the Security Council: Kosovo
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
The UN and peacekeeping operations
The concept of peacekeeping is neither defined nor specifically provided for in the United Nations Charter. Historically, it is by no means a concept associated exclusively with the United Nations (UN). Consequently, it does not lend itself to precise definition. In these circumstances, it is not surprising that there is some confusion regarding what exactly constitutes peacekeeping. Indeed, it is sometimes easier to say that a particular mission or force does not possess the generally recognised characteristics of a peacekeeping operation, than it is to confirm that it fulfils the necessary criteria. Part of the reason for this is the looseness with which states adopt such terms. It has a distinctly positive resonance, and those charged with the government of states are usually more concerned with public relations and opinion polls than with legal criteria or political reality. For this reason, the term is often applied to controversial situations where states intervene militarily and then seek to justify or portray their actions as some kind of benign peacekeeping operation.
The Cold War era (1945–89) between the United States and the Soviet Union was marked at the UN by continual wrangling over the correct interpretation of the Charter provisions. The Charter's own ambiguity and failure to provide for specific problems contributed to these disputes. In order to survive, the Organization had to be capable of adapting to the changed political circumstances and this meant adopting roles not specifically provided for in the Charter.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- UN Peacekeeping in Lebanon, Somalia and KosovoOperational and Legal Issues in Practice, pp. 1 - 32Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007