Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T14:36:15.137Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - MAINTENANCE THERAPY IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2009

S. Vincent Rajkumar
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic, Minnesota
Robert A. Kyle
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic, Minnesota
Get access

Summary

SUMMARY

The role of maintenance therapy in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma is currently under extensive evaluation. Maintenance therapy is defined as the addition of chronically applied therapy, following induction in responding or stable patient, with the goal of prolonging survival (ASH:FDA Workshop). Prolonged conventional chemotherapy has not only proven to be ineffective as maintenance therapy, but it is also associated with an increased risk of secondary myelodysplastic syndromes. Interferon α and corticosteroids have also been evaluated as maintenance therapy, but these treatments demonstrated marginal benefit at the cost of excessive toxicity. Recent studies have evaluated the role of maintenance thalidomide with hints that for certain subsets there may be a significant benefit. Additional studies are ongoing, testing the combination of thalidomide and corticosteroids, lenalidomide, and bortezomib in the maintenance setting. Future studies will need to identify not only the relative benefit for these agents in the maintenance setting but also the role cytogenetic risk groups play on the relative benefit of maintenance approaches.

INTRODUCTION

Multiple myeloma is an incurable malignancy characterized by the accumulation of malignant plasma cells. Treatment options for patients with myeloma have utilized alkylator-based therapy in conjunction with corticosteroids, and more recently, the widespread use of high-dose therapy and autologous transplant has improved overall survival (OS) for many of these patients. These improvements in OS have been associated with improving the rate of complete remission, a disease state not known to be associated with a cure but with superior long-term outcomes.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexanian, R, Balcerzak, S, Gehan, E, Haut, A, Hewlett, J.Remission maintenance therapy for multiple myeloma. Arch Intern Med 1975;135(1):147–52.Google Scholar
Alexanian, R, Salmon, S, Bonnet, J, Gehan, E, Haut, A, Weick, J.Combination therapy for multiple myeloma. Cancer 1977;40(6):2765–71.3.0.CO;2-X>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salmon, SE, Haut, A, Bonnet, JD, et al. Alternating combination chemotherapy and levamisole improves survival in multiple myeloma: a Southwest Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 1983;1(8):453–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexanian, R, Dreicer, R.Chemotherapy for multiple myeloma. Cancer 1984;53(3):583–8.3.0.CO;2-1>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maclennan, IC, Cusick, J.Objective evaluation of the role of vincristine in induction and maintenance therapy for myelomatosis. Medical Research Council Working Party on Leukaemia in Adults. Br J Cancer 1985;52(2):153–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, HJ, Bartolucci, AA, Forman, WB, Silberman, HR.Consolidation and maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma: randomized comparison of a new approach to therapy after initial response to treatment. J Clin Oncol 1986;4(6):888–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belch, A, Shelley W, Bergsagel D, et al. A randomized trial of maintenance versus no maintenance melphalan and prednisone in responding multiple myeloma patients. Br J Cancer 1988;57(1):94–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,Myeloma Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Interferon as therapy for multiple myeloma: an individual patient data overview of 24 randomized trials and 4012 patients. Br J Haematol 2001;113(4):1020–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritz, E, Ludwig, H.Interferon-alpha treatment in multiple myeloma: meta-analysis of 30 randomised trials among 3948 patients. Ann Oncol 2000;11(11):1427–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barlogie, B, Kyle, RA, Anderson, KC, et al. Standard chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemoradiotherapy for multiple myeloma: final results of phase III US Intergroup Trial S9321. J Clin Oncol 2006;24(6):929–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berenson, JR, Crowley, JJ, Grogan, TM, et al. Maintenance therapy with alternate-day prednisone improves survival in multiple myeloma patients. Blood 2002;99(9):3163–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shustik, C, Belch, A, Robinson, S, et al. A randomised comparison of melphalan with prednisone or dexamethasone as induction therapy and dexamethasone or observation as maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma: NCIC CTG MY.7. Br J Haematol 2007;136(2):203–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexanian, R, Weber, D, Giralt, S, Delasalle, K.Consolidation therapy of multiple myeloma with thalidomide-dexamethasone after intensive chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 2002;13(7):1116–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, AK, Chen, CI, Howson-Jan, K, et al. Results of a multicenter randomized phase II trial of thalidomide and prednisone maintenance therapy for multiple myeloma after autologous stem cell transplant. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10(24):8170–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feyler, S, Graham, J, Rawstron, A, El-Sherbiny, Y, Snowden, J, Johnson, R.Thalidomide maintenance following high dose therapy in multiple myeloma: A UK Myeloma Forum Phase 2 Study. Blood 2003;102(11):Abstract 2558.Google Scholar
Feyler, S, Rawstron, A, Jackson, G, Snowden, JA, Cocks, K, Johnson, RJ.Thalidomide maintenance following high-dose therapy in multiple myeloma: a UK myeloma forum phase 2 study. Br J Haematol 2007;139(3):429–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brinker, BT, Waller, EK, Leong, T, et al. Maintenance therapy with thalidomide improves overall survival after autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. Cancer 2006;106(10):2171–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Attal, M, Harousseau, JL, Leyvraz, S, et al. Maintenance therapy with thalidomide improves survival in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood 2006;108(10):3289–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abdelkefi, A, Ladeb, S, Torjman, L, et al. Single autologous stem cell transplantation followed by maintenance therapy with thalidomide is superior to double autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma: results of a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Blood 2007;111:1805–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barlogie, B, Tricot, G, Anaissie, E, et al. Thalidomide and hematopoietic-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2006;354(10):1021–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spencer, A, Prince, M, Roberts, AW, Bradstock, KF, Prosser IW. First analysis of the Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group (ALLG) trial of thalidomide and alternate day prednisolone following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for patients with multiple myeloma (ALLG MM6). ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts 2006;108(11):58.Google Scholar
Spencer, A, Prince, HM, Robert, A, Bradstock, K, Prosser I. Thalidomide improves survival when used following ASCT. Haematologica 2007;92(suppl 2):41–2.Google Scholar
Peles, S, Fisher, NM, Devine, SM, Tomasson, MH, Dipersio, JF, Vij, R.Bortezomib (velcade) when given pretransplant and once weekly as consolidation therapy following high dose chemotherapy (HDCT) leads to high rates of reactivation of varicella zoster virus (VZV). ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts 2005;106(11):3237.Google Scholar
Schiller, GJ, Sohn, JP, Malone, R, et al. Phase I/II trial of bortezomib maintenance following autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation as treatment for intermediate- and advanced-stage multiple myeloma. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts 2006;108(11):5433.Google Scholar
Knop, S, Hebart, H, Kunzmann, V, Angermund, R, Einsele, H.Bortezomib once weekly is well tolerated as maintenance therapy after less than a complete response to high-dose melphalan in patients with multiple myeloma. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts 2006;108(11):5099.Google Scholar
Chanan-Khan, AA, Sonneveld, P, Schuster, MW, et al. Analysis of varicella zoster virus reactivation among bortezomib-treated patients in the APEX study. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts 2006;108(11):3535.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×