Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Table of documents
- I Introduction to the negotiation history
- II Amendments to the Rome Statute on the Crime of Aggression
- III Historical documents
- IV Travaux Préparatoires of the Amendments to the Rome Statute on the Crime of Aggression (1995–2010)
- 1995 Ad Hoc Committee
- 1996 Preparatory Committee, First and Second Session
- February 1997
- December 1997
- January 1998
- March/April 1998
- 1998
- February 1999
- July/August 1999
- November/December 1999
- March 2000
- November/December 2000
- February/March 2001
- September/October 2001
- April 2002
- July 2002
- September 2002
- September 2003
- June 2004
- June 2005
- December 2005
- June 2006
- November 2006
- January 2007
- June 2007
- December 2007
- June 2008
- November 2008
- 116 2008 Note on the Work Programme
- 117 2008 Jurisdiction Scenarios
- 118 2008 SWGCA Report (November)
- February 2009
- April 2009
- June 2009
- November 2009
- March 2010
- May/June 2010
- V Index of Travaux Préparatoires
117 - 2008 Jurisdiction Scenarios
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2014
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Table of documents
- I Introduction to the negotiation history
- II Amendments to the Rome Statute on the Crime of Aggression
- III Historical documents
- IV Travaux Préparatoires of the Amendments to the Rome Statute on the Crime of Aggression (1995–2010)
- 1995 Ad Hoc Committee
- 1996 Preparatory Committee, First and Second Session
- February 1997
- December 1997
- January 1998
- March/April 1998
- 1998
- February 1999
- July/August 1999
- November/December 1999
- March 2000
- November/December 2000
- February/March 2001
- September/October 2001
- April 2002
- July 2002
- September 2002
- September 2003
- June 2004
- June 2005
- December 2005
- June 2006
- November 2006
- January 2007
- June 2007
- December 2007
- June 2008
- November 2008
- 116 2008 Note on the Work Programme
- 117 2008 Jurisdiction Scenarios
- 118 2008 SWGCA Report (November)
- February 2009
- April 2009
- June 2009
- November 2009
- March 2010
- May/June 2010
- V Index of Travaux Préparatoires
Summary
Jurisdiction scenarios regarding article 121 (5), second sentence
In order to facilitate the discussion regarding 121, paragraph 5, second sentence, the table below attempts to illustrate the scenarios under which the Court would have jurisdiction over the crime of aggression (CoA), triggered by a State Party referral or by the Prosecutorproprio motu (article 13 (a) and (c) of the Rome Statute).
Furthermore, the table does not refer to the possibility for any non-State Party to accept jurisdiction over the crime of aggression ad hoc in accordance with article 12, paragraph 3, of the Rome Statute. In this context, the question could be raised whether this possibility is also open to States Parties that have not accepted the amendment on aggression, given the fact that article 12, paragraph 3, only refers to non-States Parties.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011