Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T19:06:35.000Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - CRITICAL PATH INSTITUTE AND THE PREDICTIVE SAFETY TESTING CONSORTIUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2011

Elizabeth Gribble Walker
Affiliation:
Critical Path Institute
Bruce H. Littman
Affiliation:
Translational Medicine Associates
Rajesh Krishna
Affiliation:
Merck Research Laboratories
Get access

Summary

Introduction to the Critical Path in Medical Product Development

Critical Path Institute (C-Path) is an independent, nonprofit institute created in 2005 by the University of Arizona and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). C-Path is dedicated to bringing scientists from the FDA, the European Medicines Agency (EMA), industry, and academia together in collaborative research, endeavoring to improve the path for innovative new drugs, diagnostics, and devices to reach patients in need. C-Path's programs are designed to address the scientific, safety, and educational aspects of medical product development in support of the FDA's Critical Path Initiative (http://www.fda.gov/oc/initiatives/criticalpath/initiative.html). Released in 2004, the FDA's Critical Path Report analyzed input from FDA scientists and stakeholders on opportunities and challenges along the critical path of medical product development. Although not perfectly analogous, similar initiatives to improve drug safety or efficacy originating in Europe include the InnoMed PredTox collaboration (http://www.innomed-predtox.com) and, more recently, the Innovative Medicines Initiative (http://imi.europa.eu). Although the operational model for governance and execution of research varies widely, the objectives of each endeavor include the regulator's stated priorities for improving drug development and have resulted in the creation of new pathways and processes at the FDA and the EMA for reviewing and applying novel data often independent of a particular drug application.

To serve as a neutral and trusted third party for collaborators, C-Path does not accept funding from organizations that develop products regulated by the FDA or that would create a real or perceived conflict of interest.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Woodcock, J, & Woosley, R. (2008). The FDA critical path initiative and its influence on new drug development. Ann. Rev. Med. 59, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coons, SJ. (2009). The FDA's critical path initiative: A brief introduction. Clin. Ther. 31(11), 2572–2573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodsaid, FM, Frueh, FW, & Mattes, W. (2008). Strategic paths for biomarker qualification. Toxicol. 245(3), 219–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodsaid, FM and Mendrick, DL (2010). Translational Medicine and the Value of Biomarker Qualification. Sci. Transl. Med. 2, 47ps44.
Mattes, WB. (2008). Public consortium efforts in toxicogenomics. Methods Mol. Biol. 460, 221–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunter, AJ. (2008). The Innovative Medicines Initiative: A pre-competitive initiative to enhance the biomedical science base of Europe to expedite the development of new medicines for patients. Drug Discov. Today. 13(9–10), 371–373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romero, K, Mars, M, Frank, D, Anthony, M, Neville, J, Kirby, L, et al. (2009). The coalition against major diseases: Developing tools for an integrated drug development process for Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 86(4), 365–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Acquadro, C, Berzon, R, Dubois, D, Leidy, NK, Marquis, P, Revicki, D, et al. (2003). Incorporating the patient's perspective into drug development and communication: An ad hoc task force report of the patient-reported outcomes (PRO) harmonization group meeting at the Food and Drug Administration, February 16, 2001. Value in Health. 5, 521–533.Google Scholar
Willke, RJ, Burke, LB, & Erickson, P. (2004). Measuring treatment impact: A review of patient-reported outcomes and other efficacy endpoints in approved product labels. Control. Clin. Trials. 25, 535–552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (February 2006). Guidance for Industry: Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims (DRAFT). Available at: http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/5460dft.pdf
Kola, I, & Landis, J. (2004). Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 3, 711–715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
European Medicines Agency. (July 3, 2008). Final report on the pilot joint EMA/FDA VXDS experience on qualification of nephrotoxicity biomarkers. Available at: http://www.ema.europa.eu/pdfs/human/biomarkers/25088508en.pdf
Nature Biotechnology. May 2010, 28(5), 429–494 (multiple articles).
Mattes, WB, & Walker, EG. (2009). Translational toxicology and the work of the predictive safety testing consortium. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 85(3), 327–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×