Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T05:12:23.850Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter Twenty-Six - Climate change, phenology and the nature of consumer–resource interactions

advancing the match/mismatch hypothesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2013

Jeffrey T. Kerby
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University
Christopher C. Wilmers
Affiliation:
Environmental Studies Department, University of California-Santa Cruz
Eric Post
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University
Takayuki Ohgushi
Affiliation:
Kyoto University, Japan
Oswald Schmitz
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Robert D. Holt
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Understanding how species cope with ecological and environmental variation is a fundamental concern of ecology. Over the course of their lives, many organisms alter their phenotypes in response to biotic and abiotic pressures (Miner et al. 2005), responses that cascade through the food web to, in turn, affect the dynamics of species interactions. These effects, called trait-mediated effects, are pervasive in ecological communities, and their study has offered new insights into community ecology, a subject previously dominated by a density-mediated understanding of species interactions (Werner and Peacor 2003). Most analyses of trait-mediated effects take a top-down perspective where variation in consumer traits causes phenotypic responses by prey species. These phenotypic responses include behavioural, morphological and/or physiological plasticity that have ramifying consequences for the food web by influencing how predators and prey interact (Werner and Peacor 2003). This top-down perspective on the influence of traits in communities suggests that it is consumers that determine the nature and strength of the mediated effects.

Climate change is an ongoing global perturbation that also affects the densities and traits of interacting species, although these effects are not necessarily related to food web trade-offs. Cohesive shifts in phenology – the timing of periodic biological events, such as migration, flowering or mating – reveal the global scale of climate change’s influence on species’ traits (Parmesan and Yohe 2003; Root et al. 2003). These phenological changes affect conditions that influence the relative fitness contributions of life-history traits, traits such as age-structured growth, reproductive timing or developmental rates. For some species, these traits are plastic to fitness trade-offs created by phenological shifts. In this way, climate change can affect the expression of traits that have an overwhelming influence on species interactions. Unlike the top-down influence of consumers, this non-trophic forcing can affect food webs via bottom-up processes. Phenology not only affects the nature and timing of species interactions, but also influences the very likelihood that two species will interact at all. In this manner, it can conflate or confound prey trait responses to immediate food web trade-offs, like those mediated by predators. Climate-driven phenological variability provides new context for understanding the interaction between trophic and non-trophic traits and how this influences overall food web dynamics.

Type
Chapter
Information
Trait-Mediated Indirect Interactions
Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives
, pp. 508 - 525
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Araujo, M. B.Luoto, M. 2007 The importance of biotic interactions for modelling species distributions under climate changeGlobal Ecology and Biogeography 16 743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borcherding, J.Beeck, P.DeAngelis, D. L.Scharf, W. R. 2010 Match or mismatch: the influence of phenology on size-dependent life history and divergence in population structureJournal of Animal Ecology 79 1101CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bronstein, J. L.Huxman, T.Horvath, B.Farabee, M.Davidowitz, G. 2009 Reproductive biology of : the benefits of a herbivorous pollinatorAnnals of Botany 103 1435CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Browman, H. I. 1989 Embryology, ethology, and ecology of ontogenetic critical periods in fishBrain Behavioural Ecology 34 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Both, C.Visser, M. E. 2001 Adjustment to climate change is constrained by arrival date in a long-distance birdNature 411 296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Both, C.Visser, M. E. 2005 The effect of climate change on the correlation between avian life history traitsGlobal Change Biology 11 1606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Both, C.van Asch, M.Bijlsma, R. B.van den Burg, A. B.Visser, M. E. 2009 Climate change and unequal phenological changes across four trophic levels: constraints or adaptations?Journal of Animal Ecology 78 73CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Both, C.Van Turnhout, C. ABijlsma, R. B. 2010 Avian population consequences of climate change are most severe for long-distance migrants in seasonal habitatsProceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 277 1259CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, X.Hu, B.Yu, R. 2005 Spatial and temporal variation of phenological growing season and climate change impacts in temperate eastern ChinaGlobal Change Biology 11 1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costello, J. H.Sullivan, B. K.Gifford, D. J. 2006 A physical-biological interaction underlying variable phenological responses to climate change by coastal zooplanktonJournal of Plankton Research 28 1099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cushing, D. H. 1974 The natural regulation of fish populationsHarden Jones, F. R.Sea Fisheries ResearchLondonElek Science399Google Scholar
Cushing, D. H. 1982 Climate and FisheriesLondonAcademic PressGoogle Scholar
Cushing, D. H. 1990 Plankton production and year-class strength in fish populations: an update of the match/mismatch hypothesisAdvances in Marine Biology 26 249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drent, R. H.Fox, A. D.Stahl, J. 2006 Travelling to breedJournal of Ornithology 147 122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durant, J. M.Hjermann, D. Ø.Anker-Nilssen, T. 2005 Timing and abundance as key mechanisms affecting trophic interactions in variable environmentsEcology Letters 8 952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durant, J. M.Hjermann, D. Ø.Otterson, G.Stenseth, N. C. 2007 Climate and the match or mismatch between predator requirements and resource availabilityClimate Research 33 271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, M.Richardson, A. J. 2004 Impact of climate change on marine pelagic phenology and trophic mismatchNature 430 881CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elton, C. S. 1958 The Ecology of Invasions by Plants and AnimalsLondonMethuenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitter, A. H.Fitter, R. S. R. 2002 Rapid changes in flowering time in British plantsScience 296 1689CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forchammer, M. C.Post, E. 2004 Using large-scale climate indices in climate change ecology studiesPopulation Ecology 46 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fryxell, J. M. 1991 Forage quality and aggregation by large herbivoresAmerican Naturalist 138 478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grebmeier, J. M.Overland, J. E.Moore, S. E. 2006 A major ecosystem shift in the northern Bering SeaScience 311 1461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gremillet, D.Lewis, S.Drapeau, L. 2008 Spatial match–mismatch in the Benguela upwelling zone: should we expect chlorophyll and sea-surface temperature to predict marine predator distributions?Journal of Applied Ecology 45 610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hebblewhite, M.Merrill, E.McDermid, G. 2008 A multi-scale test of the forage maturation hypothesis in a partially migratory ungulate populationEcological Monographs 76 141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hipfner, J. M. 2008 Matches and mismatches: ocean climate, prey phenology and breeding success in a zooplanktivorous seabirdMarine Ecology Progress Series 368 295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hjort, J. 1914 Fluctuations in the Great Fisheries of Northern Europe viewed in the light of biological researchRapports et Procès-Verbaux des Réunions, Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer 20 124Google Scholar
Høye, T. T.Post, E.Meltofte, H.Schmidt, N. M.Forchhammer, M. C. 2007 Rapid advancement of spring in the High ArcticCurrent Biology 17 R449CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutchinson, G. E. 1957 Concluding remarksEcology 22 415Google Scholar
Ims, R. A.Henden, J-A.Killengreen, S. T. 2008 Collapsing population cyclesTrends in Ecology and Evolution 23 79CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
IPCC 2007 Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science BasisSolomon, S.Qin, D.Manning, M.New YorkCambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Jones, T.Cresswell, W. 2010 The phenology mismatch hypothesis: are declines of migrant birds linked to uneven global climate changeJournal of Animal Ecology 79 98CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leggett, W. C.Deblois, E. 1994 Recruitment in marine fishes: is it regulated by starvation and predation in the egg and larval stages?Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 32 119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, S. A. 1976 Population dynamic models in heterogeneous environmentsAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics 7 287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinksky, I.Skov, F.Svenning, J.-C.Rahbek, C. 2007 Potential impacts of climate change on the distributions and diversity patterns of European mammalsBiodiversity Conservation 16 3803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, G. X.Alatalo, R. V.Helle, P. 2006 Short- and long-term population dynamical consequences of asymmetric climate change in black grouseProceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 273 2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Memmott, J.Craze, P. G.Waser, N. M.Price, M. V. 2007 Global warming and the disruptions of plant-pollinator interactionsEcology Letters 10 710CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller-Rushing, A. J.Høye, T. T.Inouye, D. W.Post, E. 2010 The effects of phenological mismatches on demographyPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 365 3177CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miner, B. G.Sultan, S. E.Morgan, S. G.Padilla, D. K.Relyea, R. A. 2005 Ecological consequences of phenotypic plasticityTrends in Ecology and Evolution 20 685CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montes-Hugo, M.Doney, S. C.Ducklow, H. W. 2009 Recent changes in phytoplankton communities associated with rapid regional climate change along the western Antarctic peninsulaScience 323 1470CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osenberg, C. W.Werner, E. E.Mittelbach, G. G.Hall, D. J. 1988 Growth patterns in bluegill () and pumpkinseed () sunfish: environmental variation and the importance of ontogenetic niche shiftsCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 45 17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parmesan, C. 2006 Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate changeAnnual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 37 637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parmesan, C.Yohe, G. 2003 A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systemsNature 421 37CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearson, R. G.Dawson, T. P. 2003 Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful?Global Ecology and Biogeography 12 361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillimore, A. B.Hadfield, J. D.Jones, O. R.Smithers, R. J. 2010 Differences in spawning date between populations of common frog reveal local adaptationProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107 8292CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Post, E.Forchhammer, M. C. 2008 Climate change reduces reproductive success of an Arctic herbivore through trophic mismatchPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 363 2367CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Post, E.Pederson, C. 2008 Opposing plant community responses to warming with and without herbivoresProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105 12353CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Post, E.Stenseth, N. C. 1999 Climatic variability, plant phenology, and northern ungulatesEcology 80 1322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Post, E.Forchhammer, M. C.Bret-Harte, M. S. 2009 Ecological dynamics across the Arctic associated with recent climate changeScience 325 1355CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Post, E.Pedersen, C.Wilmers, C. C.Forchhammer, M. C. 2008 Warming, plant phenology and the spatial dimension of trophic mismatch for large herbivoresProceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 275 2005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Post, E.Pederson, C.Wilmers, C. C.Forchhammer, M. C. 2008 Phenological sequences reveal aggregate life history response to climate warmingEcology 89 363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Primack, R. B.Ibanez, I.Higuchi, H. 2009 Spatial and interspecific variability in phenological responses to warming temperaturesBiological Conservation 142 2569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pringle, R. M.Young, T. P.Rubenstein, D. I.McCauley, D. J. 2007 Herbivore-initiated interaction cascades and their modulation by productivity in an African savannaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104 193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, P. W. 2002 Species interactions and the evolution of biodiversityHerrera, C. M.Pellmyr, O.Plant–Animal Interactions: An Evolutionary ApproachOxfordBlackwell Science3Google Scholar
Prout, T.McChesney, F. 1985 Competition among immatures affects their adult fertility: population dynamicsAmerican Naturalist 126 521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Root, T. L.Price, J. T.Hall, K. R. 2003 Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plantsNature 421 57CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roughgarden, J. 1974 Population dynamics in a spatially varying environment: how population size ‘tracks’ spatial variation in carrying capacityAmerican Naturalist 108 649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanderson, F. J.Donald, P. F.Pain, D. J.Burfield, I. J.van Bommel, F. P. J. 2006 Long-term population declines in Afro-Palearctic migrant birdsBiological Conservation 131 93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweiger, O.Settele, J.Kudrna, O.Klotz, S.Kuhn, I. 2008 Climate change can cause spatial mismatch of trophically interacting speciesEcology 12 3472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senft, R. L.Coughenour, M. B.Bailey, D. W. 1987 Large herbivore foraging and ecological hierarchiesBioScience 11 789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slatkin, M. 1974 Hedging one’s evolutionary betsNature 250 704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thackeray, S. J.Sparks, T. H.Frederiksen, 2010 Trophic level asynchrony in rates of phenological change for marine, freshwater, and terrestrial environmentsGlobal Change Biology 16 3304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, J. N. 1996 Evolutionary ecology and the conservation of biodiversityTrends in Ecology and Evolution 11 300CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, M. 2005 Landscape ecology: what is the state of the scienceAnnual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36 319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veit, R. R.McGowan, J. A.Ainley, D. G.Wahl, T. R.Pyle, P. 1997 Apex marine predator declines ninety percent in association with changing oceanic climateGlobal Change Biology 3 23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visser, M. E. 2010 Keeping up with a warming world; assessing the rate of adaptation to climate changeProceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 275 649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visser, M. E.Both, C. 2005 Shifts in phenology due to global climate change: the need for a yardstickProceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 272 2561CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Visser, M. E.Holleman, L. J. M. 2001 Warmer springs disrupt the synchrony of oak and winter moth phenologyProceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 268 289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visser, M. E.Both, C.Lambrechts, M. M. 2004 Global climate change leads to mistimed avian reproductionAdvances in Ecological Research 35 89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visser, M. E.van Noordwink, A. J.Tinbergen, J. M.Lessells, C. M. 1998 Warmer springs lead to mistimed reproduction in great tits ()Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 265 1867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walther, G-R.Post, E.Convey, P. 2002 Ecological responses to recent climate changeNature 416 389CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, R. G. 1983 Foraging patterns and their multiplier effects on productivity of northern ungulatesOikos 40 377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. C. 1966 Adaptation and Natural SelectionPrinceton, NJPrinceton University PressGoogle Scholar
Winder, M.Schindler, D. E. 2004 Climatic effects on the phenology of lake processesGlobal Change Biology 10 1844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, E. E.Gilliam, J. F. 1984 The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populationsAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15 393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, E. E.Peacor, S. D. 2003 A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communitiesEcology 84 1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, L. H.Rudolf, V. H. W. 2010 Phenology, ontogeny and the effects of climate change on the timing of species interactionsEcology Letters 13 1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×