Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:16:52.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 8 - Cardiac Diseases Relevant to Stroke

from Section 2 - Clinical Epidemiology and Risk Factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2019

Michael Brainin
Affiliation:
Donau-Universität Krems, Austria
Wolf-Dieter Heiss
Affiliation:
Universität zu Köln
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Krijthe, BP, Kunst, A, Benjamin, EJ, et al. Projections on the number of individuals with atrial fibrillation in the European Union, from 2000 to 2060. Eur Heart J 2013; 34: 2746–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steger, C, Pratter, A, Martinek-Bregel, M, et al. Stroke patients with atrial fibrillation have a worse prognosis than patients without: data from the Austrian Stroke registry. Eur Heart J 2004; 25: 1734–40.Google Scholar
Sposato, LA, Cipriano, LE, Saposnik, G, et al. Diagnosis of atrial fibrillation after stroke and transient ischaemic attack: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2015; 14: 377–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McIntyre, WF, Connolly, SJ, Healey, JS. Atrial fibrillation occurring transiently with stress. Curr Opin Cardiol 2017; 33: 5865.Google Scholar
Healey, JS, Alings, M, Ha, A, et al. Subclinical atrial fibrillation in older patients. Circulation 2017; 136: 1276–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cerasuolo, JO, Cipriano, LE, Sposato, LA. The complexity of atrial fibrillation newly diagnosed after ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack: advances and uncertainties. Curr Opin Neurol 2017; 30: 2837.Google Scholar
González Toledo, ME, Klein, FR, Riccio, PM, et al. Atrial fibrillation detected after acute ischemic stroke: evidence supporting the neurogenic hypothesis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2013; 22: e48691.Google Scholar
Ruff, CT, Giugliano, RP, Braunwald, E, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 2014; 383: 955–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stöllberger, C. Drug interactions with new oral anticoagulants in elderly patients. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2017; 10: 1191–202.Google Scholar
Stöllberger, C, Brooks, R, Finsterer, J, et al. Use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants in nonagenarians: a call for more data. Drugs Aging 2016; 33: 315–20.Google Scholar
Tzikas, A, Holmes, DR, Jr., Gafoor, S, et al. Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion: the Munich consensus document on definitions, endpoints and data collection requirements for clinical studies. EuroIntervention 2016; 12: 103–11.Google Scholar
Stöllberger, C, Chnupa, P, Kronik, G, et al. Transesophageal echocardiography to assess embolic risk in patients with atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med 1998; 128: 630–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stöllberger, C, Schneider, B. Concerns about left atrial appendage occlusion. EuroIntervention 2017; 13: 1003–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melkonian, M, Jarzebowski, W, Pautas, E, et al. Bleeding risk of antiplatelet drugs compared with oral anticoagulants in older patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost 2017; 15: 1500–10.Google Scholar
Kapur, S, Barbhaiya, C, Deneke, T, et al. Esophageal injury and atrioesophageal fistula caused by ablation for atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2017; 136: 1247–55.Google Scholar
Arbelo, E, Brugada, J, Blomström-Lundqvist, C, et al. Contemporary management of patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation: in-hospital and 1-year follow-up findings from the ESC-EHRA atrial fibrillation ablation long-term registry. Eur Heart J 2017; 38: 1303–16.Google ScholarPubMed
Winkle, RA, Jarman, JW, Mead, RH, et al. Predicting atrial fibrillation ablation outcome: the CAAP-AF score. Heart Rhythm 2016; 13: 2119–25.Google Scholar
Hindricks, G, Piorkowski, C, Tanner, H, et al. Perception of atrial fibrillation before and after radiofrequency catheter ablation: relevance of asymptomatic arrhythmia recurrence. Circulation 2005; 112: 307–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, A, Gunaruwan, P, Collins, N, et al. Persistent iatrogenic atrial septal defects after pulmonary vein isolation: long-term follow-up with contrast transesophageal echocardiography. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2017; 48: 99103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hromádka, M, Seidlerová, J, Rohan, V, et al. Prolonged corrected QT interval as a predictor of clinical outcome in acute ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2016; 25: 2911–17.Google Scholar
Hardie, K, Hankey, GJ, Jamrozik, K, et al. Ten-year survival after first-ever stroke in the Perth community stroke study. Stroke 2003; 34: 1842–6.Google Scholar
Jensen, JK, Kristensen, SR, Bak, S, et al. Frequency and significance of troponin T elevation in acute ischemic stroke. Am J Cardiol 2007; 99: 108–12.Google Scholar
Finsterer, J, Stöllberger, C, Krugluger, W. Cardiac and noncardiac, particularly neuromuscular, disease with troponin-T positivity. Neth J Med 2007; 65: 289–95.Google ScholarPubMed
Meurin, P, Brandao Carreira, V, Dumaine, R, et al. Incidence, diagnostic methods, and evolution of left ventricular thrombus in patients with anterior myocardial infarction and low left ventricular ejection fraction: a prospective multicenter study. Am Heart J 2015; 170: 256–62.Google Scholar
Silver, B, Behrouz, R, Silliman, S. Bacterial endocarditis and cerebrovascular disease. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2016; 16: 104.Google Scholar
Knudsen, JB, Fuursted, K, Petersen, E, et al. Infective endocarditis: a continuous challenge. The recent experience of a European tertiary center. J Heart Valve Dis 2009; 18: 386–94.Google Scholar
Habib, G, Lancellotti, P, Antunes, MJ, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis: the Task Force for the Management of Infective Endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2015; 36: 3075–128.Google Scholar
Ruel, M, Masters, RG, Rubens, FD, et al. Late incidence and determinants of stroke after aortic and mitral valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 78: 7784.Google Scholar
Russo, A, Grigioni, F, Avierinos, JF, et al. Thromboembolic complications after surgical correction of mitral regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51: 1203–11.Google Scholar
Cabanes, L, Coste, J, Derumeaux, G, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in detection of patent foramen ovale and atrial septal aneurysm with transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2002; 15: 441–6.Google Scholar
Stöllberger, C, Finsterer, J, Slany, J. Why is venous thrombosis only rarely detected in patients with suspected paradoxical embolism? Thromb Res 2002; 105: 189–91.Google Scholar
Di Tullio, MR, Sacco, RL, Sciacca, RR, et al. Patent foramen ovale and the risk of ischemic stroke in a multiethnic population. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 797802.Google Scholar
Meissner, I, Khandheria, BK, Heit, JA, et al. Patent foramen ovale: innocent or guilty? Evidence from a prospective population-based study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47: 440–5.Google Scholar
Saver, JL, Carroll, JD, Thaler, DE, et al. Long-term outcomes of patent foramen ovale closure or medical therapy after stroke. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 1022–32.Google Scholar
Søndergaard, L, Kasner, SE, Rhodes, JF, et al. Patent foramen ovale closure or antiplatelet therapy for cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 1033–42.Google Scholar
Mas, JL, Derumeaux, G, Guillon, B, et al. Patent foramen ovale closure or anticoagulation vs. antiplatelets after stroke. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 1011–21.Google Scholar
Kodankandath, TV, Mishra, S, Libman, RB, et al. Recurrent stroke due to patent foramen ovale closure device thrombus eight years after implantation. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2016; 25: e1612.Google Scholar
Pinto, YM, Elliott, PM, Arbustini, E, et al. Proposal for a revised definition of dilated cardiomyopathy, hypokinetic non-dilated cardiomyopathy, and its implications for clinical practice: a position statement of the ESC working group on myocardial and pericardial diseases. Eur Heart J 2016; 37: 1850–8.Google Scholar
Homma, S, Thompson, JL, Pullicino, PM, et al. Warfarin and aspirin in patients with heart failure and sinus rhythm. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1859–69.Google Scholar
Stöllberger, C, Finsterer, J. Extracardiac medical and neuromuscular implications in restrictive cardiomyopathy. Clin Cardiol 2007; 30: 375–80.Google Scholar
Pelliccia, F, Kaski, JC, Crea, F, et al. Pathophysiology of Takotsubo syndrome. Circulation 2017; 135: 2426–41.Google Scholar
Finsterer, J, Wahbi, K. CNS disease triggering Takotsubo stress cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiol 2014; 177: 322–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El-Battrawy, I, Borggrefe, M, Akin, I. Takotsubo syndrome and embolic events. Heart Fail Clin 2016; 12: 543–50.Google Scholar
Finsterer, J, Stöllberger, C, Towbin, JA. Left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy: cardiac, neuromuscular, and genetic factors. Nat Rev Cardiol 2017; 14: 224–37.Google Scholar
Stöllberger, C, Blazek, G, Gessner, M, et al. Neuromuscular comorbidity, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation as prognostic factors in left ventricular hypertrabeculation/noncompaction. Herz 2015; 40: 906–11.Google Scholar
Stöllberger, C, Blazek, G, Dobias, C, et al. Frequency of stroke and embolism in left ventricular hypertrabeculation/noncompaction. Am J Cardiol 2011; 108: 1021–3.Google Scholar
Bukhman, G, Ziegler, J, Parry, E. Endomyocardial fibrosis: still a mystery after 60 years. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2008; 2: e97.Google Scholar
Gupta, PN, Kunju, SM, Vishwanathan, S, et al. An uncommon picture of endomyocardial fibrosis: no embolism yet. Heart Asia 2013; 5: 71–3.Google Scholar
Rajani, AR, Hussain, K, Baslaib, FO, Mirza, SJ. Endomyocardial fibrosis causing stroke in a young man. BMJ Case Rep 2012; pii: bcr2012006635; doi: 10.1136/bdr-2012-006635.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×